LG G4 vs Samsung S95F: Which flagship OLED TV is worth the money?
With incredible QD-OLED performance and ample features, the Samsung S95F is sure to be one of the year's best TVs. It's brand new, though, so it costs more than the LG G4.
When folks come to me and ask for advice about buying a top-shelf TV, I always start with the same question: 'How important is it for you to buy a brand-new TV?'
It's tempting to break the bank on one of the year's best TVs, but for many people, saving money on a year-old model is a far better option.
Take this year, for instance. When all's said and done, the newly released Samsung S95F is sure to be one of the best OLED TVs of 2025. But right now, the 2024 LG G4 OLED is every bit as good as it was when it debuted. Critically, it's also way less expensive than the newer S95F.
If you're stuck between the two, fear not: I've spent a ton of time testing and watching both of these flagship OLED TVs, and I'm here to break down all of their similarities and differences.
LG G4
Samsung S95F
Sizes
55", 65", 77", 83", 97"
55", 65", 77", 83"
Ports
4x HDMI 2.1
4x HDMI 2.1
Resolution
3,840 x 2,160p
3,840 x 2,160p
HDR
Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Smart TV software
webOS
Tizen OS
ATSC 3.0 support?
No
No
Processor
a11 AI Processor 4K
NQ4 AI Gen3
When their specs are compared side by side, it's easy to see that these two OLEDs have a lot in common.
Both the G4 and the S95F come in 55-, 65-, 77- and 83-inch models (though the G4 is also available in a mind-blowingly big 97-inch version).
Additionally, each model offers a full suite of four high-bandwidth, HDMI 2.1-compatible ports. This makes them perfect for dedicated gamers and A/V enthusiasts.
One important distinction lies with their respective HDR support. Like all Samsung TVs currently on the market, the S95F does not support Dolby Vision, a popular, proprietary HDR format. Instead, Samsung offers HDR10+, a royalty-free version of the format that works in a similar way.
You'll still be able to watch Dolby Vision streaming titles and Blu-ray discs on the S95F, but the picture will fall back to standard HDR10. In other words, the S95F won't be taking full advantage of Dolby Vision's efforts to replicate the creator's intent.
Like all LG OLEDs, the G4 supports Dolby Vision (though it leaves off HDR10+ support). For most people, Dolby Vision is the better format to have on hand, as it remains the most popular.
To learn more about Dolby Vision, check out our guide to whether or not you need Dolby Vision at all.
Both TVs make use of a pedestal-style stand rather than a pair of feet. Fortunately, each stand design offers enough headroom for a dedicated soundbar.
Thanks to the sleek nature of OLED display technology, both the G4 and the S95F showcase wildly thin panels. Of the two, however, the S95F is a touch thinner.
The biggest difference between their designs involves their inputs. The G4 houses all of its connectivity options in an L-shaped cutout on the pack of the panel. The S95F leverages Samsung's One Connect Box, which connects to the panel with a single cable and can be placed anywhere within the TV's surrounding area.
Your mileage may vary, but I appreciate the S95F's added flexibility. If you have a particular home theater setup that would benefit from the One Connect Box, the S95F will treat you well.
When it comes to remote controls, things aren't as cut and dry. I absolutely adore the Samsung Solar Cell remote, which charges an internal lithium-ion battery by way of indoor and outdoor lighting. It's very convenient.
However, the super-slim Solar Cell remote doesn't feature a dedicated input button, and I find that to be a bit of a headache when it comes to changing inputs on the fly.
The G4 is paired with last-year's version of LG's Magic Remote. Conveniently, it does feature an input-selection button, but it's also large and not nearly as convenient as the Solar Cell remote.
Each of these TVs will look great on the wall or on top of a credenza, but on the whole, the S95F is a better-designed TV.
Winner: Samsung S95F
Before we dive into which of these TVs delivers better overall performance, let's take a look at how their test results stack up in a side-by-side comparison.
LG G4
Samsung S95F
SDR Brightness (10%, in nits)
358
267
Delta-E (lower is better)
1.4
1.2
HDR Brightness (10%, in nits)
1,487
2,138
UHDA-P3 Gamut Coverage
97.17%
99.97%
Rec. 2020 Gamut Coverage
72.91%
90.26%
Input latency (milliseconds)
9.2
9.2
While both of these TVs benefit from the perfect black levels and pixel-level dimming that we've come to expect from OLED displays, the S95F is significantly brighter than the G4 when it comes to HDR content.
In a nutshell, this means that specular highlights (small, concentrated areas of brightness) will pop more on the S95F. And, when you're dealing with the self-emissive nature of OLED displays, this pop will go a long way towards the picture looking more realistic.
While watching SDR content (like basic cable and most streaming content), the G4 provides a brighter overall picture. That said, it's not significantly brighter under these circumstances, so you can probably set that aside for now.
The S95F offers some of the best color we're likely to see in 2025.
Here's some good news: Each of these TVs arrives with incredible out-of-the-box accuracy in their respective Filmmaker modes. You probably won't feel compelled to calibrate them professionally, which will save you money.
However, when it comes to color volume, the S95F is far and away the better competitor. You can see this reflected in their Rec.2020 color gamut results. In fact, the S95F offers some of the best color we're likely to see in 2025 — it's that good.
This mostly has to do with the fact that the S95F is equipped with quantum dots, which allow for brighter, purer color than what the G4's WOLED display is capable of.
Both of these OLED TVs deliver an accurate, jaw-dropping picture, particularly in HDR. If you're chasing the best possible picture, though, the S95F is the better pick. Its superior highlight brightness and next-level color volume make for a truly immersive experience.
Winner: Samsung S95F
Neither LG's webOS or Samsung's Tizen OS are my smart platform of choice, but they'll get you through your day if you opt to use them on a regular basis. I find the S95F's user interface to be more cluttered than the G4's, but both software suites are fine for most people.
On the gaming side of things, there aren't very many specs separating the two. As mentioned, each TV offers four HDMI 2.1 inputs, and both support Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), G-Sync compatibility and a variation of AMD's FreeSync.
However, if you want to leverage one of these OLEDs as a monitor for high-end PC gaming, the S95F's native refresh rate of 165Hz is slightly better than the G4's 144Hz. Both can handle the 4K/120Hz cap of current-generation consoles like the Xbox Series X and the PS5 Pro.
The most noteworthy missing feature on the S95F is, of course, Dolby Vision. I imagine that most folks shopping in the top-shelf price bracket have already made peace with Samsung's decision not to back Dolby Vision HDR. Still, it's a significant blow to A/V enthusiasts who'd like to put together a complete home theater setup.
In fact, I'd wager that the S95F's lack of Dolby Vision will ultimately matter to more people than the various AI-based features that S95F exclusively claims. Were it not for a lack of Dolby Vision, this category would come down to a draw. Instead, the LG G4 has the edge when it comes to features.
Winner: LG G4
LG G4
Samsung S95F
Specs (25)
24
24
Design (25)
21
23
Performance (25)
24
25
Features (25)
24
23
Total Score (100)
93
95
One glance at the scorecard and the closeness of this match-up is clear. But one factor we haven't considered yet is maybe the most important of all: price.
After spending countless hours with each of these TVs, I'm confident in saying the Samsung S95F is the better overall performer. Its quantum dot-enhanced color, together with its sensational HDR highlight brightness, make for a sensational visual spectacle.
But there's no running away from its price. Right now, the 65-inch Samsung S95F is $3,299, and unfortunately, this is too rich for the vast majority of shoppers.
This is where my shop-for-a-year-old TV advice comes into play. By comparison, the 65-inch LG G4 is just $2,000 right now. A TV that's just about as good as the S95F for $1,300 less feels like a pretty killer deal to me. (Plus, you'll land Dolby Vision support, if that matters to you.)
If you're looking to splash out on one of the best TVs money can buy and you don't mind dropping $3,000 or more for the privilege, the Samsung S95F is a slam-dunk choice. It's eye-wateringly expensive, but it looks incredible and it's stuffed with features for gaming and beyond. Of course, if you're set on the Samsung, maybe wait a year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
One Tech Tip: This summer, don't let your phone overheat
LONDON (AP) — The summer holidays are here and many of us will heading off on trips to hot and sunny destinations, and bringing our electronic devices along. But don't forget that phones, tablets and other electronics are vulnerable to extreme heat. Southern European nations like Spain, Italy and Greece have been baking under the sun, while forecasters have consistently issued heat advisories across the United States, particularly in the Southeast. What heat does to a phone: Most electronic devices work best in a specific temperature range. Apple says iPhones and iPads are designed to be used in temperatures between 32-95 degrees Fahrenheit (0-35 degrees Celsius). A device might change its behavior to deal with extreme temperatures, Apple warns. 'Using an iOS or iPadOS device in very hot conditions can permanently shorten battery life.' Your phone might temporarily warm up if you're charging wirelessly, downloading big files, streaming high-quality video or doing anything else that requires lots of power or data. Samsung says that's normal and it won't affect the performance or battery lifespan. What happens if the device gets too hot If your phone gets so hot that it becomes uncomfortable to hold, Samsung recommends that you stop using it. An overheating iPhone will alert users with a warning message that it needs to cool down before it can be used. Android devices will display a similar message, telling user that the screen will dim, apps will be closed and charging will be paused. What not to do There are things you can do to protect your device from high heat. Don't leave it in a car on hot day and don't leave it in direct sunlight for long. Apple also warns against using some features when it's very hot or in direct sunlight for long periods, like GPS navigation when driving, playing a graphics-heavy video game or using the camera. Google, which makes Pixel Android phones, advises users not to use resource-intensive features or apps while charging. Keep your gear cool The best thing you can do in extreme heat is turn off your device completely. 'Even background processes can generate heat,' say experts at British electronics chain Curry's. 'A full shutdown helps it cool faster.' Also keep it out of direct sunlight and put it somewhere cool, like an air-conditioned room or in front of a fan. But be careful about putting it in cool places. 'Never put your device in the fridge or freezer, as condensation can cause water damage,' Curry's says.
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I've been using apps on the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7's cover screen with this download — but I'm not totally in love with it
Samsung has made the Galaxy Z Flip 7 one of the best foldable phones you can buy right now. But no device is perfect, and there's one glaring flaw with the Flip in particular. The cover display, despite being enlarged to 4.1 inches and given a 120Hz refresh rate, is still stuck using only widgets. This can be plenty useful, saving you from having to open the phone quite as regularly. But you can't use apps in their standard form on the exterior screen, something that larger foldables like Samsung's own Galaxy Z Fold 7 or rival flip-style foldables like the Moto Razr 2025 can both handle. However, there is a Samsung-endorsed solution to this problem. It's called Multistar, and I've been trying it out to see if it solves my biggest issue with the Galaxy Z Flip 7. To enable full apps on your Galaxy Z Flip 7's cover screen, you first have to install Good Lock from the Galaxy Store. Not the Google Play Store where you likely get all your apps from normally, but Samsung's own digital storefront. Good Lock should be easy to find once you're there, as it's one of the most popular apps. It's made by Good Lock Labs, who work with Samsung to enable all kinds of unique, customizable experiences. Think of it as a secondary Settings menu for advanced users. With Good Lock installed, you next have to install the Multistar module. This module does a lot of different things, all revolving around using more apps in more places. But what we want can be found under the I ♡ Galaxy Foldable heading, and specifically the Launcher Widget. Once you've set up the Launcher Widget with up to 12 apps of your choosing, you can then add the widget to your Cover Screen carousel. And from there, you can open up these apps on the outer display of the Z Flip 7, with all the features and functionality you'd get on the inner main display. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The main hurdle to clear with Multistar is that your apps are not designed for a square display that's almost 2 inches smaller than the typical smartphone display sold these days. With an app open on the cover display, you can switch aspect ratios, using either the full screen, the portion above the cameras or a miniature vertical view. This helps in some cases, such as shrinking the viewing window in BlueSky making all the bottom navigation buttons available. But apps like Slack do not fit well into any of them, with the Tinder-style catch-up tool freaking out when you try and use it. Trying to type on the outer screen is an exercise in frustration. The default keyboard doesn't have a special small version for the outer screen, so all you can see of your app is the bottom-most line of your message. Gaming isn't much better. The small and square screen means you only get part of the game's intended view, and buttons are shrunk down to compensate. You'll need a precise touch to navigate menus, especially in an RPG game like Ex Astris, my current mobile game of choice. Before this year, I wouldn't have wanted to use Multistar on a Z Flip for long due to the irregular shape of the cover display. But with the Z Flip 7 and the latest generation of Multistar, we've hit a weird middle ground. With a four-sided display, you can now see your apps consistently on the home screen, and if you're using an app passively, scrolling through and reading without really interacting, it works well. But the moment you need to input something, like text or other commands, things get trickier. Plus, we can't ignore that to enable this in the first place, you have to download two separate things. It's hardly convenient, and could put off anyone who isn't a confident power-user of their Galaxy Z Flip. For my money, Samsung needs to fix the following — a) Make cover screen apps an option in the regular Settings app, even if it lives in the Labs section; b) Create a compact keyboard for when users need to type on the cover screen; c) Ensure that at least Samsung's own apps format properly on screens of this size. Dy doing all of this, Samsung will be able to offer users the most from their Z Flip's cover screen, while still indicating that widgets are the official preferred way to use this display. It's now about a year until the Galaxy Z Flip 8 likely launches as I write this. That gives Samsung plenty of time to work on this. But if the phone maker wanted to give us these capabilities in a One UI update before then, I certainly wouldn't complain.
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I test monitors for a living — here's the 3 I recommend for every budget
As someone who tests and reviews monitors for a living, I get overwhelmed with the number of displays that drop on what appears to be a weekly basis. From ultra-wide to curved, 1080p to 4K resolution, 240Hz refresh rates to OLED panels — buying a monitor to match your setup can be a headscratch-inducing journey (the names alone are a headache). Still, the best monitors we've tested stand out for good reason, but when LG Display unveils its 720Hz OLED display and Samsung reveals an all-new Smart Monitor M9, it gets harder to finally choose the right display to grab. But fret not; the displays to pick up right now can stay on top of your work, gaming, video editing and productivity for years to come, and I've found just the three monitors I'd put in my shopping basket. After testing hundreds of the latest monitors during my career, I'm mightily impressed with the mix of monitors to give your PC, PS5, Xbox and more the visuals they deserve. From a massively budget-friendly display sporting a 200Hz refresh rate to a gorgeous QD-OLED panel with 4K resolution, here are the monitors I'd love to have on my desk — and you (probably) will, too. When a sub-$200 monitor arrives on my desk, my immediate thought is that it simply "does the job." Well, I was sorely mistaken with the Acer Nitro KG272, as not only does it make for an extremely affordable 27-inch monitor for entry-level gaming, but it also works as a cheap, handy secondary display for your PC setup. On paper, this monitor won't exactly grab your attention: 27-inch (1920 x 1080) IPS panel, 100Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time. But take a look at its $159 price tag, and this display suddenly becomes a lot more valuable. I used the Acer Nitro KG272 as my primary monitor for over a week, and I was blown away by its visuals and buttery smooth refresh rates while playing games, watching shows and working. It's a monitor I'd easily recommend to students or those on a budget, but here's the thing about Acer's Nitro monitor series: there are tons of them. So, why not bump up those specs for a similar Acer Nitro XV270 that's currently just as cheap? Right now, the Acer Nitro XV270 is down to just $139 at Best Buy, and this sports the same 27-inch (1920 x 1080) IPS panel with an even faster 200Hz refresh rate and 0.5ms response time. Oh, and AMD FreeSync Premium for tear-free gameplay. Now that's a steal. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The Acer Nitro XV270 gaming monitor is a budget underdog for anyone looking for a simple yet effective display to play PC games or get some work done. With its 27-inch (1920 x 1080) IPS panel, 200Hz refresh rate and 0.5ms response time, it may pale in comparison to the top dogs, but for its price, it goes above and Nitro KG272 E (27"): was £109 now £99 @ Amazon If you've got the budget for it, you won't have to spend much more on this Alienware AW2725QF. The name really doesn't do this monitor justice, as it would have passed me by if I didn't see that it comes with dual resolution. As in, the best of 1080p and 4K visuals. I'm a sucker for 4K, especially since trying out an Acer Predator Orion 7000 with an RTX 5080. Whether it be for playing the best PC games, working on photo edits or watching shows, the impeccable detail 4K monitors deliver is quite simply stunning. But when it comes to fast-paced gameplay, super-fast refresh rates at 1080p are more than worth it. So, seeing as the 27-inch Alienware AW2725QF allows for 4K resolution at 180Hz and 1080p at 360Hz with just a flick of a button, it quickly became a monitor I dreamed of having on my desk. Not only this, but to get a 4K-capable monitor for (as of writing) under $500 screams value. There's no OLED here, but that's fine since it offers dazzling picture quality, bright visuals and accurate colors. Sure, dual-resolution displays aren't anything new at this point, but for this price, it's a monitor that will shine on any desk (and hopefully mine one day). Here's an amazing 27-inch display from Alienware with dual resolutions! The AW2725QF offers 4K (3840 x 2160) with a 180Hz refresh rate and a FHD (1920 x 1080) mode with a whopping 360Hz refresh rate. That's hugely beneficial for fast-paced multiplayer titles and heavy-duty AAA PC games alike. We adored this monitor in our Alienware AW2725QF review, just be aware that there isn't an OLED option and this monitor will shine on your desk!Alienware AW2725QF (27"): was £443 now £372 @ Amazon You'll find many of the best gaming monitors that boast ultra-wide curved displays and super-sized 49-inch panels for well over $1,000, but I'm perfectly happy with a straightforward flat screen that doesn't take over my whole desk. Enter the MSI MPG 321URXW QD-OLED — a stunning monitor that's made for gaming and productivity alike. It's a pricey one, but MSI's monitor aims to be your one-for-all display no matter your setup. Good thing it sports an ultra-slick and slim design, too, especially in its all-white colorway. At just 2.7 inches deep, not only does it boast a premium look, it's also thin enough to fit into a desk space with ease — whether it's on its adjustable, sturdy stand or mounted. So, with its QD-OLED panel, 4K (3840 x 2160) resolution, 240Hz refresh rate and 0.03ms response time, can it pull off some exemplary visuals? You bet, with vibrant colors and deep blacks that will shine on a PC, PS5, Xbox and yes, a Nintendo Switch 2. Even better, the monitor comes with OLED Care 2.0 tech to keep OLED burn-in at bay. That, along with its built-in KVM switch and its USB-C port offering cable connectivity for your laptop with 90W of Power Delivery (PD), makes the MSI MPG 321URXW QD-OLED a monitor worth owning. Well, once my budget allows for it. Easily the best monitor you can pair with your PC, PS5, Xbox and more, the MSI MPG 321URXW QD-OLED is an ultra-thin and ultra-stylish 4K display with a superfast 240Hz refresh rate and 0.03ms response time. It's set at a premium price, but you'll get equally premium visuals and even USB-C connectivity with 90W PD. MSI MPG 321URXW QD-OLED (32"): was £817 now £748 @ Amazon Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
