
LG G4 vs Samsung S95F: Which flagship OLED TV is worth the money?
The G4 is one of the best OLED TVs LG has ever made, and because it debuted in 2024, it's now heavily discounted.
With incredible QD-OLED performance and ample features, the Samsung S95F is sure to be one of the year's best TVs. It's brand new, though, so it costs more than the LG G4.
When folks come to me and ask for advice about buying a top-shelf TV, I always start with the same question: 'How important is it for you to buy a brand-new TV?'
It's tempting to break the bank on one of the year's best TVs, but for many people, saving money on a year-old model is a far better option.
Take this year, for instance. When all's said and done, the newly released Samsung S95F is sure to be one of the best OLED TVs of 2025. But right now, the 2024 LG G4 OLED is every bit as good as it was when it debuted. Critically, it's also way less expensive than the newer S95F.
If you're stuck between the two, fear not: I've spent a ton of time testing and watching both of these flagship OLED TVs, and I'm here to break down all of their similarities and differences.
LG G4
Samsung S95F
Sizes
55", 65", 77", 83", 97"
55", 65", 77", 83"
Ports
4x HDMI 2.1
4x HDMI 2.1
Resolution
3,840 x 2,160p
3,840 x 2,160p
HDR
Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Smart TV software
webOS
Tizen OS
ATSC 3.0 support?
No
No
Processor
a11 AI Processor 4K
NQ4 AI Gen3
When their specs are compared side by side, it's easy to see that these two OLEDs have a lot in common.
Both the G4 and the S95F come in 55-, 65-, 77- and 83-inch models (though the G4 is also available in a mind-blowingly big 97-inch version).
Additionally, each model offers a full suite of four high-bandwidth, HDMI 2.1-compatible ports. This makes them perfect for dedicated gamers and A/V enthusiasts.
One important distinction lies with their respective HDR support. Like all Samsung TVs currently on the market, the S95F does not support Dolby Vision, a popular, proprietary HDR format. Instead, Samsung offers HDR10+, a royalty-free version of the format that works in a similar way.
You'll still be able to watch Dolby Vision streaming titles and Blu-ray discs on the S95F, but the picture will fall back to standard HDR10. In other words, the S95F won't be taking full advantage of Dolby Vision's efforts to replicate the creator's intent.
Like all LG OLEDs, the G4 supports Dolby Vision (though it leaves off HDR10+ support). For most people, Dolby Vision is the better format to have on hand, as it remains the most popular.
To learn more about Dolby Vision, check out our guide to whether or not you need Dolby Vision at all.
Both TVs make use of a pedestal-style stand rather than a pair of feet. Fortunately, each stand design offers enough headroom for a dedicated soundbar.
Thanks to the sleek nature of OLED display technology, both the G4 and the S95F showcase wildly thin panels. Of the two, however, the S95F is a touch thinner.
The biggest difference between their designs involves their inputs. The G4 houses all of its connectivity options in an L-shaped cutout on the pack of the panel. The S95F leverages Samsung's One Connect Box, which connects to the panel with a single cable and can be placed anywhere within the TV's surrounding area.
Your mileage may vary, but I appreciate the S95F's added flexibility. If you have a particular home theater setup that would benefit from the One Connect Box, the S95F will treat you well.
When it comes to remote controls, things aren't as cut and dry. I absolutely adore the Samsung Solar Cell remote, which charges an internal lithium-ion battery by way of indoor and outdoor lighting. It's very convenient.
However, the super-slim Solar Cell remote doesn't feature a dedicated input button, and I find that to be a bit of a headache when it comes to changing inputs on the fly.
The G4 is paired with last-year's version of LG's Magic Remote. Conveniently, it does feature an input-selection button, but it's also large and not nearly as convenient as the Solar Cell remote.
Each of these TVs will look great on the wall or on top of a credenza, but on the whole, the S95F is a better-designed TV.
Winner: Samsung S95F
Before we dive into which of these TVs delivers better overall performance, let's take a look at how their test results stack up in a side-by-side comparison.
LG G4
Samsung S95F
SDR Brightness (10%, in nits)
358
267
Delta-E (lower is better)
1.4
1.2
HDR Brightness (10%, in nits)
1,487
2,138
UHDA-P3 Gamut Coverage
97.17%
99.97%
Rec. 2020 Gamut Coverage
72.91%
90.26%
Input latency (milliseconds)
9.2
9.2
While both of these TVs benefit from the perfect black levels and pixel-level dimming that we've come to expect from OLED displays, the S95F is significantly brighter than the G4 when it comes to HDR content.
In a nutshell, this means that specular highlights (small, concentrated areas of brightness) will pop more on the S95F. And, when you're dealing with the self-emissive nature of OLED displays, this pop will go a long way towards the picture looking more realistic.
While watching SDR content (like basic cable and most streaming content), the G4 provides a brighter overall picture. That said, it's not significantly brighter under these circumstances, so you can probably set that aside for now.
The S95F offers some of the best color we're likely to see in 2025.
Here's some good news: Each of these TVs arrives with incredible out-of-the-box accuracy in their respective Filmmaker modes. You probably won't feel compelled to calibrate them professionally, which will save you money.
However, when it comes to color volume, the S95F is far and away the better competitor. You can see this reflected in their Rec.2020 color gamut results. In fact, the S95F offers some of the best color we're likely to see in 2025 — it's that good.
This mostly has to do with the fact that the S95F is equipped with quantum dots, which allow for brighter, purer color than what the G4's WOLED display is capable of.
Both of these OLED TVs deliver an accurate, jaw-dropping picture, particularly in HDR. If you're chasing the best possible picture, though, the S95F is the better pick. Its superior highlight brightness and next-level color volume make for a truly immersive experience.
Winner: Samsung S95F
Neither LG's webOS or Samsung's Tizen OS are my smart platform of choice, but they'll get you through your day if you opt to use them on a regular basis. I find the S95F's user interface to be more cluttered than the G4's, but both software suites are fine for most people.
On the gaming side of things, there aren't very many specs separating the two. As mentioned, each TV offers four HDMI 2.1 inputs, and both support Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), G-Sync compatibility and a variation of AMD's FreeSync.
However, if you want to leverage one of these OLEDs as a monitor for high-end PC gaming, the S95F's native refresh rate of 165Hz is slightly better than the G4's 144Hz. Both can handle the 4K/120Hz cap of current-generation consoles like the Xbox Series X and the PS5 Pro.
The most noteworthy missing feature on the S95F is, of course, Dolby Vision. I imagine that most folks shopping in the top-shelf price bracket have already made peace with Samsung's decision not to back Dolby Vision HDR. Still, it's a significant blow to A/V enthusiasts who'd like to put together a complete home theater setup.
In fact, I'd wager that the S95F's lack of Dolby Vision will ultimately matter to more people than the various AI-based features that S95F exclusively claims. Were it not for a lack of Dolby Vision, this category would come down to a draw. Instead, the LG G4 has the edge when it comes to features.
Winner: LG G4
LG G4
Samsung S95F
Specs (25)
24
24
Design (25)
21
23
Performance (25)
24
25
Features (25)
24
23
Total Score (100)
93
95
One glance at the scorecard and the closeness of this match-up is clear. But one factor we haven't considered yet is maybe the most important of all: price.
After spending countless hours with each of these TVs, I'm confident in saying the Samsung S95F is the better overall performer. Its quantum dot-enhanced color, together with its sensational HDR highlight brightness, make for a sensational visual spectacle.
But there's no running away from its price. Right now, the 65-inch Samsung S95F is $3,299, and unfortunately, this is too rich for the vast majority of shoppers.
This is where my shop-for-a-year-old TV advice comes into play. By comparison, the 65-inch LG G4 is just $2,000 right now. A TV that's just about as good as the S95F for $1,300 less feels like a pretty killer deal to me. (Plus, you'll land Dolby Vision support, if that matters to you.)
If you're looking to splash out on one of the best TVs money can buy and you don't mind dropping $3,000 or more for the privilege, the Samsung S95F is a slam-dunk choice. It's eye-wateringly expensive, but it looks incredible and it's stuffed with features for gaming and beyond. Of course, if you're set on the Samsung, maybe wait a year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Android Authority
2 hours ago
- Android Authority
Here are 5 ways I actually use the cover screen on my Motorola Razr
Ryan Haines / Android Authority I love the cover screen experience that Motorola has curated for its Razr flip phones. I've said it before — often while bashing the hoops that Samsung makes you jump through to get the same usefulness from its Flex Window — and I'm sure I'll say it again, but only because I believe so strongly in it. As someone who would love to push all his friends to pick up a flip phone, it's much easier to recommend Motorola's open, easy-to-use interface, which is ready to grab and go at a moment's notice. However, just because it's easy doesn't mean people will know how to use it. Suddenly, you have this small, square display in front of you that's both a phone and not quite a phone — it works like one, yet kind of does its own thing. So, with that in mind, I thought I'd sit down and walk through a few of the ways I've started using the cover screen on my Motorola Razr (in this case, the Razr Ultra) every day. Who needs a big keyboard when a little one will do? Ryan Haines / Android Authority My love for all things flip phone started when Samsung launched its Galaxy Z Flip 4. It was my first chance to play around with the form factor, and I immediately knew it was the one for me. And, if you remember the Galaxy Z Flip 4, you'll remember that it had a tiny, inconvenient cover screen that offered little more than a quick peek at an email or the ability to read a text. Sure, you could open the door a little wider with Coverscreen OS, but it never made the cover screen big enough to use comfortably. So, when Motorola cranked its cover screen from a 1.6-inch (or so) window to a sweeping 3.6-inch panel, it changed a few things. Suddenly, I had enough space to open up a full QWERTY keyboard that still gave me just enough space around the edges to see the message I was responding to. And, with that new flexibility, the Razr's cover screen became my favorite place to respond to messages. It's much easier to tap out a quick response and then slot my phone back into my pocket without the temptation to doomscroll social media or check a hundred other things. Of course, I still do those things on the cover screen, but I don't feel quite as drawn to them. Besides, responding to messages on the Razr Ultra's cover screen isn't reserved for just texting. I've managed to keep up with Telegram group chats, Instagram DMs, and an endless stream of emails ahead of a busy summer of launches, all from the comfort of a four-inch display. Don't get me wrong — I'm not sitting here writing this article from the cover screen of my phone, but I could if I wanted to. I have time to waste? Give me a silly little soccer game Ryan Haines / Android Authority Remember when I said I like avoiding the temptation to waste time on my Razr? Well, here's where I immediately admit that was only a half-truth. Or, at least it was true until Motorola added a devious little app called GameSnacks to its cover screen. My stumble into the world of GameSnacks started in the same way as most tech reviewers — with Stack Bounce. Motorola first added it to the Razr Plus (2023), and it inspired something of a competition between all of us. We agreed to give the game our best shot, ultimately acknowledging the highest scorer in all of our reviews (you'll have to go back and read mine to find out who it was). Then, the following year, we all switched to Freekick Football in honor of the World Cup. We ran through the same competition, only to find out that none of us was good enough to earn a high score worth mentioning. Now, on my third generation with a Motorola Razr in my pocket, the world of GameSnacks is my oyster. I'm not competing with any other tech reviewer as much as trying to find the one game I can feel like an expert in. You'd think it would be easy, as GameSnacks has a few dozen titles in its pantry, but I'm still out here looking for it. Perhaps the best (most dangerous) part of wasting time in GameSnacks is that it comes pre-loaded on every Razr by default. It also automatically has a space in the cover screen slider as soon as you set up the phone. You'll need a constant data connection to play, which means it's a no-go on long flights, but I like to think of that as my forced break from screen time. This is the grab-and-go interface that Gemini was meant for Ryan Haines / Android Authority When I think about using my Razr Ultra closed, I'm usually thinking about one thing: making my own life easier. Most of the AI features that Motorola has added are designed to do the same. They do their very best to take the thinking out of my hands and try to let my phone do it for me. And the most convenient part is that I can do a lot of those things from the comfort of my cover screen — it's like a hands-free win-win. Of course, there are limits to which Moto AI features Motorola has ported to its cover screen. You can ask your Razr to Pay Attention, making a note in your digital journal, or Catch Me Up, running through your notifications like text messages, or you can ask Moto AI a question and wait for an answer. Also, if you have the Razr Ultra, you can tap into Look and Talk, which turns your flip phone into a sometimes-watching assistant, waiting for you to come within an arm's reach before it opens a Gemini Live-like interface. I've used a mix of Look and Talk and simply opening Gemini itself, depending on what answers I'm after. I usually opt for Look and Talk for a few faster tasks like kitchen questions while I'm cooking and have to work hands-free, while I'll turn around and ask Gemini for more research-oriented assistance, especially while I'm planning out what to do in Philadelphia around the Grand Slam Track event. It's proven much easier to ask Gemini for a few tips on getting to and from Franklin Field and then having NoteBook LM generate a quick podcast so I can make my plan while I log morning miles. Granted, you'll have to add Gemini to your cover screen via the app drawer — it no longer comes as one of Razr's default four apps. Welcome back, iPod Touch Ryan Haines / Android Authority Back in my pre-smartphone days, my everyday carry was an iPod Touch. As a middle-schooler, I loved that thing. It had all the music I could ever ask for (at least in my iTunes library), and it looked much cooler than the SanDisk MP3 player I got for my tenth birthday. Then, I got my LG G3, and my iPod Touch went in a drawer. My screens got progressively larger, and I had more and more control over what music I was playing once I picked up a Spotify subscription. Now, I love that my Motorola Razr has pushed me back to the good old days. By that, I mean that Motorola's Spotify widget is barebones in a good way. It doesn't let you search for songs, and you can't pick where your playlist starts; you get a grid of the last eight things you played — artists, podcasts, playlists, whatever — and Spotify takes over from there. It's like the perfect mix between my finely trained Spotify algorithm and the radio, just without the pitfalls of either one. That said, there's one fairly large problem with Motorola using Spotify as its default music widget: It doesn't work with the Playlist Studio. See, Motorola decided to add an AI-powered image generator and a playlist generator, but it would only make the latter work with Amazon Music. So, although you can create sets of ten songs to fit just about any prompt, the only way to bring them over to Spotify is to make the playlists by hand. Unfortunately, I think Motorola's new AI feature will lose out to my time-tested Spotify library in this situation, but maybe a future update will change that. I'm learning that social media is best consumed as a microdose Ryan Haines / Android Authority If you haven't figured it out by now, I use the cover screen on my Motorola Razr Ultra a lot. I'm glad Motorola doesn't give me the screen time metrics for it, because I think I'd be ashamed of just how often I whip it out of my pocket for one thing or another. However, my screentime numbers might not be too different from when I reviewed the more traditional Pixel 9 or iPhone 16. In fact, they might be just a little bit better. What I mean is that when I pull a regular old candybar-style phone out of my pocket, everything is right there. I can jump from Spotify to Instagram to TikTok and lose an hour without thinking about it. Everything is perfectly sized to the tall, thin display, which makes it easy to lose track of time. On the Razr Ultra's four-inch cover display, though, social media is inconvenient. You can keep up with the final day of the Premier League season on X (thank you, Manchester United, for beating Aston Villa), but it's tough to catch most of an Instagram post in a single frame, and Reels and TikToks come out small enough that they're not worth doomscrolling. In a way, that slight inconvenience is my favorite part about scrolling social media on the Motorola Razr Ultra's cover screen. I get just enough of a fix, but I'm more willing to pull the plug when the ads become even a little inconvenient. When they do, I simply revisit anything else on this list, and I'm immediately reminded why I fell in love with the Razr to begin with.


Tom's Guide
8 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I swapped my Apple Watch for the Galaxy Watch 7 — here's what I liked and disliked
Smartwatches have become an essential bit of kit for many, with features like fitness tracking, notifications, sleep monitoring, and heart-rate checking that were once novel and impressive. Now? They're expected. For years, I've been mostly in the Apple Watch camp. As my usual go-to everyday smartwatch, it's proven to be sleek, responsive, and — since it's tightly-knit with my iPhone and other Apple gear — it just works. Until now, I hadn't found a good enough reason to switch. But with Samsung's latest wearable, the Galaxy Watch 7, launching alongside the feature-rich Galaxy Watch Ultra and the much-hyped Galaxy Ring, I was curious. Was it time to try the other side? Could Samsung's circular contender pull me away from the Apple Watch Series 10? As someone who tests gadgets for a living, I decided it was time to find out. I've been wearing the Galaxy Watch 7 day in, day out — at the gym, pottering around the yard, walking around the block, shopping trips, in bed, and everywhere in between — to see how it stacks up against Apple's polished powerhouse. Here's everything I liked, and what I felt didn't quite hit the mark. Let's start with looks because, in my opinion, that's still what matters most on your wrist. Swapping from Apple's distinct rectangular slab to Samsung's traditional round face was — I have to say — a bit of a relief. I've never really been a fan of the Apple Watch's angular design, so it didn't take long to get used to, and prefer, the Watch's 7's more traditional circular face design. Samsung's latest wearable comes in 40mm and 44mm sizes, and the version I wore (the former) struck a great balance — not too chunky, not too delicate. The aluminium case keeps things lightweight, and I really liked the muted khaki finish of my review unit — it's subtle, modern, and goes with anything. The sapphire crystal glass is also a win, sporting a premium feel and a level of scratch resistance the aluminium Apple Watch 10 can't quite match without going up to the stainless steel model. Samsung's bezel is minimal and sleek, and the buttons are well integrated — I never once missed Apple's Digital Crown. If you're into traditional watch styling, Samsung's rounded aesthetic will feel more at home. The Apple Watch Series 10 features a bright and responsive touch screen, a comfortable and lightweight case and more smart functions than you'll know what to do with. Some of my favorites include on-wrist translations and global tide tracking. You also get useful safety tools and lots of holistic-tracking tech. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 provides in-depth, AI-backed, holistic insights into everything from sleep quality to fitness training and recovery. A handsome and easy-wearing watch, the touchscreen is bright and responsive, smart features and third-party apps are plentiful, and battery life is good for a full day. While the Galaxy Watch 7 does a decent job on the design front, its display doesn't quite dazzle in the same way the Apple Watch Series 10 does. Don't get me wrong, it's bright, colourful and sharp, and outdoors in the sun it's still clear and visible. But Apple's display just has the edge here — it feels more vibrant, especially when it comes to viewing angles and responsiveness. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. And then there's haptics. The Apple Watch is the gold standard here with crisp, tight vibrations that never miss a tap. The Galaxy Watch 7, in contrast, just isn't quite as responsive. It's by no means an issue, but it's just not as refined or as satisfying as on Apple's wearable. One of my unexpected highlights was the sheer joy of swapping bands on the Galaxy Watch 7. Sure, Apple's proprietary band system is clever, but it's also rather limiting — and not to mention expensive. Samsung's choice to use a quick-release system compatible with standard 20mm or 22mm bands means I could use all sorts of third-party straps without it putting a big dent in my wallet. From sporty silicone to classic leather, you could quite quickly build up a new mini collection of different styled straps for the Watch 7. And while Samsung's own bands are decent, it's the freedom to personalize without Apple's markup that does it for me. Lovely stuff! If only I had a dollar for every time a smartwatch brand promised 'all-day battery' and failed to deliver. Unfortunately, despite its promises, Samsung's Galaxy Watch 7 also falls into that camp. It claims 'up to 40 hours of battery life' — and yes, in some cases it'll stretch a full second day — but in reality, with notifications on, GPS use, and a bit of music control, I was plugging it in nightly. Sigh. Still, it's still a little better than my Apple Watch 9, which Apple claims lasts 18 hours (and, in my experience, often hits that mark). Nevertheless, the Galaxy Watch 7's charging speed doesn't match up. It'll give you about 40% in 30 minutes, which is fine, but Apple's fast charge still has the edge, especially when you're in a rush to leave the house. This was the big one. Apple Watch is only focused on iPhone users. If you live in the Apple ecosystem, it's seamless. But it's also a walled garden with zero Android support, no Google Maps native app, and limited options for third-party customisation. The Galaxy Watch 7, on the other hand, is a Wear OS 5 device, and it plays nicely with a huge array of Android phones and also can be used by iPhone users (although more limited than on Android). The Google Play Store access on your wrist also works super well — I could download Spotify, Google Maps, WhatsApp, and even control my smart home with the Google Home app. The interface feels smoother than on past Galaxy Watches, and while Samsung's own One UI Watch skin adds a few quirks, it's generally very intuitive and responsive. The new Exynos W1000 chip seems to help, too, with everything from app launches to swiping around feeling faster and slicker than on older models. Okay, so it's time to talk money. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7's prices start at $299 for the 40mm Bluetooth model and $329 for the 44mm version. If you want LTE connectivity, it's an extra $50 on top for either size, so you're looking at $349 and $379, respectively. Compare that to the Apple Watch Series 10, which starts at $399 for the 42mm GPS version and jumps to $499 if you want the same size with cellular. Opt for the larger 46mm model and you're looking at $429, or $529 if you want it fully connected. So, if we're comparing like for like, Samsung's pricing undercuts Apple at almost every level, and you're still getting very similar top-notch features. Add in the fact that Samsung often offers deals and trade-in offers, too, makes it even more tempting if you're already in the Android ecosystem. Annoyingly, you can't pair a Galaxy Watch with an iPhone in a way that gives you the full experience. While the Galaxy Watch 7 technically can work with iOS, some features and health metrics — like ECG, blood pressure monitoring, and Samsung Health's more advanced tools — are either stripped back or unavailable entirely. The same goes for certain third-party apps and watch face options, which are much more robust when used within Samsung's own ecosystem. To get the most out of the Galaxy Watch 7, you really need to pair it with a compatible Android phone, ideally, a Samsung one. I tested mine with the Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus, and it was a seamless, enjoyable experience. It boasted fast pairing, full feature access, and top-notch integration with Samsung Health, SmartThings, and the new Galaxy Ring ecosystem. On top of that, the Galaxy S25 Plus' big, bright AMOLED screen made it a joy to manage watch settings, workouts, notifications, etc and it felt like both devices were built to work with one another — probably because they are. Of course, it's not easy to move away from iMessage, but if you're fully onboard the Samsung train, the S25+ and Galaxy Watch 7 combo is as slick and functional as it gets on Android. After two weeks of using the Galaxy Watch 7, I can honestly say it's a strong rival to Apple's popular wearable. The design is smarter than I expected, the software is powerful and flexible, and the price is right. It's a great option for Android users — and for once, Apple fans may have something to be envious of. Still, it's not perfect. Battery life is still just okay, the screen's responsiveness isn't perfect, and the tighter integration of the Apple Watch with iPhone still can't be beaten if you're fully invested in that ecosystem. So, did I switch for good? Not yet, but I'm seriously considering it. I've gone back to my Apple Watch for now, mainly because I'm a creature of comfort (and you gotta love the seamless iOS experience), but the Galaxy Watch 7 did make a huge impression on me. If I were to move to a Samsung phone full-time (and after using the Galaxy S25+, I'm genuinely tempted) the Galaxy Watch 7 would be my go-to wrist wearable.


Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
Samsung Confirms Upgrade Choice—Galaxy Users Must Now Decide
This decision defines the future of your phone. Republished on June 7 with reports into Google's new decision for Android users. A timely warning from Samsung this week, which neatly sets out the biggest upgrade decision now facing Android users. As whispers start to spread suggesting a disconnect between Samsung and Google at the heart of Android, this is critical. We're talking AI and the new features and offerings now hitting phones and PCs at breakneck speed. This is where Galaxy has an advantage, Samsung says, 'in privacy-first, AI-powered experiences' which can 'protect you in the era of AI.' The question the Galaxy-maker asks in its latest post is the right one: 'This level of personalization' brought by AI 'can be incredibly helpful, but the more your phone knows, the more there is to protect. So, what's keeping all that personal data secure?' Samsung's answer is Knox. 'Every Galaxy device is protected from the chip up by a multi-layered approach, which includes on-device personalization, user-controlled cloud processing, and ecosystem-wide protection through Samsung Knox Matrix.' This is Samsung's secure ecosystem that is the closest replica to Apple's securely walled garden currently available on Android. 'At the core of this system is Samsung Knox Vault, Samsung's hardware-based solution for your most sensitive information.' Knox is not new and neither is the concept of hardware-enabled Galaxy data security. What is new is segmenting sensitive the latest AI-related data from the rest, and securing that alongside the more traditional PINs, passwords and credit card numbers. 'Location service metadata from your most personal photos,' Samsung says, 'could easily give away the exact location where the image was taken.' And there's not much data more sensitive than who did what, where and when. 'In the era of AI, personal information like your home address, face clustering ID, person ID, pet type, scene type and more need to be encrypted and stored in a safe location. These things aren't just files — they are deeply connected to your daily life.' It's unclear exactly what is being or will be segmented and how this plays into the various opt-ins that Samsung has added to distinguish between on-device and cloud AI, between what is only within your secure enclave and what is outside. But it's difficult not to read this push as a play against the latest announcements from Google and the cloud-based AI that will now run riot across sensitive data, including emails and even cloud data storage. Yes, there are always opt-outs, but it's all or nothing for users who want AI but are not yet worrying about privacy. 'As Galaxy AI becomes more useful,' Samsung says, 'it also becomes more personal — learning how you use your device and adapting to your needs… Knox Vault is more than a security feature, it's Galaxy's promise that no matter how advanced your devices become, or how much AI evolves, your privacy is secured.' Google, meanwhile, will not make this decision easy for Samsung user. No one is rolling out new smartphone AI innovations faster, and it will always overshadow what can be done if users take a privacy-centric, device-only approach. Per Android Police, the latest update is 'Google's Gemini replacing Google Assistant as the default AI assistant, taking on all digital assistance responsibilities as Assistant is phased out later this year. Gemini is gaining 'Scheduled Actions,' allowing users to automate recurring tasks and information delivery at specific times.' This is the stepping stone to so-called Agenctic AI on phones, where monitoring data and events and activities enables an agent to make decisions autonomously on a smartphone owner's behalf. This next step, with 'Scheduled Actions streamlining routines [and] offering personalized updates,' is just the start. As Mashable says, 'When combined with computer vision, which is what allows a model to 'see' a user's screen, we get the agentic AI everyone is so excited about… Agentic AI tools could order groceries online, browse and buy the best-reviewed espresso machine for you, or even research and book vacations. In fact, Google is already taking steps in this direction with its new AI shopping experience.' Allowing AI access to smartphones with all the data and insight they contain, pushed this to a level even beyond Windows's controversial Recall. It's decision time.