Trump lawyer: Pre-election '60 Minutes' segment caused president 'mental anguish'
While Donald Trump and his allies have long tried to present him as tough and the epitome of classical masculinity, the president himself hasn't done the myth any favors. On the contrary, the Republican, far from demonstrating strength and vigor, has an unnerving habit of whining and throwing routine tantrums.
What's more, his lawyer's latest legal filing does fresh harm to the idea that Trump is the embodiment of toughness. The Associated Press reported:
President Donald Trump suffered 'mental anguish' from CBS News' editing of a '60 Minutes' interview with Democratic opponent Kamala Harris last fall, his lawyers are arguing in court papers.
Oh my.
By now, the basic elements of this story are probably familiar, but to briefly recap, shortly before the 2024 presidential election, it's customary for the major-party nominees to sit down for '60 Minutes' interviews. Last fall, Harris agreed, while Trump initially accepted the invitation before backing out soon after.
Harris' interview wasn't especially memorable — it was, however, recently nominated for an Emmy — though Trump has whined incessantly about it for nearly seven months, claiming that the program deceptively edited the segment. The Republican's claims have already been thoroughly discredited, but his hysterics have only gotten worse: The president last month accused '60 Minutes' of, among other things, 'unlawful and illegal behavior.'
Trump added that CBS should lose its broadcast license and 'pay a big price,' while calling on the Federal Communications Commission to 'impose the maximum fines and punishment.'
But in case that weren't quite enough, Trump also has an ongoing civil suit against CBS, in which the Republican is asking for $20 billion in damages (that's not a typo), based on the president's conspiratorial beliefs about the news magazine's election coverage.
Paramount Global, CBS's corporate parent, has asked a court to dismiss the civil case, prompting the president's lawyers to defend the litigation on the merits. It was against this backdrop that Trump's counsel claimed in a court filing that the '60 Minutes' segment in question 'led to widespread confusion and mental anguish' among news consumers and Trump personally.
The same filing claimed that Trump's status as a 'content creator' was damaged; the public steered clear of his social media platform; and the then-Republican candidate had to 'redirect significant time, money and effort' after the episode aired.
Given that there really wasn't anything meaningfully wrong with the broadcast, it remains unclear why anyone would take any of Team Trump's arguments seriously, or why anyone would believe that the president suffered 'mental anguish' that warrants $20 billion in damages.
That said, Paramount Global is reportedly trying to settle the case anyway, and critics have expressed fears that the company is prepared to give Trump millions of dollars, not because '60 Minutes' did anything untoward, but because Paramount wants the Trump administration to approve an unrelated merger deal.
The Wall Street Journal reported this week that Paramount Global recently offered $15 million to settle the case, citing people familiar with the situation. The same report, which has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, added that the president's lawyers want more than $25 million and an apology from CBS News, which, again, didn't actually do anything wrong outside of Trump's overactive imagination.
This ongoing debacle has already cost the network — in the last month, the head of CBS News and the executive producer of '60 Minutes' have both stepped down — and we'll learn soon enough if the tally gets even worse. Watch this space.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
16 minutes ago
- UPI
Interior Department approves modifying federal coal mining project in Montana
The Department of the Interior Friday announced approval of a mining plan modification for Bull Mountains coal mine in Montana. It authorizes Signal Peak Energy LLC to mine roughly 22.8 million tons of federal coal. Secretary of Interior Doug Burgum (pictured in April) touted it as an example of "energy leadership." File Photo by Ken Cedeno/UPI | License Photo June 6 (UPI) -- The Department of the Interior on Friday announced approval of a mining plan modification for Bull Mountains coal mine in Montana. It authorizes Signal Peak Energy LLC to mine roughly 22.8 million tons of federal coal. It also permits the company to mine 34.5 million tons of adjacent non-federal coal. The mine is in Musselshell and Yellowstone counties and exports coal to Japan and South Korea. "By unlocking access to coal in America, we are not only fueling jobs here at home, but we are also standing shoulder-to-shoulder with our allies abroad," Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement. The Trump administration policy of increasing fossil fuel production stands in stark contrast to Biden administration policies. In October 2024 the Biden administration announced $428 million in funding for 14 federal energy projects in small towns historically known for coal production. The Trump administration is in the process of attempting to undo that clean energy approach while doubling down on coal, oil and gas production. For the Bulls Mountain coal mine, the Interior Department said Friday it is using emergency permitting procedures to disregard normal environmental review. The Interior Department said in an April statement that the procedures reduce what would normally be "a multi-year review process down to just 28 days at most." The department asserts that the procedures using the radically shortened review process still upholds environmental standards. "The Bull Mountains project is proof that we can meet urgent energy needs, work with local communities and uphold strong environmental standards," Acting Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management Adam Suess in a statement. The Interior Department said it is using "alternative arrangements" for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, the 1969 law requiring federal agencies to assess potential environmental effects of their decisions. According to the Interior Department, "These alternative arrangements apply both to actions not likely to have significant environmental impacts and to actions likely to have significant environmental impacts." The Trump administration is using a so-called national energy emergency declared by President Donald Trump on Jan. 20 to avoid fully complying with full environmental regulations agencies would normally have to follow. Under the alternative arrangements, companies would notify the department they want those alternative arrangements. The official responsible for reviewing the application would then "prepare a focused, concise, and timely environmental impact statement addressing the purpose and need for the proposed action, alternatives, and a brief description of environmental effects." According to the Interior Department, the Bull Mountains project is expected to generate "over $1 billion in combined local, state and county economic benefits, including wages, taxes and business activity."
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BRP Inc. (DOOO): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on BRP Inc. (DOOO) on Kroker Equity Research's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on DOOO. BRP Inc. (DOOO)'s share was trading at $40.55 as of 29th May. DOOO's trailing and forward P/E were 22.68 and 10.18 respectively according to Yahoo Finance. BRP Inc. presents a compelling long-term investment case as a dominant player in the recreational powersports market with iconic brands like Ski-Doo, Sea-Doo, and Can-Am. Despite facing steep earnings decline in FY2025 after record profits in FY2024, this downturn appears cyclical rather than structural. The company proactively scaled back production to realign inventory, a decision that impacted short-term results but positions BRP well for a healthier rebound. Its diversified portfolio across seasons and product lines, coupled with a robust parts and accessories business, supports recurring revenues and reinforces its competitive moat. Strategic moves like exiting the underperforming boat segment and investing in electric powersports show management's focus on long-term profitability and innovation, potentially capturing a first-mover advantage in electrification. The company's capital allocation is shareholder-friendly, maintaining dividends and buybacks even through the downturn, reflecting management's confidence in its intrinsic value. Currently trading at low valuation multiples, BRP appears significantly undervalued relative to its normalized earnings potential. A return to historical earnings levels could drive a meaningful re-rating. While the timing of recovery remains uncertain, the brand's strong consumer resonance and the cyclical nature of the downturn suggest eventual mean reversion. Key risks include continued weakness in consumer demand, elevated dealer inventories, and macroeconomic headwinds like interest rates and fuel prices. However, for patient investors, BRP offers the chance to buy a high-quality, market-leading business at a discounted price, with upside potential as the cycle turns and management's strategic initiatives begin to pay off. For a comprehensive analysis of another standout stock covered by the same author, we recommend reading our summary of their bullish thesis on Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). BRP Inc. (DOOO) is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 10 hedge fund portfolios held DOOO at the end of the first quarter which was 8 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of DOOO as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans have made changes to their party's sweeping tax bill in hopes of preserving a new policy that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. In legislative text unveiled Thursday night, Senate Republicans proposed denying states federal funding for broadband projects if they regulate AI. That's a change from a provision in the House-passed version of the tax overhaul that simply banned any current or future AI regulations by the states for 10 years. 'These provisions fulfill the mandate given to President Trump and Congressional Republicans by the voters: to unleash America's full economic potential and keep her safe from enemies,' Sen. Ted Cruz, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement announcing the changes. The proposed ban has angered state lawmakers in Democratic and Republican-led states and alarmed some digital safety advocates concerned about how AI will develop as the technology rapidly advances. But leading AI executives, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, have made the case to senators that a 'patchwork' of state AI regulations would cripple innovation. Some House Republicans are also uneasy with the provision. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., came out against the AI regulatory moratorium in the House bill after voting for it. She said she had not read that section of the bill. 'We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around,' Greene wrote on social media. Senate Republicans made their change in an attempt to follow the special process being used to pass the tax bill with a simple majority vote. To comply with those rules, any provision needs to deal primarily with the federal budget and not government policy. Republican leaders argue, essentially, that by setting conditions for states to receive certain federal appropriations — in this instance, funding for broadband internet infrastructure — they would meet the Senate's standard for using a majority vote. Cruz told reporters Thursday that he will make his case next week to Senate parliamentarian on why the revised ban satisfies the rules. The parliamentarian is the chamber's advisor on its proper rules and procedures. While the parliamentarian's ruling are not binding, senators of both parties have adhered to their findings in the past. Senators generally argue that Congress should take the lead on regulating AI but so far the two parties have been unable to broker a deal that is acceptable to Republicans' and Democrats' divergent concerns. The GOP legislation also includes significant changes to how the federal government auctions commercial spectrum ranges. Those new provisions expand the range of spectrum available for commercial use, an issue that has divided lawmakers over how to balance questions of national security alongside providing telecommunications firms access to more frequencies for commercial wireless use. Senators are aiming to pass the tax package, which extends the 2017 rate cuts and other breaks from President Donald Trump's first term along with new tax breaks and steep cuts to social programs, later this month. Matt Brown, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
