
Volkswagen takes €1.3bn hit from ‘high costs' of Trump tariffs
Volkswagen said it had made strong progress realigning the company, which is considering cutting 35,000 jobs by 2030, but that it had suffered a €1.3bn (£1.13bn) 'decline in operating result primarily due to high costs from increased US import tariffs'.
The company has also reduced its profit margin range to be between 4% and 5% for the year, based on an assumption that tariffs of between 10%, at best, and the current 27.5%, at worst, will be made permanent by the US president.
The group, emblematic of German industry, also makes the Audi, Seat and Skoda brands as well as the luxury marques Lamborghini and Bentley, and commercial vehicles including Scania trucks.
Its reduced revenues underline the German chancellor Friedrich Merz's continued appeal to Trump to urgently sign a deal on tariffs with concessions for the EU car industry.
On Monday, the Vauxhall maker, Stellantis, said Trump's tariffs had already cost it €300m, while last week the Chinese-owned Swedish brand Volvo said it had paused sales of some models to the US and experienced a substantial fall in revenues in the second quarter of the year.
German car exports to the US fell sharply in April and May as import tariffs imposed by Trump hit automakers' sales in their most important foreign market, the VDA industry association said on Thursday.
Auto exports to the US fell by 13% in April and 25% in May from the same months the previous year, the VDA said. It added that 64,300 vehicles were shipped to the US over both months.
Before Trump's return to the White House, the US charged a 2.5% tariff on European-made cars, while the EU had a 10% duty on vehicles imported from the US.
The Volvo chief executive, Håkan Samuelsson, last week called on the EU to drop its 10% tariff, saying it was 'absolutely unnecessary' in an effort to accelerate a deal with the US.
However, the EU is now closing in on a deal with the US for blanket tariffs of 15% on most goods with no special exemption for the automotive industry if a deal is struck before Trump's 1 August deadline.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
On Thursday, the EU said it thought a deal was within reach but Trump is not expected to imminently sign any executive orders as he begins a private visit to his luxury golf resorts at Turnberry in Ayrshire and Menie in Aberdeenshire.
Separately, shares in German-owned Puma dropped by more than 18% on Friday morning after it said it expects US trade tariffs to cost it €80m in gross profit this year, and that it now expects to make a loss in adjusted earnings before interest and taxes.
Much of the sportswear industry faces higher costs because of the US trade tariffs, as they rely on manufacturing in China, Vietnam, Cambodia and Bangladesh.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Liverpool suffer Alexander Isak blow as RB Leipzig respond to Newcastle's Benjamin Sesko bid
Newcastle United have made a move to sign RB Leipzig star Benjamin Sesko despite turning down Liverpool's bid for Alexander Isak but there is no good news for the Reds just yet Newcastle's bid for RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko has fallen short. The Magpies offer of £65.5m and more than £4m of add-ons was not enough to convince the Bundesliga side to part ways with Manchester United also interested in the Slovenia star. Sesko was left out of RB Leipzig's matchday squad for their friendly against Serie A side Atalanta on Saturday amid news of the bid from Newcastle. The up-front fee offered by the Toon is reported to have met the side's valuation but the overall package has not been deemed acceptable in terms of its total and structure. The German team are hopeful that Manchester United will soon make an offer having held talks with both player and club. Sesko has yet to decide his preference, having also previously drawn interest from Arsenal. Leipzig's striker is under contract until 2029 and his agent, Elvis Basanovic, has previously stated that his client wants a "special project with a special coach". And the pause in proceedings will have offered little motivation to Liverpool. The Reds saw their own bid rejected when they made a £110m offer to Newcastle for Alexander Isak. The Magpies offered little encouragement for the Anfield club to make a return for their star, said to be valued at £150m, but Liverpool's hopes could be rejuvinated should Eddie Howe find a new striker to work with. Isak is to return to Newcastle having missed his side's pre-season tour of Asia and spent time training at former club Real Sociedad. But there remains uncertainty around the Sweden international's future with the possibility of Liverpool returning to the fold should the Magpies find a replacement. Speaking on Liverpool's rejected offer, Newcastle boss Howe said: 'I was made aware of a bid yesterday (Friday) and that bid was turned down, all before I'd even heard about it. 'People back in England are dealing with the situation. I don't know what happens next. From our perspective, we still support Alex in every way and my wish is that we see him in a Newcastle shirt again.' It is old rivals Manchester United who could yet spoil Liverpool plans too. United made their first approach for Sesko last week, through intermediaries, who opened up dialogue over a potential deal. The Red Devils are set to step up talks when they have returned home from their three-game tour of the US. Though the funds involved are likely to be significant, and United are looking to offload several players before the summer transfer window closes, they have scope to sign a striker without making a sale.


The Herald Scotland
22 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump and TACO: New tariff rates issued after deadline
Tariffs are a tax on goods from other countries that importers pay, and economists generally agree it leads to higher prices for consumers. Trump began imposing tariffs on imports from the U.S.'s top trade partners in February, only to change their effective date, scope or rate over the following months. The on-again-off-again tariffs have been a theme of Trump's second term, leading to the creation of the term TACO. Here is what to know: Live updates: Trump fires head of labor statistics bureau after weak jobs report What does TACO mean? Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined "TACO trade" in May, describing how some investors anticipate market rebounds amid Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policies. The acronym stands for "Trump always chickens out." Armstrong describes TACO trade as many investors' strategy to buy into the market that dips when Trump announces steep tariffs on the assumption that he will back off his tariff order, and the market will rebound. Trump hit back at a reporter who asked about the term on May 28, saying, "you ask a nasty question like that. It's called negotiation." Trump's tariffs have been on-again-off-again Back in February, Trump announced a 25% tariff on goods from top trade partners Mexico and Canada and 10% on goods from China. Such was the start of a series of delays and negotiations that left Canada and Mexico relatively untouched when Trump expanded steeper tariff orders to the rest of the world in April. China and the U.S. were caught up in an intense trade war where the economic powerhouses retaliated until both sides issued tariffs in the triple digits. They reached a truce in May and have discussed extending the 90-day pause while they work out a deal. Trump on April 2 announced widespread tariffs in what he called "Liberation Day." Shortly after, he paused the climbing rates for 90 days. That pause was set to expire on July 9, but instead of the tariffs going into effect, Trump extended the deadline. That deadline was Aug. 1, and Trump had said the deadline would not change, but the recent order gives it another week. Mexico remains at 25% while it continues to work on a trade deal for the next 90 days, Trump said. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @


The Herald Scotland
22 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why it just got harder to become a doctor or lawyer
For people like her, navigating that maze just became far more challenging. Major changes are coming to higher education in the United States after President Donald Trump signed his major domestic policy bill into law. Among them is an end to Grad PLUS loans, a program that helps people pay for medical school and law school. Since Congress created the loans, direct from the federal government, in 2006, they have covered the full cost of attending graduate and professional school for nearly 2 million students. Beginning July 1, 2026, that won't be an option anymore. Trump's tax and spending law will eliminate the Grad PLUS program for new borrowers (students who take out loans before that date will be grandfathered in for up to three years). The measure imposes new borrowing caps - $50,000 annually and $200,000 overall - on the amount of federal direct loans students can take out for degrees in law and medicine. And it limits their repayment options after they graduate. Read more: Trump just made it harder to close the Education Department All those technicalities mean that some students like Tran may have fewer options for law school or medical school - or could be steered down a different career path altogether. "There's no way I can graduate early enough to avoid the Grad PLUS change," she said. The reforms represent the culmination of years of conservative efforts to rein in student lending. However, there has been bipartisan consensus about the causes of the underlying problem Republicans are trying to solve. Left-leaning groups and policymakers have also been highly critical in recent years of the crippling debt that some graduate programs impose on students. Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, a doctor from Louisiana and chairman of the Senate education committee, said the new legislation will put a stop to a vicious cycle that has kept college costs too high. "The increasing availability of federal loans has resulted in skyrocketing tuition prices, trapping students in a cycle of overwhelming debt that they can't pay back," he said in a statement to USA TODAY. "By capping inflationary graduate loan programs, we prevent students from overborrowing and put downward pressure on rising college costs." Read more: Is grad school worth the investment? Our exclusive data shows some surprising answers. In 2024, the average annual law school tuition at a private university was nearly $60,000, according to American Bar Association data analyzed by the Law School Admission Council. For in-state residents attending public institutions, it was roughly $32,000. It's hard to know exactly how the loan limits will impact law schools, said Austen Parrish, dean of the University of California, Irvine School of Law. It's likely, in his view, that higher-ranked, more expensive schools will enroll a greater number of wealthy students who won't be as reliant on loans. Other, less privileged students may have to trade prestige for cost, he said. "You're going to see students having to make difficult decisions," he said. Medical schools brace for shift Watching from north-central Montana as Congress passed Trump's spending bill, Julianna Lindquist was happy she started medical school when she did. The 23-year-old, originally from Connecticut, is in her second year at Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine in Montana. (Of the two types of medical schools, osteopathic programs are the less-common version; their coursework is similar to that of other medical schools, but instead emphasizes a more holistic approach to patient care.) This semester, Lindquist is taking out the full amount of Grad PLUS loans she's eligible for - roughly $24,000. "I would not be anywhere without student loans," she said. "There's financial aid, but it's not enough." About half of all medical students rely on the Grad PLUS program, borrowing more than $1 billion annually, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. Graduates of osteopathic schools, the vast majority of which take on Grad PLUS loans, often go on to serve rural areas or become primary care providers. With federal support disappearing, it'll be up to the private lending market to make up the difference, said Jane Carreiro, dean of the College of Osteopathic Medicine at the University of New England in Portland, Maine. "How are students going to navigate that?" she said. "That's a question that we're all asking." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @