
Small win for activists, but SA's HIV projects won't be reopened
HIV projects that have closed in South Africa, which were formerly funded by the US government, won't restart as a result of this decision.
The 'limited Pepfar waiver' that President Donald Trump announced in February remains in place.
The $400 million that the United States (US) Congress removed from a list of programmes from which the Trump administration will now take back previously approved but unspent funds doesn't mean that the cuts to global HIV and TB programmes in February, including those in South Africa, are now reversed.
HIV projects that have closed in South Africa, which were formerly funded by the US government, won't restart as a result of this decision.
In fact, quite the opposite.
The 'limited Pepfar (President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief) waiver' that US President Donald Trump announced in February remains in place.
That means no HIV-prevention activities, unless they intend to stop pregnant and breastfeeding women from infecting their babies, can be paid for with US government money, and projects that make it easier for teen girls and young women in Africa, trans people, sex workers, injecting drug users and gay and bisexual men - groups of people that have a higher chance of getting HIV than the general population - cannot be funded.
READ | 'Systemic shock': SA's HIV viral load testing fell 21% in wake of Pepfar cuts - UNAIDS
Without a proper explanation for it, the $400 million seems to be a random amount that Trump's administration picked to take back from Pepfar, a US government programme which funds Aids projects in poorer countries with high HIV infection rates, such as South Africa.
The amount is about 8.5% of Pepfar's $4.725-billion budget for this financial year and was part of a larger $9.4-billion 'rescissions package' - that has now been reduced to $9 billion and passed as the HR4 Rescissions Act of 2025.
Rescissions happen when the presidential administration wants to cancel funding that was approved by Congress and use it for something else.
What the decision to remove the $400 million from the package does, however, mean is that activism could finally be starting to pay off.
Activists have had hundreds of meetings with US senators and Congress committee chairs. There have been 'Save Pepfar' social media campaigns, and plenty of media coverage about the devastating consequences of the funding cuts.
READ | Motsoaledi urges unity, assures HIV/Aids programme stability amid US Pepfar funding pullout
Tens of modelling studies have also projected what could happen if the lost funds are not replaced.
Opposition from within Trump's Republican Party against nonevidence-based cuts to a programme that has, for two decades, been supported by both the Democrats and Republicans and has saved over 25 million lives, is now at last emerging.
'It's a small win within the bigger context, but nonetheless, a huge win for advocacy, and a reminder that activism is powerful and alive, and making an impact,' Jirair Ratevosian, a former head of staff at Pepfar and fellow at Duke University's Global Health Institute, told Bhekisisa at last week's Conference on HIV Science in Kigali.
Around $8 billion of the money was for foreign aid and development programmes, including global health, and just over $1 billion for public broadcast stations that the Trump administration has accused of being biased because they're too liberal.
Marko Milivojevic/Pixnio via Bhekisisa
But the Rescissions Act is, in itself, bad news.
'It opens the floodgates for the Trump administration to say: 'We don't want this or that in the budget that Congress approved,' says Mitchell Warren, the head of international advocacy organisation, Avac.
'It's trying to take the congressional power of the purse and put it in the executive branch to usurp the role of Congress in deciding how much money - and on what to spend it.'
So how did this all happen, and does it hold any good in the long term for South Africa? We break it down.
1. How did we get here?
In the US, Congress - which consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives - decides how much government money goes to who, just like Parliament does in South Africa. Both the Senate and the House have to pass budgets.
But, as analysts at the Centre for Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington, DC point out, Trump wants more control over how his administration's money is spent.
In March, he signed the 2025 budget that Congress approved into law. Three months later, in June, he decided he wanted to change some of that and submitted a $9.4-billion rescission request, which the House of Representatives (it has five more Republican than Democrat members) passed on 12 June.
When it was the Senate's turn to vote on this, some Republican senators weren't happy with the $400-million Pepfar cut, signalling they wouldn't sign off on the deal unless the Pepfar part was removed.
Because there was a danger of them swinging the vote, the Republicans removed the $400 million from the Rescissions Bill and got the House to pass that too. All that's left is for Trump to now sign the Act.
2. What was the $400 million that was removed from the Rescissions Act for?
In short, no one really knows, because the Trump administration hasn't said what it was for - or what it plans to do with it.
But what we do know is that the US law that governs rescissions, the Impoundment Control Act, says that the president can only request that Congress takes back funding that it previously approved, if the money has not yet been obligated - that means funds hadn't yet been given to a particular recipient, for instance, an HIV project in South Africa.
We also know that the $400-million was part of the financial budget for 2025, says Warren, but because the law gives Pepfar permission to spend money over five years, that money doesn't have to be legally spent until 2029.
3. What will the $400 million now be used for?
Again, no one knows. We don't even know if it will be used, because over the past few months, the Trump administration's main strategy has 'simply been to illegally impound funds - by announcing a 'funding freeze' or 'programmatic review' with no public notice at all - and force those harmed by the impoundments to pursue relief in court', the Centre on Budget and Policy Priorities explains in an analysis.
But we do know what the money can't be used for.
Unless the rules of Trump's 'limited waiver' are changed, Pepfar funds can mostly not be spent on any of the evidence-based strategies it paid for before Trump was elected in January.
Pepfar used to focus on groups of people and areas where people have the highest chance of getting infected with HIV - that way, the programme got the biggest bang for its buck.
In South Africa, for instance, Pepfar worked in the 27 districts with the highest infection rates and groups known as 'key populations' - sex workers, gay and bisexual men, trans people, injecting drug users and African women between the ages of 15 and 24 - that are much more likely to get newly infected with HIV than other South Africans.
Now those projects, which studies show stopped many new infections, have been closed down and the Trump administration says it's not prepared to buy HIV prevention medicine for any group other than pregnant and breastfeeding women.
'It used to be all about evidence,' Warren says. 'Now it's all about ideology.'
4. What do scientists and activists want the $400 million to be used for?
Ratevosian says this moment should be used to gain Republican support to change the waiver rules, so that Pepfar money can cover more of the populations and services needed for HIV prevention.
Lenacapavir, a pricey twice-a-year anti-HIV jab, which scientists believe could help to stop HIV in its tracks if it's rolled out properly, could be used to convince Republican Congress members, says Ratevosian.
'Pepfar has long wanted to get countries to transition to taking more ownership [read: Pay more] for their HIV responses. So now activists are arguing: 'Preventing more new infections with the jab, will make it easier for countries to take ownership because the pandemic will be easier to manage.''
In December, Pepfar said it would join another organisation, the Global Fund for HIV, TB and Malaria to buy enough lenacapavir for two million people over three years.
But in July, the Global Fund had to go ahead with the deal by itself, because Pepfar seemed to no longer be on board.
Warren says: 'If I were in charge, I would take the $400 million and double the two million people the Global Fund is planning to cover, because that's how you build a market, prevent new infections more quickly and drive the price down.'
5. What will Pepfar look like in future?
Trump's funding cuts didn't kill Pepfar - at least not in theory, but it's a shell of its former self.
What it will look like, will depend on the size of its next budget (the Trump administration wants to cut it by 40% but, so far, the House hasn't agreed to that, (the Senate still needs to sit on it) and how much support Republicans who believe in Pepfar can gain to have waiver rules changed.
But, Warren points out, 'we're not going to get pre-January projects back; we have to build something different.
'This has been the most seismic shift in democracy. We didn't think we lived in an earthquake zone, but January 20 (when Trump retook office) taught us: You need to be prepared for that earthquake and you therefore need a different infrastructure.
'In an earthquake you don't build back the same thing. You build better, something that is more resilient.'
Show Comments ()

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sir Keir Starmer set for Donald Trump trade talks as PM walks diplomatic line between EU allies and US on Gaza
Gaza and transatlantic trade are set to dominate talks between Donald Trump and Sir Keir Starmer when the pair meet in Scotland on Monday. Downing Street said the prime minister would discuss "what more can be done to secure the ceasefire [in the Middle East] urgently", during the meeting at the president's Turnberry golf course in Ayrshire. Talks in Qatar over a ceasefire ended on Thursday after the US and Israel withdrew their negotiating teams. Mr Trump blamed Hamas for the collapse of negotiations as he left the US for Scotland, saying the militant group "didn't want to make a deal… they want to die". Sir Keir has tried to forge close personal ties with the president, frequently praising his actions on the world stage despite clear foreign policy differences between the US and UK. The approach seemed to pay off in May when Mr Trump announced the agreement of a trade deal with the UK that would see several tariffs lowered. The two leaders are expected to discuss this agreement when they meet, with the prime minister likely to press the president for a lowering of outstanding tariffs on imports such as steel. Prior to the visit, the White House said the talks would allow them to "refine the historic US-UK trade deal". Extracting promises from the president on the Middle East may be harder though. Despite some reports that Mr Trump is growing frustrated with Israel, there is a clear difference in tone between the US and its Western allies. As he did over the Ukraine war, Sir Keir will have to walk a diplomatic line between the UK's European allies and the White House. On Thursday, French President Emmanuel Macron announced his country would formally recognise a Palestinian state in September, the first member of the G7 to do so. That move was dismissed by Mr Trump, who said it "doesn't carry any weight". Read more from Sky News:US and EU agree trade deal - with bloc facing 15% tariffsGeldof accuses Israel of 'lying' about Gaza starvation The UK, French and German leaders spoke over the weekend and agreed to work together on the "next phase" in Gaza that would see transitional governance and security arrangements put in place, alongside the large-scale delivery of aid. Under pressure from members of his own party and cabinet to follow France and signal formal recognition of Palestine, Sir Keir has gradually become more critical of Israel in recent months. On Friday, the prime minister said "the starvation and denial of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people, the increasing violence from extremist settler groups, and Israel's disproportionate military escalation in Gaza are all indefensible". Government sources say UK recognition is a matter of "when, not if", however, it's thought Downing Street wants to ensure any announcement is made at a time when it can have the greatest diplomatic impact. Cabinet ministers will be convened in the coming days, during the summer recess, to discuss the situation in Gaza. The UK has also been working with Jordan to air drop supplies, after Israel said it would allow foreign countries to provide aid to the territory. President Trump's trip to Scotland comes ahead of his second state visit to the UK in September. Downing Street says Ukraine will also likely be discussed in the meeting with both men reflecting on what can be done to force Russia back to the negotiating table. After the meeting at Turnberry, the prime minister will travel with the president to Aberdeen for a private engagement. Mr Trump is also expected to meet Scottish First Minister John Swinney while in the country.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rough deal: Social media roasts Trump's golf game after clip appears to show alleged cheating in Scotland
Social media users pounced on a clip that appears to show Donald Trump cheating on the golf course during his ongoing trip to Scotland, the latest in a long line of accusations that the president cheats on the fairway. In the video circulated by liberal commentators, a caddy appears to walk ahead of the golf-loving president in his golf cart and drop a ball behind him as the president approaches. 'Trump working hard to bring down grocery prices,' the caption says, making a satirical reference to the president's campaign promises to tackle inflation and costs 'For the morons that think Trump doesn't cheat at golf and wins all those club championships fair and square….watch his caddie here,' another account wrote. The phrase 'commander in cheat' was soon trending on the social media site. 'The video of Trump's caddy doing an Oddjob Slazenger drop isn't a big deal; cheating at golf isn't nearly the worst thing about Trump,' wrote The Atlantic's Tom Nichols. 'But watching the cult of personality try to explain it away is really some creepy North Korean level stuff.' The Independent has requested comment from the White House. The president has faced a long list of accusations that he doesn't play fair from figures ranging from actor Samuel Jackson to LPGA player Suzann Pettersen. Trump's alleged cheating, which has always denied, is even the subject of a book: Rick Reilly's Commander in Cheat. 'At Winged Foot, where Trump is a member, the caddies got so used to seeing him kick his ball back onto the fairway they came up with a nickname for him: Pele,' Reilly writes in the book. Controversy has always followed Trump, an avid golfer and developer of golf resorts, when he hits the 18 holes. The president has golfed at least 45 days out of his 189 days in office this year, or roughly 24 percent of his second term thus far. In April, the president faced criticism for attending an event from Saudi Arabia-backed LIV Golf while missing the return ceremony for the remains of four dead American soldiers. Others have criticized the president's promotion of his business interests on his own properties. During the Scotland trip, Trump met with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf course to announce an EU trade deal, and the president plans to attend a ribbon-cutting ceremony on Tuesday for a new course in Aberdeenshire. The White House described the Scotland tour as a 'working trip' while touting that Trump 'has built the best and most beautiful world-class golf courses anywhere in the world, which is why they continue to be used for prestigious tournaments and by the most elite players in the sport.' The president's Mar-a-Lago club and estate in Florida, near one his golf courses, has also emerged as a key hub for lobbying and fundraising, home to visits from tech billionaires and $1-million-per-head fundraising dinners. In the Middle East, meanwhile, the president's family company, the Trump Organization, recently struck a deal to build a golf resort in Qatar, weeks before the nation announced the gift of a $400 million Boeing 747 plane to be used for the new Air Force One. Despite the administration's insistence on cutting government spending, the president has also reportedly drained taxpayers of over $10 million in costs related to his many golf trips, while the Secret Service has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars for the use of golf carts and port-a-potties at Trump's New Jersey golf club. Since retaking office, Trump and his family businesses have taken in hundreds of millions of dollars on business ventures including cryptocurrency, real estate, and branded merchandise. 'He is president and is supposed to be working in the public's interest,' James Thurber, an emeritus professor at American University, told The Associated Press last month. 'Instead, he is helping his own personal interest to grow his wealth. It's totally not normal.'


New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
CIA director teases more files on alleged Russiagate links to Hillary: ‘Finally coming to light'
CIA Director John Ratcliffe on Sunday teased plans to publicly disclose additional files that allegedly help tie Hillary Clinton to the false claims of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Ratcliffe specifically hinted at 'underlying intelligence' referenced in the annex of the Durham report, which scrutinized probes into the Clinton vs. President Trump match-up and is currently undergoing a declassification process. 'What hasn't come out yet and what's going to come out is the underlying intelligence,' Ratcliffe told Fox News' Maria Bartiromo on 'Sunday Morning Futures,' referring to Russiagate. 4 CIA Director John Ratcliffe claims that the 'good guys' are in charge now. AP 'And what that intelligence shows, Maria, is that part of this was a Hillary Clinton plan, but part of it was an FBI plan to be an accelerant to that fake Steele dossier, to those fake Russia collusion claims by pouring oil on the fire, by amplifying the lie and bearing the truth of what Hillary Clinton was up to.' During the 2016 election cycle, an opposition-research file against then-candidate Trump and compiled by ex-MI6 spy Christopher Steele was circulated within the intelligence community. 4 Hillary Clinton's campaign helped pay for the development of the Steele dossier. The Washington Free Beacon, Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee ultimately ended up paying for the research Steele conducted into Trump during the 2016 cycle. The largely debunked Steele dossier was reviewed by investigators in the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane probe into Russia's meddling in the 2016 election. Former Special Counsel John Durham, who was appointed by the first Trump administration, investigated the FBI probe and criticized the bureau's handling of the inquiry in a report released in 2023. The unclassified portion of his report is public. 'In the summer of 2016, U.S. intelligence intercepted Russian intelligence talking about a Hillary Clinton plan, a Hillary Clinton plan to falsely accuse Donald Trump of Russia collusion, to vilify him and smear him with what would become known infamously as the — as the Steele dossier,' Ratcliffe recapped. The CIA boss said he combed through predecessor John Brennan's handwritten notes on the matter to discover the 'underlying intelligence behind it that revealed exactly what happened. 'All of this evidence that's been hidden and buried from the American people is finally coming to light,' Ratcliffe said. Some key figures from the Obama administration, which was in power at the time, have denied that the Steele dossier was the impetus for the FBI's Russia investigation into whether the Kremlin was communicating with Trump's 2016 campaign. 'There is no doubt in my mind that the people that we just talked about conspired. They conspired against President Trump. They conspired against the American people,' Ratcliffe said. 4 Former CIA Director John Brennan was a key figure in promulgating the Russiagate narrative. AP He noted that both he and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have made referrals to the Justice Department pertaining to their findings. 'I don't think statute of limitations are going to impact [it] because, on the conspiracy, the statute of limitation doesn't start to run until the last act in furtherance of that conspiracy,' he said. 'The people behind this are still furthering the conspiracy. 'They're refusing to admit or acknowledge what they did … was wrong.' Gabbard revisited Russiagate earlier this month with a series of public disclosures on previously classified information, such as a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report which determined there wasn't enough evidence to conclude Russia favored Trump in 2016. 4 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been revisiting the Russiagate controversy and declassifying key intelligence documents. Anna Wilding/ She also released material indicating that top intelligence bosses had evidence that Russia did not hack 2016 voting systems in a way that allowed them to change the election outcome. US Attorney General Pam Bondi announced a 'strike force' last week at the Justice Department to parse through the referrals made from Gabbard and Ratcliffe on Russiagate.