
Why Indira Gandhi Asked For Original Copy Of The Constitution Before Imposing Emergency
Last Updated:
Then Law Minister HR Gokhale, Attorney General Niren De and Om Mehta assured Indira Gandhi that a particular provision gave the government the power to call for an emergency
Hours before India was plunged into its darkest constitutional hour on the night of June 25, 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi sat poring over the original copy of the Constitution. It was the afternoon of 24 June 1975. Political chaos had been brewing for days, but the immediate trigger was a damning verdict from the Allahabad High Court that had threatened her very hold on power.
With mounting pressure from a rising opposition and a wave of mass protests sweeping across the country, Indira Gandhi wanted clarity on one crucial legal point – could she legally impose an Emergency without Parliament's prior approval?
Her aides, Principal Secretary PN Dhar and senior bureaucrat Om Mehta, promptly summoned the Constitution from Rashtrapati Bhavan and the Law Ministry. At her official residence at 1, Safdarjung Road, she turned to a specific provision, Article 352.
What she found in that clause would shape the destiny of a nation.
Article 352: The Gateway To Emergency Rule
Her advisors urged her to focus on Article 352, a provision that allowed the President to declare a national emergency if he believed the nation's security was threatened by war, external aggression, or internal disturbance. Unlike war or rebellion, 'internal disturbance" was a vague and pliable term, undefined in either Parliament or the Supreme Court. It was this ambiguity that became Indira Gandhi's constitutional weapon.
Then Law Minister HR Gokhale, Attorney General Niren De (not Parashar, according to historical records), and Om Mehta assured her that the provision gave the government sweeping powers to rule directly, suspending fundamental rights and democratic processes. They further confirmed that a proclamation could be issued without prior parliamentary approval; only the President's signature was needed on the Prime Minister's written advice.
By late evening on 25 June 1975, Indira Gandhi met President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed twice, once in the evening and again close to midnight. He was considered loyal and unlikely to resist. That night, at her insistence, he signed the proclamation.
At the stroke of midnight, the Emergency was declared.
The roots of this unprecedented move lay in a verdict delivered just weeks earlier. On 12 June 1975, the Allahabad High Court found Prime Minister Indira Gandhi guilty of electoral malpractice in her 1971 win over socialist leader Raj Narain from Rae Bareli. The court disqualified her from holding office and barred her from contesting elections for six years.
Soon after the court's ruling, the opposition launched a nationwide campaign demanding her resignation. Leading the movement was the venerable Jayaprakash Narayan (JP), who rallied students, workers, and civil society. In a speech that alarmed the ruling establishment, JP even urged police and military personnel to disobey 'unlawful orders".
The administration painted these acts as an existential threat to the constitutional order. Indira Gandhi's inner circle argued that the country was descending into anarchy – trains had stopped running, courts were being surrounded, and public services had come to a standstill due to strikes.
The most dramatic was the 1974 railway strike, involving 17 lakh workers, which brought the country to a near-halt. A severe economic crisis – fuel shortages, inflation, and unemployment – only intensified the turmoil.
Drafting The Justification For Emergency
As the pressure mounted, Gandhi's legal team crafted a justification for invoking Article 352. The official grounds listed in the emergency file included:
Internal instability and nationwide protests
A conspiracy by opposition forces to overthrow the elected government
Threats to national security and administrative paralysis
A direct appeal by JP to armed forces to defy the government
Dangers to the Prime Minister's personal safety
On the basis of this rationale, the President signed the Emergency order.
The Aftermath Of 1975 Emergency
With one stroke of the pen, democracy was suspended. Civil liberties vanished overnight. The press was muzzled, opposition leaders jailed, judicial oversight curtailed, and censorship became law.
For the next 21 months, India was ruled under extraordinary powers. Thousands of political opponents were imprisoned without trial. A period of forced sterilisations and slum demolitions followed, with the government wielding unchecked authority.
The Post-Emergency Reckoning
When the Emergency was lifted in March 1977, the public delivered a stinging rebuke. Indira Gandhi was voted out of power in a landmark election, and the Janata Party government led by Morarji Desai moved quickly to amend the Constitution. In 1978, through the 44th Constitutional Amendment, the vague phrase 'internal disturbance" was replaced with the more specific 'armed rebellion", to prevent future misuse.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
1975 Emergency Constitution of India Indira Gandhi
First Published:
June 27, 2025, 14:52 IST

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Rahul Gandhi slams RSS, says Constitution irks Sangh
Following RSS leader Dattatreya Hosabale's comments on the Constitution, Rahul Gandhi accused the Sangh of targeting it, alleging a desire to replace it with Manusmriti. Other Congress leaders, including KC Venugopal and Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah, echoed these sentiments, asserting their commitment to defending the Constitution's values of secularism, social justice, and democracy against any attempts to weaken or rewrite it. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: After RSS leader Dattatreya Hosabale 's comment on the Constitution , Congress leader Rahul Gandhi hit out at the Sangh, accusing it of targetting the Constitution. "The mask of RSS has come off Constitution irks them because it speaks of equality, secularism , and justice. RSS-BJP doesn't want the Constitution; they want Manusmriti . They aim to strip the marginalized and the poor of their rights and enslave them again. Snatching a powerful weapon like the Constitution from them is their real agenda", Gandhi alleged in a social media post."RSS should stop dreaming this dream - we will never let them succeed. Every patriotic Indian will defend the Constitution until their last breath", he general secretary (organisation) KC Venugopal said Hosabale's remarks were reflective of the RSS-BJP's "opposition" to the Constitution and asserted that "we will never let them succeed in this mission" and will defend the Constitution. Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah on Friday said the Congress party will stand like a rock against attempts to weaken or rewrite the Constitution while slamming RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale's criticism of inclusion of the words "socialist" and "secularism" in the Constitution . "Now they are back to their old playbook," the CM said in a statement, in a scathing attack on the RSS. "We will defend its (Constitution's) values - secularism, social justice , and democracy - with full strength and conviction."


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Assault on Constitution's soul: Opposition slams RSS' view on Preamble
RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale Several opposition parties on Friday denounced RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale's call to review the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble, terming it a "deliberate assault" on the soul of the Constitution. The attack came a day after the RSS proposed reviewing the two words, saying they were included during the Emergency and were never part of the Constitution drafted by B R Ambedkar. While the Congress saw it as a "deliberate assault" on the soul of the Constitution and claimed the RSS-BJP had never accepted Ambedkar's Constitution, the CPI(M) said the demand exposes the RSS' long-standing objective of subverting leader Rahul Gandhi said the mask of the RSS has come off again as they want 'Manusmriti'. "The Constitution irks them because it speaks of equality, secularism, and justice," he said in a post in Hindi on X."The RSS-BJP doesn't want the Constitution; they want 'Manusmriti'. They aim to strip the marginalized and the poor of their rights and enslave them again. Snatching a powerful weapon like the Constitution from them is their real agenda," he alleged. "The RSS should stop dreaming... we will never let them succeed. Every patriotic Indian will defend the Constitution until their last breath," the former Congress chief leader and Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan said Hosabale's call is a "brazen attempt to dismantle the core ideals of our Republic"."Invoking the Emergency to discredit these principles is a deceitful move, especially when the RSS colluded with the Indira Gandhi government during that time for its own survival. To use that period now to undermine the Constitution reflects sheer hypocrisy and political opportunism."Secularism and socialism are not additions; they define India. Every citizen who believes in democracy must raise their voice against this communal agenda," Vijayan said on Left parties and RJD alleged that Hosabale's proposal was part of a conspiracy to change the general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said the BJP/RSS attacked Ambedkar, Nehru, and others involved in the framing of the Constitution from November 30, 1949, onwards. "In the RSS' own words, the Constitution was not inspired by Manusmriti," he said in a post on X."The RSS and the BJP have repeatedly given the call for a new Constitution. This was Mr (Narendra) Modi's campaign cry during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. The people of India decisively rejected this cry. Yet the demands for changing the basic structure of the Constitution continue to be made by the RSS ecosystem," Ramesh said. Sharing the Supreme Court's November 25, 2024, judgment on the issue, he said, "Would it be asking too much to request him to take the trouble to read it?" In a post on X from its official handle, the Congress alleged the RSS-BJP's ideology stands in direct opposition to the Indian Constitution."RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale has openly called for the removal of the words 'socialist' and 'secular' from the Preamble. This is not just a suggestion -- it is a deliberate assault on the soul of our Constitution," it said."It is part of a long-standing conspiracy to dismantle Babasaheb Ambedkar's vision for a just, inclusive and democratic India -- something the RSS-BJP has always been plotting. Let us not forget: when the Constitution was adopted, the RSS rejected it. They didn't just oppose it, they burnt it." The Congress said the people saw through their agenda and gave them a resounding answer."Now, they have returned to their old playbook. But let it be known: The Congress will stand as an unbreakable wall against any attempt to undermine the Constitution. Jai Samvidhan," it General Secretary (Organisation) K C Venugopal mounted a scathing attack on the RSS and the BJP, saying, "The RSS' single-minded focus to destroy the Constitution is never hidden for too long. Beyond the BJP's lip service to the Constitution, their hidden agenda has always been to distort and destroy our Constitution -- because it stands against the core fascist beliefs of the RSS-BJP." "A senior RSS member surely knows that the Supreme Court declared socialism and secularism to be part of the basic structure of the Constitution. Yet, to take this stand is a clear insult to the Constitution, a rejection of its values, and a direct attack on the Supreme Court of India as well," he said on X. The MP from Kerala's Alappuzha added that the people of India were very much aware of the "devious means deployed by the RSS to spread poison and divide this country". "We will never let them succeed in this mission, and will defend the Constitution to the hilt," he stressed. Congress deputy leader in the Rajya Sabha Pramod Tiwari said, "Once again, the truth slipped out. The hidden agenda of the BJP and RSS is now out in the open. They want to remove the core values of secularism and socialism from the Constitution." The BJP hit back at the Congress, accusing it of being behind all the violations of India's Constitution since Independence and asked the party to apologise for its Emergency-era atrocities on people instead of resorting to issue before the country is the violation of people's fundamental rights by the Congress government during the Emergency, said BJP national spokesperson Sudhanshu other opposition parties, RJD president Lalu Prasad, who claimed that social justice and communal harmony are his guiding principles, voiced his anguish on X by terming the RSS a "casteist" RJD supremo also said, "They do not have the guts to cast an evil eye on the Constitution and reservations provided therein. Why are people with an unjust character so full of hatred for democracy and Babasaheb Ambedkar's Constitution?" Party MP Manoj Kumar Jha said, "Perhaps he (Hosabale) hasn't read it; I would advise him to seriously read the Constituent Assembly debates. Socialism and secularism were integral parts of our Constitution." In a statement, the CPI(M) Politburo said the inclusion of 'socialism' and 'secularism' in the Preamble is not an arbitrary addition and reflects the core values for which freedom fighters sacrificed their lives. "The Communist Party of India (Marxist) strongly denounces the proposal made by the RSS general secretary to remove the words 'socialist' and 'secular' from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. This proposal exposes the RSS's long-standing objective of subverting the Constitution and its intent to transform India into a Hindu Rashtra, in pursuit of its Hindutva project." "It is the height of hypocrisy for the RSS, which played no role in the freedom movement, to now advocate for the removal of these foundational principles. That it cannot tolerate the values cherished by our martyrs betrays its reactionary, anti-people, and divisive ideology," the Left party "firmly" opposed "any attempt to alter the core values enshrined in our Constitution. We appeal to the people to remain vigilant and resolutely resist all such efforts by the RSS and its protege BJP." CPI General Secretary D Raja said everyone knows what RSS wants. "Everyone knows it is opposed to constitution/why they spoke of '400-paar' and that is why defending constitution became the central issue for opposition parties." Hosabale, while addressing an event on the Emergency, said on Thursday that "the preamble of the Constitution Baba Saheb Ambedkar made never had these words." "During the Emergency, when fundamental rights were suspended, Parliament did not work, and judiciary became lame, then these words were added." The RSS leader said discussions were held on this issue later but no effort was made to remove them from the Preamble. "So whether they should remain in the Preamble should be considered," he had added. Union Minister Jitendra Singh, however, sought to defend Hosabale's call, saying any right-thinking citizen would endorse it because everybody knows that these words were not part of the original Constitution written by Ambedkar. PTI


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Shivraj seconds Hosabale's call for review of insertion of secularism, socialism in Preamble
'Secularism is not the core of our culture. That is why there should indeed be a discussion about it. The word 'secularism' was added during the Emergency—there should be deliberation on removing it,' Chouhan said to a question on whether these terms should be removed from the Preamble. These words, according to the senior BJP leader, were not part of India's civilisational ethos and had been inserted during the 1975 Emergency. New Delhi: After Dattatreya Hosabale of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan joined the bandwagon demanding a rethink on the relevance of the words secularism and socialism in the Constitution. In Varanasi, the Union Minister of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare also described India as 'an ancient and great nation' founded on the principle of Sarva Dharma Sambhav—equal respect for all faiths. He emphasised that India, as a civilisation, has long upheld religious harmony and mutual respect across traditions. 'This is the India that, not today but thousands of years ago, said 'Ekam sad vipra bahudha vadanti'—Truth is one, the wise call it by many names,' he said, quoting ancient scripture to underline India's pluralistic tradition. 'This is the India that says 'Munde munde matir bhinna'—every mind is different. It respects differing thoughts and forms of worship.' Citing Swami Vivekananda's historic speech in Chicago, Chouhan added, 'No matter which path you follow, ultimately all lead to the same supreme truth.' A day earlier, Hosabale had forcefully argued for reviewing the inclusion of secularism and socialism in the Constitution. The RSS general secretary said the two terms were inserted into the Preamble during the Emergency—bypassing public debate—and were not part of the Constitution originally drafted by Chouhan also questioned the relevance of socialism in contemporary India, asserting that Indian philosophy already embodies egalitarian values through its ancient teachings. 'Atmavat sarvabhuteshu—to see oneself in all beings—is India's fundamental thought. The entire world is one family—this is India's spirit. Live and let live, let there be goodwill among living beings, let the world be well,' he said. 'Sarve bhavantu sukhinah, sarve santu niramayah—may all be happy, may all be free of illness—this is India's true sentiment. That's why we don't need socialism,' Chouhan said. 'We've been saying it for years—Sia Ram may sab jag jani—see everyone as one and the same. There is no need for imposed socialism.' The nation, the Union Minister said, must seriously reflect on this (removal of secularism and socialism from the Constitution. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: 'Mask comes off' as RSS wants 'Manusmriti', says Rahul on call to drop 'secular' from Constitution