
Shazia Iqbal: in cinema as in life
It's uncommon for debut filmmakers to get theatrical releases these days as commercial stakes are high. Iqbal also had a long and tricky dance with the censor board and has had to fend off fans who are annoyed that Karan Johar's Dharma Productions is remaking Pariyerum Perumal, Mari Selvaraj's cult anti-caste Tamil hit, produced by Pa. Ranjith in 2018.
But if reviewers called the first Dhadak a watered-down version of Marathi film Sairat, Dhadak 2 is an amped up cry against casteism in higher education and love. 'Don't treat a film or book like religion,' says Iqbal. 'You're emotionally attached and that is fine, but a remake won't hurt the original and it's a chance for more people to watch it.'
Dhadak 2 is not an exact copy of Selvaraj's film. 'I felt we needed to talk about both caste and gender,' Iqbal says, adding that she wanted the female lead to have more agency than in the original. 'People can be flawed and ignorant and yet they can have a voice.' It's an important film for an age when young Indians still don't have the right to choose their life partner.
Full circle moment
Iqbal's award-winning 2018 short film Bebaak (meaning defiance) was about a young woman being told that she would only get a scholarship from a religious trust if she wore the hijab and behaved more 'Muslim'. It's based on something the director, once a quota student in a Muslim-run college, faced when she went to ask for financial assistance with untied hair and her unblinking attitude. Only, unlike the girl in Bebaak, Iqbal complied. 'It rattled me so much,' she says. 'I began looking critically at how patriarchy functions in my own community and family.'
After she graduated as an architect, Iqbal opted for production design. She worked in advertising but was drawn to the Hindi film industry, and has worked on half a dozen movies and web series such as Sacred Games, Lust Stories and Love Storiyaan. Telling her story in Bebaak was healing. 'I overcame that guilt or trauma of being in such a vulnerable position that I had to take that money,' she says.
Iqbal was born in Patna, one of four siblings. Her father Zahid, an RJ who wrote radio plays, was a man with emancipated ideas and he told her, when she was eight, that life was about more than getting married. The idea stuck. It was the age of Salim-Javed and someone suggested that Zahid try his hand at writing for Hindi films, so he moved to Mumbai in the 1970s. At one point, he worked with director Ramanand Sagar on the TV series Ramayan. 'I love to tell people that my father cast Ram and Sita,' Iqbal says. The family followed him in 1988 and lived on the 'fringes of the metro' in Vasai. Iqbal's father never made it as an independent writer and years later, his daughter felt like she had to 'complete that circle' for him.
The personal is political
The issue of identity and marriage is one Iqbal has engaged with since 2008, when her brother informed the family that he was in love with a Hindu woman. 'It was very shocking for my parents and I also thought my brother was doing the wrong thing,' she says. 'Back then, we believed that whatever parents say is right.'
A year later, her second brother announced he was seeing a Malayali woman and then, her sister fell in love with a Gujarati man. All three siblings are in interfaith marriages. 'My mom used to think her children are behaving like this because we are not upper middle class or rich,' says Iqbal. 'I told her Anil Ambani also married someone against his parents' wishes. Being with someone you chose is not about money or disrespecting parents.'
After chaos and cancellations, the family emerged stronger. 'My extended family have become better people because my siblings took a stand,' she says. 'In their way, they made the world a better place.' In an industry that rushes to label itself 'apolitical', Iqbal practises that feminist maxim — the personal is political.
Representation matters
Her expertise in production design means Iqbal is adept at building worlds and backstories. At some point during the making of Dhadak 2, the costume team wanted to know how authentic the film would look. 'It has to look as real as possible,' Iqbal told them. 'We have to buy a ₹100 shirt, not a ₹2,500 shirt and then age it to look like a cheaper shirt.'
She cites the example of Anurag Kashyap's 2018 film Mukkabaaz, about a Varanasi-based boxer, on which she was production designer. 'We would never shoot with new things,' she says. 'We would buy stuff and request the neighbours to give us their old stuff to build a lived-in environment.'
Iqbal makes films because she wants to make a difference. She wants a student in Kota who is feeling bullied in college to see themselves represented in her film. The power of mainstream cinema lies in its reach, and when people watch her film, she hopes they will think: 'I saw myself on screen.'
The writer is a Bengaluru-based journalist and the co-founder of India Love Project on Instagram.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Kingdom' Box office collection day 2: Vijay Deverakonda's spy action thriller collects Rs 25.50 crore in India
Picture Credit: X Vijay Deverakonda 's much-awaited action thriller 'Kingdom' hit theatres on Thursday, and early box office reports show that the film has had a fairly good start. Directed by Gowtam Tinnanuri , after a strong opening performance, 'Kingdom' earned approximately Rs 25.50 crore in India in total in two days. As per early estimates from Sacnilk, 'Kingdom' opened with an impressive Rs 18 crore on its first day. The film saw a drop on day 2, bringing in around Rs 7.50 crore, which is still a respectable number given it was a working weekday. It will be seen how the movie will perform over the weekend, especially with positive word-of-mouth and strong viewer interest. According to a social media post shared by the makers, the movie has already minted over Rs 39 crore worldwide. Theatre Occupancy In terms of audience turnout, the film recorded an overall Telugu occupancy of 42.56% on Friday, August 1. The turnout varied across the day, with the morning shows witnessing a slow start at 27.39%. However, by the evening, numbers picked up to 43.21%, peaking at 61.50% during the night shows. While the film performed decently in the Telugu belt, it saw a more modest turnout in Tamil-speaking regions. On the same day, the overall Tamil occupancy stood at 17.41%. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo Morning shows recorded just 8.44%, improving slightly in the afternoon with 20.18%. The evening shows maintained a 17.75% occupancy, while night shows peaked at 23.26%. About the film 'Kingdom' tells the story of Suri, played by Vijay Deverakonda, a police constable turned spy who is sent on a covert mission to Sri Lanka. Alongside national duty, Suri is also on a personal quest to find his long-lost brother, Siva, played by Satyadev. The movie stars Vijay alongside Satyadev, Venkatesh, and Bhagyashri Borse. The film is currently competing with Pawan Kalyan's 'Hari Hara Veera Mallu', which was released the week before.


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Saiyaara' Box Office collection day 15: Ahaan Panday-Aneet Padda's film maintains its hold amid competition from ‘Son of Sardaar 2' and ‘Dhadak 2'; mints over Rs 4 crore
The romantic drama 'Saiyaara', starring newcomers Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda , continues to charm audiences as it enters its third week in cinemas. According to early estimates by Sacnilk, the film collected Rs 4.25 crore on Day 15 (2nd Friday), taking its total to a whopping Rs 284.75 crore in just 15 days. This makes it one of the biggest box office hits of 2025. Two weeks of solid numbers 'Saiyaara' had a blockbuster start and has continued its steady momentum into the third week. The film collected Rs 107.75 crore in Week 2 alone, proving that it is still drawing big crowds well beyond its opening weekend Day-wise earnings so far Week 1: Day 1 (Friday): Rs 21.5 crore Day 2 (Saturday): Rs 26 crore Day 3 (Sunday): Rs 35.75 crore Day 4 (Monday): Rs 24 crore Day 5 (Tuesday): Rs 25 crore Day 6 (Wednesday): Rs 21.5 crore Day 7 (Thursday): Rs 19 crore Total Week 1: Rs 172.75 crore Week 2: Day 8 (Friday): Rs 18 crore Day 9 (Saturday): Rs 26.5 crore Day 10 (Sunday): Rs 30 crore Day 11 (Monday): Rs 9.25 crore Day 12 (Tuesday): Rs 10 crore Day 13 (Wednesday): Rs 7 crore Day 14 (Thursday): Rs 6.5 crore Week 3: Day 15 (2nd Friday): Rs 4.25 crore (early estimate) Total collection so far: Rs 284.75 crore Steady occupancy across shows On August 1 (Friday), the film had an overall 19.42% occupancy for its Hindi shows. Morning shows recorded 11.89%, while afternoon shows improved to 19.15%. Evening shows saw 20.24% occupancy, and night shows peaked at 26.40%. This steady attendance proves that audiences are still turning up in good numbers to watch the romantic drama on the big screen. Competing with fresh new releases Though 'Saiyaara' has remained strong, it now faces new competition. Ajay Devgn 's 'Son of Sardaar 2' and Triptii Dimri-Siddhant Chaturvedi's 'Dhadak 2' both hit cinemas on Day 15. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo According to Sacnilk, 'Son of Sardaar 2' earned Rs 6.75 crore, while 'Dhadak 2' collected Rs 3.35 crore on their opening day. These fresh releases may slow down the momentum of 'Saiyaara', especially going into the weekend. Another strong box office competitor is 'Mahavtar Narsimha', which has been performing well in recent days. As more options enter the theatres, it remains to be seen how 'Saiyaara' will hold its ground. Can it reach Rs 300 crore? With Rs 284.75 crore already in the bag, 'Saiyaara' is now inching closer to the Rs 300 crore mark. While the pace has slightly slowed down, all eyes are on the weekend. If numbers go up again on Saturday and Sunday, the film could very well hit the milestone.

The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Telangana's surrogacy scam: The business of selling babies
The Secunderabad railway station in Telangana is a noisy transit hub. Thousands of people enter and exit the concourse every day. Ad jingles in Hindi, Telugu, English, and Bengali, about the various medical procedures offered by hospitals across the city, blare over the din. Billboards outside the station feature smiling couples with babies. The city, along with Hyderabad, is a significant hub for medical tourism in India. In August 2024, after having done some research, Sonam Singh and her husband Akshay travelled to Secunderabad from Kuharwas village near Jhunjhunu in Rajasthan for an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) procedure. They rented a house near the railway station and began searching on the Internet for hospitals nearby. Near the railway station, they found the Universal Srushti Fertility Centre, which promised them an 85% success rate for an IVF procedure. The hopeful couple met the owner, Pachipala Namratha aka Athaluri Namratha, 64. 'The test results showed that we were medically fit to conceive,' says Sonam, speaking over the phone from Kuharwas. 'But the doctor insisted that we opt for surrogacy. She told us that it was safer and more reliable. She also assured us that the clinic would use our sperm and egg, and also handle all the paperwork and legalities.' While an IVF procedure can cost anywhere between ₹2 lakh and ₹6 lakh per cycle, Namratha told the couple that surrogacy would cost them ₹30 lakh. She asked Sonam and Akshay to transfer half the amount through their bank account and pay the remaining in cash, supposedly for the surrogate. Convinced, the couple made their first payment on August 16, 2024. According to the First Information Report filed by Akshay, Namratha also promised the couple that 'a healthy child [would be] delivered... after DNA confirmation.' Nearly a year later, on June 5, Sonam and Akshay were handed a baby at Lotus Hospital in Visakhapatnam. However, the couple grew suspicious when Namratha's clinic refused to perform the DNA test. They took the infant to the DNA Forensics Laboratory in Vasant Kunj, Delhi. To their shock, the results showed that the baby was not theirs. When they returned to Secunderabad to confront Namratha, she had disappeared. Sonam and Akshay approached the Gopalpuram police in Secunderabad, which investigated the matter and uncovered a baby-selling racket. The police booked Namratha under Sections 61, 316, 335, 336, and 340 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Act, 2023, which deal with criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust by carriers, forgery of documents, and related offences. They also booked her under Sections 38, 39, and 40 of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, which deal with prohibitions, punishments, and penalties related to surrogacy practices. Sourcing surrogates According to the Gopalapuram police, Universal Srushti Fertility Centre has cheated at least 15 couples. Promising these couples a baby through surrogacy, it has charged them between ₹20 lakh and ₹30 lakh each, and handed them babies not related to them. It has also furnished falsified documents, say the police. An investigation has revealed that the clinic paid commissions to smaller centres for referrals of potential surrogate mothers and women who wanted to undergo abortions, forged medical reports, and operated without proper licensing. According to the police, an agent called Dhanasri Santoshi struck a deal between a couple from Assam and the clinic. They say the Assamese couple's baby was given to the couple from Rajasthan. The police have arrested the couple from Assam on charges of selling their baby. 'Instead of getting ₹15 lakh, the couple from Assam got ₹90,000 for selling their baby,' says a police officer. The baby has been moved to foster care at Shishu Vihar, a childcare centre under the Women and Child Welfare Department. The police add that they have discovered a disturbing pattern in how surrogates are sourced. The sealed medical facility in Secunderabad is surrounded by lodges and bed-and-breakfast rooms. These lodging facilities were used to house women. A police officer says, 'The agents would approach vulnerable women, particularly those seeking abortions, and offer them money to continue their pregnancy so that they could take the baby later. These newborns would then be passed off as children conceived through surrogacy. This is how people were misled into believing that the babies were biologically theirs.' In at least four known cases in Telangana, women were not paid at all and completely abandoned post-delivery, the officer adds. On November 26, 2024, a woman engaged as a surrogate by a couple died after falling from the ninth floor of a building in Raidurgam in the western part of Hyderabad. According to the police, the victim and her husband, both natives of Odisha, were given accommodation by Rajesh Babu and his wife at their residence. When Rajesh allegedly tried to sexually assault the 26-year-old woman, she tried to escape through the balcony and slipped and died. She was purportedly brought to the city through middlemen for surrogacy for ₹10 lakh, say police reports. Donors in queue As the police widened their probe, they raided a facility operating under the name, Indian Sperm Tech, near Secunderabad East Metro Station, located about 400 metres away from the fertility clinic. They found 17 sperm donors and 11 egg donors waiting in queue at the facility. 'The women donors were brought from Delhi, and the men from Andhra Pradesh and other parts of Telangana. The sperm donors, mostly aged between 22 and 30, were paid ₹1,000-₹1,500 per sample. The men were in need of quick cash,' says a police officer who led the raid. L. Shiva was among the people arrested by the police in the midnight raid. Shiva, 35, from Vizianagaram, brought egg and sperm donors and connected them to the hospital. Another broker who was arrested hails from Indore in Madhya Pradesh. One of the egg donors caught in the raid was a 30-year-old resident from Baksa, Assam. Indian Sperm Tech, reportedly headquartered in Ahmedabad, had allegedly set up the sperm collection unit in Secunderabad without a valid license. 'It is a diagnostic centre,' says an officer from the District Medical and Health Officer's office. 'They collect sperm samples, freeze them, and send them to Ahmedabad. The processed samples (isolated and concentrated to select the healthiest sperm) are then returned with reports and sold to clinics across Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh. The place has been operating for two years without registration.' In trouble before It is a typically busy weekday afternoon on St. Johns Road in Secunderabad. But just a short turn away from this arterial road, the noise fades. A narrow bylane, about 20 feet wide, is almost hidden in plain sight. Two old gates, one swung wide open and the other barely ajar, lead into it. Two policemen sit here, silent witnesses to what the North Zone police uncovered. The building of Namratha's clinic has been sealed and the clinic shut down, following an investigation that exposed the baby-selling racket running under the guise of fertility treatments. 'The hospital operated only on the first two floors. The rest were empty,' says one constable. The two floors were filled with equipment required for childcare and fertility treatment. Rajesh Ravi lived here for 16 years before moving closer to the city centre. He is shocked by the revelations. 'You live somewhere for over a decade and you think you know your neighbourhood. I found nothing suspicious. The only time we were mildly inconvenienced was when too many patients came and there would be many cars on the street,' he says. Rajesh says there was a police case involving the same place about 10 years ago. 'No one talked about it much because back then, news on social media did not reach us as fast as it does now,' he says. 'We knew what was happening here,' says Manu, a lawyer who lives across the street of the four-storied Rushi Test Tube Bab Cent. While the name in English has missing letters, the name in Telugu etched beneath it reveals the complete name — Srusthi Test Tube Baby Centre. 'This place was sealed five times earlier. But eventually things got back to 'normal'. This time I think it is serious and she (Namratha) will not be allowed to carry on the business.' The Telangana Medical Council says Namratha was involved in a surrogacy scandal in 2016. A U.S.-based couple, who had used the clinic's services, had discovered that the child born to them through a surrogate was not biologically related to them. 'Following a police case and court hearings, we suspended the doctor's license for five years, with a lifetime ban on conducting surrogacy procedures,' says Dr. G Srinivas, Vice-Chairman of the Council. Yet, when the suspension period ended, the doctor returned, seeking to have her license reinstated. 'We refused. She was still involved in a court case, and our rules are clear on that,' Dr. Srinivas adds. A stringent law As surrogacy has become an increasingly popular option for couples grappling with infertility, Indian law has become more stringent to ensure that the practice remains ethical and free from commercial exploitation. What once operated in legal grey zones is now bound by clear rules, thanks to the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021. Under the Act, only altruistic surrogacy is permitted in India. This means a surrogate mother cannot be paid for carrying a child, except for her medical expenses and insurance coverage. Commercial surrogacy, any arrangement involving monetary compensation or profit, is banned and is a punishable offence. According to the Act, all surrogacy procedures must take place at clinics registered under the Act and authorised by the office officially designated as the State Appropriate Authority. . These clinics must comply with strict medical standards and ethical norms. Any attempt to bypass the law, whether through brokers, unregistered clinics, or financial inducements, is considered a criminal offence, punishable with imprisonment of up to 10 years and fines reaching ₹10 lakh. Fertility specialists say the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Regulation Act, 2021, and the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, have brought much-needed order to what was once a loosely regulated and, at times, opaque system. Dr. Preethi Dayal, who runs the Preethi Fertility Centre in Jangaon district, says prior to the enforcement of the ART law in January 2023, 'many centres operated without oversight. You could bring in any random donor, collect the sample, and proceed with checks or documentation. But we are now bound by very strict protocols. Every donor must be sourced only through a registered ART bank, which keeps Aadhaar-linked records of every sample, though the identity is never disclosed to either doctors or patients.' She adds that the new law mandates comprehensive screening of all donors, including genetic testing, and imposes tight eligibility criteria based on age and health. 'There is no room for ambiguity now. Everything has to be documented and traceable.' Dr. Preethi also points out that, legally and ethically, all third-party donor procedures must be conducted with confidentiality. 'Patients are never informed about the identity of the donor. The child born through surrogacy belongs legally and emotionally to the intended parents. That is the framework we follow,' Dr. Preethi says. To reduce the risk of human error, the doctor says many IVF clinics have now adopted the RI Witness system, a high-tech safety protocol that tracks every sample using barcode verification. 'Every patient is given a barcode-linked card. Before processing a sample, we scan the card in the system. If there is any mismatch, the entire hospital is alerted,' she says. While many corporate hospitals have already adopted this system, Dr. Preethi says smaller or less-regulated clinics may not yet have the infrastructure or the will to comply. 'Some centres are still conducting 10 to 15 IVF cycles a day. Without safeguards like the RI Witness system, the chances of mix-ups increase,' she says. Additional reporting by Naveen Kumar Names have been changed to protect privacy