
Blue Angels jets killed my beloved pet cat Layla...then did something that tipped me over the edge
Lauren Ann Lombardi's 14-year-old cat Layla died on August 11 after suffering from congestive heart disease, which the cat mom claims was worsened by noise from the Blue Angels.
'Layla's final days on Earth were marred by sadistic suffering - cowering in terror beneath furniture while her ailing heart struggled against the Blue Angels' relentless noise pollution,' her federal lawsuit said.
Lombardi's lawsuit filed in the Western District Court of Washington on Monday alleged that one year before Layla's death, she messaged the Blue Angels on Instagram to complain about the sound, but was blocked by their account.
The lawsuit claims, 'Every August, a squadron of F/A-18E/F Super Hornets multirole fighter aircraft descend upon the Puget Sound with the subtlety of a military occupation, conducting screeching low altitude flights with their twin jet engines reaching speeds of over 700 mph.'
In August 2023, one year before Layla's passing, Lombardi sent the Blue Angles explicit messages which stated: 'Stop with your f*****g b******t you are terrorizing my cat and all the other animals and wildlife. F**k off' and 'Nobody gives a f**k about your stupid little planes.'
A few days later, she attempted to send them another message calling them 'cowards,' but it was never delivered 'due to the blocking,' the lawsuit claims.
'An American citizen exercised her Constitutional right to criticize her government's role in her daughter's suffering,' the filing said.
'In response, a cadre of emotionally fragile snowflakes masquerading as naval officers chose the coward's path: they silenced this citizen's speech, violated their oath to the Constitution, and brought disgrace upon the uniform they claim to honor.'
In the summer of 2024, Layla's heart condition worsened and Lombardi said that despite her efforts to block the noise, the Blue Angels' 'sonic barrage' tortured her cat in her final days.
'Even through the narcotic fog of sedation and her weakened state, Layla's primitive limbic system overruled her medication and she fled in primal panic beneath furniture, her labored breathing escalating to clinically dangerous levels,' the lawsuit said.
'Whatever bandwidth Layla's walnut-sized brain could previously gorge upon had been narrowed to a single overwhelming frequency: pure debilitating terror.'
Lombardi is seeking to have the Blue Angels unblock her account and told KIRO Newsradio she is willing to do whatever it takes.
'They will never be able to wait me out,' she said. 'I'm a very spiteful, vengeful person. I have nothing but time on my hands.'
The lawsuit also states that she is seeking to have her attorney fees covered and 'any additional relief as may be just and proper.'
Notably, her attorney is also her husband, Nacim Bouchtia, who is listed as Layla's cat father in her obituary.
'[The Blue Angels] continued blocking prevented her from expressing her grief and renewed criticism of the government actions that contributed to her beloved companion's death and suffering, compounding her Constitutional injury during a time when her need for expressive speech was most relevant,' the lawsuit said.
'A year later, when that same vulnerable creature died after enduring yet another sonic assault during her final days on Earth, the Navy's Constitutional betrayal compounded the tragedy — an American remained silenced, unable to voice her grief or otherwise hold her government accountable for its role in her family's suffering.'
The Blue Angels next show in Seattle is scheduled for August 2 and August 3 at the Boeing Seafair Air Show, according to their website.
On social media, many locals were sympathetic to Lombardi and agreed the noise is less than desirable, but felt the lawsuit was taking it too far.
'It's not the Blue Angels, I'm sorry about your cat but I think it had something going on prior to the show,' one person said.
'I certainly can understand a cat having panic attacks from the noise. I have a cat that is very stressed by fireworks. I think a lawsuit is ridiculous though,' said another.
'I'm a cat person. I feel bad for her cat… but this is… a bit much,' said a third.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
PHOTO COLLECTION: AP Top Photos of the Day, Monday, July 28, 2025
News PHOTO COLLECTION: AP Top Photos of the Day, Monday, July 28, 2025 Show all 13


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Dear Richard Madeley: My wife and I no longer seem to be able to sleep in the same room
Dear Richard, My wife and I are in our late 50s, and lately we've both started to sleep more lightly, as seems common at this stage of life. Sometimes she or, less commonly, I migrate to the spare room for some portion of the night, where we can read for a bit and hopefully drift off to sleep again. Usually I go to bed an hour or so after my wife, and she's already asleep when I get there. My problem is that I have started to feel really tense when I get into bed, which makes me more fidgety. This often wakes her up, which I feel bad about. I'm not worrying about work, as she says she often does in the night – just about waking her. I sleep more soundly when she's away, though I also miss her presence a great deal. And I've tried forsaking the late-night film and going to bed at the same time as her, but that doesn't seem to work. I told her that I was twitchy in the night because I was worried about waking her and she seemed to appreciate the kindness of the thought but then got quite defensive, as if I was accusing her of being oversensitive. I realise we're lucky to have a spare room – though our bedroom is my favourite room in the house, and I remember how happy it made me to think I'd be sharing it with her every night. Is it just the new normal when you get to our age, or is there something we can do to break these cycles? – S, via email Dear S, I can see the ribbons of nascent guilt rippling through your letter, and I feel rather sorry for you. There's no need for such self-chastisement, S. You should step back from this sleep scenario and see it for what it is – a timely readjustment to your marital arrangements. Let's deal with the elephant in the room straight off. Sex. You don't have to sleep together – as in zizz together – to make love, S. Actually spending time mutually unconscious, pillow-to-pillow, is not a requirement for an active love life. Sex and sleeping can be mutually exclusive. In fact, many couples swear by it. And yes, you are right. Judging purely by the number of letters I receive that are broadly similar to yours, advancing years bring lighter, more fractured sleep patterns. You are not alone in finding sleep in a single bed more restful and refreshing than in twitching, super-conscious coupledom. My advice is to go with the flow and stop beating yourself up about this. You're both getting older and things change, physically and psychologically. If you sleep better apart, and you have the means to do so – then sleep apart! It's not a betrayal or a failure or a calculated insult, and it's certainly not, as I say, a comment on how attractive you find one another. It's simply the next phase, the next chapter, in the long story of your lives together. Don't be frightened to turn the page. Sleep well, the pair of you.


The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
Have you been a victim of the ‘gen Z stare'? It's got nothing on the gen X look of dread
Have you been the victim of a gen Z stare? Maybe you have but didn't realise, because you didn't know it existed, so let me explain: gen Z, now aged 13 to 28, have apparently adopted a widely deplored stare: blank, expressionless and unnerving. The stare is often deployed in customer service contexts, and many emotions can be read into it, including 'boredom, indifference, superiority, judgment or just sheer silliness', according to Forbes, whose writer described his unease in Starbucks when faced with a 'flat, zombie-like look that was difficult to read'. Hang on, aren't oversensitive snowflakes supposed to be younger people, not journalists my age? Has a generation ever been so maligned as Z? Probably, but I'm mortified by the mutterings about gen Z, when they are so self-evidently at the pointy end of older people's poor past (and present) decision-making. They don't get jobs, homes or a livable planet – but we're getting huffy about their 'rudeness' and 'lack of social skills'? Anything short of blending us into their protein shakes seems fair to me at this point. But I do get it, sort of. Young people have been treating their elders to scornful stares since homo sapiens first gruntingly suggested a 'nice walk' to their offspring, and it's easy to get defensive and lash out. As a 'meme scholar' suggested, crushingly, to NPR: 'Maybe what we're witnessing … is some boredom, especially with who they're interacting with.' That's exactly what I was afraid of. But everyone succumbs to the odd vacant stare and it's not necessarily directed at, or derogatory to, the stare-ee. I'm not qualified to parse gen Z stares (maybe they're thinking about matcha; maybe they're actually mewing?), but I can definitely explain some reasons my own people, gen X (aged between 45 and 60), go starey, slack-mouthed and silent – and why it's almost certainly not about you. We can't hear getting a bit deaf but struggling to accept it, so we're fumbling our way through the world with context clues and inept lip reading. If you say something and we just stare blankly, we're probably trying to decide whether to deploy one of our catch-all non-committal responses ('mmm'; 'right?') or ask you to repeat yourself. Again. We suspect one of our idols is standing behind that Thom Yorke or your kid's design-tech teacher? Winona Ryder or some woman you recognise from wild swimming? We need to know. Something you said triggered a memory of a public information film we saw at primary school.'Building site'; 'railway line'; 'fireworks'; 'electricity substation': there are so many trigger words that summon a horrifying mental kaleidoscope of doom. We've just remembered we were too 'cool' to top up our pension, ha ha ha, oh that realisation hits, mid-conversation, and we need to take a beat to fight the rising tide of panic. We've heard an unusual bird call but it would be rude to use the Merlin app on our that a redstart? Something weird is happening to one of our teeth.A filling coming loose, a tooth crumbling, some kind of searing, definitely expensive, pain? Mortality starts in the mouth. We started thinking about the 19-year-old Reform councillor in Leicestershire who is now responsible for children and family the 22-year-old one in charge of adult social care who previously said 'depression isn't real'. Just an ill-defined, increasingly uneasy sensation that we've forgotten something important meeting. Our passwords. The keys. Your name. You said something we don't get 'slay' and 'mid' and we hoped we weren't 'delulu' to believe we 'understood the assignment'. But you've just come out with an expression so baffling, we are simply unable to deduce any meaning from context. Maybe we are going to 'crash out'? Just give us a silent, sweaty moment. You're watching video on your phone without this one is about you and it's entirely deserved. I use my eyes to try to bore decency into sodcasters; I just wish my eyes were lasers. We're existentially we just lapse into a thousand-yard stare that semaphores: 'Help, reality has become overwhelming; I need to disassociate momentarily.' And who, of any generation, hasn't felt that this year? Perhaps the blank stare is actually proof there's more that unites than divides us. Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.