Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar supports Pahalgam attacker TRF, questions where is the proof of Kashmir attack
The Resistance Front
(TRF) as a
Foreign Terrorist Organisation
and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. The announcement was made by US Secretary of State
Marco Rubio
following a series of attacks the group has been linked to, including the brutal assault in Jammu and Kashmir earlier this year.
Just a day later, Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister
Ishaq Dar
delivered a pointed speech in Parliament, rejecting the accusations against TRF. Speaking about the UN Security Council's statement on the
Pahalgam attack
, he revealed that Pakistan had used its diplomatic position to keep TRF's name out of the official condemnation.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Project Management
Operations Management
Data Science
Management
Digital Marketing
MBA
Leadership
Artificial Intelligence
Data Analytics
MCA
Design Thinking
Cybersecurity
Data Science
Public Policy
healthcare
CXO
PGDM
Technology
Finance
others
Product Management
Degree
Others
Healthcare
Skills you'll gain:
Portfolio Management
Project Planning & Risk Analysis
Strategic Project/Portfolio Selection
Adaptive & Agile Project Management
Duration:
6 Months
IIT Delhi
Certificate Programme in Project Management
Starts on
May 30, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Project Planning & Governance
Agile Software Development Practices
Project Management Tools & Software Techniques
Scrum Framework
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Certificate Programme in IT Project Management
Starts on
Jun 20, 2024
Get Details
'We opposed the mention of TRF in the UNSC statement. I got calls from global capitals, but Pakistan will not accept,' Dar said. 'TRF was deleted, and Pakistan prevailed.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
New Container Houses Indonesia (Prices May Surprise You)
Container House | Search ads
Search Now
Undo
— OsintTV (@OsintTV)
He went further: 'We don't consider TRF illegal. Show us proof they carried out the Pahalgam attack. Show ownership by TRF. We won't accept the allegation, and TRF had to be deleted from the UN press release.'
A separate video clip from April, now resurfacing, shows Dar making similar remarks. 'Alhamdulillah, we are a non-permanent member of the UNSC. We don't consider TRF illegal. Show the evidence that TRF carried out the Pahalgam attack or prove its ownership. We will not accept these claims, TRF had to be deleted from the UN press release,' he can be heard saying.
Live Events
'TRF, a
Lashkar-e-Taiba
front and proxy, claimed responsibility for the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam attack which killed 26 civilians,' the US State Department said in a statement. It further noted, 'TRF has also claimed responsibility for several attacks against Indian security forces, including most recently in 2024.'
Rubio described the Pahalgam killings as 'the deadliest assault on civilians in India since 2008' and added, 'These actions demonstrate the Trump administration's commitment to protecting our national security interests and seeking justice for victims of terrorism.'
With the designation, TRF will now face US-led financial sanctions and its ability to draw support from individuals and entities under American jurisdiction will be restricted.
Jaishankar welcomes US decision
India responded swiftly to the US move. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar called the decision a strong signal of
India-US cooperation
on security issues.
'Appreciate SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF, a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy, as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam attack. Zero tolerance for terrorism,' Jaishankar posted on X.
— DrSJaishankar (@DrSJaishankar)
The Pahalgam massacre: What happened
The Pahalgam terror attack took place on 22 April and left 26 civilians dead. Most of the victims were Hindus. Survivors recalled that the gunmen separated the women and children, then ordered the men to recite the Islamic declaration of faith. Many were killed on the spot.
The assault was one of the most severe in recent years and ignited a wave of violence across the region. Over the next four days, escalating clashes along the Line of Control resulted in over 70 reported deaths. It was the worst standoff between Indian and Pakistani forces since the Kargil conflict in 1999.
TRF initially claimed responsibility for the attack in a post that was later deleted. Despite that, both India and the United States have cited intelligence linking TRF to the Lashkar-e-Taiba network, a UN-designated terrorist group operating out of Pakistan.
India continues to view TRF as a terror group operating under the umbrella of Lashkar-e-Taiba. New Delhi has consistently maintained that Pakistan backs such outfits as proxies to destabilise Kashmir and carry out cross-border attacks.
Pakistan, however, refuses to acknowledge TRF's involvement. Ishaq Dar's statements in Parliament reflect Islamabad's hardened stance, even in the face of international pressure and mounting evidence.
The contrasting reactions from India and Pakistan underscore the larger diplomatic battle now unfolding. On one side, the US and India are aligning on counter-terrorism. On the other, Pakistan is digging in its heels, rejecting any claims that tie TRF to the Pahalgam attack or to its soil.
The fallout from this will likely be felt beyond Kashmir. As global scrutiny grows, so will the pressure on Pakistan to explain its position.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
RS adjourned till Monday amid continued Oppn protest, legislative gridlock
The Rajya Sabha witnessed its fifth consecutive day of legislative impasse following persistent disruptions during the post-noon session, capping a day of high political tension and procedural deadlock. The Chair adjourned proceedings till Monday as Opposition parties sustained vociferous protests over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls. With the state heading into crucial Assembly elections later this year, the Opposition has raised sharp concerns over alleged discrepancies and procedural opacity surrounding the revision process, demanding a full-fledged debate under Rule 267. Despite repeated appeals from the Chair and Union ministers for order and constructive dialogue, the House remains mired in disruption, reflecting escalating tensions over electoral integrity and institutional accountability. Deputy Chairman Harivansh had earlier adjourned the House till noon after rejecting nearly 28 Opposition notices under Rule 267, which sought suspension of regular business to discuss issues ranging from the SIR in Bihar to constitutional concerns in Manipur and the impact of India-UK trade negotiations on the Indian economy. When the House reconvened at noon, Ghanshyam Tiwari resumed proceedings with Question Hour, calling BJP MP K. Lakshman (Uttar Pradesh) to seek a government response on a specific campaign initiative. However, the session quickly descended into chaos as Opposition members raised slogans, drowning out Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan's attempts to speak. Chouhan repeatedly appealed for order, stressing the importance of legislative business, but the disruptions continued unabated. Anticipating further breakdown, the Chair adjourned the House till Monday. Earlier in the day, Zero Hour saw similar scenes. Despite Deputy Chairman Harivansh's efforts to facilitate urgent interventions, members, including Ajit Bhual, Rajiv Shukla, Ranjeet Ranjan, Trichi Siva, Santosh Kumar P., and Ramji Lal Suman, were denied floor time, prompting loud protests. The Chair invoked Rule 235, which prohibits placard displays and interruptions, before adjourning the House. Actor-politician Kamal Haasan, founder of Makkal Needhi Maiam (MNM), made his parliamentary debut, taking oath in Tamil as a Rajya Sabha Member. Backed by the DMK-led alliance, Haasan was elected unopposed and pledged to uphold constitutional values. He was joined by fellow DMK members Rajathi, S.R. Sivalingam, and P. Wilson. Routine business continued in parallel. Commerce Minister Jitendra Prasad tabled the grant demands and a report on India's trade cooperation with Gulf nations. Members Ram Nath Thakur, Bhagirath Choudhary, Kiran Choudhary, and Shaktisinh Gohil laid committee reports. Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Dr L. Murugan outlined the legislative agenda for the coming week, including the Goa Bill 2024, the Merchant Shipping Bill, and two key sports-related legislations: the National Sports Governance Bill and the National Anti-Doping Bill 2025. The sports governance bill, in particular, proposes the creation of a Sports Regulatory Board and mandates ethical standards, athlete representation, and dispute resolution mechanisms. With the Opposition determined to press its demands and the government firm on procedural adherence, the Rajya Sabha faces a deepening impasse over electoral integrity, environmental accountability, and institutional transparency.
Fashion Value Chain
28 minutes ago
- Fashion Value Chain
Apparel Sector Welcomes India–UK FTA, Eyes Growth
The apparel industry has welcomed the signing of the India–United Kingdom Free Trade Agreement (FTA), describing it as a transformative move for bilateral trade. The deal was finalized during Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi's UK visit and was praised by Shri Sudhir Sekhri, Chairman of the Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC), who acknowledged the Prime Minister and Union Commerce Minister Shri Piyush Goyal for their leadership in securing the agreement. Calling it a 'milestone for India–UK strategic and economic ties,' Shri Sekhri emphasized the FTA's potential to accelerate garment trade, enhance market access, and generate employment in India's apparel sector. He noted that the agreement would help businesses from both nations thrive by simplifying compliance, reducing duties, and ensuring smoother customs procedures through mutual recognition of standards. With duty-free access for Indian apparel products to the UK, the industry expects a renewed momentum in exports. Shri Sekhri added that this development reflects a shared commitment between the two nations to deepen cooperation and foster reliable trade partnerships. The UK, a major fashion hub, was the world's 5th largest garment importer in 2024, sourcing apparel worth USD 19.7 billion. India, with exports valued at USD 1.2 billion that year, ranked among its top four suppliers, mainly shipping cotton-based garments like t-shirts, dresses, and babywear. Currently, India faces a 9.6% duty on most garment exports to the UK. The FTA is expected to eliminate this barrier and support India's push to expand its presence, particularly in high-potential areas like winter wear and man-made fiber (MMF) garments where competitiveness has been a challenge.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India misses chance to tackle UK carbon tax in trade pact. Why is it concerning?
India's efforts to secure a concession for its small and medium enterprises under the UK's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) did not materialise, as the text of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) released on Thursday made no mention of a resolution on the contentious issue. The UK's CBAM, which is set to come into effect from January 1, 2027, is expected to impact India's exports of steel, aluminium and other carbon-intensive goods. India's steel and aluminium exports are already facing steep tariff restrictions from the US after US President Donald Trump raised the tariffs on the items to 50 per cent. An absence of a resolution not only weakens India's position—as it missed the opportunity to address the levy within a legal framework—but also casts a shadow over the duty concessions won for 99 per cent of its exports to the UK under the long-negotiated trade deal as UK could raise tariffs on industrial imports once it implements CBAM. Trade experts believe that if the UK has not conceded ground on the carbon tax, the EU may also refuse to offer any concessions on its own carbon measures. Hervé Delphin, EU Ambassador to India, told The Indian Express last month that the EU's CBAM is not part of negotiations. 'CBAM is not a trade measure. It is not part of trade and the FTA. It's about compliance with our climate agenda to accelerate decarbonisation,' Delphin told the newspaper. While the Ministry of Commerce and Industry claims that the UK trade deal will allow around 99 per cent of Indian exports to benefit from zero-duty access to the UK market, CBAM significantly could alter that. The UK government has said that the carbon tax will apply to both 'direct and indirect emissions' embodied in imported CBAM goods, 'including those emissions embodied in relevant precursor goods at a point further up the value chain'. This means that London, based on its carbon calculations, could impose duties on Indian intermediate exports as well as finished products. Indian goods exports worth at least $775 million to the UK, therefore, continue to face the risk of higher duties under its carbon tax mechanism. As per the CBAM regulation, the UK will place a carbon price on some of the most emissions-intensive industrial goods imported to the UK—covering the aluminium, cement, fertiliser, hydrogen, and iron & steel sectors—which are considered at risk of carbon leakage. But the scope will increase going forward. 'The sectoral and product-level scope of the CBAM will be kept under review beyond 2027 as new evidence comes to light to reflect changes to carbon leakage risk, as well as methodological and technological advances,' a statement read. India's exports to the UK rose by 12.6 per cent to $14.5 billion, while imports grew by 2.3 per cent to $8.6 billion in 2024–25. Bilateral goods trade between India and the UK increased to $21.34 billion in 2023–24 from $20.36 billion in 2022–23. As no concession was secured under the FTA, India could challenge the regulation at the WTO on the grounds that CBAM violates special and differential treatment (SDT) provisions, which advocate longer implementation periods for developing countries to safeguard their trade interests. However, trade law experts warn that the CBAM regulations in both the UK and EU may be in effect by the time the WTO rules on the matter, given the dysfunction of the organisation's Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). They also said there is limited likelihood of an adverse ruling on CBAM at the WTO, as the EU remains one of the strongest supporters of the institution. A more probable outcome would be adjustments to the regulation rather than its complete withdrawal. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
