logo
Today in History: The Seneca Falls Convention

Today in History: The Seneca Falls Convention

Boston Globe5 days ago
Advertisement
In 1848, the first 'Convention to discuss the social, civil, and religious condition and rights of Woman' convened at the Wesleyan Chapel in Seneca Falls, N.Y.
In 1969, Apollo 11 and its astronauts —Neil Armstrong, Edwin 'Buzz' Aldrin, and Michael Collins —went into orbit around the moon.
In 1975, the Apollo and Soyuz space capsules that were linked in orbit for two days separated.
In 1979, the Nicaraguan capital of Managua fell to Sandinista guerrillas, two days after President Anastasio Somoza fled the country.
In 1980, the Moscow Summer Olympics began, minus dozens of nations that were boycotting the games because of Soviet military intervention in Afghanistan.
In 1989, 111 people were killed when United Air Lines Flight 232, a DC-10 which sustained the uncontained failure of its tail engine and the loss of hydraulic systems, crashed while making an emergency landing at Sioux City, Iowa; 185 other people survived.
Advertisement
In 1990, baseball's all-time hits leader, Pete Rose, was sentenced in Cincinnati to five months in prison for tax evasion.
In 1993, President Bill Clinton announced a policy allowing gays to serve in the military under a compromise dubbed 'don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue.'
In 2006, prosecutors reported that Chicago police beat, kicked, shocked, or otherwise tortured scores of Black suspects from the 1970s to the early 1990s to try to extract confessions from them.
In 2005, President George W. Bush announced his choice of federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts Jr. to replace Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. (Roberts ended up succeeding Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, who died in September 2005; Samuel Alito followed O'Connor.)
In 2013, in a rare and public reflection on race, President Barack Obama called on the nation to do some soul searching over the death of Trayvon Martin and the acquittal of his shooter, George Zimmerman, saying the slain Black teenager 'could have been me 35 years ago.'
In 2018, a duck boat packed with tourists capsized and sank in high winds on a lake in the tourist town of Branson, Missouri, killing 17 people.
In 2021, Paul Allard Hodgkins, a Florida man who breached the U.S. Senate chamber on Jan. 6, 2021, carrying a Trump campaign flag, received an eight-month prison term in the first resolution of a felony case arising from the US Capitol insurrection. (In 2025, President Donald Trump pardoned, commuted the prison sentences, or vowed to dismiss the cases of all 1,500-plus people charged with crimes in the riot.)
Advertisement
In 2022, Britain
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wyoming rancher wants Supreme Court to slam door on ‘corner-crossing'
Wyoming rancher wants Supreme Court to slam door on ‘corner-crossing'

E&E News

time35 minutes ago

  • E&E News

Wyoming rancher wants Supreme Court to slam door on ‘corner-crossing'

A Wyoming rancher is asking the Supreme Court to reverse an appellate court's ruling on 'corner-crossing' that allows hunters and others to cross over slivers of private property on their way to public land throughout the West. Citing an 'important and recurring' question affecting property rights across 150 million acres, attorneys for the Iron Bar ranch urged the high court to scrutinize the earlier ruling issued last March by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. That unanimous decision by a three-judge appellate panel gave the green light to so-called corner-crossing, which occurs when an individual steps from one public tract to another, passing diagonally across two adjacent parcels of private property. Iron Bar's attorneys call this trespass. Advertisement 'This case presents questions of profound legal and practical significance,' a team led by attorney R. Reeves Anderson, identified as the counsel of record, wrote in a petition for a writ of certiorari filed with the Supreme Court.

Appeals court blocks Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship, upholding lower court order
Appeals court blocks Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship, upholding lower court order

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Appeals court blocks Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship, upholding lower court order

A divided federal appeals court panel on Wednesday ruled that President Trump's executive order outlawing birthright citizenship cannot go into effect, upholding a lower court order blocking the directive. In a 2-1 ruling, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals determined that Democratic attorneys general from Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon challenging Trump's Jan. 20 birthright citizenship executive order would be likely to succeed in demonstrating that it is unconstitutional. 'The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order's proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is Unconstitutional,' read the appeals court's majority opinion. 'We fully agree.' 3 The appeals court ruling comes after the Supreme Court curbed the use of nationwide injunctions in response to lawsuits against Trump's birthright citizenship order last month. AP Judges Michael Day Hawkins and Ronald M. Gould, both appointees of former President Bill Clinton, ruled in the majority, while Judge Patrick J. Bumatay, a Trump appointee, partially dissented. Bumatay argued that the states didn't have standing to sue the Trump administration over the order. 'Courts must be vigilant in enforcing the limits of our jurisdiction and our power to order relief,' Bumatay wrote. 'Otherwise, we risk entangling ourselves in contentious issues not properly before us and overstepping our bounds,' he added. 'No matter how significant the question or how high the stakes of the case — at all times, we must adhere to the confines of 'the judicial Power.'' The Trump-appointed judge did not express an opinion on the constitutionality of ending birthright citizenship. The judges in the majority found that the Democrat-led states were entitled to a nationwide injunction, because a narrower block would not provide them with 'complete relief.' The ruling keeps an injunction issued by Seattle District Judge John C. Coughenour in place. Federal judges in New Hampshire, Maryland and Massachusetts have also issued sweeping universal injunctions blocking Trump's order from taking effect. 3 The appeals court found that Democrat-led states challenging the executive order were likely to succeed. Michael Brochstein/ZUMA Press Wire / The appeals court order comes after the Supreme Court ruled last month that nationwide injunctions issued by lower-court judges 'likely exceed' the judicial branch's constitutional authority. The case centered on injunctions related to Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, and the high court curtailed the ability of federal judges to block presidential policies. The justices, however, allowed some plaintiffs — including those in class-action lawsuits and states — to continue to seek universal injunctions if needed for complete relief. Both avenues have been pursued by plaintiffs seeking to stop Trump's directive. Since the Supreme Court ruling, two courts — the Ninth Circuit and a New Hampshire district court — have issued temporary nationwide injunctions of Trump's birthright citizenship order. The Ninth Circuit panel concluded that the Seattle district court 'did not abuse its discretion in issuing a universal injunction in order to give the States complete relief.' 3 The appeals court agreed with the Democrat-led states and the lower court that deemed the order unconstitutional. Eric Kayne/ZUMA / Trump's executive order seeks to only grant automatic citizenship to children with at least one parent who is a US citizen or legal permanent resident. The 14th Amendment stipulates that '[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.' Trump maintains that birthright citizenship has been abused and ushered in an era of 'birth tourism,' in which foreign nationals have babies in the US to give their children citizenship. The president and his allies have also argued that the Civil War-era amendment was originally aimed at the children of freed slaves, and has since been improperly interpreted as applying to the children of migrants. The White House did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment.

Supreme Court Lets Trump Oust Top Consumer-Safety Officials
Supreme Court Lets Trump Oust Top Consumer-Safety Officials

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Supreme Court Lets Trump Oust Top Consumer-Safety Officials

A divided US Supreme Court let President Donald Trump temporarily remove three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, extending a line of decisions giving the White House more control over independent agencies. Over dissents from the court's three liberals, the justices on Wednesday put on hold a federal district court decision that said Trump was bound by job protections created by Congress for CPSC members. US District Judge Matthew Maddox's June 13 decision had reinstated the three commissioners after Trump fired them in May.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store