&w=3840&q=100)
Javed Akhtar reacts to Bollywood's silence on Operation Sindoor: 'If they're not speaking...'
Javed Akhtar recently reacted to Bollywood's silence on Operation Sindoor, the Indian government's counter-terror attack in the wake of the Pahalgam attack, which took place in Jammu and Kashmir. The legendary personality spoke candidly and shared his thoughts on the same.
'I spoke about it, I didn't stay silent. Sometimes people may not like what I say, sometimes they do. But I say what I believe is the truth. Now who doesn't speak. How would I know? many people are apolitical too,' he said while talking to The Lallantop.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Reflecting on his early days in the industry, Akhtar elaborated, 'Look, when I was young, even though I came from a politically conscious and very vocal family… But when my films were becoming hits one after another, I had no idea what was going on in politics… I probably didn't even read the newspaper. So that happens. Some people are just busy with their own work… If they're not speaking, so be it. What's the big deal? Some people are speaking. Many are. Others are chasing different goals… They want to earn more money or fame. Let them. It's not necessary for everyone to speak, or for us to ask why they didn't.'
The veteran lyricist and writer shared that a popular businessman recently confronted him on the same topic. 'Aapke Bollywood waale jo hain, nationalist films toh bohot banate hain… par iss maamle par sab chup hain,' the businessman reportedly said. Giving his witty reply, Akhtar said, 'First of all, the term 'Bollywood' itself is an anti-national name. You call the Indian film industry 'Bollywood'? In the world, if there's any industry that can compete with Hollywood, it's the Indian film industry. It has nearly wiped out European cinema. Our films are released in 136–137 countries on average… and you call it Bollywood?'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Radhika Apte Says Film Industry Isn't Supportive Of New Mothers: 'It's Really Difficult To...'
Last Updated: Radhika Apte says the film industry isn't conducive to the needs of new mothers, calling it 'really difficult' to balance long shoots with motherhood. Radhika Apte may have returned to work just a week after giving birth, but she's the first to admit that the Indian film industry isn't built to support women like her. Speaking from London while caring for her six-month-old daughter, Apte offered a candid perspective on the challenges new mothers face in showbiz. 'I don't think they are," she said when asked if the film industry is conducive to the needs of new moms. 'I don't know how I'm going to navigate that going ahead." Her comments come at a time when conversations around maternity in the entertainment business are gaining traction. Just this week, Deepika Padukone was reported to have exited Sandeep Reddy Vanga's Spirit, allegedly due to requests for shorter, more manageable work hours post-pregnancy. Meanwhile, actor-producer Ajay Devgn claimed at a trailer launch that eight-hour workdays were becoming the norm for 'people at large," not just mothers. But Radhika isn't so sure. 'It's really difficult to work in our film industry, given the number of hours and how we film generally, and the time for which we don't get to see the child," she explained. 'So I guess I'll just have to figure it out now." This struggle isn't just theoretical for her. Radhika worked through her pregnancy, turning in a writing draft the day before she went into labour, and was back on Zoom calls for virtual meetings within a week of delivery—one of which she attended while breastfeeding, a moment she captured in a photo shared last December. On the work front, Radhika Apte's latest film Sister Midnight is set to hit Indian theatres on May 30. The film, which originally premiered at the 2023 Cannes Film Festival, features Radhika as Uma, a bold, rebellious woman challenging societal norms, particularly those around arranged marriage. The cast also includes Ashok Pathak, Chhaya Kadam, Smita Tambe, and Navya Sawant. Sister Midnight was released in the US on May 16 and is slated for a French release on June 11. Radhika was last seen in a cameo in Merry Christmas, starring Katrina Kaif and Vijay Sethupathi. First Published:
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
The Failure of Failure?
Santosh Desai is a leading ad professional. He says he has strayed into writing entirely by accident, and for this he is "grateful". "City City Bang Bang" looks at contemporary Indian society from an everyday vantage point. It covers issues big and small, tends where possible to avoid judgmental positions, and tries instead to understand what makes things the way they are. The desire to look at things with innocent doubt helps in the emergence of fresh perspectives and hopefully, of clarity of a new kind. LESS ... MORE Failure, today, is not allowed to die its natural death. It must be rehabilitated, repackaged, and recycled—turned into grit, grace, or growth. It is no longer a terminus but a threshold. The fall is not the end of the story, only the second act. Fail better. Fail forward. Fail fast. But by all means, fail usefully. We tell ourselves we are being more open, more real. We celebrate vulnerability—as long as it is accompanied by hindsight. We speak of rejection, loss, collapse—but only once we have emerged intact, triumphant even, with a lesson to teach. The shame of failure is permitted, but only briefly and only as narrative bait. There are many costumes we dress failure in. The most flattering is redemption. The stumble that made us stronger. The heartbreak that made us wiser. The bankruptcy that taught us discipline. All is forgiven, as long as it leads somewhere better. This is LinkedIn failure at its best, a pose worn by the successful to increase engagement, to say, Once I was a loser like the rest of you, but fear not; you too can be redeemed if I could be. Statistically speaking, It is an inclusive lie, but it serves its purpose. Then there's the tragic-but-noble failure. The one born of principle, conviction, or timing. The artist who never sold, the idealist who died unknown, and the fighter who was undone by the world, not by their own missteps. This version dignifies failure—but it also aestheticises it. It is curated suffering. It leaves the soul intact. It makes us suffer on their account, to feel righteous from a distance, having no skin in the game. It gives us some succour to know that our failures may exist despite our being geniuses. In our mind at least. Look at van Gogh. And when neither nobility nor redemption is available, we default to utility. Failure becomes feedback. A prototype. A data point. No time to feel, just iterate. The modern world is full of people who kept trying, or to use the language of the start-up, pivoting till something clicked and they made podcasts about it. The overblown narrative that surrounds failure today is based on truth. People do redeem themselves, failure does teach lessons that success can come nowhere near, it builds resilience and humility and can makes us better not just in terms of material progress but as people. The problem perhaps is that this narrative is purely instrumental – it thinks of failure as a means to an end, burying the fact that there can be another kind of failure. The one we don't know how to name. The failure that simply hurts. The kind that exposes you—not as a misunderstood genius or a courageous risk-taker, but as someone who misjudged themselves. The kind that brings not growth, but shame. Not insight, but silence. The kind of failure that makes you smaller, and not in a good way. Smaller, because you thought you could. And you couldn't. This failure doesn't want to be posted about. It doesn't want to be learnt from. It doesn't want to teach you anything. It just wants to exist—to be carried, not converted. We often say that younger generations lack the mental equipment to deal with failure. That Gen Z, in particular, is fragile, thin-skinned, over-therapised. That they crumble under pressure and overshare their wounds. But we, the older cohort, are hardly models of grace either. We pride ourselves on coping, on never making a fuss. But our inability to accept failure is just as deep—only better disguised. We don't collapse; we deflect. We don't feel; we reframe. We have grown up believing that failure must always be private, always provisional, always recoverable. What we cannot bear is the idea that we may have been wrong about ourselves—that we aimed for something and missed, not because the world was cruel, but because we weren't enough. The truth is, all of us are not built for greatness. A lot of us will lead ordinary lives, reaching destinations no one tells inspiring stories about. The sense of failure is often a product of unrealistic goals, something our culture is loath to admit is a real thing. We speak the language of stoicism, but we are terrified of consequence. We cannot stand the thought that some things break and stay broken. That shame is not always a dysfunction. That some failures are just failures. But maybe we need a place for that again. A place where not all pain needs to be processed. Where not all scars are signs of strength. Where we can fail—and not redeem, not repurpose, not post—but simply live with the weight of it. Because failure, in its rawest form, teaches us nothing. It just tells the truth. And that, perhaps, is enough. Or should be. The modern tendency to take all that is hard and bitter and turn into a wellness potion of some kind serves to disconnect us from the idea of pain. Adversity takes on an unrecognisable shape with well-meaning language crowding out all exits. It is important to recognise that we will have wounds, carry scars, grapple with our own failings. As people we wear skins over skins – layers grown not from growth but from the act of being. From enduring, not transforming. And that should mean something. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ajay Devgn and Kajol wish R. Madhavan a 'shaitaani' birthday on social media
, the darling Indian actor, celebrated his 55th birthday on June 1, 2025. Among all the soulful birthday wishes on the internet, including the fan edits and photos, The Devgns adorably wished him in a pun-ful social media post. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Ajay Devgn wishes R. Madhavan on his birthday... Ajay Devgn, who worked with the actor in 'Shaitaan' and is soon collaborating with him again for 'De De Pyaar De 2,' wished Madhavan on Instagram. The 'Raid 2' actor shared a story where the actors are looking at each other with a brooding face. Captioning the story with, 'Look serious hai lekin dimaag mein sirf shaitaani chal rahi hai. Happy Birthday bro @actormaddy,' Ajay referenced the hit film, 'Shaitaan,' where Madhavan portrayed the evil monster with a goal to accomplish. Ajay donned a maroon shirt and a pair of glasses while folding his hands, and R. Madhavan wore an all black ensemble with a t-shirt and jacket, with a pair of shades as he joined his hands. Kajol wishes R. Madhavan on his birthday... The stunning actress and Ajay Devgn's wife, Kajol, wished R. Madhavan on Instagram as well. The 'Maa' actress shared a picture of Madhavan with salt-and-pepper hair, where he donned a maroon shirt and a wide smile. Captioning the photo, she wrote, 'Shaitaan is getting older, wiser and sneakier, happy birthday @actormaddy,' referring to the sinister thriller film 'Shaitaan' as well. About R. Madhavan's surprise appearance at the trailer launch of 'Maa' Recently, during the trailer launch of 'Maa' starring Kajol, Ronit Boseroy, and Indraneil Shubhra Sen Gupta, R. Madhavan made a surprise appearance. The speculations quickly sparked regarding his appearance in the film as well, as 'Maa' is set in the same universe as 'Shaitaan.' 'Maa' is a supernatural thriller about a mother who becomes a warrior to protect her children.
