Reform councillors were ‘shocked' that they won their seats, says Farage
Since then, KCC opposition leader Antony Hook says 'most committees have not met once', adding that no 'key' decisions have been taken.
Reform enjoyed great success in the council elections (Gareth Fuller/PA)
On Monday, Mr Farage arrived at Kent County Council and was met by KCC leader Linden Kemkaran for an update on the authority's work.
After the meeting, he told the PA news agency: 'I'm very proud of the election result, the stunning number of seats that we won – way more than we thought – and so there were an awful lot of shocked new councillors walking in here a few weeks ago.
'We've established a cabinet, we've got a full council meeting on Thursday at which our first big savings will be announced.
Mr Farage acknowledged a 'slow start' (Gareth Fuller/PA)
'This whole, 'oh, you're very slow at getting going' = we're not a continuum, we're not here to do exactly what was done before. We're a rethink on the way local government in Kent works, we're getting bedded in, we're making progress.'
On Kent County Council's website, its meetings calendar shows that almost 50% of the meetings in June and July were cancelled.
Ms Kemkaran pointed out that these were meetings set up by the previous administration and there was 'no way' the new Reform councillors could have stuck to the schedule.
She said: 'Those meetings were set for May and June, clearly, 57 new councillors, to get appointed to cabinet, to deputy cabinet, to get to grips with their portfolio.
'Clearly there was no way on God's earth, with the greatest will in the world, we were going to be able to get all the cabinets and the committee places sorted out.'
Make Britain Great Again hats were on show at the authority HQ (Gareth Fuller/PA)
She added that it would 'take time' for councillors to 'work out how to do their jobs' in the new administration.
The leader of KCC's opposition, Mr Hook, said: 'The election was on May 1 – we are two months in, and most committees have not met once.
'No key decisions have been taken. Real people are suffering while Reform councillors dither, delay and do anything except the job they were elected to do.
'The problems are urgent and Liberal Democrats demand action to improve services people depend on.'
During his visit, Mr Farage also criticised the UK Government plan to restructure local government and told his party councillors to 'fight tooth and nail' against the plans.
'If people out there in the street knew what was being proposed they would be against it, so we will launch a campaign on this, an education campaign,' said Mr Farage.
Mr Farage said councillors had been getting to grips with their new portfolios (Gareth Fuller/PA)
He added: 'If the county feel as strongly as I do, well, we may well take that to a referendum.'
Kent and Medway were not selected to be to be a part of the Government's Devolution Priority Programme, which would include a mayor.
However, there are moves towards turning their two-tier systems of district and county council into divided unitary authorities, which KCC's Reform council leader called 'a bit communistic'.
Ms Kemkaran told PA: 'I worry that local government reorganisation, carving us up into unitary authorities, it's a bit… it just strikes me as a little bit communistic.
'You know, you're taking the power away from people to elect their district councillors, their county councillors, their town councillors, and you're basically passing it up the chain.'
The Government has argued that unitary local government can enhance accountability by making it easier for residents to understand who is responsible for public services and local decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Farage urges Reform councils to ditch ‘virtue-signalling' net zero targets
Nigel Farage has pressured Reform-led councils to scrap 'virtue-signalling' climate emergency targets amid concerns they are 'massive diversions of time'. Eight in 10 local authorities across Britain declared so-called climate emergencies between May 2019 and 2023, with many racing to beat each other into announcing their green-focused pledges. The floodgates were opened six years ago after the House of Commons agreed on a motion tabled by Jeremy Corbyn for Parliament to declare an emergency. Local authorities vowed to follow suit by devoting millions of pounds to decarbonise offices, waste collection trucks and all council-run services. Rather than opt for a 2050 deadline – as agreed by Parliament – the majority of councils pledged a more ambitious 2030 target. Mr Farage, whose party gained control of 10 county councils two months ago, told The Telegraph the net zero pledges need to be ditched. He said: 'They need to be scrapped. It's not the job of county councils to deal with global issues, and it wouldn't make any difference at all if they were scrapped. 'It costs money and they are a massive diversion of time. It's virtue-signalling.' Mr Farage's comments come after he said in May that staff working on climate change initiatives should be 'seeking alternative careers'. Of the 10 councils Reform gained control, the party inherited seven climate emergency policies. Kent County Council last week became the first Reform-led authority to announce cost-savings plans of £40m by cutting net zero spending. It declared a climate emergency in 2019. In a move described as 'reckless' by critics, Lincolnshire County Council scrapped its flood management scrutiny committee in May, while Derbyshire County Council axed its climate change committee and cancelled all climate-related meetings. 'We have no idea how much it all costs' Since committing to their climate emergencies, various councils across the UK have been accused of ploughing millions into eco targets at the expense of cutting key services. For example, cash-strapped Lambeth council – which has dimmed streetlights to save money – spent £25m on climate initiatives such as 'rain gardens' and low-traffic neighbourhoods between 2019 and 2024. An investigation by The Times last year found the Labour-run south London authority paid more than 40 staff members at least £100,000 a year, including a 'director of climate and inclusive growth' on £160,000. Pembrokeshire County Council, which vowed in 2019 to become net zero by 2030, is poised to launch a review into its climate emergency after councillors raised concerns over its cost and deliverability. Cllr Mike Stoddart, who previously branded the emergency 'virtue signalling on stilts', successfully tabled a motion last month to start a review. He said: 'We have no idea how much it all costs and there has been no accountability for years. The UK is responsible for just under 1pc of global CO2 emissions, and Pembrokeshire's population of 120,000 is roughly one five hundredth of that of the UK. 'If the council ceased to exist, it would make no difference whatsoever to the Earth's climate.' A meeting of Pembrokeshire's full council – which is coalition-led – will decide whether to pursue a review at a meeting this month. Council papers show that it does 'not currently have an assessment' of the costs of its climate emergency, despite previously pledging to publish bi-annual reviews. Elsewhere, in Merseyside, Sefton Council, which has reduced emissions by 43pc since 2019, said it is 'clear that a substantial amount of investment will be required' to reach net zero by 2030. External funding is needed, but a progress report goes on to state that the council 'must carefully evaluate its position in the coming years'. Councils taking 'minimum action' Having announced climate emergencies, some councils have taken the most 'minimum action possible', according to watchdog group, Climate Emergency UK. Damning findings show that only a quarter of councils have turned at least 10pc of their vehicle fleet electric since pledging to decarbonise. Isaac Beevor, of Climate Emergency UK, said some councils are 'driving forward local climate action', yet others are falling short. He said: 'There are councils which continue to lag behind, taking the minimum action possible.' Having ranked every local authority's performance, the watchdog concluded progress across the UK is 'slow', with hundreds of councils not on track to meet their own self-declared net zero targets. Climate Emergency UK scored councils across seven categories of performance, ranking them on a score from 0 to 100. Just 62 of the 391 councils assessed scored higher than half marks. Rutland came bottom of the pile for county councils, while Castle Point (Essex) ranked last for district authorities. At the other end of the scale, Islington council topped the overall chart. Mr Beevor said: 'We are calling for climate action to be a fully funded legal duty for all UK councils, as we need all councils to be creating the zero-emission communities we need to thrive.' Two-thirds of councils were not confident of meeting their targets, according to a survey published by the Local Government Association (LGA) last year. Adam Hug, a spokesman for the LGA, said: 'The Government will not meet its net zero goals without empowering councils to deliver local climate action in every village, town and city. 'With the right support, local areas could cut carbon quicker and for less money, while boosting the local economy and ensuring local people benefit.'
New Statesman
7 hours ago
- New Statesman
Compulsory voting can save British democracy
The July 2024 general election produced one of the most fragmented results in British history: while Labour won a huge majority, it did so on only 34% of the vote. Amidst a falling combined vote share for the two major parties, we saw the entrance of Reform MPs into Parliament, and the victory of historic numbers of Greens and independents. Since then, this fragmentation has only accelerated: Reform is now surging, while ex-Corbynites moot the formation of new challenger parties on the left; the two traditional parties of government both languish in the polls, commanding less than 50% support between them. With the first-past-the-post electoral system increasingly failing either to keep the old party-system in place, or to force the electorate into new coherent blocs, the traditional calls for proportional representation (PR) have grown louder. Electoral reformers argue that we need a voting system in which the public's true preferences can be given free rein, and the party system allowed to naturally evolve. While its advocates may be right that PR is an inherently fairer system, the political diagnosis behind it feels outdated. British politics is not so much defined by an institutionally-thwarted re-alignment, as by an ever more widespread phenomenon of de-alignment. Old party loyalties may be falling away, but they are not being replaced by anything new. In other words, what we are witnessing is not simply the senescence of a particular party system, but rather a more general breakdown of the relationship between citizens and the state – a breakdown that is perhaps most starkly reflected in the rising number of citizens who no longer bother voting. This is the phenomenon that the Irish political scientist Peter Mair famously diagnosed as the 'hollowing out' of democracy, in which the collapse of traditional mediating institutions, and a 'mutual retreat' of politicians and voters from the public sphere, leaves citizens disconnected from political elites, who in turn find themselves presiding over a socio-political 'void'. In the context of the Mair-ian void, PR loses its radical edge, and risks doing little more than accelerating political fragmentation, re-arranging the distribution of seats between flimsy and hollow parties, all of which struggle to mobilise voters and fail to command lasting loyalties. Those looking to remedy the crisis of UK democracy should therefore begin looking to an alternative (or perhaps complimentary), less-discussed approach to electoral reform: the introduction of compulsory voting. Currently used in 22 democracies across the world, compulsory voting works by making voting a duty, legally obligating eligible voters to cast a ballot, and issuing those who fail to do so with a small fine. In the UK, compulsory voting saw a flurry of advocacy in the New Labour years, when then-unprecedentedly low levels of general election turnout saw politicians like Peter Hain, David Blunkett, and Tom Watson turn to it as a potential solution. More recently, it has been advocated by right-wing journalists like Tim Montgomerie, centrist podcasting behemoth 'The Rest is Politics', and prominent left-wing politicians like former Welsh First Minister Mark Drakeford. Last week, a new cross-party Campaign for Compulsory Voting was established, bringing together politicians, democracy activists, and academics from across the four nations of the United Kingdom. Advocacy for compulsory voting is based on two fundamental premises. First, that the fashionable minimalist conception of democratic citizenship as consisting of nothing more than a bundle of individual rights is insufficient. The idea of compulsory voting draws instead on older notions of civic responsibility, active citizenship, and democracy as a system of mutual obligations. It is our duty as citizens to help ensure the healthy functioning of the democratic system from which we all benefit, and that means participating in elections. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Second, the case for compulsory voting is based on an understanding that within a democratic system, elections based on universal suffrage provide the central mechanism for linking individuals to the state, for aggregating public preferences, and for ensuring that governments are incentivised to serve the interests of their citizens. When voter turnout ceases to be near-universal, and instead falls to low levels, elections cease to be able to perform this function, and democracy slips into crisis. Here in the UK, we are deep into that crisis territory. The last election saw barely more than half of eligible voters participate. Within that, data from Ipsos suggests that turnout was over 10 points higher amongst white voters than ethnic minorities, over 20 points higher amongst upper-class voters than working-class voters, and over 30 points higher amongst over-65s than under-65s, and amongst homeowners than renters. The result is an unrepresentative electorate – richer, older, whiter, and more secure than the UK public at large. This in turn creates warped incentives for politicians, who are pushed by cold electoral logic to disproportionately prioritise the interests of an older, economically-insulated minority at the expense of the wider public. We have seen this play out in practice as pensioner benefits have been protected at the expense of working-age welfare, and as soaring asset-price inflation has gone unaccompanied by either GDP or real wage growth. Crucially, such outcomes only exacerbate the initial problem: stagnation and inequality drive disillusionment with democratic politics, pushing more and more voters into the arms of either extremism or abstention, and leaving vast swathes of the public both alienated and disconnected from the democratic political process. The central challenge British politics faces today is thus how to reconnect citizens with the state. The answer is unlikely to be purely constitutional – changes in how political parties, public services, and the media operate are all no doubt necessary. But political reform nonetheless has its part to play: above all, elections must once again become effective means of democratic linkage, and credible expressions of public will. For this to be the case, turnout must be both high and demographically even. With turnout as low as it is today, compulsory voting is the only reform whose impact would be on the scale necessary (in countries such as Australia where compulsory voting is used, turnout rates regularly reach over 90%). Critics will surely object that compulsory voting is illiberal, or that it represents an unacceptable imposition on personal freedom. Such arguments should quickly be dismissed: coercion and civic obligation are an inevitable and necessary feature of democratic life. We happily accept them in the form of taxes, jury duty, or the obligation to fill out the census, so why not apply the same logic to voting, the most basic democratic act of all? Citizens would still have the option of actively abstaining by spoiling their ballot, and fines imposed on non-voters are unlikely to be onerous (in Australia they are slightly under £10). Ultimately, such reservations should be seen as trifling in the face of the scale of the democratic crisis we face. What compulsory voting offers is a means of breaking the vicious cycle of low turnout, warped incentives, bad policy, and rising political disaffection. If compulsory voting feels like a muscular measure, so be it – it is simply what the moment demands. Related
Times
12 hours ago
- Times
Reform ‘unpatriotic' over UK's net zero ambitions, Steve Reed warns
The environment secretary has accused Reform of being unpatriotic by opposing Britain's goal of reaching net zero emissions. Steve Reed said that hosepipe bans such as the one affecting five million people in Yorkshire will become much more common in future if we fail to act on climate change. 'It's fundamentally unpatriotic of parties like Reform to refuse to act on things which are affecting our way of life so profoundly,' Reed said. Labour will make the case for action on global warming and arresting nature loss, as a report by the Met Office found record-breaking heat is becoming the norm in Britain. Ed Miliband accused Reform and the Conservatives of 'abandoning the fight against climate change' JONATHAN BRADY/PA Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, said: 'Those who say 'let's abandon the fight against the climate crisis', this report is a sign of what a betrayal that would be. Because the warning could not be clearer about what is happening to our climate and the fact that our British way of life is under threat.'
