Texas Governor Says Emails With Musk Are Too 'Embarrassing' to Release
'Section 552.101 encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information that is … highly intimate or embarrassing, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person and not of legitimate concern to the public,' a letter from Abbott's counsel read.
'Embarrassment' is a ludicrous reason to block the public release of messages between one of the country's most powerful Republican governors and the richest man in the world, who has plenty of his own political motivations. And as ProPublica notes, that 'common law privacy' doctrine is usually only levied in situations that involve highly personal information, health data, or children, not to very wealthy, public, and powerful men.
Were Musk and Abbott chatting about bringing a Grok data center to Texas? Were they planning a trip to Mars? Were they flirting? What could be so embarrassing and intimate about these messages?
We'll likely never know, as a recent ruling from the Texas Supreme Court has granted more protections to public officials who are asked to divulge public records. Abbott's office has yet to elaborate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
4 minutes ago
- Fox News
'This is the language Russia understands': Expert praises Trump's hard power strategy
Palantir Technologies Defense Head Mike Gallagher discusses President Donald Trump threatening sanctions on Russia ahead of Special Envoy Steve Witkoff's meeting with officials over achieving a ceasefire deal.
Washington Post
4 minutes ago
- Washington Post
I'm a Republican who didn't vote for Trump. I was wrong.
I am a registered Republican. And like many others, I didn't vote for Donald Trump. His tone and rhetoric alarmed me. But in hindsight, much of what Trump has done, particularly in his foreign policy, has turned out to be effective. Realizing my mistake set me thinking about a question I've pondered my whole life: What does it mean to be smart?
Washington Post
4 minutes ago
- Washington Post
RFK Jr.'s slander of mRNA technology will harm Americans
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to cancel almost $500 million in contracts for projects to develop vaccines using mRNA technology underscores perhaps the greatest harm that he might inflict on the nation with his anti-vaccine ideology. The disparagement of existing immunizations by the health and human services secretary is dangerous on its own, in that it might persuade people to forego recommended shots and reduce herd immunity against diseases. But potentially even worse are the impacts that will be harder to see: the diseases that public health officials won't be able to fight because of the lifesaving innovations he is cutting short. Kennedy's resistance against mRNA vaccines is without evidence. In fact, the technology — which instructs the body's cells to produce a harmless bit of virus that is then used to train the immune system, as opposed to using weakened or dead versions of a virus — delivered arguably the most important achievement of President Donald Trump's first term: the production of effective vaccines against the novel coronavirus within the span of a few months. Such speed was practically unheard-of in biomedical research. Thanks to the urgency created by Operation Warp Speed, the federal government was able to mount an impressive vaccination rollout that boosted the population's immunity to the coronavirus just when it was needed. As with any medical treatment, these vaccines were not perfect. In very rare instances among adolescents, they resulted in a serious side effect known as myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle. Their effectiveness also waned over time as the coronavirus mutated, as is the case with vaccines for other respiratory diseases. But there can be no doubt: These vaccines saved millions of lives. Kennedy absurdly claimed in a video statement that 'mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.' He further claimed that a single mutation in a virus can render vaccines 'ineffective.' He even went so far as to argue that this effect 'encourages' mutations and could 'prolong' a pandemic. This is just plain wrong, as the covid pandemic demonstrated. The effectiveness of mRNA coronavirus vaccines might have diminished over time, but they continued to protect people against severe illness over the course of multiple strains. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention continued to recommend the shots for vulnerable populations for that reason, and manufacturers updated boosters to combat new strains. Giving up on this game-changing technology will slow down scientific innovation, leaving Americans more vulnerable to diseases. Kennedy just canceled or altered 22 mRNA projects that were supported by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. On the chopping block are vaccine developments for several respiratory illnesses. That includes a project to defend the country against the H5N1 bird flu virus, which scientists warn could spiral into a deadly pandemic if someone contracts it while also infected with the seasonal flu virus. And that's just the beginning. Researchers are eager to deploy mRNA technology against a slew of other hard-to-tackle pathogens, from hepatitis C to HIV to malaria. There are even efforts to use this approach to activate the immune system to attack cancer cells and to treat other genetic diseases. Some scientists have suggested this research could also be essential for national security, as it might help defend against attacks from biological weapons. Calling Kennedy's latest actions shortsighted understates the gravity of his slander. Americans will bear the cost of his rejection of science.
