FAA moves to protect aircraft owners private information
By David Shepardson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Aviation Administration said Friday it was making it easier for airplane owners to keep information private like their name and address after Congress approved legislation over privacy concerns.
The FAA said that starting on Friday, private aircraft owners and operators can electronically request that the agency withhold their aircraft registration information from public view. Social media accounts have used FAA registry information and Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast data to track private planes used by celebrities like Tesla CEO Elon Musk and singer Taylor Swift.
Some websites or social media bots track numerous planes used by well-known politicians and entertainers including Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, Harrison Ford, Kim Kardashian and Oprah Winfrey. Some sites seek to highlight the carbon emissions footprint of celebrities who regularly travel by private plane.
In February 2024, media outlets reported a lawyer for Swift sent a cease and desist letter to a college student that tracked Swift's jet movements and posted regular social media updates.
Twitter -- now known as X -- suspended the creator of an account tracking Musk's private jet in real-time soon after Musk bought Twitter.
The FAA said it will seek comment, including whether removing the information would affect the ability of stakeholders to perform necessary functions, such as maintenance, safety checks, and regulatory compliance.
The agency said it is also evaluating whether to default to withholding the personally identifiable information of private aircraft owners and operators from the public aircraft registry and provide a way for owners to download their data if needed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
After the Trump-Musk dustup, NASA has much to consider
The social media-driven feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk may have simmered down a bit, with the rhetoric cooling and Musk even deleting some of his ill-considered posts about Trump from X and then apologizing for them. But the shockwaves generated by the tit-for-tat insults and threats still reverberate through NASA and the commercial space sector. When Trump threatened to pull all of SpaceX's government contracts and Musk responded by threatening to decommission the Dragon spacecraft, an apocalyptic scenario that would have cripped NASA loomed. Fortunately, both men have since backed off. Even so, according to the Washington Post, NASA and the Defense Department are quietly urging commercial space companies to hurry the development of hardware that can compete with what SpaceX has to offer. Encouraging competition with SpaceX is sound policy regardless of the relationship between Trump and Musk. However, that competition is months, if not years, in the future. The next flight of the Boeing Starliner, which failed so spectacularly in 2024, will be early next year at the earliest. The Blue Origin New Glenn, an answer to the SpaceX Falcon family of rockets, may launch once more this year and is a long way from achieving Falcon-level launch cadence. It is in Trump's and Musk's interests, and that of the American space effort, that both men repair their relationship and move on. One of the issues that drove Trump and Musk apart was Trump's abrupt and inexplicable withdrawal of the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur and private space traveler, for NASA administrator. Musk had championed Isaacman, who is well regarded in the aerospace community, and took it to heart when Trump changed his mind about his own nominee. The resulting leadership vacuum at NASA is being filled by Congress. The Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), has offered its own ideas for a NASA budget. The Senate Commerce document is at odds with the White House proposal in one important aspect. Whereas the Trump budget eliminates the Space Launch System after Artemis III and the Lunar Gateway, Senate Commerce would retain the massive, expensive rocket at least through Artemis V and would build the Gateway to support future Artemis missions. A NASA administrator such as Isaacman would be able to argue for the White House's approach. As for Isaacman, some people in the MAGA world, no doubt stung by the near-universal outrage sparked by his treatment at the hands of the White House, have started to trash the former nominee in the media. A recent Daily Caller story quoted unnamed White House officials accusing Isaacman of not only giving money to Democrats but of supporting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives at his companies and in his private spaceflights. But both of these facts were known when Isaacman was nominated. According to the story, the officials said, 'Isaacman would have been a black spot on an administration otherwise filled with Republican Trump supporters or, at least, individuals like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who backed the president prior to the election.' To hear these unnamed sources talk, Isaacman is no better than left-wing House members Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and their Squad. It should be noted that even if Isaacman wanted to impose DEI policies at NASA, he couldn't because of Trump's executive order prohibiting it across the federal government. Isaacman posted to X in his own defense: 'I am a moderate and donated to both parties for different reasons … my largest contribution was to President Trump — because I support many of his policies. I definitely did not like the direction this country was going over the last 4 years.' He went on to state, 'I have never spoken against the President. I have never voted against him.' It sounds like Isaacman is very loyal to Trump, remarkable under the circumstances. The suggestion of disloyalty is spurious and against the White House's interests. Isaacman's situation could provide the basis of a rapprochement between Trump and Musk. Musk has already apologized to the president for some of his posts on X, particularly the one suggesting that Trump is named in the Department of Justice's files on Jeffrey Epstein. But the president should admit fault as well. He was deceived by some of his staff about Isaacman's character. If it is not too late, he should reverse himself a second time and send his fellow billionaire's name back into nomination. NASA, the U.S., and the Trump-Musk partnership would gain as a result. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, 'Why is America Going Back to the Moon?' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
Trump's FAA pick has claimed ‘commercial' pilot license he doesn't have
President Donald Trump's nominee to head the Federal Aviation Administration long described himself in his official biography as being certified to fly aircraft commercially — but records examined by POLITICO show that he does not hold any commercial license. Bryan Bedford's biography at Republic Airways, the regional airline where he has been CEO since 1999, said until Thursday that he 'holds commercial, multi-engine and instrument ratings.' (By Friday, after POLITICO's inquiries, the word 'commercial' had been removed.) The FAA registry that houses data on pilot's licenses does not list any such commercial credentials for Bedford. Similar language asserting commercial credentials for Bedford appeared in his Republic bio since at least 2010, according to the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Bedford is a licensed private pilot, the FAA records show, and has attained additional credentials allowing him to fly in a variety of specialized circumstances, including operating multi-engine planes and piloting at night or in bad weather. He has passed 'written and oral exams' for becoming a commercial airline pilot, the Transportation Department said in a statement, adding that Bedford had not 'personally nor publicly claimed to be a commercial airline pilot.' Questions about Bedford's credentials do not appear to threaten his prospects for heading the FAA, an agency trying to recover from years of high-level leadership shake-ups, failures of key aviation technology, a spate of near-misses in the skies and January's 67-fatality crash near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Bedford didn't respond to multiple attempts by POLITICO to request comment, nor did Republic. The White House referred questions to DOT. DOT defended Bedford, who would be the latest in a string of licensed pilots confirmed to lead the aviation agency. The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing on his nomination earlier this week. 'Bryan never misrepresented his credential; it was an administrative error that was immediately corrected,' DOT said in a statement. The agency did not respond to questions about what the 'error' was or how it had been fixed. The aviation news publication The Air Current previously reported in April about questions regarding Bedford's pilot credentials. The FAA issues various forms of commercial pilot ratings, including a 'commercial privileges' certificate that allows pilots to fly people or goods for hire, such as on cargo planes, small propeller aircraft or charter flights. Working as an airline pilot requires someone to hold a more rigorous commercial rating designating them as an 'air transport pilot,' which requires extensive flight hours, among other things. Darren Pleasance, president and CEO of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, a trade group for private airplane owners, said earning any pilot's license — including for commercial planes — requires written and oral exams and also a 'check ride' conducted by a licensed FAA examiner, who evaluates a person's skill at actually flying a plane. Pleasance, who holds an 'air transport pilot' license and is a certificated flight instructor, said a pilot working toward their commercial privileges would additionally have to pass a more comprehensive flight test that includes successfully performing complicated maneuvers in midair and during landing or take-off. 'You cannot get a commercial rating without having gone through and taken those tests,' Pleasance said after being asked to comment on the pilot licensing process and testing criteria. He was not addressing any specific questions regarding Bedford's credentials. Another aviation expert familiar with the licensing process, granted anonymity to speak candidly about a sensitive topic, said that 'if you haven't successfully gone through all of that, no one should claim to have a certain rating — because they don't have it.' 'It's like saying you are a medical doctor but you haven't finished medical school,' said the expert. After viewing Bedford's publicly accessible licensure record, the person confirmed that it does not contain any commercial certifications. It lists Bedford as being licensed to fly single and multi-engine planes as well as having earned his 'instrument rating,' which means he can fly at night or in bad weather. In a statement, DOT said that Bedford has never claimed to be a 'commercial airline pilot,' and added that he had passed 'written and oral exams' needed to be licensed to fly commercially. DOT didn't address whether Bedford had completed a 'check ride' with an experienced pilot, which is necessary for a commercial certificate. Besides the wording on his company's website, Bedford also gave a speech in 2019 at Liberty University where another speaker introduced him as holding 'commercial, multi-engine and instrument pilot ratings.' During a question-and-answer portion of his appearance, Bedford said he had decided to pursue pilot training after going through an intense period of union negotiations, where labor insisted that he didn't understand what it meant to be an airline pilot. 'When I was in Minnesota between like, 1994, 1997, I went through private, instrument, multi-engine, commercial, and by the time we got to our next labor negotiation three years later, I had all my ratings, and l'd actually been flying some of our turbine airplanes around,' Bedford said. At Bedford's confirmation hearing Wednesday, Republican senators repeatedly praised his fitness for the FAA job — including Sen. Todd Young of Indiana, who called him 'exactly the type of innovative leader' the agency needs. Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz of Texas added that 'as a pilot, Mr. Bedford understands how important it is for pilots to go through rigorous training.' Democrats at the hearing pressed Bedford on other issues related to public safety, including whether he would scale back the FAA's requirement that people seeking to become airline pilots log at least 1,500 of flight time — a rule that Republic requested an exemption from in 2022. None of them brought up his pilot's credentials. 'I am less worried about that than I am more worried about the fact that in his previous role at Republic Air[ways], he pushed very hard to degrade the 1,500 hour rule,' Illinois Sen. Tammy Duckworth, the Commerce Committee's top Democrat, said when asked about the credentials issue during a call with reporters Tuesday. The assertion that Bedford holds a commercial rating appears to have been scrubbed from two sections of Republic's website at different times within the past seven months. According to a screen grab from the 'Executive Leadership' section of the airline's website from December 1, 2024, accessed via the Wayback Machine, Bedford's biography said at the time that he 'holds commercial, multi-engine and instrument pilot ratings.' By March 18, according to the Wayback Machine, the word 'commercial' had been removed from that sentence. One day before that, Trump announced Bedford as his pick on social media. However, the claim that Bedford holds a 'commercial' rating still appeared as of Thursday on the Republic website's 'Board of Directors' page. By Friday the reference had been scrubbed. As of Friday, similar language also remained in a biography section for Bedford at the Regional Airlines Association trade group website. When asked about possible questions on Bedford's biography after Wednesday's hearing, Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) told a reporter he'd 'heard about that' and that his team 'did flag that.' 'We are doing just sort of an extensive look, not just at his policies, but just sort of his background as well,' he said. 'So I haven't made a determination yet but it is something that' he is examining, Kim said. — Chris Marquette and Sam Ogozalek contributed to this report.
Bloomberg
5 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's Executive Order to Make Flying Cars a Reality
On the heels of President Trump's recent executive order, we explore the fast-emerging world of flying cars, or eVTOLs, as companies like Joby Aviation and Pivotal race to bring personal air travel to life. Joby is working toward FAA certification for air-taxi services in cities, with plans to launch in 2026, while Pivotal is focused on lightweight, personal aircraft for consumers, public safety, and defense. Despite regulatory and technological hurdles—especially around batteries and infrastructure — the hope is to make flying as accessible as and more efficient than driving. (Source: Bloomberg)
