Meet the Carnarvon flapjack octopus, a newly-discovered species of rare and unusual octopus
Meet the Carnarvon flapjack octopus, or opisthoteuthis carnarvonensis, a new species discovered off the West Australian coast.
It was collected by scientists during a CSIRO voyage in 2022 from the Carnarvon Canyon Marine Park, but was not named until last week.
As one of the smaller members of the flapjack species, the octopus only grows to around four centimetres but shares the species' unique ability to flatten its body into the shape of a pancake — or a flapjack as its name suggests.
It's a type of cirrate or "dumbo" octopus, a rare and unusual species that have a pair of fins on the top of their heads that resemble miniature elephant ears and assist with swimming.
They reproduce and grow slowly, but, unlike other octopus, they cannot produce ink or change their colour.
As hungry dwellers that live more than 1,000 metres deep on the dimly lit sea floor, the Carnarvon flapjacks' large eyes enhance their ability to capture worms and small crustaceans.
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery volunteer Tristan Verhoeff is the systematic taxonomist who named the octopus.
Dr Verhoeff described the year-long process as "fun".
"It is exciting, but at the same time, there is pressure to do it right," he said.
The procedure for naming a species involves multiple steps, including collecting measurements, counting suckers, dissecting internal organ systems, and capturing detailed photographs.
After that, the results need to be compared with previous research to ensure the species is indeed new.
Dr Verhoeff has also helped name six other cirrate octopus species since 2021. Some of those species had been stored in unidentified collections for decades.
He said the discovery of the Carnarvon flapjack, along with those he was involved in identifying previously, helped "increase our understanding of Australia's deep-sea ecology and biodiversity".
"Describing new species is also essential for future work on their ecology, and assessing populations for conservation."
He said research had already found Australia has a higher biodiversity of cirrate octopus species compared with any other country.
There are now more than 50 cirrate octopus species identified worldwide, with 15 recorded in Australian waters.
Because the Carnarvon flapjack can only be found off north-western Australia, "its presence adds extra value to the recently established marine parks", Dr Verhoeff said.
The naming of the Carnarvon flapjack octopus marks the 10th new marine species to be discovered during the research voyage, joining the recently identified painted hornshark and the parallel-spine scorpionfish.
The CISRO said that throughout the voyage, scientists used advanced underwater camera systems to survey thousands of metres below the ocean surface.
Nets and sleds were then used to collect targeted samples of specimens.
Since the voyage, researchers, partner museums and research collections "have been busily working to help identify and describe some of these new species", the CSIRO said.
CSIRO Marine National Facility team leader Venetia Joscelyne said the discoveries made "help marine managers, such as Parks Australia, better conserve and protect the incredible diversity of marine life that inhabits Australia's oceans".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Widespread PFAS exposure, but cancer risk ‘low,' experts confirm
There is 'considerable concern' among communities about exposure to so-called 'forever chemicals' found in everyday products and their potential health risks. However, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence, experts say the health effects appear to be small and individual blood testing offers no clear medical benefit. The NSW Health Expert Advisory Panel on PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) has released its final report, delivering clear guidance on the health effects of these widely found 'forever chemicals', the value of blood testing, and the best ways to communicate risks to communities. PFAS have been used since the 1940s in products resistant to heat, stains, grease, and water, but concerns have grown worldwide about their presence in the environment and potential health impacts. The panel, made up of leading clinical experts across toxicology, oncology, cardiology, public health, and risk communication, evaluated the latest Australian and global research to inform health advice. While acknowledging the body of research for health effects related to PFAS is 'large and still growing', the panel concluded that the health effects of PFAS 'appear to be small'. It noted links between PFAS exposure and conditions including high cholesterol, reduced kidney function, immune system changes, hormone alterations, liver enzyme changes, menstruation issues, lower birthweight, pregnancy high blood pressure, and some cancers. However, the panel stressed the evidence was inconsistent, with 'limited evidence of a dose-response relationship' and difficulty separating PFAS effects from other factors that can affect health, especially in studies with PFAS levels similar to the general population. It also highlighted the influence of bias and confounding factors such as smoking, diet, and age. Addressing widespread public concern about cancer, the panel said it remained confident that the absolute cancer risk from PFAS was low based on the human epidemiological studies and levels of exposure in the Australian population. The panel noted that while the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified PFOA as 'cancer causing' and PFOS as 'possibly cancer causing', IARC's findings didn't specify safe exposure levels, how much exposure increases risk, or how big that risk might be. PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonate) are specific types of PFAS. The panel stressed that, despite these hazard classifications, the actual cancer risk from PFAS in Australia was low based on studies and typical exposure levels. One of the panel's strongest messages is that there is 'no clinical benefit' for an individual to have a blood test for PFAS. The report stated that PFAS chemicals appeared in more than 95 per cent of people tested, showing widespread exposure from multiple sources. Because PFAS are so common, the expert panel said blood tests were hard to interpret and didn't predict health outcomes, so it didn't recommend individual testing. Although levels have been declining over the past 20 years, high background exposure makes studying health effects challenging. The panel supports ongoing population monitoring to track changes This stance differs from 2022 guidance by the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), which suggested blood testing might guide clinical care. The NSW panel pointed out limitations in NASEM's approach, including reliance on studies with small effects and possible bias, and noted that US agencies like the CDC and ATSDR have not adopted NASEM's recommendations for individual blood testing. The panel also advised against interventions such as phlebotomy or cholesterol-lowering medications to reduce PFAS in the blood, calling their benefits 'uncertain' and warning they 'may cause harm' like anaemia or medication interactions. Instead, clinicians are urged to focus on 'usual preventative health interventions' to support patients. Recognising 'genuine concern' in parts of the community about exposure to PFAS and the potential health impacts, the panel stressed that risk communication must be 'tailored to the diverse levels of concern' and continued transparency maintained. The panel stated that reliable epidemiological studies required 'well characterised' exposures, measured confounders, and sufficiently large populations; conditions 'not currently met in the Blue Mountains population or in other communities in NSW'. It urged authorities to avoid using currently available human epidemiological studies to derive threshold levels due to the higher risk of bias and confounding. Instead, it supported continuing Australia's conservative approach of setting exposure limits based on animal studies with safety factors, such as those by the National Health and Medical Research Council. NSW chief health officer Kerry Chant said updated NSW Health advice provided consumers with guidance on how to reduce PFAS exposure. 'There is considerable concern, particularly in the Blue Mountains community, about exposure to PFAS through drinking water, and NSW Health takes these concerns very seriously,' Dr Chant said. 'NSW Health will continue to support local clinicians with information for GPs who may be managing patients with concerns about PFAS exposure, including evidence about potential adverse health effects, counselling patients, the utility of blood tests for PFAS and the role of further investigations.'
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Lab Notes: The native ants that take down cane toads
Belinda Smith: It's National Science Week. And this year ABC Science is celebrating the slimy, bitey and downright bizarre creatures that never get featured on postcards. We're shining a spotlight on our underrated animals. And as far as I'm concerned, one of the most underrated creatures is the meat ant. When I was a kid growing up in Western Victoria, I'd often see bird or lizard carcasses absolutely crawling with meat ants, their bones being picked completely clean. Look, I know, meat ants don't sound like the most endearing creatures. But it turns out they're not just aggressive, flesh-tearing fighters. They're also farmers, architects and the best bit of all, cane-toed exterminators. Hi, I'm Belinda Smith and you're listening to Lab Notes, the ABC Radio National show that dissects the science behind new discoveries and current events. To help me convince you that meat ants are underrated is Peter Yeeles, an entomologist and ecologist at James Cook University. Alright, first things first, what are meat ants? Peter Yeeles: Yeah, so meat ants, they're only found here in Australia and only on the mainland. They're not on Tasmania. They're quite a large ant, so sort of depending on the species, they range from about 8 to 12 millimetres. And it's a species complex, so it's actually made up of between six and seven species, depending on who you speak to. But the majority of meat ants that people will see, especially in the southern part of the country, is a species called Iridomyrmex purpureus. Belinda Smith: Yeah, Iridomyrmex means rainbow ant, doesn't it? And purpureus means purple, which is really descriptive of what the ant looks like. Peter Yeeles: Yeah, yeah. So if you look at them from a distance, they just sort of look like a generic large ant with a bit of red and a bit of black. But if you look at them closely, you can see that they're sort of red on their thorax and head. They've got this amazing blue iridescence, which gives them, in combination with that red, this beautiful purple look. Belinda Smith: And they've also got some quite fearsome looking jaws on Peter Yeeles: them too. Absolutely. Yeah, yeah. They don't have a sting, so instead of having a sting, they can spray chemicals as a defence. And they have large jaws, which they can use to defend themselves, their colony and also for processing food. Belinda Smith: Right, OK, the meat ant sounds more like a dinosaur and less like an ant. Are they as aggressive as I'm imagining? Peter Yeeles: They're super aggressive. They're very dominant within most of the ecosystems that they can be found in, very competitive. They get their name meat ant from their sort of propensity to strip vertebrate carcasses of meat. And even farmers used to drop dead farm animals near a meat ant nest and they'd clean it up for them. Belinda Smith: Real clean-up crew, sort of like a forensics team almost. Yeah, yeah, exactly. In a kind of grim way. So do they only eat meat? Peter Yeeles: No, so they are quite generalist in terms of what they consume. So the colony is sort of divided into two main components. You've got the worker ants, which are the ones that you see. And then back held in the colony, you've got lots of larvae. So they're the baby ants essentially. And the baby ants need lots of protein. So they consume the sort of the dead insects and things that the workers bring back and the carrion, the meat. While the worker ants primarily feed on carbohydrates, so sugars. And they get those from flowers and from tending bugs, hemipterans and aphids and things like that up in the tree canopy. Belinda Smith: Yeah, meat ants are farmers. And they're livestock are special sugar-producing insects. Peter Yeeles: They're called hemipterans or bugs, we call them bugs. They drink tree sap. So they'll sit on trees and on plants and they've got a long proboscis that they'll use to drink tree sap. But tree sap has lots of sugar in it compared to what the bugs actually need. They only need a little bit of sugar. So they sort of concentrate and expel the excess tree sap. And we call it honeydew. And ants absolutely love honeydew. So they have learned to essentially farm the hemipterans. There are species of ants that will move them around to find the best place on the plant to get the sap. They'll defend them from predators. There are even some when the queen has a mating flight, will carry a hemipteran with her for when she founds her new colony so they've already got hemipterans to start off with. Belinda Smith: Meat ants also like to feast on seeds, which is mutually beneficial for the plants and the ants. So some Peter Yeeles: seeds have like this fatty growth on it called an eliosome, which is part of the seed. But these plants have evolved to have this eliosome larger and fattier than on other plant species. And they do that to attract ants. So meat ants, for example, will pick up the seed because it's got this fatty body and they'll take it back to consume it. They'll eat the fatty body, but they don't eat the seed. The seed's got the very hard seed coat so it's not edible to the ants. So once they've eaten that fatty eliosome, they'll dispose of the seed, usually in like a garbage heap essentially, just outside the nest, and disperse that seed for the plant away from its parent. Belinda Smith: When I think of meat ants, I tend to think of their nests. They're just these beautiful rounded domes cleared of most stuff. But how big can they get? I imagine we're only just sort of seeing a tiny proportion of what a meat ant colony would look like from the surface. They Peter Yeeles: can be relatively deep, sort of up to a couple of metres, but generally their size is sort of laid out over the landscape. So most meat ants are what we call polydomous. So they'll have one queen usually, and she's held in one central nest. And then radiating out from that nest will be sort of a network of cleared pathways which have satellite nests. So they'll have multiple nests for that one colony, for that one queen. And they can be spread out over quite a large distance as well. So there's plenty of records of meat ant colonies with a series of nests that stretch over half a kilometre across. Oh my gosh. They can be quite large. They travel quite a long way as well when they're sort of foraging. So we've seen them in Western Australia travelling well over 100, 120 metres just to get food. So they can spread quite a long way from that central nest. Belinda Smith: Now are meat ants dangerous to humans or just occasionally annoying? Peter Yeeles: Yeah, they're not really dangerous, but they're just a nuisance. So often when you go camping or something like that, if you accidentally put your tent near a meat ant mound, it's pretty miserable, and I think you'd end up having to move. They've got quite a nasty bite, especially when they're very numerous and they're crawling up your legs. And Belinda Smith: they certainly know how to track down food. Peter Yeeles: They're very efficient foragers, so they'll be spreading out from those central place nests quite a long distance looking for food. And when they find food, they'll travel back to their nest, leaving a pheromone trail, which all of the nest mates will then follow back to the food to consume it as quickly as they can. Belinda Smith: This voracious foraging isn't limited to native food sources. They attack invaders too. I Peter Yeeles: think probably the most famous one would be meat ants interacting with cane toads. So some researchers at the University of Sydney found that meat ants were able to kill and consume young cane toads, which are obviously quite poisonous to most other animals that try to eat them. They found that meat ants consumed these baby cane toads, and there has been some research into looking at how those meat ants could be utilised to try and control cane toads when they're in very high densities, high populations, potentially moving meat ants to around billabongs and waterholes where the cane toads lay their spawn. Belinda Smith: How fascinating. So meat ants just don't... They're not affected by the cane toad poison at all? Peter Yeeles: No, I'm not actually aware of the mechanism. I don't know whether it's that they consume parts of the cane toad which aren't toxic, or whether they're just immune to that toxin, I'm not sure. Belinda Smith: So could the meat ant be a practical solution to a cane toad problem? Peter Yeeles: I think that the challenge involved in utilising meat ants as a control for cane toads is primarily going to be associated with moving and manipulating the locations of the ants. It's quite difficult to move ant colonies around and then have them established because they'd be moving into communities which are already established. Belinda Smith: Are you aware of any trials or any results that might have come out of...? Peter Yeeles: I'm not aware of whether that's been successful yet or not. Yeah, that's Rick Shine and Georgia Ward-Fears' work. It'll be very interesting to see though. Belinda Smith: Where does the meat ant rate in terms of your favourite ant species? Peter Yeeles: I'd probably be pretty high. I guess I'm fascinated by ants that have these abilities to influence and change the habitats that they live in. So meat ants are definitely one of those. Belinda Smith: And meat ants are definitely underrated, that's very clear. Peter Yeeles: Ants in general, they're one of the most ecologically important animals that we have. There was a famous entomologist in America who once said that if you were to remove all of the birds and mammals, many communities would continue functioning pretty much as they are now. But if you were to remove all of the ants, you'd see these sort of broad scale changes to how those communities function. Belinda Smith: That was Peter Yeeles, an entomologist and ecologist at James Cook University. And thank you for listening to Lab Notes on ABC Radio National, where every week we dissect the science behind new discoveries and current events. I'm Belinda Smith. This episode was produced on the lands of the Wurundjeri and Menang Noongar people. Fiona Pepper's the producer, and it was mixed by Ross Richardson. Catch you next week.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
BTN: S2025
BTN Education News & Current Affairs Australian Watch Article share options Share this on Facebook Twitter Send this by Email Copy link WhatsApp Messenger BTN is a high-energy, fun way for Upper Primary and Secondary students to learn about current issues and events in their world. Each program is built around major news stories of the week.
