BlackRock calls defence tech the next 'mega force' as NATO shifts into rearm mode
NATO lifts defence spend to 5% after fiery Hague summit
BlackRock says defence tech is the new mega-force
DroneShield's $61m Euro deal ignites ASX defence run
A few summers ago it would have sounded bonkers, but here we are: NATO leaders have just agreed to jack up their collective defence spending target to 5% of GDP (from a previous target of 2%).
Inked during a white-knuckle summit in The Hague on Wednesday, the pledge is an all-out gear shift, a sign the West is rearming for a world that feels like it's cracking at the edges.
There was no shortage of drama. Trump arrived at the meeting floating his usual lines about freeloading Europeans and asking what America's getting in return.
But by the end, after closed-door huddles and some diplomacy, he changed tune: 'It's not a rip-off. We're here to help them protect their countries.'
And while Trump's claiming victory, it's also a win for Europe and especially for NATO's new secretary general Mark Rutte, who had apparently spent months quietly stitching this together.
The NATO alliance, once rattled and rusty, is now bracing for a far more contested world than the one it thought it was defending a decade ago.
The Russia-Ukraine war has basically rewired its mindset.
Germany, once shy about spending on tanks and missiles, now wants to build Europe's most powerful military. Sure, not everyone's on board. Spain and Slovakia are already whining about affordability.
BlackRock all-in on defence
No surprise then that BlackRock, the world's biggest asset manager, is getting more bullish about the defence sector.
In its latest market outlook, the BlackRock Investment Institute called defence one of the defining 'mega forces' reshaping global markets right now.
Not just because of war, but because of how war is evolving: AI, drones, and cyber strikes. It's not the same old battlefield anymore.
BlackRock has recently been rolling out Europe-focused defence ETFs, following surging interest in names like Lockheed Martin, RTX, Northrop Grumman, as well as smaller drone-tech firms.
According to BlackRock, its defence ETFs have already attracted over US$7.5 billion in global inflows this year, a notable shift a sector once considered too controversial for many investors to stomach.
Aussie defence stocks step up
That shift is already rippling through the ASX, where several homegrown players are starting to look like serious contenders.
Take DroneShield (ASX:DRO).
This week it landed a monster $61.6 million contract from a European military customer, more than its total revenue last year.
It will be shipping handheld counter-drone kits across Q3, and according to CEO Oleg Vornik, this is just the beginning.
'The scale and frequency of orders has been increasing as leading military customers are moving from testing hardware to broader rollouts," Vornik said.
'DroneShield is well placed to meet the increasing demand."
Then there's Elsight (ASX:ELS), which makes battlefield-grade connectivity systems.
Its Halo unit, a plug-and-play data pipe that stitches together mobile, satellite and RF links, has become the backbone for unmanned military vehicles.
So far this year, the company has clinched over US$14.7 million in contracts from a single European OEM. That's a 600% revenue surge.
And if the fight is moving into the digital realm, Vection Technologies (ASX:VR1) is there too.
The company's virtual reality training tech is now being used by defence clients to simulate missions, map out battlefields, and rehearse critical ops.
Meanwhile, Harvest Technology Group (ASX:HTG) is also filling another critical gap – real-time, secure comms in low-bandwidth or remote environments.
Its Nodestream platform lets remote patrols, ships or field drones stream encrypted video and data back to HQ, even with minimal connectivity.
What next?
If NATO's 5% goal holds, experts say we're staring down trillions in new defence spending through to 2035.
And while much of that will go to the usual suspects – Lockheed, Raytheon, Thales – there's real space for niche, high-tech players that solve modern military problems.
That's where Australian firms are starting to shine, building the networks, training tools and autonomous brains that will run the battles of the future.
But this isn't easy money.
Defence contracts are slow, complex and political. You need trust and staying power.
Which means the Aussie firms that win are likely the ones who have already laid the groundwork.
ASX DEFENCE-RELATED STOCKS
Security Description Last Month % 6-month % 12-month % Market Cap
TTT Titomic Limited 0.270 -7% 59% 275% $357,954,767
ELS Elsight Ltd 1.500 148% 290% 219% $273,520,523
ASB Austal Limited 6.075 19% 97% 149% $2,472,326,858
HCL Highcom Ltd 0.300 67% 88% 131% $30,804,802
AL3 Aml3D 0.160 3% -9% 129% $86,038,495
EOS Electro Optic Sys. 2.600 61% 118% 74% $503,604,978
CDA Codan Limited 19.670 12% 21% 69% $3,605,996,922
DRO Droneshield Limited 2.235 85% 249% 51% $1,871,513,148
OEC Orbital Corp Limited 0.115 22% 15% 43% $18,125,769
BRN Brainchip Ltd 0.195 -9% -38% -3% $384,890,930
1CG One Click Group Ltd 0.008 14% -20% -11% $9,458,289
3DA Amaero Ltd 0.330 20% 29% -14% $238,274,469
BIS Bisalloy Steel 3.300 -9% -26% -15% $157,123,811
AJX Alexium Int Group 0.007 -13% -42% -36% $11,105,001
BCT Bluechiip Limited 0.003 0% 0% -40% $3,616,878
At Stockhead we tell it like it is. While Harvest Technology is a Stockhead advertiser, it did not sponsor this article.
This story does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
38 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Blows to balancing Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
Congressional Republicans have removed the so-called revenge tax provision from President Donald Trump's big bill after a request by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The Section 899 provision that was nixed would have allowed the federal government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging "unfair foreign taxes" on US companies. The measure was expected to lead many companies to avoid investing in the US out of concern that they could face steep taxes. But the removal of the provision adds a wrinkle to Republicans' plans to try to offset the cost of the massive package. Bessent said in an X post that he made the request to lawmakers after reaching an agreement with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal. He said that after "months of productive dialogue," they would "announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests." Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, said they would remove the provision. But, they noted, "Congressional Republicans stand ready to take immediate action if the other parties walk away from this deal or slow walk its implementation." The removal of the provision will provide "greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond," Bessent said in his post. An analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestlé, estimated that the provision would have cost the US 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product. Republicans are rushing to finish the package this week to meet the president's Fourth of July deadline for passage. Earlier ,the Senate parliamentarian advised that a Medicaid provider tax overhaul central to the spending bill does not adhere to the chamber's procedural rules. Guidance from the non-partisan Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough is rarely ignored. Republicans were counting on big cuts to Medicaid and other programs to offset trillions of dollars in Trump tax breaks, their top priority. Additionally, the parliamentarian advised against various GOP provisions barring certain immigrants from health care programs. Republicans scrambled Thursday to respond, with some calling for challenging, or ever firing, the parliamentarian, who has been on the job since 2012, though GOP leaders dismissed those views. Instead, they worked to revise the various proposals. "We have contingency plans," said Majority Leader John Thune. Friday's expected votes appeared to be slipping, but Thune insisted that "we're ploughing forward." Democrats, who are unified against the package as a tax giveaway for the wealthy at the expense of American safety net programs, said the procedural decisions would devastate the GOP package. Trump hosted House Speaker Mike Johnson and other GOP lawmakers at the White House joined by truck drivers, firefighters, tipped workers, ranchers and others that the administration says will benefit from the bill. "We don't want to have grandstanders," Trump said of the GOP holdouts. At its core, the big bill, which has passed the House and is now being revised in the Senate, includes $3.8 trillion in tax breaks that had been approved during Trump's first term, but will expire in December imposing a tax hike if Congress fails to act. Senior Republicans said they would try to revise the provision to make it acceptable, perhaps by extending the start date of any changes.
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Trump team gives ‘irrefutable' evidence of Iran bunker-busting success
The Pentagon on Thursday released new details about how the US prepared for its marathon bombing mission against three Iranian nuclear sites, the crews that carried out the daring weekend raid, and how Iran tried fortifying one of the sites that held critical aspects of its nuclear program. In a morning briefing, which President Donald Trump had promised ahead of time would be 'interesting and irrefutable', Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the US undertook 'the most secret and most complex military operation in history', without offering many specifics. It was Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Dan Caine who laid out compelling details on how the the highly sophisticated mission was conducted. The briefing, however, did not provide new intelligence supporting the president's assertion that the strikes 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program. What was revealed Caine revealed previously unpublicised details about the bombing crew that took part in the mission, as well as the extensive preparations undertaken for it across the military. So many experts worked on designing the bombs that hit their target that they became the 'biggest users of supercomputer hours within the United States of America' at one point, he said. The crews who flew the 37-hour mission included both men and women and ranked from captain to colonel. They included active duty members of the Air Force and members of the Missouri Air National Guard. Most were graduates of the Air Force Weapons School – an elite academy in the Nevadan desert. 'When the crews went to work on Friday, they kissed their loved ones goodbye, not knowing when or if they'd be home,' Caine said. 'Late on Saturday night, their families became aware of what was happening.' When the bombers returned to Missouri, the crews' 'families were there, flags flying and tears flowing,' he added. 'I have chills, literally talking about this.' Days before the mission, Iran attempted to fortify the Fordow nuclear facility, which is embedded deep in a mountain, by covering with concrete the ventilation shafts through which the American bombs would penetrate. 'I won't share the specific dimensions of the concrete cap,' Caine said. 'But you should know that we know what the dimensions of those concrete caps were. The planners had to account for this. They accounted for everything.' Despite those needed last-minute adjustments, Caine insisted the mission went as planned and that the massive 14,000kg bunker-buster bombs functioned 'as designed' during their first uses in combat. 'We know that the trailing jets saw the first weapons function,' the general said. During the briefing, Caine played video that demonstrated how the massive bombs are meant to function. The slow-motion video showed a bomb penetrating what appeared to be a type of bunker. An orange glow emitted from an open passageway visible at the side of the facility, followed by a large fireball. 'Of course, nobody was down inside the target, so we don't have video from the target,' Caine said. About 44 soldiers and two Patriot missile batteries were tasked with defending a nearby base from potential Iranian retaliation. Unanswered questions While the military officials provided some new information about the planning of the strikes, they offered no new evidence of their effectiveness against Iran's nuclear program. Both Caine and Hegseth referred questions about that to the intelligence agencies. The comments from both Caine and Hegseth focused on the Fordow nuclear facility. Two other facilities that were targeted, Natanz and Isfahan, went unmentioned. The full extent of damage at the facilities remains unclear. At Fordow, Hegseth noted that someone would need 'a big shovel' to fully assess the inside of the facility, adding 'no one's under there able to assess' the damage. Caine said the Joint Chiefs do not do battlefield damage assessments 'by design' and referred specific questions about the extent of the strikes' effectiveness to the US intelligence community. 'We don't grade our own homework,' the general said. 'The intelligence community does.' An early assessment from the Pentagon's Defence Intelligence Agency, reported on by CNN and numerous other outlets, suggested the strikes did not destroy the core components of Iran's nuclear program and likely only set it back by months. CIA Director John Ratcliffe later said his agency has learned the facilities were destroyed and 'would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' The initial DIA assessment, Hegseth noted, said it could take weeks for a clearer picture to emerge about the efficacy of the strikes and their impact on Iran's nuclear program. He said it was a 'historically successful attack' but stated assessments of that success remain in progress. Hegseth continued to defend Trump's claim the Iranian nuclear program was 'obliterated', sidestepping questions about how the president reached that conclusion just hours after the bombs were dropped. 'I can assure you, the chairman and his staff, the intelligence community, our staff and others, are doing all the assessments necessary to make sure that mission was indeed successful,' Hegseth said. While Caine's account of the mission provided some of the most concrete details the US has given about the preparations to undertake the raid and included human elements that personalised the bombing crews and other service members who participated, Hegseth took a more pugilistic and political tone that criticised the media's reporting on the aftermath of the mission. It's a familiar role for Hegseth, long known as a vociferous defender of Trump on camera. On Thursday, it appeared his boss was watching: not long after reporters raised questions about whether vehicles seen outside one of the facilities before the attacks could signal Iran had preemptively moved enriched uranium from the site, Trump took to social media to downplay the idea. 'The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts,' the president said on Truth Social. 'Nothing was taken out of facility.'
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump rejected invitation to Bezos wedding due to ‘scheduling conflicts'
Donald Trump rejected an invitation to Jeff Bezos' star-studded Venetian wedding. Bezos, the tech billionaire, was reportedly trying to cosy up to the US president, in what could be seen as an attempt to fill the position of 'First Buddy' vacated by Elon Musk. The Wall Street Journal reported that the 61-year-old, who is preparing for his lavish three-day wedding in Venice, had spoken twice to Trump in the last few weeks. As part of his charm offensive, Bezos extended an invitation to his coming nuptials with Lauren Sanchez. White House officials confirmed to the WSJ that the invitation had been offered. However, Trump was not expected to attend the Venice ceremony owing to scheduling conflicts. Loading Trump's daughter Ivanka, a friend of Sanchez, is expected to attend, along with her husband, Jared Kushner. Donald Jr, the president's eldest son, is also going. In 2019, Donald Trump mocked Bezos as 'Jeff Bozo' in a dig at The Washington Post, which the billionaire owned.
