Trump's words undermine DOJ's argument regarding men deported to El Salvador's CECOT
WASHINGTON — The words of President Donald Trump and members of his administration undermined the government's contention during a court hearing on Wednesday that the men deported from the country under the Alien Enemies Act and delivered to El Salvador were not in the constructive custody of the United States.
In a hearing on Wednesday evening, Chief U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg questioned a Justice Department attorney over whether Trump was telling the truth when he said that he could secure the release of Abrego Garcia from the CECOT facility in El Salvador.
Boasberg used the president's own words, as well as statements from Press Secretary Karoline Levitt and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, to chip away at the government's contention that those incarcerated at CECOT in El Salvador were not in the constructive custody of the United States.
Trump said last week that he 'could' have Garcia returned to the United States with a phone call, while Levitt said the United States was paying El Salvador 'approximately $6 million' to keep the men, and Noem said that CECOT was 'one of the tools in our tool kit' that the United States could use.
'Is the President not telling the truth, or could he secure the release of Mr. Abrego Garcia?' Boasberg asked Deputy Assistant Attorney General Abhishek Kambli, who was representing the government on Wednesday.
'Was the president telling the truth,' when he said he could pick up the phone and secure the release of Garcia or not, Boasberg asked.
'That goes towards the president's belief about influence he has,' Kambli responded, saying that "influence does not equate to constructive custody."
Under questioning from Boasberg, Kambli said that a "grant" dated March 22 that was described as for law enforcement needs related to the 238 alleged Tren de Aragua members recently deported to El Salvador. Kambli confirmed 'grants were made' that 'can be used for detention of these individuals.'
Boasberg said the plaintiffs had 'a lot of facts in your favor' in arguing that the United States had what's called 'constructive custody' of the men — something the Trump administration has argued in and out of court they do not have. Boasberg questioned Kambli on whether the government would concede that transferring individuals to CECOT without due process would mean that the government had violated the rights of the deportees.
'I don't know if I would put it in those terms," Kambli replied.
Boasberg has ordered the Trump administration to provide sworn declarations from administration officials regarding the issue of who exactly has custody of these individuals at CECOT.
Boasberg has ordered lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union and Democracy Forward who brought the lawsuit to review that information, and to decide, by Monday, whether or not to request discovery — and if so, exactly what questions, depositions, and documents they are requesting. After that, Boasberg will decide exactly what to order the government to produce, if necessary.
The Supreme Court last month lifted Boasberg's order which temporarily blocked the administration from sending members of Tren de Aragua to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, but the Supreme Court didn't reach a decision on the merits of Trump's invocation of the act. Last week, a Trump-appointed judge became the first to strike down the administration's use of the act, which had previously only been deployed during the War of 1812, World War I and World War II.
While the Trump administration proclaimed that they won the Supreme Court argument, Boasberg questioned Kambli about the decision, noting that the court had not reached the merits of the administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. Boasberg asked whether Kambli acknowledged that the Supreme Court didn't reach the arguments about the administration's use of the act itself, and Kambli conceded that the court "did not analyze that precise issue."
"I assume that's a yes," Boasberg replied.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS How Biden was secretly spying on Musk for YEARS before Trump win
Elon Musk was secretly spied on by several agencies in the Biden administration that watched foreign nationals visiting the billionaire's properties, a bombshell report has said. Musk was reportedly trailed by government agencies in 2022 and 2023 including Homeland Security and the Justice Department, focusing on who may have been influencing him before he began supporting Donald Trump. Insiders told the Wall Street Journal that the investigations into Musk were primarily looking into whether he was being swayed by foreign powers 'in Eastern Europe and elsewhere', but never progressed to bringing charges. The investigations under Biden predate Musk's move into Trump's orbit, which also raised concerns over conflicts of interest between his multiple businesses and proximity to power. This is a developing story and will be updated.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
How Trump defanged the Justice Department's political corruption watchdogs
WASHINGTON - Created after the Watergate scandal, the U.S. Justice Department's Public Integrity Section has fought political corruption for nearly half a century. Five months into President Donald Trump's second term, it has been stripped of power. The unit has lost its authority to file new cases. Its staff has been reduced from more than 30 attorneys to five. And its once-powerful gatekeeping role – reviewing potential cases against members of Congress and other public officials to prevent politically motivated prosecutions – has been suspended. Those changes, confirmed by three people familiar with the department's operations, are part of an overhaul of the Justice Department by the Trump administration that is dismantling guardrails designed to stop political interference in criminal investigations involving politicians, federal judges and other public figures. Reuters reviewed the Public Integrity Section's cases and internal memos, and conducted more than 15 interviews, to document the decimation of an office with a mission to investigate and prosecute corruption allegations at all levels of government and supervise criminal probes into election crimes. Among the most significant changes is the suspension of a longstanding Justice Department requirement that federal prosecutors seek the Public Integrity Section's approval before bringing charges against members of Congress – and consult with the unit before launching criminal prosecutions in many other matters involving public officials. The suspension of that rule in early May hasn't been previously reported. It frees political appointees in the Justice Department to prosecute public officials without going through a review intended to prevent baseless or politically motivated prosecutions. It also halts the unit from supervising election fraud cases, including allegations of election disinformation. A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed changes to the rules are under review, but said no final decisions have been reached. The spokesperson added that Justice Department leaders believe the U.S. Attorney's offices around the country, which are 'closer to the facts and to the communities they serve, are better placed to determine whether to charge these crimes.' U.S. Attorneys are appointed by the president. The requirements to run public corruption cases through the Public Integrity Section give the unit 'far too much power,' the spokesperson said. The crippling of the Public Integrity Section, under a president who campaigned on a vow to exact retribution against his enemies, could make it easier to prosecute Trump's opponents and spare his allies, said constitutional law experts and former Justice Department officials. 'We are talking about the politicization of the justice system,' said Stuart Gerson, the head of the Justice Department's civil division under Republican President George H.W. Bush and an acting attorney general under Democratic President Bill Clinton. 'The rule of law is endangered.' The Justice Department defended the changes. 'This Department of Justice is committed to ending the weaponization of government and will continue to prosecute violent crime, enforce our nation's immigration laws, and make America safe again,' the spokesperson said. Trump has said the changes are necessary to root out Justice Department lawyers he derides as 'hacks and radicals' for prosecuting him and some of his supporters while he was out of power. In a March speech at the Justice Department, he argued that under former President Joe Biden, federal prosecutors undermined public trust and used law enforcement to 'thwart the will of the American people.' Trump Attorney General Pam Bondi has vowed to refocus the department on combatting violent crime and illegal immigration. Justice Department prosecutors who worked on federal investigations involving Trump in recent years repeatedly denied in court filings any political influence in those cases. The dismantling of the Public Integrity Section is part of a broader Justice Department shift away from pursuing corruption cases under a leadership dominated by a core group of Trump's former attorneys, led by Bondi. In February, the administration suspended investigations of U.S. companies for alleged corruption overseas. It also disbanded a Federal Bureau of Investigation task force that examined foreign interference in U.S. politics. In April, it directed prosecutors to step back from litigating fraud involving cryptocurrency – a freewheeling sector that has become a major money spinner for Trump's family. A White House spokesperson said the crypto policy shift 'has nothing to do with the president himself.' Reuters documented the departure of at least 28 staff from the integrity unit in the past five months, including 10 resignations. Eighteen others either transferred, left for temporary details or are awaiting approval for reassignments. Just five remain. Ultimately, staffing is expected to be cut to two or three attorneys, according to the three people familiar with the matter. Trump also has started to undo the Public Integrity Section's legacy by pardoning people convicted in cases brought by the unit's attorneys, giving clemency to political allies and others accused of defrauding the public. Since January, the White House has issued four such pardons involving cases brought by the unit. The defendants in at least five other convictions are seeking pardons, Reuters found. The White House has said the pardons are attempts to correct the wrongs of a politicized Biden Justice Department. A new Justice Department 'Weaponization Working Group' – led by conservative lawyer and activist Ed Martin – is scrutinizing past investigations into the president and his allies. Beyond the Justice Department, Trump and his administration have sought to weaken or eliminate other institutions meant to be insulated from political influence, including firing independent inspectors general, who audit federal agencies for fraud and waste. Those moves risk steering the U.S. toward a more autocratic style of government, some constitutional specialists warn. 'What is happening here is utterly unprecedented,' said Andrew Kent, who teaches constitutional law at Fordham University School of Law. 'These seem like very dangerous steps for a democracy.' The Public Integrity Section was set up after the 1970s Watergate scandal that forced President Richard Nixon to resign under threat of impeachment for covering up a burglary at a Democratic campaign office and interfering with Justice Department investigations. The new unit, meant to restore faith in government andhold public officials to account, became an elite post for career prosecutors. In the 1980s, the Public Integrity Section won the convictions of multiple congressmen in a famous sting operation codenamed 'Abscam' in which FBI agents posing as Arab sheikhs offered bribes in return for political favors. Today, the unit is responsible for 'some of the most sensitive, complex, and contentious public corruption cases' handled by the Justice Department, its website says. Its work spans the political spectrum, including recent corruption prosecutions of both Republican and Democratic members of Congress. The unit also consulted on the prosecutions of Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith over allegations that Trump mishandled classified documents and tried to overturn his 2020 election defeat, but it did not have a direct role in prosecuting the cases. Smith, who declined a request for comment, dropped both matters when Trump won a second term in office. The unit's Election Threats Task Force also investigated a wave of violent threats by Trump supporters against election workers that arose after Trump falsely claimed the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him. More than a dozen cases were prosecuted. After Trump returned to power in January, the Public Integrity Section quickly came under pressure as two cases involving prominent politicians show. In the first weeks of the new administration, Public Integrity attorneys clashed with Martin after the staunch Trump supporter was appointed interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. Martin, a lawyer for defendants in the 2021 Capitol riots, wanted to charge U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer with making a criminal threat five years ago. In 2020, the New York Democrat said in a speech that conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices would 'pay the price' for curtailing abortion rights. Schumer expressed regret the next day and said he had no intention of suggesting violence. In February, attorneys in Martin's office advised the Public Integrity Section, as required, that he wanted to subpoena Schumer, said the three people familiar with the department's operations. The unit opposed the plan, arguing in a memo to senior Justice Department officials that Schumer's remark was constitutionally protected political speech and there was no legal or factual basis to investigate him, they added. Martin appealed to the deputy attorney general's office, noting he had drafted an indictment and criticizing what he viewed as the Public Integrity Section's recalcitrance, the three sources said. Martin lost the argument and the case died. In an interview with Reuters, Martin downplayed the conflict with the Public Integrity Section and described the episode as 'a helpful process.' 'Schumer had not done something that could be chargeable,' he said. He declined to comment on whether he had drafted an indictment and tried to override the unit. The second case involving a prominent politician came three months later. By then, the Public Integrity Section was powerless. On May 9, U.S. Representative LaMonica McIver and two other Democratic members of Congress from New Jersey turned up at an immigration detention center for a congressional oversight visit, which is permitted under federal law. The Democratic mayor of Newark, Ras Baraka, briefly joined them inside the facility's gated perimeter but was ordered to leave by federal agents. In a chaotic scrum outside the perimeter, as federal officers moved to arrest Baraka on trespassing charges, McIver's elbows appeared to make brief contact with an officer, according to the criminal complaint brought by the U.S. Attorney's office in New Jersey against McIver and video of the incident. The complaint also accused McIver of shoving a second officer. No one was reported injured in the scuffle. On May 19, the acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, Alina Habba, dropped the trespassing case against Baraka but charged McIver, a vocal Trump critic, with two counts of assaulting and impeding a law enforcement officer. Announcing the charges against McIver, Habba said: 'No one is above the law – politicians or otherwise.' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, a longtime Trump ally, issued a statement saying the decision to charge McIver followed 'a thorough review of the video footage.' The Justice Department's manual for investigations of elected officials sets a high standard for such cases. To prevent politically motivated charges against members of Congress, prosecutors must seek 'prior approval' from Public Integrity Section attorneys on 'any criminal charge,' the manual says. But Habba didn't consult with or seek approval from the Public Integrity Section before filing her case in federal court, said two of the people familiar with the department's operations. The Washington Post reported on May 17 that the department was considering whether to end the consultation requirement. But the suspension had been implemented for about a week by then, the people who spoke with Reuters said. Habba, a former personal lawyer to Trump, told Reuters that she 'coordinated closely with (Justice) Department leadership every step of the way.' She did not respond to a question about whether she sought approval from the Public Integrity Section for the McIver charges. Habba said Reuters' reporting about the case is incorrect but declined to offer specifics. McIver, who denies wrongdoing, told Reuters her prosecution reveals how changes at the Department of Justice are 'making abuse of power easier.' Her lawyer, Paul Fishman, called the charges 'spectacularly inappropriate' and said members of Congress have 'the right and responsibility' to assess conditions at immigration facilities. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for June 11. 'A normal Department of Justice would never have suggested, 'Hey, we have a case here,'' said Peter Zeidenberg, who spent seven years as a Public Integrity Section prosecutor. After reviewing video of the incident, he described the McIver indictment as 'transparently political' because the assault charges appear unsupported by facts. The Trump administration began reining in the Public Integrity Section well before the McIver case. On January 20, the day of Trump's inauguration, more than a dozen senior Justice Department attorneys – including Public Integrity Section chief Corey Amundson – were ordered to move to a new 'Sanctuary Cities Working Group.' It was tasked with gathering information on cities that resist Trump's mass deportation orders for migrants in the U.S. illegally. Amundson didn't move; he quit. A 23-year Justice Department veteran appointed during Trump's first term to run the Public Integrity Section, he was among the first in a series of resignations and reassignments that stripped the office of people, power and responsibilities. The hollowing out accelerated after former Trump personal attorney Emil Bove, then acting deputy attorney general, ordered Manhattan federal prosecutors in a February 10 memo to dismiss a corruption case against Eric Adams, the New York mayor. Bove did not respond to a request for comment. Adams had aligned himself more closely with Trump after being charged in September last year with taking bribes and illegal contributions. Adams denies the charges. Bove's memo said the case was the type of Biden-era politicized prosecution Trump wanted to quash and that the administration needed Adams' support for its immigration crackdown. That order prompted four Public Integrity Section attorneys to resign in a single day, including its acting chief, John Keller. A supervisor from the criminal division also left. A month later, on March 11, a senior manager relayed a message from Justice Department leaders that the Public Integrity Section faced further staff cuts and would no longer bring new prosecutions, said the three people familiar with the department's operations. 'The Titanic was sinking,' stunned colleagues joked among themselves. Today, the remaining staff are working through at least 10 ongoing cases, according to court filings. Former supervisors' offices are empty at the unit's Washington D.C. headquarters. Attorneys from at least one other section have started claiming open desks. 'It's like the village of the damned,' said one of the sources who is familiar with the current mood. With the Public Integrity Section marginalized, Trump is ramping up pardons of public figures convicted in cases brought by its attorneys, helping allies and supporters who have echoed his claims of being persecuted by the Justice Department under Biden. Of more than two dozen people who have received pardons or commutations since March, four have been in cases brought by the Public Integrity Section, a historically high number, including one who was indicted during Trump's first term. Among the four is a former Virginia sheriff convicted last year on federal bribery charges. Another is a Las Vegas Councilwoman convicted of fraud last October after paying for personal expenses, including rent, travel and her daughter's wedding, with money she raised to build statues for two slain police officers. Both were ardent Trump supporters who the president characterized as victims of biased Biden-era prosecutions. One recent pardon came after Justice Department leaders received a letter from the lawyers of Brian Kelsey, a former Republican state senator in Tennessee who reported to prison in late February. Kelsey was indicted in 2021 and pleaded guilty the following year to conspiracy to defraud the federal government for illegally funneling money to his failed 2016 congressional bid. The Public Integrity Section and the U.S. Attorney's office in Nashville prosecuted the case. The letter from Kelsey's lawyers, which is previously unreported, accused the prosecutors of misconduct, alleging they were 'anti-Republican,' among other claims, according to a person with direct knowledge of Kelsey's case. Two of the four prosecutors declined comment; two others did not respond to questions. On March 11, Trump pardoned Kelsey, 47, after he had served two weeks of his 21-month sentence. 'God used Donald Trump to save me from the weaponized Biden DOJ,' Kelsey wrote on X, referring to the Justice Department. Reuters could not determine if the letter contributed to Kelsey's pardon. Kelsey did not respond to questions about his case. In contrast, Reuters could identify only one defendant in a Public Integrity case pardoned during Biden's four-year term: former Kentucky Democratic Party Chairman Jerry Lundergan, 78, who was convicted in 2019 for illegal corporate donations to his daughter's 2014 Democratic campaign for a U.S. Senate seat. Lundergan was serving a 21-month sentence when he was freed on compassionate grounds due to old age and poor health, court records show. Citing that and his post-prison community service, Biden pardoned him on his last day in office, at least two years after he was released. But Biden faced withering criticism at the end of his term when he also pardoned his son, Hunter, who had pleaded guilty to tax violations and was convicted on firearms-related charges. Hunter was prosecuted by a U.S. Attorney who began his probe during Trump's first term and was appointed as a special counsel under Biden to continue the investigation. The Public Integrity Section was consulted on the probe, according to one of the people familiar with the department and an additional person with knowledge of the case. But the unit had no direct role in the prosecutions. Biden had promised not to pardon his son, but later justified the move, claiming Hunter was 'selectively and unfairly prosecuted.' Currently, defendants in at least five other public corruption cases handled by the Public Integrity unit are seeking pardons or dismissals, according to a review of public statements, court filings and interviews with one of the people familiar with the department's operations and two others close to the defendants. Those and other cases will be reviewed by Ed Martin, the lawyer who now leads the Weaponization Working Group. A longtime Republican activist in Missouri, Martin helped lead the 'Stop the Steal' movement to overturn the 2020 election for Trump. The Weaponization Working Group will review cases against Trump brought by local, state and federal prosecutors and tackle 'abuses of the criminal justice process,' Attorney General Bondi said in a Feb. 5 memo. Trump also appointed Martin pardon attorney, a traditionally nonpartisan job that reviews clemency applications. It does not issue pardons but makes recommendations to the White House. It's typically been occupied by a career Justice Department attorney – rather than a political appointee – to ensure pardons are conducted without favoritism. On May 22, Peter Ticktin, a Florida lawyer and longtime Trump ally, delivered a pardon application to Martin for Jonathan Woods, a former Republican state senator in Arkansas convicted of a bribery and kickback scheme in 2018, during Trump's first term. He is serving an 18-year prison sentence in a case that was prosecuted by the Public Integrity Section. In his appeal for a pardon, Woods said he was targeted because he is an 'outspoken conservative' with 'Christian values,' Ticktin told Reuters, reading from the application. Asked why the Woods case began under Trump, Ticktin argued that Trump 'didn't have control over everything' in his first term. He added that Jack Smith, who headed the Public Integrity Section from 2010 to 2015, had compromised the unit through overzealous prosecutions. As the transformation of the Public Integrity Section hobbles its ability to pursue future cases, and the wave of pardons undoes past convictions, some former Justice Department staff are bracing for a loss of law-enforcement independence. 'The true weaponization is beginning now,' said Randall Eliason, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney in Washington D.C. specializing in corruption under both Democratic and Republican administrations.
Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Third Chinese scientist arrested after smuggling ‘biological pathogens' into US from Wuhan after ‘agroterrorism' probe
Han Chengxuan was arrested at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on Sunday WUHAN SHOCK Third Chinese scientist arrested after smuggling 'biological pathogens' into US from Wuhan after 'agroterrorism' probe Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A THIRD Chinese scientist has been charged for allegedly smuggling "biological material" into the United States. It is the second such case within a matter of days after a University of Michigan researcher and her boyfriend were charged for allegedly bringing a toxic fungus into the country. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 A Chinese scientist has been charged with smuggling biological materials into the United States Credit: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 5 Han was arrested on Sunday at Detroit Metropolitan airport Credit: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 5 She initially denied sending the parcels at all, court documents claim Credit: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan In the latest case, Han Chengxuan was arrested at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on Sunday. Cops claim she sent four packages from China to the States that contained "biological material related to round worms". These packages were sent to people linked to the University of Michigan lab between September 2024 and March 2025. Han has been charged with smuggling goods into the United States. She initially denied sending the parcels at all, court documents claim. Han would then insist they contained plastic cups rather the petri dishes before ultimately admitting to sending the samples, the documents add. They had reportedly been collected during her PhD research in the Chinese city of Wuhan. FBI Director Kash Patel posted on X: "Han is alleged to have sent four packages to the U.S. from China containing a biological material related to round worms — addressed to individuals associated with a lab at the University of Michigan. "Upon arriving at the Detroit Metropolitan Airport on June 8, Han allegedly made false statements to federal officials regarding the packages she had previously mailed — and had erased her electronic device just days prior. "In a follow up interview with FBI and ICE HSI agents, Han admitted to sending the packages and lying about their contents. China floods sea bases with nuke bombers, terrifying satellite pics show - as US warns Xi could SEIZE Taiwanese islands "This case is part of a broader effort from the FBI and our federal partners to heavily crack down on similar pathogeon smuggling operations, as the CCP works relentlessly to undermine America's research institutions." It comes after two other Chinese scientists were charged last week for allegedly trying to smuggle a toxic fungus into the States. Researchers Jian Yunqing, 33, and Liu Zunyong, 34 are facing charges of smuggling goods, conspiracy, visa fraud and providing false statements. They are alleged to have tried to bring Fusarium graminearum into the country - which can cause severe damage to livestock and crops. 5 Jian denied that she was aware of her boyfriend's intent to smuggle the pathogen Credit: University of Michigan 5 Samples of a pathogen identified by the US Department of Justice as Fusarium graminearum Credit: Reuters Authorities claim the fungus could be used as a "potential agroterrorism weapon". Prosecutors say Liu attempted to smuggle it through Detroit Airport so it could be studied at a University of Michigan laboratory. Jian, who is Liu's girlfriend, worked at the lab according to prosecutors. The university did not have the necessary federal permits to handle this pathogen. A statement from the university says the institution has not had "funding from the Chinese government in relation to research conducted by the accused individuals". Officials further allege that Jian is a Chinese Communist Party member, and that her research on the fungus in China got Chinese government funding. Liu allegedly lied about trying to bring the pathogen into the country in July 2024 before later admitting it. While Jian has been arrested in the US, Liu was sent back to China at the airport - so his arrest is unlikely unless he returns. Following Jian's arrest, FBI Director Kash Patel posted on X: "This case is a sobering reminder that the CCP is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions and target our food supply, which would have grave consequences... putting American lives and our economy at serious risk."
