Countries Tell Ukraine ‘You Are Not Alone' after UN Adopts Neutral Stance on War
Dozens of countries rallied behind Ukraine at a meeting at the United Nations in Geneva on Tuesday, a day after the UN Security Council adopted a US-drafted resolution that takes a neutral stance on the conflict.
The event, held to commemorate "resistance to the Russian aggression", follows the resolution adopted in New York on the war's third anniversary that reflects President Donald Trump's upending of US policy on Ukraine and his more conciliatory stance towards Russia.
"You are not alone. Norway and other countries, all the countries who are here, but also other countries, will continue to support you as you fight for your territorial integrity, your sovereignty and your human dignity," Norway's Deputy Foreign Minister Andreas Motzfeldt Kravik told a packed room of ministers and diplomats.
Thousands of Ukrainian citizens have died since Russia invaded in 2022 and more than 6 million are refugees abroad. Russia has said it had no choice but to launch what it calls its "special military operation" due to the NATO alliance's eastwards expansion.
Estonia's Minna-Liina Lind, Undersecretary for Global Affairs, told the room she was "extremely worried" by the fact that the Security Council passed a resolution that does not include long-held language on Ukraine's territorial integrity.
"But I think the European resolve is even greater. When there's someone else not as strong, the others fill in," she told Reuters after the meeting, co-organized by Ukraine and Liechtenstein on the sidelines of the UN Human Rights Council.
The US failed to convince the UN General Assembly to pass the same resolution that passed in the Security Council on Monday. The General Assembly instead adopted motions seen as more favorable for Ukraine, in a diplomatic victory over Washington.
Most countries attending the Geneva event were European and included France and Germany, but others such as Türkiye, South Korea, Australia and Japan were also present. Washington sent a delegate who did not take the floor.
Ukraine's ambassador Yevheniia Filipenko, who at one point became emotional while addressing the room, asked countries to continue their support for rebuilding Ukraine and seeking accountability for crimes committed since Russia's invasion.
"The road ahead is very challenging but when we are united we can prevail," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
33 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's ugly divorce
In one of his emotional outbursts, Elon Musk wrote months ago on his platform 'X': 'I love [Donald Trump] as much as a straight man can love another man.' Since then, we've seen him – with his son – accompanying Trump more often than we see the president with his own wife and son, Barron. Yet this affection and personal attraction were, in reality, built on fragile foundations of mutual interest and benefit. It was expected that this tangled relationship would end quickly – but not in the bitter and ugly way it did, when Musk accused his former boss of ties to the infamous Jeffrey Epstein case and called for his ouster. Trump, known for firing his staff in humiliating ways – sometimes without them even knowing – and calling them 'idiots,' couldn't treat the richest man in the world the same way. Elon Musk is no ordinary man, and he played a critical role in Trump's re-election. That's why Trump tried to ease him out gracefully and with minimal damage. In a bland farewell ceremony before reporters in the Oval Office, he handed Musk – who was in a state of turmoil – a golden key in honor of his service. In his parting words, Musk said he would remain a supporter and friend to Trump, who, despite Musk's remarks, tried to absorb the blow and calm the tension. But just a few days later, Musk launched a furious, unhinged attack on his former boss, declaring that he hadn't meant what he said in front of millions. Musk is an emotional and volatile figure, difficult to contain. This is one of the key reasons behind the rift between him and Trump that led to this ugly split. While Trump seeks to weaken established institutions and challenge the so-called deep state, Musk operates entirely outside traditional government structures, disregarding its norms and conventions altogether. Trump, despite rebelling against Washington and its elite, still adhered to some rules and never became an absolute destructive force – after all, he is the president of the United States. Musk, on the other hand, has never worked in government, but wants to change it as he does his corporate leadership teams – without oversight or accountability. His clash with members of Trump's administration over the government efficiency board known as 'DOGE' sparked much controversy. He used a harsh management style, and although Trump publicly supported him at first, Musk's employee purge campaign ultimately damaged Trump's political image and failed to deliver the promised financial savings. It was a chaotic project doomed to fail from the very beginning. Another rift between Musk and Trump lies in their worldviews. After Trump's victory, Musk entered into a state of hysterical celebration, declaring that the win would serve human civilization and the interests of mankind. Musk's motivations are cosmic and idealistic, whereas Trump speaks in terms of individual interests, 'America First,' egg prices, and tariffs. While Musk saw Trump's win as a turning point in human history, Trump was busy attacking Biden and blaming him. Their conflict was a collision of extremes – excessive idealism versus self-serving realism, visionary romanticism versus cold materialism. For all these reasons, the split wasn't surprising – it was a logical conclusion to a fragile relationship between two personalities who were never meant to meet in the first place.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
Trump banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the US. Here's what to know
DAKAR, Senegal: President Donald Trump has banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States and restricted access for those from seven others, citing national security concerns in resurrecting and expanding a hallmark policy from his first term that will mostly affect people from Africa and the Middle East. The ban announced Wednesday applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The heightened restrictions apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the US and don't hold a valid visa. The policy takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m. and does not have an end date. Here's what to know about the new rules: How Trump justified the ban Since returning to the White House, Trump has launched an unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement that has pushed the limits of executive power and clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. The travel ban stems from a Jan. 20 executive order Trump issued requiring the Department of State, Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the US The aim is to 'protect its citizens from aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes,' the administration said. In a video posted on social media, Trump tied the new ban to a terrorist attack Sunday in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. US officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. Who is exempt from the ban, Which countries are affected Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay US visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. 'We don't want them,' Trump said. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban makes exceptions for Afghans on special immigrant visas, who were generally the people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade war there. The list can be changed, the administration said in a document, if authorities in the designated countries make 'material improvements' to their own rules and procedures. New countries can be added 'as threats emerge around the world.' State Department guidance The State Department instructed US embassies and consulates on Friday not to revoke visas previously issued to people from the 12 countries listed in the ban. In a cable sent to all US diplomatic missions, the department said 'no action should be taken for issued visas which have already left the consular section' and that 'no visas issued prior to the effective date should be revoked pursuant to this proclamation.' However, visa applicants from affected countries whose applications have been approved but have not yet received their visas will be denied, according to the cable, which was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. And, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting on Monday. How the ban differs from 2017's Early in Trump's first term, he issued an executive order banning travel to the US by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries, including Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travelers from those nations were either barred from getting on flights to the US or detained at US airports after they landed. They included students and faculty, as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban,' was retooled amid legal challenges until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. That ban affected various categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Reactions to Trump's order Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans. Chad President Mahamat Deby Itno said his country would suspend visas for US citizens in response to the ban. Aid and refugee resettlement groups also denounced it. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. But reactions to the ban ran the gamut from anger to guarded relief and support. In Haiti, radio stations received a flurry of calls Thursday from angry listeners, including many who said they were Haitians living in the US and who accused Trump of being racist, noting that the people of many of the targeted countries are Black. Haitian-American Elvanize Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the US are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' William Lopez, a 75-year-old property investor who arrived from Cuba in 1967, supports the travel ban. 'These are people that come but don't want to work, they support the Cuban government, they support communism,' Lopez said at a restaurant near Little Havana in Miami. 'What the Trump administration is doing is perfectly good.'
Leaders
12 hours ago
- Leaders
Ukraine, Russia Prepare for Major POW Exchange Next Week
Ukraine announced on Sunday that a significant exchange of prisoners of war (POW) with Russia will commence next week, following mutual accusations from both nations regarding delays and obstructions in the process, highlighting the fragile nature of their negotiations amidst ongoing hostilities. Moscow has accused Kyiv of postponing the swap, while Ukraine claims Russia is engaging in manipulative tactics. These tensions surfaced after Russia launched a substantial drone and missile attack on Kharkiv, Ukraine's eastern city. Despite these challenges, both countries have reaffirmed their commitment to the exchange, which includes returning the bodies of fallen soldiers. Negotiations and Agreements The negotiations, held in Istanbul, resulted in an agreement to repatriate prisoners and the remains of soldiers starting next week. Kyrylo Budanov, head of Ukraine's defense intelligence, confirmed this schedule on social media. The agreement, reached on June 2, marks a critical step in the ongoing conflict, offering a glimmer of hope for the families of the captured and deceased soldiers. The planned exchange will involve all severely wounded and sick prisoners of war, as well as young soldiers aged 18 to 25. This comprehensive swap aims to address the humanitarian aspects of the conflict, providing relief to the most vulnerable captives. Additionally, both sides agreed to return the bodies of 6,000 fallen soldiers, a move that underscores the grim reality of the prolonged war. Previous Exchanges and Current Progress Previous prisoner exchanges between Ukraine and Russia have generally proceeded without major issues. For instance, Ukraine recently shot down a Russian Su-35 warplane, demonstrating its ongoing defensive capabilities. The successful operation in the Kursk direction highlights Ukraine's resilience amidst continuous aggression. Despite the progress, the path to a full ceasefire remains contentious. Russia has resisted Ukraine's proposals for an unconditional ceasefire, instead offering a partial truce. Ukrainian officials have expressed their desire to continue peace talks, aiming for a more comprehensive agreement that could pave the way for lasting peace. Turkey has played a crucial role in facilitating these negotiations, offering to host further discussions between the leaders of both nations. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed optimism about the potential for future talks, emphasizing the need for international support to achieve a sustainable resolution. As the planned exchange approaches, the international community watches closely, hoping for a successful implementation that could alleviate some of the suffering caused by the conflict. The upcoming weeks will be critical in determining whether this exchange can build momentum towards a more lasting peace. Short link : Post Views: 2
