
Does Iran have nuclear weapons? Why US is attacking now
It had long been assumed that Iran's two main nuclear enrichment facilities were hidden so deeply into the country's mountains that it would prove challenging for the Israeli military to destroy them.
That did not stop Israel trying. Some experts questioned whether its attacks starting on June 12 would do anything more than temporarily set back the nuclear programme — but there will be far less doubt about the effectiveness of America's bombing raid on Saturday.
• America strikes Iran: follow live
Israel's attack on Iran was, therefore, a gamble. Either it has degraded Iran's nuclear weapons facilities sufficiently enough to halt further production, or the prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has emboldened Tehran to accelerate its race to build a nuclear bomb.
Israel claimed the threat was 'imminent' after Iran enriched more than 400 kilograms of uranium to 60 per cent, just shy of the 90 per cent needed to build a bomb. The fuel, if weaponised, could be enough for nine nuclear warheads, according to the UN.
Israeli missiles struck Natanz, one of the country's main facilities, and killed some of Iran's top nuclear specialists. The strikes also killed Iran's top two military commanders and severely injured a senior aide to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who headed nuclear policy.
The attack came a day after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) declared Iran to be in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time due to Tehran's unwillingness to disclose information about its nuclear stockpile, and days before Iran and the US were scheduled to hold another round of talks to curb the nuclear programme.
But western intelligence agencies, including US ones, had assessed that Iran was not currently building a bomb, although it possessed the know-how. Iran has always claimed that its nuclear programme was meant for peaceful purposes but that it could build a bomb if its sites were attacked.
Even before America joined in, one expert said that the Israeli strikes could bring that moment closer. 'It's far more likely now that Iran will withdraw from the non-proliferation treaty and make the decision to build nuclear weapons,' said Kelesy Davenport, the director for Nonproliferation Policy at the Arms Control Association.
• What weapons does Iran have and how long can it attack Israel?
'Israel cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has gained about nuclear development. There is already a real risk that Iran is already diverting enriched uranium to covert sites. So Israeli strikes can set back the programme, but Israel cannot stop Iran indefinitely,' she said.
It is widely accepted that Israel has nuclear weapons of its own, although it does not admit or deny having them. In 2008, The Sunday Times uncovered the secrets of a subterranean factory engaged in the manufacture of Israeli nuclear weapons.
Hidden beneath the Negev desert, the factory had been producing atomic warheads for 20 years. Back then it had almost certainly begun manufacturing thermonuclear weapons, with yields big enough to destroy entire cities.
It is not clear what weapons were used to attack Natanz and how far down they were able to penetrate. Some experts believe only with American support could Israel meaningfully degrade all of Iran's nuclear capabilities.
• The Iran-Israel conflict in maps, video and satellite images
Last year, Iran fired drones, cruise and ballistic missiles at Israel on two occasions and it appears likely that Tehran will retaliate.
Those previous exchanges avoided setting off a devastating regional war because of the strength of Israeli air defences. But with each attack, the risk increases that a missile gets through. Indeed, Netanyahu may calculate that an Iranian misstep could drag the US into the conflict — forcing Trump to reconsider his opposition to a strike on Tehran's nuclear facilities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Netanyahu sees lifelong dream coming true as Iranian beast reels
For Benjamin Netanyahu the bombing of Fordow and the destruction of Iran's nuclear programme marks the best part of a life's work – and a promise kept to Israel. That it was US bombers that finished the job will make not a jot of difference. Iran's theocratic regime has been Bibi's obsession for the best part of four decades and few will see the destruction of its nuclear sites as anyone else's victory but his own. A week last Friday, he took care to remind people of this when Israel launched its first strikes against Iran. 'If I may, on a personal level, I've been watching this threat for over 40 years,' he told the nation. 'In 1982, I wrote in one of my books – that's three years, only three years, after the establishment of the regime of the ayatollahs – that the biggest threat faced by humanity and by us, our state, will be the terror regime of the ayatollahs.' On Sunday morning, on the international stage, he was busy praising the American effort ('Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history'). But the Israeli prime minister was bigging up the president safe in the knowledge that, at home, it was his name - not Trump's - that was being mentioned second only to God's. 'This morning, the world is a better and safer world,' said Bezalel Smotrich, Israel's messianic finance minister. 'Thank you to the Lord of the Universe. Thank you to Prime Minister Netanyahu … [oh, and] Thank you to President Trump'. Most Israelis only got the news when air raid sirens sounded at 7.30am and they got to the bomb shelters. In mine in central Tel Aviv, there was no outward celebration but relieved smiles broke across most peoples faces as they lit up their phones. Over the past week, there has been real anxiety here that Trump would chicken out and leave Israel to hang. The two week timeline set a few days ago by the president was widely seen as opening the door to a climb down. That mood has shifted dramatically. 'For me the biggest message this sends is that no one f---s with us,' a young South African Israeli told me after the blast doors opened. Where things go from here is anyone's guess but, make no mistake, Netanyahu, the ultimate political operator, has plans. His generals have been very careful over the last few days to stress in their morning briefings that the existential threat Iran poses to Israel is, not singular, but three pronged: nuclear, ballistic missiles and Oct 7 style terrorism. Yet elections loom in Israel (they must be held by Oct 2026 at the latest) and as the polls stood the day before the strike, Netanyahu was still trailing. He will no doubt aim to exploit the destruction of Iran's nuclear facilities to boost his prospects but - as happened to Winston Churchill after the Second World War - Israel may yet choose a different leader to build the peace, if indeed peace comes. How this would be taken by Netanyahu is not clear. Churchill turned to writing, painting and bricklaying but Bibi is a very different animal and has corruption charges against him to contend with, not to mention alleged war crimes. One Israeli commentator recently wrote that he 'he sees himself as a type of white knight fighting against the Iranian monster in order to save humankind'. His father was a famous Israeli historian known for his revisionism and Netanyahu is said to have been shaped by him. If he is remembered for slaying the Iranian beast, one suspects he will ultimately retire satisfied, no matter what else he faces.


Sky News
37 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: Trump says Iranian nuclear sites were 'obliterated' by US strikes; Tehran warns of 'everlasting consequences'
The US has carried out attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran, in what Donald Trump called a "spectacular military success". Officials at the UN are "gravely alarmed" - with Iran calling for an emergency security council meeting. Watch and follow the latest from Sky News below.


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Iran accused of abducting journalist's family over Israel war coverage
Iranian authorities have reportedly detained family members of a journalist working for the London-based Iran International news channel, in what the broadcaster describes as an "appalling act of hostage-taking" aimed at coercing her resignation. The detention, which reportedly took place on Saturday, is explicitly linked to the channel's coverage of the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel. According to Iran International, the family members are being held with the explicit threat that they will not be released until the journalist resigns from her position. The London-based Farsi news channel issued a strong condemnation of the incident, stating it "strongly condemns the abduction of its journalist's family, calling it 'an appalling act of hostage-taking aimed at coercing our colleague into resigning from their post.'" "This deeply reprehensible tactic marks a dangerous escalation in the regime's ruthless campaign to silence dissent and suppress independent journalism," the news channel said. The detainment marks the latest example of Iran's longstanding effort to crack down not only on Iranian journalists inside the country but also those abroad who still have family and friends living in Iran. The Islamic Republic is one of the world's top jailer of journalists, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, and in the best of times, reporters face strict restrictions. The broadcaster said that Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guards took the presenter's mother, father and younger brother to an unidentified location. The journalist, whose name the outlet did not disclose, then received a phone call from her father early Saturday, urging her to resign from her role, according to Iran International. The voices of security agents could be heard in the background telling her father what to say. "I've told you a thousand times to resign. What other consequences do you expect?" Iran International said her father told her. "You have to resign." Farsi-language broadcasters like Iran International and BBC Persia have long been targets for the Islamic Republic, given the fact that they broadcast in the native language and many Iranians, both domestically and abroad, rely on them for news, especially of the most recent Iran-Israel war amid an official internet blackout. Iran International in particular has become a target of Tehran in recent years over its programming that is critical of the theocratic government in Tehran. The Iranian government has called the news outlet a terrorist organization. One of its journalists was stabbed in 2024 in an attack suspected to have been carried out by Iran, while men were arrested in a suspected plot to target others at the channel.