New ‘drive-through' cargo centre at Changi Airport cuts processing time; will be test bed for T5 ops
The 3,000sq m Bulk Unitisation Programme (BUP) Handling Centre is able to process outgoing air cargo shipments in two hours, instead of 2½ hours.
BUP is a packing strategy that consolidates loose cargoes into standardised, ready-to-ship individual units such as pallets or containers to speed up handling processes. It is typically used for consumer and electronic goods such as clothes and household products.
Before the launch of the centre, freight forwarders needed to transport loose cargoes to a warehouse for packing into pallets or containers for loading onto an aircraft, in addition to some ready-to-ship individual units.
Built by ground-handling services provider Sats, the facility in Changi Airfreight Centre, next to Changi Airport Terminal 1, will also test-bed enhanced air cargo processes and systems for the upcoming Terminal 5 (T5) and the Changi East Industrial Zone. The industrial zone is an airport logistics park that will optimise the flow of air cargoes and reduce the costs and transit time for processing goods to and from T5.
As Sats has to work with the space available in the facilities here before the opening of the zone in the mid-2030s, it is important to maximise the use of the space it has by moving ready-to-ship units into a dedicated facility, said Kuah Boon Kiam, senior vice-president for cargo services at Sats.
Faster processing time at the new centre comes from the acceleration of the acceptance process, in which freight forwarders hand the goods over to handlers to check the weight and shape of the cargoes to ensure they can fit into the aircraft, as well as to verify documents.
With the drive-through concept, this has been halved from 10 to 15 minutes to five to eight minutes.
The cargo handling processes at the previous air freight terminals were manual, as workers needed to use forklifts to place the cargoes onto weighing machines before transferring them into the warehouse for packing and acceptance.
Each terminal had only one weighing machine, which often led to congestion at the roads near the terminals.
The new centre is equipped with six cargo lanes and six weighing stations, where freight forwarders can just drive their tractors and cargo dollies in to deposit their cargoes after getting them processed. Cargoes are weighed while they are still on the dollies.
The cargoes will then be towed to the airside.
The centre will be manned by a team of 20, and the workers will need to perform new tasks such as verifying documents and checking cargoes to ensure they are ready for loading, instead of executing tasks such as moving cargoes.
Sats declined to reveal the construction cost of the new centre.
Kuah said freight forwarders can now go through a much more straightforward and simple acceptance process in a 'more spacious' set-up.
It is similar to the clearance lanes for cargo trucks at the Tuas and Woodlands land checkpoints, Sats noted.
Kuah gave these details during a media tour on the night of July 28, noting that the centre will streamline cargo flow and boost handling efficiency.
Sats had previously operated two air freight terminals – one for Singapore Airlines and the other for all other airlines it serves. They have been repurposed since April 7.
Hence, Kuah described the new sheltered facility as a 'one-stop shop' for cargo handling for all airlines. It started operations in early April.
The handling of cargoes at one of Sats' previous air freight terminals, in which loose cargoes had to be manually loaded onto a weighing scale and then moved into the warehouse for packing.
With the new centre, Sats hopes to increase the amount of freight it handles in BUP units from the current 30 to 35 per cent of its total volume to at least 50 per cent over the next one to 1½ years.
Kuah noted that the new facility is able to handle 600 units daily, double Sats' previous volume of 300 units in total for both terminals.
The new BUP Handling Centre allows freight forwarders to drive through the centre to weigh their ready-to-ship units, check the contours of the cargoes to ensure they fit into the aircraft and verify the documents.
Adding that the utilisation rate is now at 50 per cent, Kuah said Sats had designed it this way with a lot of room to grow.
'This will be a test bed for what we intend to do for the new Changi East Industrial Zone, because that will be (launched) in the mid-2030s – so a lot of the things that we're doing right now will basically lead up to that.'
'So we will obviously look at how we are doing it now – if it works very well, then we will replicate it for the new facility. If there are certain improvements that need to be done, then we'll have time to do them before we move to the new facility in the mid-2030s,' he added.
Speaking to the media at the opening ceremony on Aug 5, Kerry Mok, president and chief executive of Sats, said there is a need for Singapore's air cargo sector to be resilient amid the ongoing tariffs.
He said Sats thus needs to improve its existing facilities and drive new cargo handling processes to support the rise in volume, because there will be no new infrastructure for the next 10 years until the Changi East Industrial Zone is ready.
Noting that the BUP centre will allow Sats to handle increased cargo volumes using the same infrastructure, Mok said: 'When T5 comes, these are some of the new ideas that can be launched in the design of T5. So we can't wait, we've got to do it now.'
He added: 'And to do it now, it means we can then design something better for T5.'
On the impact of the new facility on Singapore's position as a transit hub, Kuah said any kind of time savings that Sats can give to the air cargo logistics industry will give the republic a competitive edge.
Global air cargo demand will grow by 4 per cent to 6 per cent year on year in 2025, according to freight data analysts. Likewise, South-East Asia's e-commerce market is expected to grow at an average rate of 22 per cent annually from 2025 to 2026. - The Straits Times/ANN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Voices: The killing of Al Jazeera's Anas al-Sharif in Gaza is an attack on truth itself
The news of Anas al-Sharif's killing hit me like a physical blow. A journalist with Al Jazeera, Anas was not my friend in the everyday sense – we never shared coffee, never walked the streets of Gaza together. But he was my neighbour. He was born in the same place I was born: Jabalia refugee camp. His family's home stood in the same crowded lanes where I grew up, among the same walls scarred by decades of displacement and war. Over the past 677 days, I saw him every single day – not in person, but through my screen. When the rest of the world looked away, Anas was still there, reporting from the very heart of my city, from the streets where my family still lives. At a time when no one else dared to enter northern Gaza, he walked through the rubble, speaking into his camera, delivering not just the news, but fragments of home. When Israel plunged Gaza into darkness, cutting communications and severing people from the outside world, Anas's voice broke through like oxygen. Through his reports, I could see the neighbourhoods I knew, hear the voices I recognised, and feel the pulse of a place I am exiled from but can never leave in my heart. He was more than a journalist – he was the thread that connected me to my people in their darkest hour. That made him a target. The Israeli army threatened Anas several times. They warned him to stop reporting from the north. They told him his life was in danger. He knew exactly what they meant – in Gaza, such threats are never empty. Yet he never stopped. He refused to be silenced. Instead, he doubled down, documenting every bombing, every destroyed home, every lifeless child carried from the ruins. He understood better than anyone that Israel does not just want to erase lives – it wants to erase the record of those lives. And it has made sure of that by banning international journalists from entering Gaza, leaving Palestinian reporters like Anas to bear the entire, deadly weight of telling the world what is happening. Israel even accused him of being Hamas – an accusation as absurd as it was predictable – despite the fact that Anas spent most of the past 23 months in front of the camera, reporting live, his location always known. I often knew exactly where he was, just by following his social media and Al Jazeera broadcasts. The question is: why did Israel kill him now? Is it because what is coming to Gaza is even darker, with the latest announcement of invading Gaza City and displacing more than a million people? Anas even pleaded publicly with the international community to protect journalists in Gaza so they could continue to expose Israeli war crimes. He was not asking for special treatment. He was asking for the basic right to do his job without being killed for it. That plea, like so many others from Gaza, went unanswered. On 10 August 2025, an Israeli airstrike hit a tent outside al-Shifa Hospital where Anas and his colleagues were covering the famine and starvation gripping Gaza. The strike killed Anas along with four other journalists – Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa. It was not just an attack on individuals; it was an attack on the truth itself. Anas's killing is part of a relentless pattern. Since the war began in October 2023, over 230 journalists have been killed in Gaza – the deadliest conflict for journalists in modern history. The vast majority were Palestinian reporters, camera operators, and media workers, many of whom were the sole remaining eyes and ears for the outside world. But journalists are not the only ones targeted. Israel has also killed over 400 aid workers, including UN staff and Palestinian Red Crescent volunteers. It has bombed clearly marked ambulances and convoys. More than 700 doctors, nurses, and paramedics have been killed. Hospitals and clinics have been destroyed or rendered inoperative. These are not 'collateral damage' – these are deliberate strikes on the people and infrastructure meant to protect life. And still, no one has been held accountable. Not for Anas. Not for the executed medics in Rafah. Not for the aid workers buried in mass graves. The world issues statements of concern, but statements cannot stop bombs. Words without action are just noise – and in Gaza, the noise is already deafening. For me, this loss is deeply personal. Anas and I shared the same streets growing up, the same camp, the same stubborn will to survive. I have lived in exile for years, but through his reporting, I could still feel close to Gaza. Every time he went live, I knew I was watching someone who was not just doing his job – he was carrying the burden of speaking for an entire people. He filmed not as an outsider looking in, but as someone living the nightmare alongside those he reported on. He showed the world mothers digging through rubble for their children. Fathers carrying tiny bodies wrapped in white cloth. Children searching for food among the debris. And he showed it without flinching, without sanitising, without letting anyone look away. That is why they killed him. And that is why we must remember him. If there is any award, any honour, any recognition worth giving, it belongs to the Palestinian journalists of Gaza. They have risked – and given – their lives so the truth could survive. Their work has been done under constant bombardment, without protective gear, without safe corridors, and often while their own families were being killed. Anas al-Sharif will never report another story. But his courage remains. His words remain. And his example must remain a rallying cry – not just for press freedom, but for justice. Because the killing of journalists is not just a crime against the press. It is a crime against history itself. It is an attempt to ensure that what happened in Gaza can one day be denied. We cannot allow that to happen. For Anas. For every journalist, aid worker, and medic killed. For the people of Gaza still living – and dying – under siege. Ahmed Najar is a Palestinian economist and commentator originally from Gaza, now based in London
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Are Sharing The Most Money Their Kid Ever Cost Them In One Go Because Of An Accident, And I'm As Impressed As I Am Horrified
Raising children, as I understand, is beautiful. It's also extremely messy. And extremely expensive. Knowing this first-hand, a parent on the popular fatherhood subreddit r/Daddit asked the forum to share their stories in response to the question: "What's the most money your kid has ever cost you in one go? Can anyone beat $7,800?" Of course, that dollar amount had us all on the edge of our seats, so poster Good_Policy3529 started the conversation: "A while back, I found out that my young son had discovered the cap on our sewer cleanout wasn't correctly in place. He developed a hobby of dropping rocks down it for fun..." "...We had to get an excavator out and dig up the whole line. It was packed with hundreds of rocks. All shapes and sizes. Total bill around $7,800. I'd love some similar stories for commiseration..." "...P.S. And yes, I have replaced the cap and am keeping an eye on it. Neither my house nor my kid came with an owner's manual, and nobody told me that one of the rules of parenting was 'make sure your kid isn't blocking your main sewer line with rocks to amuse themselves.'" Here are some of the stories other dads shared about the single biggest costs they've incurred because of their kids (or that they caused their parents when they were kids): 1."A friend's daughter was using her allowance to buy bags of candy. She then used the candy to bribe her 2-year-old brother to be quiet at night. $5,000 dental bill in a 2-year-old." —Bishops_Guest 2."Mine broke several trilobite fossils. They didn't cost me much in dollars. But trilobites died out 250 million years ago, so, counted in time, I was pretty pissed." —miguel-elote 3."Told my 4-year-old to go potty before we all walked to the playground. He apparently couldn't reach to turn off the water after washing his hands and didn't bother to tell us. We came home after about 45 minutes to water pouring through the ceiling into the main floor. Had to get all new floors and a new master bath. $120,000 in damages, 10-month-long fight with insurance, and had to stay in an Airbnb for 2 months. House looks great now, but def wouldn't recommend." —unreasonably_sensual 4."I was doing yard work, and my 15-year-old was target shooting with a spring-loaded BB gun. Randomly heard a crash and got a $700 bill for the neighbor's rear sliding glass door." —95jw85so84bs 5."You know those ultrasonic sensors on the back of a car bumper? He thought they were buttons, so he pushed them…harder and harder until they fell into the bumpers. Ended up being something like $700 to fix them all." —nafuot 6."Well, my middle child totalled my van. According to my insurance, it was worth $15,000." —whats1more7 7."My daughter stuck a Lego 1x1 up her nose, and it got stuck. My wife took her to urgent care, who said it was way out of their league, and she got sent to the ER. Three nurses and my wife had to hold down my daughter, and two different doctors attempted to get it out until a third one got it out on the first try. A $500 ER deductible later, and my wife didn't even keep the damn brick so I could at least put it on my Lego shelf as the most expensive Lego purchase I've ever made." —clunkclunk 8."$12,000. Youngest woke up in the middle of the night and ran the upstairs sink with the drain closed. It ran like that for hours until the kitchen and dining room ceilings collapsed." —schrombomb_ 9."My kid was flushing wet wipes down the toilet. We specifically told him not to do it, but he did it anyway. Eventually, it clogged the main line, and sewage backed up in our finished basement. Had to tear up all the bamboo flooring plus two feet of drywall. Cost us around $15,000, though homeowners' insurance paid for some of it. We don't keep wet wipes in the house anymore." —nutkizzle 10."I was the kid in this case. Got a Wolverine 'adamantium' mold thing as a gift. Tried to make the mold, it sucked, poured it down the bathroom sink. The 'adamantium' basically hardened into concrete in the pipes, cost my parents close to $5,000." —CaptainObvious1906 11."Last year's summer vacation — our 3-year-old got five minutes without surveillance when we were putting our baggage in the house, and there was a small playground at the front yard where he started playing right away after hours of sitting in the car. Sadly, there were some colorful stones lying around, and he took them to do a superquick drawing session on several parking cars. 15,000€ damage on the paint of five cars in fucking 5 minutes. Our own car not counted, which also got a new design." "Technically, we wouldn't need to cover the other people's damage under German law, as he is too young and five minutes is not problematic for the duty of supervision. But we are no assholes and actually have insurance exactly for this kind of damage done by our young kids. Doorbell ringing around, a big sorry from our tearful boy, handing over our insurance data, and the whole episode was cleared." —ore2ore 12."$3,500. Turned off our chest freezer that we had just loaded with a 1/2 cow and a pig, plus some other stuff. We didn't notice until 5 days later." —thecasey1981 13."Didn't cost me much money, but a similar story. My son had a delicious cut of beef brisket that he didn't want to finish, and apparently didn't want me to know he didn't finish. So he flushed it. Just big enough to hide in the curves of the toilet. As I try plunging it, it just pushes the clog down further." "The final straw was the snake pushing it down to the choke point of the toilet, where it opens to the pipes. Had to completely remove the toilet only to find a very compressed chunk of brisket stuck in the toilet. We had only one bathroom at the time. That was a fun day indeed. Total cost: 1 pipe snake (useful though, so I didn't mind), and a replacement foam ring to replace the wax seal on the toilet." —bs2k2_point_0 14."It's not as expensive, but one of my kids at some point put a quarter into the CD slot in my minivan radio, which eventually bumped and jostled its way around and through the system until it nestled so perfectly between a couple of wires that it caused the whole vehicle's interior electrical system to short circuit, killing my turn signals, and lighting up every warning on my dashboard. $300 to find and remove a 25-cent quarter, so I guess it cost me $299.75." —cranberries_hate_you 15."My brother drove my mother's car through the back of the garage at age 4. Took out the car, the garage, the bikes, and the BBQ. It was 1986, but still probably more than $7,000." —drewlb 16."I had a soap dish on my bathroom wall. My daughter planted a foot on either side and pulled as hard as she could, and yanked the whole thing out of the wall, and caused a bunch of the tiles on the wall to start popping off, smashing into and chipping the tub. Ended up doing a whole bathroom remodel for $15,000." "Bathroom was in dire need of it (was the same everything from the 1950s, immaculately preserved by the previous owners, but still very, very old), but it sucked to have our timetable for a remodel moved up by several years." —trevdak2 17."I was at work about 40 mins away and my other half was struggling to keep an eye on both our boy and dogs, just one of those days... The boy threw small boxes of raisins on the floor, and one of the dogs snuck off with two boxes and ate them. Fortunately, my partner noticed quickly and rushed the pup to the vets. Lots of vomiting and a blood test later, we're slapped with a £450 ($600) bill." "I'd already had around £600 worth of car maintenance fees that month, so it was a little rough. Needless to say, raisins are now kept out of reach, and he's monitored closely whenever he has them. (Raisins are HIGHLY toxic to dogs and will destroy their kidneys if left to digest.)" —iBear92 18."Not me, but my sister ran up a $4,000 phone bill between 10-cent texts and daytime minutes used, and of course, an extensive library of ringtones. Thankfully, the phone company didn't make him pay it all, but I will always remember the day that bill came." —crazyleasha37 19."My stepbrother had his dad's credit card number logged on his Xbox. He bought V-Bucks in Fortnite, skins in COD, etc. I never found out the total, but allegedly it was enough to buy a car, so I'm guessing in the low $20,000s. He now has to pay off every penny back by giving half of his paycheck to his dad. This happened when he was 17, and he's still paying it off three years later." —Natural-Secretary-24 20."My son is prone to extreme mood swings/angry outbursts. He manages this much better now, but things we've had to replace following his rage include: Living room TV (threw something at it, cracking it) $5,002; cabinet doors (kicked and cracked), $600; 4-5 panes of glass, $60 in materials (I got good at DIY'ing these replacements); door and trim damage from slamming, DIY'd for $50 in materials; wall damage from kicking, DIY'd for $50 in materials." "He also once, arguably absentmindedly, decided to scratch his name into the car with a rock. It's an old car and we didn't elect to repair it, but I think we got one quote for $900 before deciding to live with it. Sigh. I love that kid, but he's a chaos monkey." —shimon finally, "Accidental issues. Broken dishwasher. Son was goofing around in the kitchen while the door was all the way down. Fell on it and completely bent/twisted it. It was about $1,200 for a new dishwasher." —robowarrior023 And there you have it, folks. If you have kids or know any accident-prone ones (or were one yourself), we want to hear about the single biggest expense they've caused the adults in their life. Share with us in the comments or via this anonymous form. Your responses may be featured in an upcoming BuzzFeed Community article. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A pause on higher tariffs for China is due to expire Tuesday. Here's what to know.
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — A 90-day pause on imposing higher tariffs on China is due to expire on Tuesday and it is unclear if it will be extended. After the most recent round of China-U.S. trade talks, held late last month in Stockholm, Chinese and U.S. officials said they expected the deadline to be extended for another 90 days. The U.S. side said the decision was up to President Donald Trump. So far there has been no formal announcement about whether he will endorse an extension or push ahead with the higher tariffs. The uncertainty has left businesses in limbo and a decision to raise the import duties could jolt world markets. SILENCE FROM WASHINGTON AND BEIJING Trump has repeatedly shifted deadlines and tariff rates, and neither side has indicated what it plans for Tuesday. Extending the Aug. 12 deadline for reaching a trade agreement with China would forestall earlier threats of tariffs of up to 245%. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Trump was deciding about another 90-day delay to allow time to work out details of an agreement setting tariffs on most products at 50%, including extra import duties related to illicit trade in the powerful opiate fentanyl. Higher tariffs are aimed at offsetting the huge, chronic U.S. trade deficit with China, which hit a 21-year low in July as the threat of tariffs bit into Chinese exports. It's not unusual for the U.S. to give hints on where talks stand, but it's rare for China to make announcements until major decisions are set. CHINA RESISTED CUTTING AN EARLY BARGAIN Prohibitively high tariffs on Chinese exports to the United States would put huge pressure on Beijing at a time when the Chinese economy, the world's second largest, is still recovering from a prolonged downturn in its property market. Lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have left around 200 million of its workers reliant on 'gig work,' crimping the job market. Higher import taxes on small parcels from China have also hurt smaller factories and layoffs have accelerated, But the U.S. relies heavily on imports from China for all sorts of products, from household goods and clothing to wind turbines, basic computer chips, electric vehicle batteries and the rare earths needed to make them. That gives Beijing some powerful leverage in the negotiations with Washington. Even with higher tariffs, China remains competitive for many products. And its leaders are aware that the U.S. economy is only just beginning to feel the effects of higher prices from Trump's broad tariff hikes. For now, imports from China are subject to a 10% baseline tariff and a 20% extra tariff related to the fentanyl issue. Some products are taxed at higher rates. U.S. exports to China are subject to tariffs of around 30%. Before the two sides called a truce, Trump had threatened to impose 245% import duties on Chinese goods. China retaliated by saying it would hike its tariff on U.S. products to 125%. MUCH IS AT STAKE A trade war between the world's two largest economies has ramifications across the global economy, affecting industrial supply chains, demand for commodities like copper and oil and geopolitical issues such as the war in Ukraine. After a phone call with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in June, Trump said he hoped to meet with Xi later this year. That's an incentive for striking a deal with Beijing. If the two sides fail to keep their truce, trade tensions could escalate and tariffs might rise to even higher levels, inflicting still more pain on both economies and rattling world markets. Businesses would refrain from making investment commitments and hiring, while inflation would surge higher. Companies are in an 'extended wait-and-see mode,' Oxford Economics said in a recent report. Christopher Bodeen, The Associated Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
