United Airlines plane makes 'emergency landing' at Heathrow amid reports of smoke in the cabin
Emergency services rushed to the United Airlines flight UA949 after it landed back at the airport and reportedly stopped the aircraft on the taxiway.
The plane had been due to fly to San Francisco and was over Milton Keynes when it was forced to make an emergency landing.
It was reported that the plane stopped climbing at around 15,000 feet after leaving Heathrow Airport at around 2pm today.
The Boeing 777-200 aircraft then made a U-turn to make an emergency landing back at the airport, where it was escorted to the gate by three fire engines.
The return London was due to a technical fault, AirLive reported.
Heathrow Airport confirmed the plane landed safely and there was no wider impact on operations.
United Airlines has been contacted for comment.
Jerry Dyer from Big Jet TV, who was filming at Heathrow when the plane returned back to the airport, told Metro that there was no smoke when the place landed 'safely.'
The steps were taken to the aircraft shortly after it landed to allow passengers to leave the plane
He said the plane had used a general emergency code, which could be anything from 'minor technical issues to a problem with a passengers like a health issue.'
Jerry praised the emergency services, the plane crew and Heathrow for their response, saying the fire engines and ambulances were already on the tarmac as a precaution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
Faulty gadget is urgently recalled from UK supermarkets over safety hazard that could spark a fire
TOTAL RECALL The device doesn't comply with an important piece of safety legislation A POPULAR gadget is being urgently recalled after a shocking fire risk was revealed. The product is being pulled from supermarket shelves and shoppers are advised to return the item, if they have it. 2 2 The Goblin cordless vacuum is an immensely popular product, designed to make cleaning easy. However it is now being removed from shelves, after a fire risk was uncovered. A statement on the UK Government's website reads: "It has been identified that in some units of the Goblin handheld vacuum, the battery may overheat." The statement added that the device "does not meet the requirements of the Electrical Equipment (Safety) Regulations 2016". Your product recall rights Chief consumer reporter James Flanders reveals all you need to know. Product recalls are an important means of protecting consumers from dangerous goods. As a general rule, if a recall involves a branded product, the manufacturer would usually have lead responsibility for the recall action. But it's often left up to supermarkets to notify customers when products could put them at risk. If you are concerned about the safety of a product you own, always check the manufacturer's website to see if a safety notice has been issued. When it comes to appliances, rather than just food items, the onus is usually on you - the customer - to register the appliance with the manufacturer as if you don't there is no way of contacting you to tell you about a fault. If you become aware that an item you own has been recalled or has any safety noticed issued against it, make sure you follow the instructions given to you by the manufacturer. They should usually provide you with more information and a contact number on its safety notice. In some cases, the manufacturer might ask you to return the item for a full refund or arrange for the faulty product to be collected. You should not be charged for any recall work - such as a repair, replacement or collection of the recalled item Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Animal rights group warns over ‘misleading' footwear labelling
British consumers trying to avoid animal-derived products are being misled by unclear footwear labelling, a leading animal rights charity has said. Under current legislation in the UK, all footwear must be labelled to show the main materials – at least 80% – used in the upper, lining and sock, and outer sole. However, if no single material makes up 80%, the two main materials must be listed. For example, a label or pictogram might show '30% rubber, 70% leather'. Wool is not required to be named on footwear labels. Even when it is a main material, it is grouped under 'textile', which also includes plant-based and synthetic fibres such as cotton, hemp and polyester, unless a brand chooses to specify it. As a result, consumers trying to avoid animal products might unknowingly buy shoes containing wool, believing them to be vegan, said Kate Werner, a senior campaigns manager at Peta, an animal rights organisation. '[Wool] is labelled with the same symbol as vegan textiles, leading consumers to believe that a product with that symbol is 'safe' to purchase from an ethical standpoint,' she added. In a letter to Jonathan Reynolds, the secretary of state for business and trade, Peta has called for regulations to be updated so consumers can make informed choices that align with their values. It also asked for wool to be given a unique symbol 'that clearly communicates its animal origin, such as the one currently used for leather'. It added: 'Many people choose products based on ethical considerations and environmental concerns, and they deserve transparency. If wool is grouped with humane and non-animal materials, it prevents consumers from making informed decisions aligned with their values.' Richard Matthews, the lead officer for fair trading at the Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI), said it was the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure footwear was properly labelled and not misleading. 'At present, if the footwear is made up of 'mixed materials' the word 'textile' is permitted in the description. If shoes are described as vegan, we would expect this description to be honest. However, if the shoes are generically labelled, and are labelled according to the regulations, this complies with legislation.' Peta pointed to the 'significant suffering' sheep experienced in the wool industry. Grouping wool under the textile symbol 'is misleading, as it obscures the fact that wool production, like leather and sheepskin, involves the exploitation and slaughter of animals', the letter states. A spokesperson for Ethical Consumer, a nonprofit that investigates corporate ethics and product sustainability, said: 'People have a right to know what materials they are buying so they can make informed decisions, because many people do want to avoid supporting animal exploitation and see wool as part of that. Therefore the use of the word 'textile' without reference to wool is misleading, or at very least insufficiently transparent.' A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said: 'Regulations require the main materials used in shoes to be stated clearly. We encourage anyone who needs more information to speak to their retailer.' CTSI urged consumers with concerns about the presence of animal fibres in footwear to double check before buying them.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Zoo baffled by otter cub discovery
An otter cub, named Mingo, was discovered curled up in the flamingo enclosure at Colchester Zoo, weighing just 800 grams. Jody Bedford, a team leader at the zoo, found Mingo "snoring his head off," with staff baffled as to how the cub, thought to be a few months old, entered the habitat. Zookeepers called Wildlives Rescue, as the cub had "zero" chance of survival without immediate intervention due to his reliance on his mother. Mingo was initially dehydrated, weak, and frightened but responded to emergency care from Wildlives Rescue. He has since been transferred to the UK Wild Otter Trust's specialist facility in Devon, where he will be cared for until strong enough for release back into the wild.
