
Home Office has no idea how many migrants overstayed
The Independent
The government has failed to gather basic information such as whether people leave the UK after their visas expire or how many might have stayed to work illegally, the chairman of a cross-party committee of MPs said. The Public Accounts Committee (Pac), which examines the value for money of government projects, said the Home Office had failed to analyse exit checks since the skilled worker visa route was introduced by the Tories in 2020. Some 1.18 million people applied to come to the UK on this route — designed to attract skilled workers in the wake of Brexit — between its launch in December of that year and the end of 2024.
Around 630,000 of those were dependents of the main visa applicant. But the Pac said there is both a lack of knowledge around what people do when their visas expire and that the expansion of the route in 2022 to attract staff for the struggling social care sector led to the exploitation of some migrant workers. Its report said there was "widespread evidence of workers suffering debt bondage, working excessive hours and exploitative conditions", but added there is "no reliable data on the extent of abuses". It noted that the fact that a person's right to remain in the UK is dependent on their employer under the sponsorship model means migrant workers are "vulnerable to exploitation". While the problems began under the previous Conservative government, the revelations will come as a major headache for Yvette Cooper, who is trying to persuade voters she can get a grip on illegal migration.
It comes just days after new figures showed that a record number of people have crossed the Channel in small boats in the first six months of this year, despite Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to "smash" the smuggling gangs. Provisional Home Office data showed that a total of 19,982 people have arrived in the UK since the start of 2025 — the highest total for the halfway point of the year since data was first collected on migrant crossings in 2018. Meanwhile, figures published earlier this year suggested thousands of care workers have come to the UK in recent years under sponsors whose licences were later revoked, in estimates suggesting the scale of exploitation in the system. The Home Office said more than 470 sponsor licences in the care sector had been revoked between July 2022 and December 2024 in a crackdown on abuse and exploitation.
More than 39,000 workers were associated with those sponsors since October 2020, the department said. In its report, published on Friday, the Pac said: "The cross-government response to tackling the exploitation of migrant workers has been insufficient and, within this, the Home Office's response has been slow and ineffective." It also noted a lack of information around what happens to people when their visas expire, stating that the Home Office had said the only way it can tell if people are still in the country is to match its own data with airline passenger information.
The report said: "The Home Office has not analysed exit checks since the route was introduced and does not know what proportion of people return to their home country after their visa has expired, and how many may be working illegally in the United Kingdom." Committee chairman Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said while the former Tory government had "moved swiftly to open up the visa system to help the social care system cope during the pandemic", the speed and volume of applications "came at a painfully high cost - to the safety of workers from the depredations of labour market abuses, and the integrity of the system from people not following the rules".
He added: "There has long been mounting evidence of serious issues with the system, laid bare once again in our inquiry. "And yet basic information, such as how many people on skilled worker visas have been modern slavery victims, and whether people leave the UK after their visas expire, seems to still not have been gathered by the government." Earlier this week legislation to end the recruitment of care workers from abroad was introduced to parliament as part of a raft of immigration reforms. The move has sparked concerns from the adult social care sector, with the GMB union describing the decision as "potentially catastrophic" due to the reliance on migrant workers, with some 130,000 vacancies across England. The Home Office believes there are 40,000 potential members of staff originally brought over by "rogue" providers who could work in the sector while UK staff are trained up.
Sir Geoffrey warned that unless there is "effective cross-government working, there is a risk that these changes will exacerbate challenges for the care sector". He said the government must "develop a deeper understanding of the role that immigration plays in sector workforce strategies, as well as how domestic workforce plans will help address skills shortages", warning that it "no longer has the excuse of the global crisis caused by the pandemic if it operates this system on the fly, and without due care". Adis Sehic, policy manager at charity the Work Rights Centre, said the report "unequivocally finds that the sponsorship system is making migrant workers vulnerable to exploitation because it ties workers to employers" and that the Home Office had "simply relied on sponsors' goodwill to comply with immigration rules". He added: "This report is yet more damning evidence that the principle of sponsorship, which ties migrant workers in the UK to their employer, is inherently unsafe for workers and, in our view, breaches their human rights.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
a day ago
- The National
UK plans to use AI to determine ages of child asylum seekers
The use of AI facial recognition technology to determine the ages of child asylum seekers in the UK threatens to result in more of them being deemed to be adults, campaigners have warned. The Home Office this month began inviting companies to bid to provide the technology with a view to rolling it out over the course of 2026, as Britain continues to deal with migrants arriving by small boats. The Border Security and Asylum Minister Angela Eagle has said using AI is the 'most cost-effective option' for fixing flaws in the system that assesses the ages of unaccompanied asylum seekers. This has led to hundreds of them being wrongly deemed to be over 18 and placed in accommodation with adults where they are vulnerable to abuse and exploitation. But refugee and human rights groups are warning that AI technology could lead to even less accurate evaluations than ones carried out visually. Kamena Dorling, director of policy at the Helen Bamber Foundation, told The National the government's proposals to use AI are 'concerning, unless significant safeguards are put in place'. 'Existing evidence has found that AI can be even less accurate and more biased than human decision-making when judging a person's age, with similar patterns of errors,' she said. Anna Bacciarelli, senior AI researcher at Human Rights Watch, said so far technology has only been trialled in a handful of supermarkets and websites to assess if customers buying age-restricted goods are under 25, not whether a person is over 18. 'Experimenting with unproven technology to determine whether a child should be granted protections they desperately need and are legally entitled to is cruel and unconscionable,' she told The National. All asylum seekers who arrive in the UK on their own and give their age as being under 18 are subject to an initial assessment by immigration officers when they are taken ashore at Dover. They are then also assessed by social workers from local councils, who have responsibility for housing unaccompanied asylum seeker children and placing them in education. They are meant to go through a formal process known as a Merton Assessment, although in many cases that doesn't happen. A report by the UK's chief inspector of borders and immigration found the age assessment process was 'perfunctory' and that this has led to children being put into adult accommodation. The Helen Bamber Foundation revealed in 2024 that at least 681 children had been wrongly assessed to be adults. Legal challenges in the courts by asylum seekers wrongly deemed adults have exposed the problems of visual assessments. In one case, a Syrian male was deemed by officials to be 28, turned out to be 17. In another case, a shaving manual produced by Gillette was used to determine that a child was an adult. These children were forced to share rooms with strangers in adult asylum accommodation, and many are now also ending up in adult prisons after being prosecuted for arriving illegally. Algorithms cannot grasp how malnutrition, dehydration, sleep deprivation, and exposure to salt water during a dangerous sea crossing might profoundly alter a child's face Anna Bacciarelli The Helen Bamber Foundation cites academic studies which cast doubt on the ability of AI to accurately assess age. In one of them, researchers from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel found in a 2022 study that when it comes to assessing age, 'as it turns out AI platforms make many of the same errors as humans, although to a larger extent'. Ms Bacciarelli said the turn to AI to assess the ages of asylum seeker children comes after governments in Europe and tried various other methods, such as measuring bone density, which have not lived up to expectations. 'What we're really worried about with the introduction of AI is that it's a quick-fix solution to a complex problem,' she said. She believes the technology that could be used was not designed for children who are seeking asylum. She explained that algorithms used age assessment to identify patterns in the distance between nostrils and the texture of skin. But these cannot account for children who have 'aged prematurely from trauma and violence'. 'It doesn't take into account the particular facial features of someone arriving in this country by boat. They may have had their face weathered by exposure to salt water, may have experienced a lot of trauma, not slept and suffered malnutrition. Algorithms cannot grasp how malnutrition, dehydration, sleep deprivation and exposure to salt water during a dangerous sea crossing might profoundly alter a child's face.' Ms Dorling said that even if AI is introduced, the final decision on whether an asylum seeker is a child or not should always rest with trained social workers and properly trained border staff. 'Replacing poor human decision-making with facial recognition technology that is not sufficiently accurate will not address the current safeguarding crisis. The Home Office has this week announced the expansion of live facial recognition technology as a "targeted" crackdown on high harm offenders. A Home Office representative said: 'Robust age assessments are a vital tool in maintaining border security. "We will start to modernise that process in the coming months through the testing of fast and effective AI Age Estimation technology at key Border Force locations, with a view to fully integrate Facial Age Estimation into the current age assessment system over the course of 2026.'


Gulf Today
4 days ago
- Gulf Today
People believe Britain is broken, which worries Starmer
Fraser Nelson, the former editor of The Spectator, the Conservative weekly, is having a remarkable afterlife as a great defender of the Labour government. He has gone head-to-head with Nigel Farage over the Reform leader's claim that we are living in 'lawless Britain'. There is less crime in Britain today than there has been for decades, Nelson pointed out at one of Farage's media conferences this week. This crime reduction is nothing to do with people not bothering to report crime to the police any more, because the figures come from the Crime Survey for England and Wales, a large survey of a representative sample of the population that asks people if they have been the victim of a crime in the previous 12 months. The number of crimes has fallen by four-fifths since 1995. Farage waved the Crime Survey aside, saying it was 'discredited' because it does not include shoplifting. It doesn't, because it asks people about crimes of which they have personally been the victim, and shoplifting has indeed increased. But that does not mean the Crime Survey is discredited. On the contrary, it is the best and most reliable evidence, and it is especially useful for measuring trends over time, because it is not affected by changes in the way police record crime. What did Farage say to that? 'We all know that crime has risen significantly over the course of the last few years.' A big welcome back, please, to that dread phrase, 'we all know'. For years, I would point out that four public inquiries had found that Tony Blair told the truth about Iraq, only to be told that 'we all know' he didn't. As Nelson comments: 'This is the politics of perception.' As he points out in an excellent article in The Times today, it is the same with road safety, air pollution, sewage, and living standards. 'We all know' they are getting worse, when in fact they are getting better. So it does not matter to most people what the Crime Survey says. Most people believe that crime is rising, and the numbers who believe that have not changed over the years that crime has been falling. People are influenced by reports of terrible things happening to other people and misremember their own experience. Anything more than five or 10 years ago was a golden age when there was some decent music in the charts and Mars bars weren't behind perspex screens. Why, though, has what 'we all know' become so much worse in the past year? Probably because some highly visible crimes have increased: shoplifting, phone thefts and graffiti. These are crimes that make people feel threatened by disorder, even as more of us than ever report feeling safe walking alone in their local area at night. What is corrosive is the perception — 'we all know' — that the authorities are not securely in control. Behind that perception lies the reality of asylum-seeker hotels and a government that is powerless to stop the boats. What has changed since the election is that Farage is more active, at the head of a social-media movement and a TV channel, GB News, dedicated to portraying the country as a hellhole. The intensity of this campaign to spread fear and insecurity seems to have reached a critical mass that is dangerous to Keir Starmer. He cannot fight it with facts, or not only with facts, because the answer will always be that 'we all know' that the facts are wrong. As Ian Leslie, the advertising executive turned social commentator, says, 'Instead of asking, 'Why are people angry?' we should ask, 'What are we missing?'' What the government needs is to take visible and forceful action on the things that people care about, the shoplifting, phone snatching and graffiti, but above all on asylum hotels and stopping the boats.


Gulf Today
5 days ago
- Gulf Today
UK to deport foreign criminals to free up jail space
Tara Cobham, The Independent The UK is set to deport foreign criminals to free up prison space in the government's latest immigration crackdown. Justice secretary Shabana Mahmood vowed the offenders will be sent 'packing' immediately when they receive a custodial sentence. The proposed law change — which could save taxpayers an average of £54,000 per year, per prison place — would apply to prisoners serving fixed-term 'determinate' sentences. Authorities would also retain their power not to deport a criminal but instead keep them in custody, for example, if the offender was planning further crimes against the UK's interests or national security. 'Our message is clear,' Ms Mahmood said. 'If you abuse our hospitality and break our laws, we will send you packing.' She added: 'Deportations are up under this government, and with this new law they will happen earlier than ever before.' Almost 5,200 foreign national offenders have been deported since July 2024, a 14 per cent increase on the 12 months prior, according to the government. The justice secretary's announcement follows a tweak in the law in June — expected to come into force in September — which will see prisoners face deportation 30 per cent into their prison sentence rather than the current 50 per cent. The government will need parliament to greenlight its proposal to bring this down to 0 per cent. According to a Labour source, the previous Conservative government relied on prison transfer agreements with other countries to deport foreign national offenders, in deals which allow inmates to serve their custodial sentence in their 'home' country. This saw 945 prisoners sent to jails abroad between 2010 and 2023. Foreign national offenders make up around 12 per cent of the prison population. Conservative shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said: 'In Starmer's topsy-turvy world investors are fleeing the country in their droves while record numbers of violent and sexual offenders from abroad are put up in our prisons. It's a farce. 'Yet again Starmer has refused to confront our broken human rights laws. He needs to grow a backbone and change them so we can actually deport these individuals. The safety of the British public is infinitely more important than the 'rights' of sick foreign criminals. 'If countries won't take back their nationals, Starmer should suspend visas and foreign aid. His soft-touch approach isn't working.' The prison population currently stands at 88,007, just 514 below the record high of 88,521, which was reached on 6 September last year. The government has vowed to create 14,000 new prison places by 2031. Ms Mahmood has also accepted a string of recommendations following a major report by David Gauke, which will see some offenders serve less of their sentence in custody in sweeping reforms expected to ease pressure on prisons. The proposed law change comes amid the government's wider crackdown on immigration. Labour has put a pledge to tackle the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government. Last week, figures showed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK this year after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 — the earliest point in a calendar year at which the 25,000 mark has been passed since data on Channel crossings was first reported in 2018. With boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action — pressure which is exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls. Meanwhile, escalating protests are breaking out across the UK opposing the use of hotels to house asylum seekers. In recent days, the government announced further measures to support its crackdown on illegal migration, including pouring an extra £100m into the efforts. The money will support the pilot of the UK's new 'one in, one out' deal with France, paying for up to 300 more National Crime Agency officers and new technology and equipment to step up intelligence-gathering on smuggling gangs. The first small boat migrants were detained this week under the UK's new returns agreement with Emmanuel Macron and could be sent back to France within weeks. The agreement, announced by the prime minister in a joint press conference with the French president last month, means that for each small boat migrant sent back across the English Channel, an asylum seeker will be allowed to enter the UK from France under a legal route.