Melbourne University sells historic Parkville mansion Cumnock
The university purchased the property for $7.1m in 2017, but had left it vacant in recent months after declaring it surplus to requirements.
Industry sources have suggested it has attracted an offer within its advertised price range of $7.9-$8.69m.
Its listing earlier this year came shortly after the institution publicly committed to repay $72m in staff underpayments dating back to 2014.
RELATED: Cricket great's former home hits market
Whisk taker: Dessert Masters winner's $100k gamble
Myer family reveal new look for $100m estate
Known as Cumnock, the historic Italianate estate at 160-162 The Avenue was designed in 1889 by Windsor Hotel architect Charles Webb and occupies a 1376sq m corner block directly opposite Royal Park.
The impressive residence was listed for sale last month, and late last week was marked as under offer.
A property industry figure told The Herald Sun there had been strong and qualified interest in the address, particularly for its proximity to the Melbourne CBD.
University of Melbourne Chief Operating Officer Katerina Kapobassis confirmed the divestment was underway at the start of May and said the property had previously housed a Vice-Chancellor and was used 'regularly for official University functions and activities.'
'A property within the University of Melbourne's portfolio is in the process of being divested. The University has adhered to relevant legislative requirements regarding the sale,' she said.
Handled by Nelson Alexander Carlton North's Stephanie Hawke and Nicholas West, who declined to comment on the result or buyer.
At the time of listing, Mr West described the home as Parkville's 'crown jewel,' citing its scale, architectural significance and rare parkland setting.
'Most Italianate mansions of this scale are tightly packed into inner suburbs like Carlton,' he said.
'But here you've got open parkland across the road, minimal surrounding density, and incredible privacy, that's almost unheard of.'
Originally built for stock and station agent George Howat, Cumnock remained in his family until 1919 before it was acquired by Anglican theological institution Ridley College.
It was held for decades before being sold to developer Drapac, who then sold it to the university.
Behind its grand Corinthian-columned facade, the home features a pressed-metal entry hall, formal dining and sitting rooms, a library, and a state-of-the-art kitchen with Miele appliances and custom cabinetry.
French doors open to a leafy courtyard with a fish pond centrepiece.
Upstairs, a rumpus leads to a wraparound balcony and turret with sweeping park views. The main suite features a marble ensuite, with three further bedrooms sharing a designer bathroom with a freestanding bath.
The four-bedroom mansion includes eleven principal rooms, nine original fireplaces, a turreted viewing tower and wine cellar, and has long been considered one of Parkville's grandest private residences.
Sign up to the Herald Sun Weekly Real Estate Update. Click here to get the latest Victorian property market news delivered direct to your inbox.
MORE: Cricket great's former home hits market
Metro Tunnel turns Shrine into hot property
No more 'awkward conversations': wild rental crisis solution
david.bonaddio@news.com.au
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
2 days ago
- AU Financial Review
Indigenous businesses generate $42.6b in social value a year
Supply Nation was founded on the premise that self-determination and improved social outcomes can be achieved by supporting Indigenous-owned businesses through procurement. Economic empowerment is a catalyst for social empowerment, improving financial security, standards of living, health, education and overall wellbeing. This is a model that promotes inclusion over exclusion and prosperity over dependence. Our latest research report The Sleeping Giant Rises confirms that Indigenous-owned businesses are generating significant economic and social value for Australia. This pioneering study reveals that Indigenous businesses generate $42.6 billion in social value each year – value that benefits Indigenous business owners, Indigenous employees and their households. Social value refers to the positive changes measured through an Indigenous lens of wellbeing. This includes increased agency, expanded aspirations, financial security, pride, health, as well as stronger connections to community, culture and country. While many Indigenous businesses do give back, through formal or informal means, there should not be an expectation or assumption that they are all philanthropic. Our research demonstrates that even without social or community elements, these businesses are creating economic and social value purely by being in business. The outcomes are powerful: 95 per cent of respondents feel proud of who they are, 89 per cent are more able to express their culture, and 86 per cent say young people in their family have more pride in their culture. Of the survey respondents 78 per cent confirmed that as a result of running a business young people in their family are more positive about their future career options. Research by the University of Melbourne found that the Indigenous business sector contributes around $16 billion to the economy, employs 116,000 people, and pays $4.2 billion in wages. Supply Nation's research reinforces these figures and provides evidence that for every $1 generated by an Indigenous business, $3.66 in social and economic value flows back into the Australian economy. This is powerful empirical evidence that can't be ignored. Supporting Indigenous-owned businesses leads to measurable outcomes that close gaps. Additionally, Indigenous corporations, organisations and traditional owners are contributing real and quantifiable value to the health of our economy through land and sea management, carbon farming, habitat renewal, fire abatement and renewable energy projects. We welcome Prime Minister Albanese's recent announcement at Garma Festival committing to an economic partnership agreement with the First Nations Economic Empowerment Alliance and the Coalition of Peaks. But to realise the full potential of this agreement, we need the support of business. Tomorrow marks the beginning of Connect 2025 Australia's largest and longest running event showcasing the Indigenous business sector. Held at ICC Sydney, this two-day event will feature more than 270 Indigenous exhibitors and welcome over 4000 corporate and government representatives, international delegates and community leaders seeking commercial, cultural and trade opportunities. Opening with the Knowledge Forum, business owners, procurement experts, entrepreneurs, academics, and advocates will engage in essential conversations on the current state of the sector, its successes and challenges. These discussions will explore proposed changes to the federal government's Indigenous Procurement Policy (IPP) and the definition of an Indigenous business. Supply Nation has long advocated for the definition of an Indigenous business to be 51 per cent or more Indigenous owned, managed and controlled. Panel sessions will also focus on traditional knowledge systems, disruptive and innovative technologies, structuring long-term partnerships, and access to capital and financial services. Supply Nation now has more than 850 corporate, government and non-profit members committed to supporting the growth of Indigenous businesses through procurement. Our national database, Indigenous Business Direct, now lists over 5800 verified Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander suppliers, representing every sector of the economy. These commercial partnerships between our members and suppliers deliver economic empowerment and real progress in closing gaps. This year's Connect theme is Beyond the Horizon. Thousands of us will gather on Gadigal Land to celebrate the progress of a premise, chart bold new pathways and elevate pride in country, community and culture. I invite all Australians to look beyond the negative narratives, beyond the myths and support the rising Indigenous economy. Corporate Australia has played a significant role, but there is still so much opportunity for partnerships and sustainable growth.
ABC News
7 days ago
- ABC News
As bold economic reform ideas go, an 'imputed rent' tax on home owners has precedents
As industry leaders and the federal government prepare for next week's economic summit, two economists have started a national conversation by arguing that, to make Australia's tax system fairer for all, we should consider taxing home owner-occupancy. This week, Peter Siminski from UTS Sydney and Melbourne University's Roger Wilkins said Australia's tax-free treatment of owner-occupied housing was allowing home owners to derive untaxed income from their homes, and it was an unusual privilege in our tax system. They said that, to make Australia's tax system work more fairly for everyone, we should consider taxing owner-occupied housing in some way (and cutting taxes in other areas of the economy). But how do home owners derive income from their homes? They were talking about two specific concepts: "Imputed rent " and "accrued capital gains". Imputed rent was part of Australia's income tax base from 1915 to 1923 and its reintroduction for taxation was proposed in 1975, although it didn't go ahead. What does "impute" mean? It means to assign a value to something by inference. In the case of imputed rent, that's the estimated rental value of your residential property. In 2022, the OECD published a useful paper surveying the different ways family homes were taxed in OECD countries. lt explained imputed rent this way: Part of the return to an owner-occupier housing investment accrues to the taxpayer in the form of living in the property rent-free. This in-kind return is known as imputed rent. The concept of imputed rent on owner-occupied property is motivated by the idea that the owner-occupier could rent out the property on the market to earn a rental income. However, refraining from doing so indicates that the value of the housing service to the owner-occupier must at least be equal to the forgone rent. While the property owner (making the investment) and the dweller (paying the rental income and consuming the housing service) are two separate individuals in the case of rented housing, they are one and the same person when considering owner-occupied property. Imputed rent is commonly exempt for tax purposes. This has been found to be one of the most significant drivers of the preferential tax treatment of owner-occupied housing. While mortgage interest relief for rental property allows owners [i.e landlords] to deduct costs that are associated with generating taxable rental income, mortgage interest for owner-occupiers is deducted without a corresponding taxation of imputed rental income [NB: Australia does not allow tax-deductibility of mortgage interest payments for owner-occupiers]. This generous tax treatment of owner-occupied housing results in negative marginal effective tax rates in some countries, effectively providing a tax subsidy for owner-occupied housing. To remove distortions in housing investment decisions and eliminate the homeownership bias, the taxation of imputed rents combined with mortgage interest relief has often been suggested as a 'first-best' policy approach. In practice, a range of conceptual, administrative and political considerations have made the taxation of imputed rental income difficult to implement in practice. Only four OECD countries (Denmark, Greece, the Netherlands and Switzerland) tax imputed rents, although at comparatively low rates and only under certain conditions. The OECD report shows how residential housing is taxed in different ways globally. It says property is taxed when it's purchased (acquisition of asset), when someone is living in it (holding of asset), and when it's sold (disposal of asset). All OECD countries levy recurrent taxes on immovable property. The report says owners of rental properties (that is, landlords) are taxed on their rental income, but in a minority of countries owner-occupiers are also taxed on imputed rent. Transaction taxes are commonly levied on housing purchases (eg: stamp duty). Capital gains taxes are levied on the disposal of housing (when a house is sold), although many countries (including Australia) exempt capital gains taxes on the sales of main residences. Inheritance and gift taxes may also be levied when property is transferred to heirs. The report also has a table of 38 countries that show how every country in the OECD taxes residential property (as of January 1, 2022). Here's a shorter version of the table: Of the 38 countries, only four countries tax owner-occupiers' imputed rent. They're included in the list above: Denmark, Greece, Netherlands and Switzerland. Notice how countries can use very different combinations of taxes on residential property. Professors Siminski and Wilkins did not say we should try to directly tax imputed rent in Australia. However, they said its existence, combined with the accrued capital gains that home owners receive from rising property prices, was contributing to growing inequality between renters and home owners. They said when we include owner-occupiers' imputed rental income and accrued capital gains in measures of household income, inequality is much higher in Australia than we think, and it's rising more strongly. They said it makes Australia's tax and transfer systems less "redistributive" than we think. For its part, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) also says that including imputed rental income in an analysis of Australian household income would allow for "more meaningful comparisons" of the income of people living in different housing tenure types. It says it would also better-capture how income levels and the distribution of income changed over time as people moved in and out of different tenure types. The ABS says net imputed rent is estimated this way: Net imputed rent is estimated as gross imputed rent less housing costs. For owner-occupiers, the housing costs subtracted are those which would normally be paid by landlords i.e. general rates, water and sewerage rates, mortgage interest, building insurance, and repairs and maintenance. When Professors Siminski and Wilkins said policymakers should consider taxing the family home to make housing more affordable and to remove the distortions in our tax system that were encouraging Australians to pour so much money into housing (which is a non-productive investment), they weren't necessarily calling for a direct tax to be whacked on residential properties. They were suggesting something more subtle. They were saying that, when we think about household income, if we make conceptual space for the existence of imputed rental income and accrued capital gains that Australia's home owners enjoy (both of which are untaxed), it would allow us to re-jig our tax system to make the system work more fairly for everyone, rather than its current heavy privileging of property owners. They said there were plenty of ways to fairly incorporate owner-occupied housing into our tax and transfer systems too, while simultaneously cutting taxes in other areas of our economy (eg: personal income tax). For example, we could use a broad-based land tax, or a broader wealth tax, or an explicit tax on owner-occupied housing wealth. And there was a "strong case" to reconsider the exemption of owner-occupied housing from pensions means tests. "We should have a national conversation on whether the current tax treatment of owner-occupied housing is sensible," they wrote. "Moving away from complete [tax] exemption would open up opportunities for reduced reliance on income taxes and more food on the table for renters and owners of modest homes."
News.com.au
14-08-2025
- News.com.au
University of Technology Sydney ‘temporarily suspends' 146 courses, axing 400 staff
The University of Technology Sydney has 'temporarily suspended' new enrolments for more than 100 bachelor and postgraduate programs, with 400 staff jobs on the chopping block. The suspension affects 146 courses across six faculties which the university says are 'those which have low student enrolments'. In a statement released on Thursday, UTS said it 'continually reviews its course offerings as we want to make sure our curriculum is relevant to what students and employers need'. The affected faculties include the UTS Business School, Faculty of Design and Society, Faculty of Engineering and IT, Faculty of Health, Law, Science and the Transdisciplinary School. The temporary suspension of courses will affect domestic and international students, though the university stressed it 'has no impact on current students at this time and is aimed only at prospective new students for 2026'. In addition, 400 jobs – or about 10 per cent of the UTC faculty – will be cut as part of the cost-saving initiative, including 150 academics and 250 professional staff. Faculty and staff were offered a range of support services, training sessions and counselling, including a list of '50 tips' for staff who may be losing their job, the ABC reported. Some tips included 'bake a dessert' or 'do that task you've been dreading, like washing delicates, organising receipts for your taxes, or cleaning a bathroom'. In response, some staff told the outlet they felt their concerns were 'de-legitimised' by the list. UTS researcher and National Tertiary Education Union representative Hossai Gul said the list 'naturally de-legitimised concerns of already distressed staff'. Speaking to NewsWire, a UTS spokesman said they were 'very mindful of our need to support staff though periods of uncertainty and change'. 'Throughout this period of organisational review we have sought to consult with and hear from staff in town halls meetings, drop-in sessions and QandAs, and have a dedicated internal site with frequent updates, support and feedback channels,' they said. The spokesman said the externally-produced list of '50 tips' was one of multiple different recourses for staff, including 'internal key contacts, training, counselling, wellbeing and career recourses'. 'We recognise that the change process is difficult, and not all resources are going to be suitable for everyone and we review resources available based on the feedback form staff,' they told NewsWire. In an email to UTS staff obtained by NewsWire, UTS vice-chancellor and president Andrew Parfitt said he '(recognised) that we are in a period of great uncertainty' and was 'mindful of our obligations to manage psychosocial risks ensure a safe and supportive work environment'. The email explained the cuts were an 'operational decision' intended to 'minimise potential disruption and dissatisfaction' for prospective students that could arise if 'applications are made for autumn 2026 courses that may subsequently be changed or discontinued'. While more than 100 programs have been paused, the university said the 'suspension of new student intake does not mean a course will automatically be closed'. 'Sometimes intakes are suspended ahead of phase out, some intakes are suspended while courses are redesigned to refresh curriculum and/or better meet student demand before being offered again,' the statement read. 'The suspensions will be in place until a decision is made on the future of these courses following consultation with staff and unions through a change proposal process.'
