Neccessary, positive step for province
The Manitoba government took a significant and necessary step in March toward expanding equality by introducing legislation that would explicitly protect gender expression under the province's human rights code. While gender identity has been protected for years, adding gender expression ensures people are also protected based on their outward appearance, clothing, behaviour and preferred pronouns.
Justice Minister Matt Wiebe emphasized the move would bring Manitoba in line with most other Canadian provinces. As the bill advances through the legislature, it's important to recognize why this alignment is critical — not just legally, but socially, economically and culturally.
Closing gap in human rights protections
Mikaela MacKenzie / Free Press
Manitoba Justice Minister Matt Wiebe
Human rights codes must evolve to meet the realities people face every day. Manitoba's existing code protects individuals from discrimination based on gender identity, yet it leaves an important gap when it comes to gender expression — how people outwardly present their gender to the world.
This gap is not academic. Across Manitoba, trans and gender non-conforming individuals regularly face discrimination when accessing basic services simply because of their appearance or mannerisms. Being visibly gender non-conforming can lead to precarious housing situations or even loss of employment.
By explicitly protecting gender expression, Manitoba will ensure individuals are not forced to hide who they are to access employment, housing and services. Clear legal protection matters because it empowers people to live authentically without fear of unjust treatment.
Aligning with rest of Canada
Most provinces have already amended their human rights legislation to include gender expression. Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta and Nova Scotia, among others, have recognized gender identity and expression, while related, are distinct and both need explicit protection.
Aligning Manitoba's human rights code with other provinces promotes consistency and fairness across the country. People moving for work, school or family reasons should not have to navigate a patchwork of protections. It also signals Manitoba takes equality seriously and stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the rest of Canada in defending the rights of marginalized communities.
Falling behind the national standard could isolate Manitoba and discourage people and businesses who prioritize inclusive environments from investing in the province.
Reinforcing commitment to inclusion
When governments expand human rights protections, it sends a strong signal about the kind of community they are building. Wiebe spoke of 'one Manitoba' — a vision of unity that embraces diversity and ensures everyone feels they belong.
Legal protections do more than provide remedies after harm has occurred. They shape social expectations and culture by declaring who is valued and protected. Expanding the human rights code to include gender expression reflects a vision of a province that celebrates all its citizens, regardless of how they choose to express themselves.
This kind of affirmation is particularly important at a time when visible minorities, including trans and gender-diverse people, still face social stigma and systemic barriers.
Supporting economic growth, talent attraction
Beyond the moral and social imperatives, updating Manitoba's code makes strong economic sense. In today's labour market, skilled workers — particularly younger generations — expect and demand inclusive environments. They want to live and work in places where diversity is not just tolerated but embraced.
A province that demonstrates a real commitment to inclusion is far more likely to attract and retain top talent. Conversely, jurisdictions that appear to lag behind on human rights protections risk losing workers to places perceived as more progressive and welcoming.
Building an inclusive environment also directly benefits organizations. Studies consistently show diverse workplaces are more innovative, resilient and successful. Employees who feel safe and respected are more engaged, more productive and more loyal. By expanding protections, Manitoba is not only doing the right thing socially — it is positioning itself for long-term economic success.
Protecting vulnerable communities
Trans and gender non-conforming individuals experience disproportionately high rates of unemployment, housing insecurity, mental health struggles and violence. These vulnerabilities are exacerbated when discrimination based on outward appearance goes unaddressed.
Explicitly adding gender expression to Manitoba's human rights code will provide a vital layer of protection against some of the root causes of these disparities. It makes it clear no one should lose their job, be denied housing or face service discrimination because their appearance or presentation does not conform to traditional gender norms.
Human rights protections cannot eliminate prejudice overnight, but they establish a powerful foundation for greater safety, opportunity and dignity.
Reflection of modern values
Society's understanding of gender has evolved significantly over recent decades. Modern human rights laws must reflect this evolution by recognizing gender is not solely about biological markers or legal documents — it is also about expression, lived identity and daily experience.
Adding gender expression to the Manitoba human rights code brings the law into alignment with current understandings of human dignity and respect. It recognizes people's right to express themselves is inseparable from their right to exist free from discrimination.
Manitoba has a proud history of human rights leadership, from being home to the Canadian Museum for Human Rights to past legislative advances on issues such as marriage equality and anti-racism efforts. Expanding protections for gender expression continues that legacy.
Conclusion
Tuesdays
A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world.
The decision to expand Manitoba's human rights code to include gender expression is more than a legal technicality. It is an affirmation of the province's commitment to equality, inclusion, and human dignity.
It closes critical gaps in protection for vulnerable communities, brings Manitoba into alignment with national standards, strengthens the province's appeal to talented workers and fosters a society where everyone can live authentically and safely.
By acting now, Manitoba is taking an important step toward a future where all citizens — regardless of how they dress, speak, or present themselves — are recognized, respected and protected. This move is not just about aligning with other provinces; it is about leading with courage and compassion.
The proposed bill deserves strong support — because a Manitoba that protects and uplifts all its people is a stronger Manitoba for everyone.
Tory McNally, CPHR, BSc., vice-president, professional services, is a human resource consultant, radio personality and problem solver. She can be reached at tory@legacybowes.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
Conservatives aiming to amend Criminal Code so immigration status won't be a factor in sentencing
Article content The Crown sought a 90-day jail sentence. Ontario Court judge Paul O'Marra wrote that a criminal record would likely prevent the offender from sponsoring his wife to also become a permanent resident, as well as delay the offender's eligibility for Canadian citizenship and jeopardize his ability to become a licensed engineer. Article content O'Marra concluded that 'a custodial sentence would be unduly harsh' and instead handed down a conditional discharge with 12 months of probation, which included three months of house arrest. In establishing the basis for his reasoning, he wrote: 'The Pham decision stands for the principle that collateral consequences, while not determinative, can justify a lower sentence within the legal range to avoid disproportionate hardship,' Article content In an Alberta case cited by Rempel Garner, a man in Canada on a visitor's permit was accused of groping an 18-year-old woman in a nightclub twice. The judge ruled that 'in consideration of the devastating collateral immigration consequences to recording a conviction, I conclude that the appropriate sentence for Mr. Singh is a conditional discharge with a probation order of maximum duration, 3 years.' Article content Article content Rempel Garner insists that when 'it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a system of two-tier justice where judges can and have given lighter sentences to individuals who are non-citizens.' Article content The Conservatives are proposing a bill that would prohibit immigration discounts in sentencing. Great news! Courts have been more lenient on non-citizens since 2013, at times going light on sex offenders to help them remain in Canada. That can change if Parliament wills it. — Jamie Sarkonak (@sarkonakj) August 13, 2025 Article content Article content Rempel Garner said the Conservatives intend to introduce legislation to amend the Criminal Code. 'Our bill will add a section after Section 718.202 … which will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or … their family members, should not be taken into consideration by a judge when issuing a sentence.' Article content Acknowledging that the vast majority of immigrants and temporary residents in Canada abide by the law, she said 'removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer. Conservatives will always fight to protect Canadians, the value of our citizenship and the safety of every person who lives here. Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right.'
Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
Conservatives aiming to amend Criminal Code so immigration status won't be a factor in sentencing
When Parliament resumes this fall, a Conservative MP says her party will introduce legislation to end consideration of immigration status when a judge is sentencing a convicted criminal who is not a citizen. Michelle Rempel Garner, MP for Calgary Nose Hill and shadow minister for Immigration, said the practice has essentially resulted in a two-tier justice system that allows non-citizens to get lighter sentences than Canadians convicted of the same crime. 'This offends all principles of fairness that should be foundational to our justice system,' Rempel Garner said at a press conference in Ottawa on Wednesday. She pointed to a 2013 Supreme Court of Canada decision that she says has permitted judges to consider immigration status at the sentencing stage of a case. In that case, R. v. Pham , the accused was a non‑citizen, convicted of two drug‑related offences. The trial judge imposed a sentence of two years' imprisonment. However, the Supreme Court noted that under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, a non‑citizen sentenced to a term of imprisonment of at least two years loses the right to appeal a removal order against him or her. In reducing Pham's sentence, the Supreme Court ruled that 'collateral immigration consequences' are relevant factors that a sentencing judge may take into account in determining an appropriate sentence, but added that those consequences should not influence whether or not deportation occurs. Rempel Garner cited a few recent cases that relied on the Pham ruling in handing down a sentence. In the first example, a permanent resident was convicted of trying to buy sex from a police officer posing as a 15-year-old in an online sting operation. The Crown sought a 90-day jail sentence. Ontario Court judge Paul O'Marra wrote that a criminal record would likely prevent the offender from sponsoring his wife to also become a permanent resident, as well as delay the offender's eligibility for Canadian citizenship and jeopardize his ability to become a licensed engineer. O'Marra concluded that 'a custodial sentence would be unduly harsh' and instead handed down a conditional discharge with 12 months of probation, which included three months of house arrest. In establishing the basis for his reasoning, he wrote: 'The Pham decision stands for the principle that collateral consequences, while not determinative, can justify a lower sentence within the legal range to avoid disproportionate hardship,' In an Alberta case cited by Rempel Garner, a man in Canada on a visitor's permit was accused of groping an 18-year-old woman in a nightclub twice. The judge ruled that 'in consideration of the devastating collateral immigration consequences to recording a conviction, I conclude that the appropriate sentence for Mr. Singh is a conditional discharge with a probation order of maximum duration, 3 years.' Rempel Garner insists that when 'it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a system of two-tier justice where judges can and have given lighter sentences to individuals who are non-citizens.' The Conservatives are proposing a bill that would prohibit immigration discounts in sentencing. Great news! Courts have been more lenient on non-citizens since 2013, at times going light on sex offenders to help them remain in Canada. That can change if Parliament wills it. Rempel Garner said the Conservatives intend to introduce legislation to amend the Criminal Code. 'Our bill will add a section after Section 718.202 … which will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or … their family members, should not be taken into consideration by a judge when issuing a sentence.' Acknowledging that the vast majority of immigrants and temporary residents in Canada abide by the law, she said 'removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer. Conservatives will always fight to protect Canadians, the value of our citizenship and the safety of every person who lives here. Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Rustad calls for BC Ferries to scrap Chinese vessel contract
The leader of B.C.'s official Opposition is calling for the province to cancel BC Ferries' multi-billion-dollar contract with a Chinese shipyard. The ferry company has faced criticism from all sides since announcing this spring it would purchase its next four vessels from China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards (CMI Weihai) after a lengthy open bid process. No Canadian shipyards bid on the project, and the ferry company says the Chinese bid came in at about $1.2 billion cheaper than European competitors. BC Conservative Leader John Rustad said Tuesday that in the wake of China's latest tariffs on Canada, the deal should be scrapped. China announced a 75.8 per cent tariff on Canadian canola products this week, expected to deliver a $5 billion hit to the industry. 1:57 Union demands ferries be built in Canada Rustad said the Chinese move follows similar aggressive trade actions targeting Canadian seafood and wood pulp. Story continues below advertisement 'I think we should break this contract. I think that we need to send a message. We want to be able to have a good trade relationship with China. We want be able make sure that we have the ability to do things, but you don't reward a country that is quite frankly attacking other sectors of our economy,' Rustad said. 'I think there probably would be a penalty and quite frankly I think the board of BC Ferries should be fired for incompetence for actually putting us in this position in the first place.' Rustad further accused the NDP government of 'incompetence' for failing to work with local shipbuilders years ago to ensure they had the capacity to handle upcoming BC Ferries orders, and said if they were already fully committed to other projects the ferry company should have gone with 'some of our allies' like Germany or Poland. B.C. Premier Davide Eby has previously said that he would not override the deal, telling reporters it would cost billions to overturn and delay the procurement of badly-needed vessels. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In a statement, NDP Saanich South MLA Lana Popham said acquiring the new vessels was urgent. 'People need the new ships, quickly, so they can get where they need to go and aren't left sitting at the terminal parking lot. We are working to ensure future ships for BC Ferries are built here in Canada. Story continues below advertisement BC Ferries has said that cost was a key driver in its new ferry procurement process, and that any additional cost of more expensive vessels would be passed on to passengers. 1:24 'We shouldn't be giving federal tax dollars to subsidize jobs overseas:' Poilievre calls for loan to BC Ferries to be cancelled BC Ferries currently charges $95 for a car and driver plus $15 per passenger one-way on its major southern routes, and has warned that it could be forced to further hike fares by 30 per cent by 2028. Earlier this month, CEO Nicolas Jimenez told the House of Common Transport Committee that while two Canadian shipyards pre-qualified for the process, neither submitted a bid. BC Ferries received six compliant proposals, all from foreign shipyards, and chose the bid with the best overall value, including delivery timeline, technical performance, lifecycle cost, and service-level commitments, he testified. 'This was a choice between a foreign bid or no new ferries,' he told MPs. Story continues below advertisement Domestic shipyards, however, have argued that the bid process essentially excluded them by focusing on cost alone and that they were unable to compete due to pricier local labour. UBC Sauder School of Business economics professor Werner Antweiler said that while there have been many calls for BC Ferries to drop the contract, it would only make sense if there was a realistic alternative. He noted that local shipbuilder Seaspan is already fully booked with contracts for the military and Coast Guard, and that waiting is likely not an option for BC Ferries. 'If you want to receive ships that are affordable and available soon, there seems to be very little other options than going ahead with the contract that has been signed with China CMI,' he said. 2:12 Push for government to support domestic ship building industry 'So I'm not quite sure when people say well, we should build them domestically, what exactly they are proposing who is going to build and when.' Story continues below advertisement He added that cancelling the deal would do little harm to China's larger economy, while risking further increasing trade tensions. BC Ferries is technically an independent company with its own board and executives, though its sole shareholder is the BC government. Antweiler added that given its arms-length status, it would be improper for the provincial government to step in and override decision making. 'It means like really renationalizing BC Ferries and bringing it back under provincial control and making it a Crown corporation,' he said. 'If that is what is being proposed then Mr. Rustad should be clear about if that is where he wants to go.' 1:48 Federal transportation minister calls out province on BC Ferries' contract with China Rustad is not alone in his criticism of the deal. Story continues below advertisement Trades in the province and the union representing BC Ferries workers have both spoken out against it. B.C. Transportation Minister Mike Farnworth said he was 'disappointed' more Canadian shipyards weren't involved, while federal Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland said she was 'dismayed' at the choice and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Canadian tax dollars should not be subsidizing jobs overseas. MPs have launched a probe at the federal transportation committee of a $1 billion loan to BC Ferries from Canada Infrastructure Bank. BC Ferries is not the first Canadian ferry service to receive a ferry from CMI Weihai. Marine Atlantic Ferries, a federal Crown corporation that services Newfoundland, recently took a delivery of a new vessel from the same shipyard.
