logo
Oscar-Nominated and Broke

Oscar-Nominated and Broke

Yahoo28-02-2025

BRADY CORBET AND SEAN BAKER, the directors, respectively, of The Brutalist and Anora are using their awards campaigns to raise awareness of the financial condition of indie film. We should listen to them: Independent cinema is in trouble. The state of the industry is so dire that accurate descriptions would normally be dismissed as hyperbole. But it really is that bad right now.
Both Corbet and Baker have talked about how they, and other creatives in this space, get paid. The following is from Baker's acceptance speech at the recent Spirit Awards where Anora won best picture and best director:
The system has to change because this is simply unsustainable. We are creating product that creates jobs and revenue for the entire industry. We shouldn't be barely getting by. Creatives that are involved with projects that span years have to begin getting higher—much higher—upfront fees. And again, because back end simply is not—it can't be relied upon any longer, we have to demand that. If not, indie films will simply become calling-card films, and that's—I know that's not what I signed up for. So let's demand what we're worth.
Corbet echoed these thoughts on a recent WTF with Marc Maron podcast. Here is Indiewire's summary of his thoughts:
The 'Brutalist' writer/director said during the 'WTF with Marc Maron' podcast that he made 'zero dollars' from 'The Brutalist.' The indie notably had a budget of less than $10 million. The sprawling 215-minute drama spans 30 years in the life of Adrien Brody's lead character, fictional architect László Tóth.
To financially sustain himself, Corbet directed three advertisements in Portugal. 'This is the first time I've made any money in years,' Corbet said of the ads.
It was the same story with 2018's 'Vox Lux.' 'Both my partner [Mona Fastvold] and I made zero dollars on the last two films we made. Yes, actually zero. So we had to just live off of a paycheck from three years ago,' Corbet said, 'And obviously, the timing during an awards campaign and travel every two or three days was less than ideal, but it was an opportunity that landed in my lap, and I jumped at it.'
It is worth emphasizing that Baker and Corbet are both at the top of their game, professionally: Both have made several films and both are nominated for Best Director at the Academy Awards this year. Yet they are struggling to reap any sort of reward. Why?
Join now
In the simplest terms, it takes time—years and years—to make an indie movie. First, one must write a script and start development on a film. That by itself can take years: writing, gathering funding, attaching stars, etc. Then it takes months (or longer) to shoot and complete post-production on a film. Then it takes more time for a movie to be released by a distributor. Anora, for example, premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in May 2024 and is still in the initial phase of its Neon release In March, it will hit its third and final major phase of exploitation—its streaming debut on Hulu—around eleven months after its festival premiere. Baker and his creative team got paid when the budget was fully paid for, typically a few months or weeks before the film starts shooting.
And that's it. They may have access to any profit the film makes with the distributor but that won't occur until months or years after the film has been released. It may never happen. First, the distributor has to recoup their costs to release the movie, the cost for them to acquire the film—which is the money used to pay for part or all of the film's budget—and their fees to release the film. From start to finish, that's at least two or three years of commitment in which nothing but initial fees are earned.
Share
AND LOOK: ARTISTS KNOW THE DEAL. They get paid 'up front' (that is, after a year or two of development) with the understanding it will involve years of work. They enter into this deal willingly. The problem in 2025 is twofold. First, the fees that creatives get have been reduced considerably. In Corbet's case, it sounds like he forewent any fees at all to keep the budget at a level where the film had a chance of finding investors. Second, even with the relatively low budgets for Anora and The Brutalist, their share of the profits may never materialize, and not because of the dreaded 'Hollywood math' or because their movies failed. It's because the markets have been reduced so much in 2025 that the opportunity for a film to break out and make money for all parties, not just the distributor, is akin to hitting the lottery.
Indie films have been considerably devalued in the marketplace. Yes, the industry as a whole has been hit hard by the one-two punch of COVID and strikes, but it's actually worse for indie films. Quoting Baker again from his Spirit Awards speech:
Gone are the days of DVD sales that allowed for a greater risk to be taken on challenging films. That revenue stream is gone, and the only way to see significant back end is to have a box office hit with profits that far exceed what any of our films will ever see unless you are Damien Leone and strike gold with a franchise like 'Terrifier.' But as we all know, that's an extreme rarity.
It's not just the collapse in DVD sales: Streaming has effectively replaced all transactional activity—which used to be DVDs and is now the digital rentals and purchases one makes on Amazon Prime or Apple TV. On top of that, the theatrical window for indie releases has almost entirely collapsed. Where once there were three revenue windows—theatrical, then transactional, and then broadcast/streaming—there now are three half-windows that overlap and allow audiences to be content to just wait for streaming, the traditionally least lucrative of the windows. Baker is absolutely correct that this is unsustainable.
Share The Bulwark
It's also worth observing that the main streamers are also paying far less to license these films than in the initial days of streaming. Yes, the biggest streaming services go to festivals and pay millions—sometimes upwards of $20 million—to license a few films every year. And a handful of indie distributors like Neon, A24, Bleecker Street, Roadside Attractions, Magnolia, and IFC/RLJ Entertainment have output deals with a streamer that guarantees a license fee. (Indeed, IFC/RLJ Entertainment is owned by AMC, a cable channel with premium streaming services.) Again, this is like hitting the lottery. These deals go to around 10 percent of films that play at major film festivals. (Needless to say, for the countless indies that never play at a major festival, things are even worse.) Additionally some streamers have told distributors that work on indie films that the services flat out do not want indie films any longer, and those that do are offering less than half of what was on the table a few years ago.
That's why the fees that creatives earn—and the overall budgets of indie films—have declined so precipitously. It's a vicious cycle: Streaming has largely replaced the other windows for indie movies, meaning that streaming is where most of these films make any money, and the streamers know this so they're offering less than ever. Too many independent filmmakers find themselves in an untenable 'take it or leave it' situation.
Well, you might say, it's a free market and the market has lowered the price because consumer demand simply isn't there. What's the problem? From my perspective, indie films are needed to create the healthiest ecosystem for the entire film industry. In part because they are incubators of talent: Without Memento, there may be no Christopher Nolan; without Reservoir Dogs, there may be no Quentin Tarantino. But I'd also argue that even in a landscape dominated by intellectual property (IP) plays—your comic-book movies, your reboots and your retreads—diversification and advancement of the product is essential in any healthy industry. What happens when the value of IP films diminishes? Look what's happening to the value of the biggest IPs: Star Wars, Marvel, Pixar, Fast and the Furious, etc., are all seeing diminishing returns. Nothing sustains its peak time after time. The algorithms will keep feeding itself the same type of film until that type of film is run into the ground because they are the only type of films getting any eyeballs. Indie film has been and will remain the best way of refreshing the types of movies that can get made and the creatives who can make them.
Keep up with all our articles, newsletters, podcasts, and livestreams:
WHAT'S THE SOLUTION THEN? If the movies are only making so much money, how do you create more value for them? I'll start with something Baker alluded to in another acceptance speech, this time at the Directors Guild Awards:
Let's do whatever we can do for us feature filmmakers to expand that theatrical window again; demand it. Let's get it back to what it used to be, at least ninety days, and really support movie theaters.
If we can return to fully exploiting all films in three windows (theatrical, transactional, and streaming/broadcast) again, then the amount of money each film makes can be greater. Much has been written about the value of an exclusive theatrical release (see Entertainment Strategy Guy's excellent piece here). Give a movie time to make money in each window. Give it three full bites at the apple instead of a few nibbles. Theatrical windows need to return to at least 45 days even if most of the revenue is generated in the first three weeks. The other three weeks is necessary to protect that exclusive window so consumers don't just wait three weekends to watch a movie at home, where it will be cheaper and more convenient for them. Then give the movie an exclusive transactional release so it doesn't hit streaming until at least six months after its initial release.
It's either that or hope there are enough wealthy individuals or companies who want to fully subsidize indie film, like when Criterion was saved by Indian Paintbrush. While I wish there were dozens of billionaires desperate to subsidize the indie game, it's far more pragmatic for the industry to commit to three windows again. That's what the strikes should have been about, not about streaming residuals. Without a realistic business model, it will be impossible for filmmakers like Corbet and Baker—and the dozens of people they employ on every production—to get paid their full worth.
Send this article to a friend or post it to social media:
Share

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

You Probably Hate This Masterpiece Sci-Fi Show. Here's Why You Need to Rewatch It in 2025
You Probably Hate This Masterpiece Sci-Fi Show. Here's Why You Need to Rewatch It in 2025

CNET

timean hour ago

  • CNET

You Probably Hate This Masterpiece Sci-Fi Show. Here's Why You Need to Rewatch It in 2025

You may be thinking, "Really, Macy? You're going to the mat over a show that came out over 20 years ago?" Well, yes. Because it simply isn't given the respect it deserves. Like many Americans, my family and I loved our nights huddled around the TV to watch our favorite TV shows live. For us, that meant American Idol, Dexter and, of course, ABC's network hit, Lost. There's a good chance you watched Lost in the early 2000s, too. And there's an even better chance you think it got bad. Or you have some sort of perspective that it started strong but went off the rails after the first three seasons. Somewhere along the way -- maybe when the flash-sideways began, or when a smoke monster turned into a man, or when you realized there wasn't going to be a clear-cut answer to every mystery -- you bailed. Maybe you saw the finale and thought it ruined the whole show. (More on that later.) I watched Lost when I was a kid, but hadn't revisited it for close to a decade. Until it came to streaming services, first Hulu and now Netflix and Disney Plus. One day, I decided to replay the pilot episode and, well, it transformed me into the person writing this 1,500-word defense. I binged the show and then immediately turned around and binged it again. I'm truly mad at myself for wasting so much time thinking this show was a disappointment. In truth, it's a glorious, ambitious near-masterpiece. It's my favorite show. That's why I'm writing this. I'm here to ask you to do something radical: Rewatch Lost in 2025. Yes, all of it. And this time, go in with fresh eyes -- see it not as a weekly network drama, but as a serialized, character-driven odyssey that, along with The Sopranos and Mad Men, paved the way for the prestige genre TV we obsess over now. Because the truth is, Lost wasn't a failure. It was just ahead of its time. Here's why. It's time to go back to the island for a 2025 rewatch. ABC's Lost Looking for more streaming recommendations? You should also watch my favorite movie, a historical drama packed with modern themes, for free now. No, the ending is not what you think The last thing I want to do is spoil the ending of a show I'm trying to get you to rewatch. But I feel like I need to address this early since one of the main reasons audiences ultimately turned on the show was a misconception about the ending. I'll tell you right now, spoilers be damned. They. Were. Not. All. Dead. The. Whole. Time. The idea that the characters were really all dead the whole series and that the island was just a purgatory-like state is completely untrue. It's been debunked by the creators of the show, the actors who starred in the show and the dialogue in the series finale itself. A twist ending like that -- revealing they had all died in the plane crash right at the start -- would be a horrible one. It would retroactively reduce the entire plot of the show to meaningless, empty nothingness. So, thankfully, that's not how it actually ended. Now, you can just enjoy the show knowing that it all matters. The cinematography of Lost is some of the best ever put to television. ABC's Lost TV in 2004 didn't look like Lost When Lost premiered in 2004, there was nothing like it on network television. A lush, cinematic sci-fi mystery shot on 35mm film, with a massive ensemble cast of mostly unknown actors and an evolving mythology? On ABC, of all places? In the era of CSI, Desperate Housewives, and the dozens of other cop shows and formulaic TV, Lost was a risk. Lost is a sci-fi show (I think a lot of people forget that) with horror and supernatural elements. It's serialized, meaning you must see each episode to understand the next one, unlike so many shows that were airing on network TV at the time. The show follows a group of drastically different people who have just survived a plane crash on a remote, tropical island that seems to harbor deep, dark mysteries. But each survivor has secrets of their own. And they must live together in order to survive. (I can vividly remember hearing protagonist Jack Shepard say, "If we don't learn to live together… we're gonna die alone.") These characters come together with their differences, their pasts (beautifully depicted in flashback scenes), their traumas, their hopes and their desires, to collectively navigate this horrible situation. What unfolds is six seasons of intense, heart-wrenching plot points that subvert expectations and are rich with themes of faith, spirituality, dualism, philosophy and the mystical. It's pretty normal for TV shows now to be cinematic. Shows like The Last of Us, Succession, Stranger Things and Severance all make use of big budgets, high-quality production, engrossing performances and teams of insanely talented writers. But Lost was doing that in 2004 on ABC, which means the showrunners were dealing with the many obstacles and restrictions of network television. For instance, the show's creators -- J.J. Abrams, Jeffrey Lieber and Damon Lindelof -- wanted Lost to only be three seasons, but ABC said no, and pushed them to do 10 seasons when they saw what a hit the show had become. They eventually negotiated down to the six seasons we have today. But that's twice the amount of runtime the original creators intended. Despite this, the writers crafted compelling story lines and introduced some of the most intriguing characters (Ben, Juliet, Jacob, Penny, Miles) into the later seasons. It's easy to forget that Lost was doing time jumps, shifting perspectives and emotional bottle episodes long before The Leftovers, Dark or Severance existed. It experimented with structure constantly: a flashback here, a flash-forward there, a time loop in season 5. Entire episodes would focus on side characters you hadn't seen in weeks. It was complicated, sure, but thrillingly so. The show trusted its audience to keep up, even when it was confusing. And yes, that led to frustration at the time, but trust me, it works much better now that Lost is on streaming services. It's a show that really should be binged, so that you can truly appreciate the nuance and hidden details of the writing. The things that made Lost so good at the time are why it hasn't been fully appreciated. It was simply ahead of its time. Small plot seeds would be introduced and then left unvisited for several episodes, making Lost a show that's perfect for binge-watching. ABC's Lost Lost indeed was a risk, but one that paid off in six seasons of wild, genre-bending storytelling and a gut-punch, emotional ending that will land as long as you give it another chance with an open mind. Read also: The 21 Best Sci-Fi TV Shows to Stream on Netflix It holds up in 2025 Part of what makes Lost such a rewarding rewatch in 2025 is that it doesn't feel dated. The series still looks and sounds incredible. Because it was filmed on 35mm, which can be upscaled and remastered. Plus, shot on-location in Hawaii, the series still looks gorgeous. Lost was shot on 35mm film, which means it can be upscaled and still look brand new 20 years later. ABC's Lost The performances of the 14 regularly recurring leads of the cast are absolutely brilliant, too. Even though this was a cast of mostly unknown actors at the time, they all, guest actors included, reached a caliber of performance that is still so rare to witness in a TV series. And the music is absolutely remarkable. Michael Giacchino (The Incredibles, Up, Coco, Inside Out) created what I think is the best TV score of all time for Lost. I mean, he used debris from the crashed plane from the pilot episode to create the unique, bizarre sounds you hear each episode. The score is a perfect fit for a unique storyline. More than anything else, Lost is a show that will make you feel. Lost is a show that is full of emotionally poignant moments. ABC's Lost Is every plotline perfect? No. Do the final seasons get a bit complex? Absolutely. But on balance, Lost is one of the most ambitious, strange, beautiful things ever put on television, and it is emotionally satisfying from start to finish. Lost opened the door for serialized sci-fi and genre storytelling on TV, especially character-first narratives with weird, metaphysical themes. What I'm saying is that without Lost, it's hard to imagine Severance, Stranger Things or other TV sci-fi faves. So if you haven't watched it since 2010 -- or if you've never watched it at all -- now's the time. The entire series is available to stream on Hulu, Netflix, Disney Plus and Prime Video for rent. Skip the Reddit threads. Forget the hot takes. Just hit play. And maybe, just maybe, you'll find that Lost didn't lose its way. We just didn't know how to watch it yet. For more, you can explore the 13 best sci-fi shows on Apple TV Plus and the 18 best sci-fi shows on Prime Video.

Colin Farrell and Makeup Designer Mike Marino Toast ‘The Penguin' — and Push Back Against AI
Colin Farrell and Makeup Designer Mike Marino Toast ‘The Penguin' — and Push Back Against AI

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Colin Farrell and Makeup Designer Mike Marino Toast ‘The Penguin' — and Push Back Against AI

It's not every day you get to bring your vigilante artistry to Gotham City. That joyous privilege and the power of practical effects was top of mind for 'The Penguin' star Colin Farrell and makeup designer Mike Marino, accepting the 2025 IndieWire Honors Wavelength award for their striking partnership in HBO's gritty superhero spinoff. 'We were two big kids in a really vast sandbox,' said Farrell at the Los Angeles event on June 5. 'Both of us grew up watching genre films. I grew up watching Danny DeVito. Well, I know I haven't fully grown up. I think we've established that. And we go to go to work every day and play in the sandbox. It was such a joy [and] nightmare Mike Marino's canvas.' More from IndieWire From a Mini 'Girlfriends' Reunion to 'Matlock' Rolling Deep, IndieWire Honors 2025 Was About Support The Return of 'Phineas and Ferb' Promises Aliens, Therapy, and the Best Summer Vacation Ever 'It means a lot to be recognized for something that was done entirely by human hands,' said Marino. 'Just clay, glue, rubber, inspiration, and the intention to create something special. There was no AI involved here. No shortcuts, just time, thought, and trust. Colin Farrell was fully committed.' Academy Award nominee Farrell reflected on his experience growing up 'enthralled' by Burgess Meredith's performance as The Penguin. He also shared the fear he felt taking on the role at first. 'Matt Reeves wrote the film 'The Batman,' and I was lucky enough to get the role of The Penguin in that. Then, Lauren LeFranc wrote this show, but it was only when I saw Mike's design of the visage of Oz Cobb that I couldn't leave it. Before that I was struggling to think of what I could bring to the project. I was going, 'I'm just going to be flat as fuck and it's going to be terrible.'' But looking at Marino's design for the first time, Farrell said, 'I couldn't believe it. I kind of got emotional because as I said, I'm 49 going on 10 sometimes and I just got so man is an extraordinary, extraordinary artist. I am so grateful.' He went to thank the legendary Christopher Tucker, the makeup artist on 'The Elephant Man' who inspired Marino to take up the craft. Farrell continued, 'Things are ever shifting now in a business where everything is going towards tech, and I understand that. I'm not like campaigning for pigeons with notes in their talons. But I also notice that there is a kind of edging away from practical makeup and the magic and the artistry and the tactility and the immediacy and the beauty of practical makeup.' Speaking on existential evolutions within the industry, Marino said, 'It takes many thousands of steps to do something so realistic. When you think you know what someone looks like in your mind and then you want to see it come to life, it's a huge task. We're in time when AI can create basically anything convincingly right now. That does make it a substitute for human creativity. If we want to protect the soul of filmmaking, we have to protect the people who make it.' The IndieWire Honors event took place at NeueHouse in Hollywood on Thursday, June 5. Other honorees for the evening included Ben Stiller, Owen Cooper, Julianne Nicholson, Kathy Bates, and more. Best of IndieWire 2023 Emmy Predictions: Who Will Win at the Primetime Emmy Awards? 2023 Emmy Predictions: Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Special 2023 Emmy Predictions: Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Series

High school grad goes viral for working at his Burger King job … still wearing his graduation outfit
High school grad goes viral for working at his Burger King job … still wearing his graduation outfit

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

High school grad goes viral for working at his Burger King job … still wearing his graduation outfit

Proudly wearing his high school graduation medals, Mykale Baker stopped by the Burger King in Dacula, Georgia, to mark the milestone with his coworkers. He had no way of knowing that a simple visit would lead to a life-changing viral moment. Baker wasn't scheduled to work the night he received his diploma, but when he saw the crew struggling to keep up with a surge of customers, he stepped in without hesitation. It was a natural instinct for the 18-year-old who had been named manager of a Wendy's at just 17. At that moment, Maria Mendoza happened to be waiting at the Burger King drive-through window for her order. She, like Baker, was coming from commencement, which had ended at 10 p.m. Although her daughter, Daizie Chavez, had graduated from Mill Creek High School the same year as him, the two had never met, which wasn't surprising in a class of more than 700 students. From the passenger seat, Mendoza, 45, craned her neck, curious about what was happening behind the counter. Who was preparing her Whopper? 'I'm kind of nosey sometimes!' Mendoza admits in an interview with 'And that's when I saw Mykale.' Around his neck hung medals honoring his achievements in marching band — as a percussionist, he was voted 'Most Selfless Person' — and in track and field, where he competed in hurdles. 'My whole world froze,' Mendoza recalls. 'My first thought was, he's working. He's not out celebrating like the rest of the kids. My child gets to be with me after the ceremony, and he's here.' And yet Baker was smiling, his face glowing with a wide beaming expression full of warmth and pure joy. "I was so happy I graduated," Baker tells "I couldn't take my eyes off of him," Mendoza says. She says something came over her, a sudden urge she couldn't ignore. She felt compelled to start recording, quietly capturing the scene without her husband or Baker noticing. Later that night, she posted the footage on TikTok, explaining that Baker had gone straight to Burger King after his graduation ceremony and that he looked 'so proud to carry his medals.' 'This young man deserves a scholarship!!!!' Mendoza wrote. The 43-second clip touched hearts across social media, and in just four days, a GoFundMe campaign for Baker — which Mendoza created and originally aimed to raise $5,000 — brought in more than $198,000 for his education. In the fall, Baker, a car fanatic, will attend Gwinnett Technical College to study automotive mechanics. With nine siblings, he says, there's never much to spare. 'Some of the money is going to go into fixing my car and the rest is going into a trust fund for school purposes only,' Baker, who was raised by a single mom, says. Soft-spoken and humble during the interview, Baker shies away from questions that focus on him but lights up when asked about Mendoza. 'It's brought our families together,' he says. 'She's a part of my family, and I'm a part of hers now.' He adds that he and Mendoza's daughter, Daizie, are now friends. Mendoza, for her part, is more than happy to brag about Baker if he won't do it himself. She shares that Mendoza's goal was to attend college and that he had been saving for it, holding jobs in the fast food industry since he was 16. If he didn't have enough, his plan was to join the Army, which would cover the cost of his education, a testament to his determination and resolve. 'He's incredible,' Mendoza says. "A lot of kids don't think that way." After hearing about the story, Burger King and the Burger King Foundation surprised Baker at work with a $10,000 scholarship. In recognition of Mendez's act of kindness, the foundation also awarded Daizie a $10,000 scholarship to support her studies in neuroscience at Georgia State University. Baker is training to become a manager at Burger King and will be working this summer, but he's most looking forward to an upcoming trip to Disney World with a friend. Demisha Scott, Baker's mother, describes him as 'the quietest' of her children, as well as 'very loving' and dependable. 'He doesn't think, he just automatically jumps in to help,' Scott tells TODAY. 'He's a very hard worker.' Scott says one of the band directors wrote a letter praising her son for always being the first to arrive and the last to leave practice. 'He'd load the van, break down the instruments and fix things if they broke,' she says. "That is who he is." Donations continue to pour in on Baker's GoFundMe, accompanied by messages filled with praise and admiration for his work ethic "Congratulations and God Bless You, Mykale! You are an inspiration and deserve to have the brightest future, and then some. You are already a leader and a role model at your precious, young age, and this world is made so much better by your presence," one person wrote. Added another, "Your story truly inspired me & touched my heart. It takes determination & humility to work after graduation. I pray that God continue to BLESS you beyond measure. As a PHD educated Black woman, I am truly moved by your GRIT. The future is yours! Go get it." This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store