Post Office scandal report ‘shows full scale of horror unleashed on victims'
Jo Hamilton was falsely prosecuted for a shortfall of £36,000 at her Post Office branch in South Warnborough, Hampshire, in 2006.
A first tranche of the public inquiry's final report into the scandal, published on Tuesday, laid bare the devastating consequences for victims and their families, from police investigations to convictions and imprisonment.
Between 1999 and 2015, approximately 1,000 subpostmasters were prosecuted after faulty Horizon accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts.
The report said 59 victims of the scandal contemplated suicide with 10 attempting to take their own lives.
Inquiry chairman Sir Wyn Williams said there was a 'real possibility' 13 people took their own lives as a result of the suffering they endured during the scandal.
Other details in the report detailed impacts including bankruptcy and relationship breakdowns.
Speaking following the report's publication, Ms Hamilton said it is 'really important'.
She added: 'It shows the full scale of the horror that they unleashed on us. You know, we were just decent people trying to do a day's work for our community.'
Sir Wyn, who said around 10,000 people are eligible to submit compensation claims, urged the Government to establish a public body to devise, administer and deliver compensation to those wronged by authorities.
Ms Hamilton said that was a 'necessary' recommendation which she would like to see implemented immediately.
'The Government shouldn't be anywhere near this because they actually owned the Post Office which perpetrated the crime and they must have been aware what was going on. So I think they should be taken out of it altogether.'
Asked about her hopes for the future, she said: 'I have a sneaky feeling that this will run right through next year, because that's the way things are, but I really hope not, because so many people are dying.
'You know, we've lost, I think 350 is the number, and 100 of the GLO (Group Litigation Order) group aren't here any more, and there's still 138 of them to be paid which is incredible.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
UK backs joint call for Israel to allow foreign media in Gaza
The UK is among 27 countries backing a statement calling for Israel to allow immediate independent foreign media access to Germany, Australia, and Japan have also signed the text released by the Media Freedom Coalition - an intergovernmental group which advocates for the rights and protection of journalists statement also condemned attacks on journalists, saying those working in Gaza must be journalists have been banned by Israel from entering the Gaza Strip independently since the start of the war nearly two years ago. Some journalists have been taken into Gaza by the IDF under controlled access. At least 192 journalists and media workers, the vast majority of them Palestinian, have been killed since then in the deadliest conflict for journalists ever documented, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).Thursday's statement, the first of its kind to be made jointly by countries, says their call is in light of "the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe", adding they "oppose all attempts to restrict press freedom and block entry to journalists".It says that "deliberate targeting of journalists" is unacceptable, calling for all attacks to be investigated and followed up by latest such attack occurred earlier this month when four Al Jazeera journalists, including prominent reporter Anas al-Sharif, were killed in a targeted Israeli strike near Gaza City's al-Shifa and another correspondent, Mohammed Qreiqeh, along with cameramen Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal, were in a tent for journalists at the hospital's main gate when it was struck, the broadcaster said at the other freelance journalists were killed - Moamen Aliwa and Mohammed Israel Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed it had targeted Sharif, alleging he had "served as the head of a terrorist cell in Hamas".However, the CPJ said Israel had failed to provide evidence to back up its allegations. Al Jazeera has also denied Israeli claims. With no international journalists allowed into Gaza, local reporters have continued throughout the war to provide coverage directly on social media and working for Palestinian or international media High Court of Justice last year ruled that restrictions on entry were justified on security grounds. The Foreign Press Association, which represents journalists operating in Israel, has been petitioning the court to lift the ban, arguing that "unprecedented restrictions" had "hindered independent reporting". For the journalists still in Gaza, the situation is dire. As well as Israeli air strikes, many have faced the threat of month, the BBC and three news agencies - Reuters, AP and AFP - issued a joint statement expressing "desperate concern" for journalists in the territory, who they say are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their than 100 international aid organisations and human rights groups have warned of mass starvation in which controls the entry of aid supplies into Gaza, has accused the charities of "serving the propaganda of Hamas". But its own government figures show the amount of food it allowed into the territory between March and July was significantly below what the World Food Programme (WFP) says is needed for even basic assistance needs. There are more fears about Palestinians after the Israeli military began the first stages of a planned ground offensive in Gaza government announced its intention to conquer the entire Gaza Strip after indirect talks with Hamas on a ceasefire and hostage release deal broke down last Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken least 62,122 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry. The ministry's figures are quoted by the UN and others as the most reliable source of statistics available on casualties.
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Westbury man caught driving 100mph 'no match' for police dog
A man who was caught driving at more than 100mph, including on blind bends and into oncoming traffic, has been jailed for a year after being detained by a police Kibblewhite, of Castle View in Westbury, Wiltshire, also tried to flee officers on foot during the pursuit in Bathampton on 10 31-year-old drove round the back of a warehouse and got out to run, but "was no match for police dog Stan", said PC Layton of Wiltshire Police, who described Kibblewhite's actions as "incredibly reckless".He was sentenced at Swindon Magistrates Court on 20 August after pleading guilty to multiple driving offences. The chase began at about 10:15 BST on Bradford Road in the direction of Bradford on Avon, said refusing to stop, Kibblewhite was followed. Officers briefly lost sight of him until they spotted a huge dust cloud in a roadside there said the vehicle had been driven round the back of a large warehouse, where Kibblewhite was seen walking away, then running when he saw in an empty horsebox by Stan, he tried to flee but was detained by the dog before being arrested, during which he racially abused an officer. PC Layton said: "Kibblewhite's driving was incredibly reckless and dangerous, putting numerous lives at risk as he attempted to escape justice."After he fled his vehicle he tried to hide, but he was no match for police dog Stan."Kibblewhite pleaded guilty to dangerous driving, driving without a licence, driving without insurance, failing to stop for police, failing to provide a specimen for analysis and racially aggravated public order.
BreakingNews.ie
18 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher
Actor Noel Clarke is set to discover whether he has been successful in his High Court libel claim against the publisher of the Guardian on Friday. Clarke, 49, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast, including an article in April 2021 that said 20 women who knew him professionally had come forward with allegations of misconduct. Advertisement Clarke denies the allegations, while GNM is defending its reporting as being both true and in the public interest. Noel Clarke is set to discover whether his High Court libel claim has been successful. Photo: Jordan Pettitt/PA. A trial earlier this year heard from multiple witnesses who made accusations against Clarke, including that he had allegedly shared nude photographs of them without their consent, groped them, and asked them to look at him when he was exposed. Barristers for Clarke told the court that there is a conspiracy of people with financial and personal grudges against him who engineered his downfall because they could not bear to see him receive a Bafta award. Mrs Justice Steyn is set to hand down her ruling at 10.30am on Friday. Advertisement The trial of the libel claim was held from early March to early April at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Clarke, who has previously appeared in TV shows including Doctor Who, Auf Wiedersehen, Pet and Bulletproof, gave evidence over several days. At one stage, he appeared visibly emotional as he claimed the publisher had 'smashed my life'. He said: 'They have smashed my life for four years with this rubbish, this nonsense. Four years.' Advertisement He continued: 'I did not do this, I would not do this. I have got children. This is not true.' He later said that while he was 'a flawed guy', he added: 'The reason I stand here four years later is I am not what they have branded me.' Philip Williams, representing the actor, said that his client was a 'casualty' of a media 'purge' following the emergence of the MeToo movement. He continued that Clarke was made a 'scapegoat' and was an 'easy target' because he was at the height of his success when the media industry 'zealously sought to correct itself'. Advertisement The barrister also criticised the Guardian's investigation, saying the newspaper 'manifestly failed to do its job properly'.Mr Williams asked the court to find the claim successful, saying the Guardian's reporting has caused serious harm to Clarke's career, with 'continuing hostile reactions online and in public discourse'. Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, said there is 'not a shred of evidence' to support Clarke's claim of a conspiracy, describing it as 'nonsensical and rather desperate speculation'. He said Clarke has a 'very clear motive to lie' because he 'stands to lose a great deal'. In written submissions, Mr Millar said Clarke 'used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues' over a period of 15 years. Advertisement He said: 'This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. 'They received information from a wide range of sources with direct evidence of misconduct and in each case carefully considered and tested the information they were given, electing to publish only such information as they believed was credible.'
