Australia news live: ‘we'll make our own decisions,' says Albanese amid pressure to recognise Palestinian state
Date: 2025-07-31T20:38:05.000Z
Title: Tania Safi
Content: The two Australians who were on board a boat intercepted by Israel while trying to transport aid to Gaza last weekend were expected to arrive back in Sydney this morning.
We'll bring you more details on that later, but you can read more about what happened to journalist and human rights activist Robert Martin here:
Update:
Date: 2025-07-31T20:37:36.000Z
Title: 'Want to make sure it's not just a gesture': PM holds firm on Palestinian recognition position
Content: The prime minister said last night that Australia will only recognise a Palestinian state once it 'can make a contribution to the creation of two states'.
Appearing on ABC's 7.30 last night, Anthony Albanese was asked what had to change in order for Australia to recognise Palestinian statehood after Canada joined the UK and France's announced they intended to do so at the UN General Assembly in September.
We will give consideration to all of the factors which are there. But I believe very strongly that the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people need to be realised, but in order for that to be achieved, there needs to also be security for the state of Israel.
Asked what's stopping Australia from making a similar commitment to Canada, Albanese said: 'We want to make sure it's not just a gesture but it's a positive contribution.'
Albanese was pressed on what exactly needs to change for his stance to change. He responded:
Well, it won't be a personal decision, it will be a decision by the Australian government based upon the assessment that my fellow cabinet members will make … making that declaration will actually make a difference and be a positive step towards the realisation of the two-state goal.
Asked if Australia will recognise Palestine if the US doesn't, he said: 'We'll make our own decisions.'
Update:
Date: 2025-07-31T20:34:04.000Z
Title: Welcome
Content: Good morning and welcome to our live news blog. I'm Martin Farrer with the top stories this morning and then it'll be Nick Visser to take you through to the weekend.
The question of whether Australia should recognise should join the UK, France and Canada in recognising a Palestinian state continues to dominate the federal politics picture this week after Anthony Albanese appeared on ABC's 7.30 and defended his government's stance to remain on the fence on the issue. Full details of what the prime minister said coming up.
The independent NSW MP Alex Greenwich has come out in support of the pro-Palestine protest planned for Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday, saying it 'would send a powerful global message'. His support comes as the Palestine Action Group goes to the supreme court today to challenge a decision by police chiefs that the bridge should not be shut down to allow the march to go ahead. We'll have more shortly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Israeli military chiefs 'are clashing over civilian killings in Gaza'
Israeli military chiefs fell out in an explosive shouting match over the sheer number of Palestinians killed by IDF airstrikes, according to local media. Major General Yaniv Asor, head of the army's southern command, is said to have complained to the air force that it was consistently overruling bombing requests for targets in Gaza, which has already been decimated since Israel began its siege of the enclave. In response, Major General Tomer Bar, the head of Israel's air force, said that many of requests made by Asor's subordinates were killing civilians and showed a 'lack of professionalism.' Local media reported that the argument only spiralled from there, resulting in the senior military figures screaming at each other in front of top officers. The spat required Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, chief of staff at the IDF to intervene, witnesses said. The argument reflects a deep division within Benjamin Netanyahu 's government over what the future, vis-a-vis Gaza, ought to look like. Earlier this week, Netanyahu told the military to prepare for a full takeover of the Gaza Strip, including areas where hostages are being held. A source in the Prime Minister's Office told The Jerusalem Post on Monday that the message had been passed on to IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir saying: 'If this does not suit you, then you should resign.' Israeli soldiers walking next to damaged buildings as smoke billows during a military operation in the north of the Gaza Strip amid continuing battles between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas It comes as Netanyahu prepares to meet with top officials to decide on the next steps in Gaza and what to do about the remaining hostages. An Israeli official told The Jerusalem Post: 'The prime minister is considering all available options regarding the next steps.' Hamas, however, has brushed off talks of an Israeli takeover. The group said: 'Israel's threats are repetitive, worthless, and have no influence on our decisions.' But a political analyst with Channel 12 quoted an unnamed official saying: 'Hamas won't release more hostages without total surrender, and we won't surrender. 'If we don't act now, the hostages will starve to death and Gaza will remain under Hamas's control. ' According to reports, the prime minister used the phrase 'occupation of the Strip' in private conversations while describing his intentions for Gaza. If Netanyahu's plans are successful, the Israeli military could extend its reach across the whole region, according to local reports. It currently holds 75 percent of the Strip. He is now set to take the plans to his cabinet to seek their backing for the plan. In a video message, Netanyahu said he was 'committing to free Gaza from the tyranny of these terrorists'. According to The Times of Israel, the IDF is against the proposal and has said it would take a significant amount of time to clear infrastructure belonging to Hamas.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Only 1.5% of Gaza cropland left for starving Palestinians due to Israel's war, UN says
Israel's destruction of Gaza has left starving Palestinians with access to only 1.5% of cropland that is accessible and suitable for cultivation, according to new figures from the UN. This is down from 4% in April, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), suggesting Israel has continued to target Palestinian farmland since initiating a complete blockade in early March, severely restricting aid from entering the Gaza Strip, where 2 million starved people are trapped. Before the conflict, Gaza was a thriving agricultural hub, where farmers and ordinary Palestinians cultivated a wide variety of fruits, vegetables, nuts and grains for local consumption. According to the FAO, agriculture accounted for around 10% of the Gaza Strip's economy, and more than 560,000 people, or a quarter of the population, were at least partially supported by agriculture and fishing. Israel has targeted food sources – orchards, greenhouses, farmland and fishers – since the beginning of its siege on Gaza in October 2023. By 28 July 2025, Israel had damaged 86%, the equivalent of almost 13,000 hectares (32,000 acres), of farmland in the Gaza Strip – up from 81% in April, the FAO said. While just under 9% of cropland is still physically accessible, only 1.5% – the equivalent of 232 hectares – is both accessible and not damaged by the Israeli offensive. 'Gaza is now on the brink of a full-scale famine. People are starving not because food is unavailable, but because access is blocked, local agrifood systems have collapsed, and families can no longer sustain even the most basic livelihoods,' said FAO director-general Qu Dongyu. 'We urgently need safe and sustained humanitarian access and immediate support to restore local food production and livelihoods – this is the only way to prevent further loss of life. The right to food is a basic human right.' In northern Gaza, Israeli tanks and bombs have destroyed or damaged 94% of what was among the most fertile, productive land in the territory, and Palestinians have no access to the remaining 6% of their cropland. In Rafah, near the Egypt border, 79% is flattened and the rest has been blocked as part of Israel's so-called military corridor. Last week, Israeli forces partially demolished a seed bank in Hebron, in the West Bank, destroying tools and equipments used to used to reproduce heirloom seeds. UN experts, agencies and aid groups have been warning since early 2024 that Israel is orchestrating a campaign of deliberate mass starvation in Gaza by systematically destroying local food production and blocking aid, in violation of international law. Hundreds of Palestinians have now starved to death, and thousands more have been killed trying to access food aid. Earlier this week, Michael Fakhri, the UN special rapporteur on the right to food, told the Guardian: 'Israel has built the most efficient starvation machine you can imagine. So while it's always shocking to see people being starved, no one should act surprised. All the information has been out in the open since early 2024.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Judy, 89, worked hard all her life and lives in one of Australia's richest suburbs. She has launched a stunning bid to stop new homes being built nearby - and Gen Z is FURIOUS
An 89-year-old resident of one Sydney 's most exclusive areas has sparked controversy by launching a landmark legal challenge against the construction of high-rise apartment buildings in her suburb. Judith Pearson, who has lived near Balmoral Beach in Mosman for over three decades, is challenging the NSW Government's sweeping new housing reforms as a private citizen in court. The state government is trying to encourage the construction of housing in the Harbour City with a policy known as the Low and Mid-Rise Housing SEPP (State Environmental Planning Policy). The SEPP overrides local council planning controls and removes their ability to assess developments on a case-by-case basis. Mosman - one of the wealthiest suburbs in Australia, with a median weekly family income of $4,500 - has been given a relatively modest target of constructing 500 new homes by 2029, compared to Ryde's 11,600 and North Sydney's 5,900. Even the posh eastern suburbs council of Woollahra is taking on more than three times the number of homes than Mosman, with 1,900 new builds - but that hasn't stopped Pearson from taking drastic action. Pearson, an accountant who says she supports the need for more housing, argues the reforms enforce a 'one-size-fits-all' model that strips councils and communities of their ability to shape local development and protect heritage-listed homes. 'I couldn't just stand by and watch the value and character of what makes the area special being destroyed,' she told The Sydney Morning Herald. 'I thought somebody has got to stop this.' 'Someone asked me if (the court challenge) is about being 'entitled' and my reply to that was: 'Yes, we are entitled because we've worked hard to live here'. I am entitled to live here'," she told the Herald. The Daily Mail took to the streets to ask locals how they really feel about high-density builds popping up in their suburb. Amanda, a young professional currently hunting for a rental in the area, said she supported new planning rules if it helped to improve housing supply. 'If it helps people break into the market, that'd be better, and make it easier to live around here,' she said. 'At the moment, it's pretty restricted.' Former Sydney University student Tom, who grew up on the city's northern beaches and north shore, slammed Ms Pearson's legal bid as 'entitled and selfish'. 'There are lots of people who have grown up around this area and have dreams of owning a place where they grew up someday,' he said. 'If you look at places in Auckland, it's very clear that building more homes makes rents cheaper and homeownership possible for people my age.' But not everyone agrees, with Virginia, a baby boomer, arguing building high-rise buildings would damage the character of the suburb. 'Three or four storeys max, but nothing more than four,' she said. Her friend Gabriel agreed. 'Four to six is too high. Six is way too much for this area,' she said. Titia said the government should reconsider height allowances. 'It's not good. There should be a regulated height limit,' she said. Housing advocate group Sydney YIMBY was scathing of the legal challenge. 'Sydney YIMBY calls upon Pearson to donate her $500,000 to a homelessness charity instead of fighting homes for people who weren't lucky enough to buy in for pennies 40 years ago,' Chairman Justin Simon told the Daily Mail. 'Mosman is one of the richest, highest demand areas in the country and it's an absolute joke that they only have to deliver 100 homes a year. We hope this draws attention to the matter and the next target is 10x higher.' Only two development applications have been lodged with the Mosman Council under the Low and Mid-Rise Housing Policy. One of the proposals is for a four-storey build on Muston Street, Ms Pearson's street, which would feature four spacious three-bedroom residences. The second is for a larger six-storey development on nearby Awaba Street, which if built would comprise 29 units. On Tuesday, Mosman Council voted to hold an urgent meeting with Ms Pearson, her legal team and community supporters, to discuss the case and consider whether the suburb should formulate its own strategic housing plan. The motion was moved by Mosman councillor Simon Menzies, who has been contacted by Daily Mail for further comment. Supporters of Ms Pearson's campaign point to Kuring-Gai Council, where the SEPP was paused to allow for a localised planning approach. They argue Mosman should be afforded the same opportunity. In a surprising twist, it can be revealed Ms Pearson is no stranger to luxury property development and previously worked with four business associates to acquire land to build high-end homes. The group's first development, completed in 2006, reportedly sold for $5.4million, according to a 2008 article by the Australian Financial Review. A second property was expected to fetch around $12million.
