
Father of girl, 14, 'sexually assaulted' in Epping backs migrant hotel protests - as asylum seekers are told they'll be made homeless if they refuse to move out
Thousands of migrants are being housed across the country in taxpayer-funded hotels which have been taken over by the Home Office, as Britain struggles to get a grip with the small boats crisis.
Violent protests have erupted outside some venues, with riot police clashing with anti-migrant activists in the market town of Epping, Essex, close to one hotel where a migrant allegedly sexually assaulted a schoolgirl. He denies the charges.
A wave of demonstrations have followed, including in Norfolk where the Home Office is planning to replace families with single male migrants as well as a four-star Canary Wharf hotel earmarked for housing asylum seekers.
But amid the scenes of anger, counter-protesters have rushed to the hotels to insist 'refugees are welcome'. They returned to The Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf today, where police have gathered in anticipation of further protests.
The presence of counter-protesters has led to accusations of police double standards after footage emerged of Essex Police and Hampshire Police escorting them to the hotels for demonstrations.
Epping has become the eye of the anti-migrant storm, with protests held outside The Bell Hotel on July 13, 17, 20 and again last night. Calls are growing for the Government to close the hotel amid community tension.
Those living on the ground face an unprecedented dilemma. They insist they are not right-wing or anti-migrants, but rather no longer feel safe in their own homes.
Perhaps summing up the mood of residents in Epping, one woman told BBC Newsnight: 'I'm really disappointed that it's been reopened. It's not right, there is a school right by. It's just not correct.
'It's right the families of this little village actually fight for it. They are not right [wing], they are not Reform or anything like that. They are just there to protect their children.
Asked why it's inappropriate with a school nearby, she added: 'We don't know where they've come from. It sounds so right wing but I'm not. I just find it so wrong, why did they close it in the first place? I don't think it should be open at all.'
The Bell Hotel housed migrants for two years, ending in April last year, and asylum seekers were moved to other locations.
But today, the hotel is the epicentre of the anger, having reopened back up to house migrants three months ago.
The crisis exploded once again after after Ethiopian asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, was charged with a number of sexual offences only days after arriving in the UK.
The father of a 14-year-old girl allegedly sexually assaulted has backed calls to have The Bell Hotel - where Kebatu was staying - shut down.
Conservative Councillor Shane Yerrel read out a message allegedly from the girl's father at a council meeting last night, which reportedly said: 'I just want the hotel to be moved, not only off our streets, but away from making any other family feel how we're feeling right now.
'It's not fair that the Government are putting our children and grandchildren at risk, even their own.'
He is then said to have thanked the people of Epping for their 'kind messages' and that they were 'helping [my daughter] get through every day'.
It comes as an investigation by The Mail on Sunday revealed the shocking scale of serious crime being committed by migrants living in hotels nationwide.
At least 312 asylum seekers have been charged with an astonishing 708 alleged criminal offences in just three years – including rape, sexual assault, attacking emergency workers and theft.
The research, based on an analysis of court records, provides a snapshot of crimes recorded at 70 of the 220 taxpayer-funded hotels being used to house migrants, with 18 charges of rape, five of attempted rape, 35 of sexual assault, 51 of theft and 43 drug offences allegedly having been committed by residents.
Last night, Epping residents told MailOnline about feeling 'uncomfortable' with the ongoing crisis.
Lindsey, 58, said: 'I've been in Epping for 17 years and my daughter goes to the school behind here (the hotel) and also the same school where the poor girl was allegedly attacked.
Others in the community say: 'We welcome all migrants'. Pro-migrant protesters have countered at the demonstrations
'We have been uncomfortable. There are 140 men who are there. This is a small town people talk and hear stuff all the time. In big cities those things can get flushed away and airbrushed out here we hear more.
'And we are terrified. I've been here everyday and we are just mums in sundresses, facing up against police is masks and weapons.
'At this point the hotel needs to be closed. And the people sent somewhere where they are not free to roam around before they can be vetted.
'People think this is only about racism but it has nothing to do with race. You can be whatever colour, they could be Scottish people in there but until we know who is in our town they are not welcome. They must be vetted.'
Phillip, 64, who is from Buckinghamshire, said: 'We have the same issue in Buckinghamshire that is why I am here. There is a hotel there and a school just round the corner.
'We have had cases of illegals who make gestures at the children. It is disgusting. If I had a young girl I would be terrified. How can the government put us in this situation?'
Councillors in Epping have unanimously voted to urge the Government to close The Bell Hotel and the nearby Phoenix Hotel - another lodging housing migrants.
When false rumours spread online that the Epping migrants were being moved to The Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf earlier this week, protesters descended on London's financial district to voice their anger.
The four-star hotel was surrounded by the Met Police following Wednesday's protest by anti-migrant demonstrators. A ring of steel has been formed around it as workers begun bringing in mattresses and beds.
MailOnline spoke to protesters at the hotel yesterday, with many 'outraged' by the Home Office plans.
Paul, 41, an account manager who lives in the area and was live-streaming the scene on his phone, told MailOnline: 'It is outrageous. A majority of us couldn't afford to stay in a £400 a night hotel.
'I don't understand why they are getting such treatment. Everyone should be treated equally and fair.
'I think this is going to go on until this whole operation is shut down. People are not happy. It is just not fair on the taxpayer. Me, you, the police, the protesters both the left and the right.
Ben Cavanagh, who has lived just a couple of streets away from the hotel in Canary Wharf for all his life, said: 'I am here to peacefully protest about these guys coming into the hotel.
'I am basically here for the safety of my wife, my kids, my relative's kids and anyone else around that lives in the local area.
'We have all seen from other parts of the country what these guys are doing, not all of them but a small minority who are causing havoc to the local women and children and this won't be happening in the Isle of Dogs.'
The 45-year-old added: 'It has been all local people protesting. We are protesting for our families on the Isle of Dogs and our community.
'You cannot expect to put a large group of men in one place and not expect there to be repercussions. That is my fear.
'This will just heap more and more pressure on the local community. We are already under pressure massively, financially.'
Ben's mother Lorraine, 70, is also concerned for the welfare of the local community. She told MailOnline: 'We are here before the rent-a-mob lot come. We are here peacefully.
'Our concerns are that we don't want a repeat of what happened in Southport or in Epping. Our pensioners are terrified. They are absolutely terrified. We don't want to get to the point of I told you so.'
But pro-migrant protesters have fought back, including spraying 'We welcome all migrants' in graffiti outside the hotel.
While protests are raging in the south, the feeling is similar in the north. At The Cedar Court hotel in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, residents say they feel 'vulnerable in their own homes'.
The hotel hit the headlines when it was revealed a secret Deliveroo and Uber Eats takeaway kitchen was being run, amid fears residents were staffing it.
Security was recently stepped up after the premises were daubed with 'Stop the Boats' and 'Boycott Hotel' in red paint on the walls along with other hate messages.
Police are investigating after spray paint was used on the walls and signs in the early hours of Wednesday, July 9.
Anne Critchell, 70, said the crisis 'is ridiculous and completely out of hand'.
She said: 'This lot frighten me. I have got security lights outside so I can see if there is anyone. In the garden. We feel vulnerable in our own homes.
'I don't see an end to it. I just think it is going to get worse. There were protests literally the day we moved in and we thought 'What is going on here?'.
Walking his dog Ruby, Graham Bennett, 74, said: 'I think it is disgrace that we are paying to keep them there. It is totally disgusting. They will not give pensioners a rise but they give them buggers it.
'Then there is the homeless as well. The management of the hotel are making money out of us and our taxis.
'No one can stay at the hotel anymore and there is security on the gate stopping us going in. Ninety per cent of people disagree with the agreement.
'The Government say they cannot stop them coming over. But they are giving them more and more money. If they did not give them anything they would not want come over here.'
Sophie, 45, who declined to give her second name, said: 'I walk my dog a lot so I see what is going on and you can smell the cannabis.
'My neighbour is having to close her window at night even though it is so warm because of the noise from the hotel.
'Last year, I was walking my dog and found one of their benefit cards. I rang the number on the card and they told me hand it in at the hotel.
'When I got into reception there was security residents drinking and smoking and I was told I was not supposed to set foot on the premises.'
Martine, 40, who declined to give her second name, said: 'The other month there was quite a serious incident with my daughter I had to report to police.
'I was painting the fence and my daughter asked to walk the dog down the street to the lamp post and back.
'She is only seven and has never ventured anywhere. I looked up to see a guy crossing the road towards her.
'I shouted to her. She did not hear me. So I legged it down the road. He clocked me and pretended to be stroking the dog.
'But he had been heading directly for my daughter and there was no other reason to cross the road other than seeing a child on her own.
'It was really scary. I reported it to police. They went to the hotel to take his details but there was nothing concrete so there were no charges.
'The noise has got really bad. There is no number to ring when they are playing music really loud at 10pm at night.
'We are concerned that they are protesting again down south. I just don't want it to kick off up here again.
'When it happened last year it was horrendous with all the police presence and goodness knows how much it was all happening.'
Terrance Ryder, 80, said: 'It is the same throughout the country. I sympathise with asylum seekers but I don't believe a big percentage of them are asylum seekers.
'They are all young men coming here to work for a while. I think they ought to be moving them on.
'I just don't think the government knows what its doing. They are supposed to be stopping the boats but they are not stopping them at all.
Christine Ashton, 71, said: 'I have got seven cameras up on the house now. Our lives have changed. We feel like we are being watched.
'You feel trapped. If you go on holiday it is scary. We had only been on holiday a few days and we got broken into.
'It is all kicking off down in Epping so it is just a matter of time before it comes up here. So everyone is feeling nervy.'
Chris Mitchell, 61, said: 'It is getting worse. When these guys first came over five years ago they were really nice. Now the smoke cannabis and party until 12 o clock at night.
'They have got a sense of entitlement over the last six to 12 months. Two weeks ago I was at my wits end because it was so hot.
'I had my windows open and weed was blowing through it. It was beyond a joke. I have to get every morning for work to pay for all them.
'Security and management have lost control now. There used to be a 9pm curfew and it was fine.
'Residents are afraid to walk down the gunnel at night.'
Another male resident, aged 75, said: 'I can see they are refugees who may be fleeing death threats. But they are staying in a four star hotel and see to have free reign where they go and what they do.'
Meanwhile an asylum seeker hotel in suburban Manchester has been hit by regular rounds of protests after a story went round that migrants were getting private healthcare.
Protesters have regularly turned up at the Cresta Court Hotel in Altrincham, in recent months - with counter demonstrations from left-wing protestors chanting against them to add to the chaos.
The hotel became a focus for anti-migrant protests after widely shared fake claims that the 300 migrants at the hotel were getting free private healthcare
Tempers flared at a church hall meeting held by local Conservative councillors after it was wrongly suggested that asylum seekers would receive medical treatment from a private doctors' service.
At the same, it was announced that Altrincham Hospital's minor injuries unit would be closing permanently.
In reality, Gtd Healthcare, a not-for-profit organisation, rather than local services that had been given a 12-week contract to provide publicly funded NHS healthcare to the migrants.
The false claims have also led to a number of so-called anti-migrant influencers turning up with film cameras to the hotel's reception.
And some migrant residents say they feel it is 'now dangerous' for them to leave the hotel.
One male Nigerian said today: 'We're all scared.
'They were a few protesters who were filming us and asking us where we were from. They were in the hotel grounds.
'A few of them shouted: 'Go home'. It was frightening as they were right in our faces.
'I have also been followed while walking into the town. I came to this country to feel safe but now I don't.
'I came on a small boat and it was not safe. It is not worth it if my life is in danger.'
IT worker Sam Brownhill, 45, said: 'I saw about 20 to 30 far right campaigners here the other week with Union Jack flags.
'They were screaming stuff like go home. I fear there could be trouble here especially if the sun comes out more.'
There are concerns the unrest will spiral into a summer of protests. Adding to the anger is accusations of police double standards.
In Epping, Essex Police admitted escorting pro-migrant protesters to The Bell Hotel after initially denying they had done this. Officers from Hampshire Police were filmed doing the same, on May 10, at Potters International Hotel in Aldershot in new footage.
Yesterday, a policing leader said the protests in Epping were a 'signal flare' revealing how ill-equipped forces are to deal with disorder.
Tiff Lynch, head of the Police Federation in England and Wales, which represents rank-and-file officers, warned that unrest at The Bell was 'not just a troubling one-off' but a reminder of the 'deep fragility within our public order policing system'.
Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith warned: 'There is no question, this is the unhappiest I have seen, I think, the UK in a long, long time and it's all coming to a head.'
He told Talk TV: 'The migrants issue is a major cause of this.'
Jonathan Reynolds, the Business and Trade Secretary, said protesters in Epping were 'upset for legitimate reasons'.
He acknowledged there was 'huge frustration that is shared by the Government' about the asylum system and the pressures it has created on housing.
When asked whether he was worried about unrest spreading, the Cabinet minister told Sky News that the Government, police and other enforcement agencies were 'prepared for all situations'.
He said: 'I think what we've got to talk about is: Why are people unhappy with, say, the asylum system? Are they reasonable?
'Are they upset for legitimate reasons? Yes, we share those as a government.
'That is why we are sorting it out. And I understand the frustrations people have, but ultimately, you solve those frustrations and solve the problem by fixing and getting a grip of the core issue, which is what we're doing.'
Mr Reynolds said the number of hotels being used to house asylum seekers in the UK had halved from 400 to about 200.
He added: 'The solution is not putting people in different forms of accommodation, it's about having a system where if people shouldn't be in the UK, they have to leave the UK.'
Sixteen people were arrested after a protest at The Bell last week. Eight officers were injured and a number of police vehicles were damaged.
A planned march from The Bell to an emergency meeting of councillors last night threatened to bring disorder but, thanks to rain and a heavy police presence, fewer protesters than expected turned up.
Many seemed to be so-called social media influencers, recording themselves live on their phones. Having been kept behind the metal barriers, a number of women led a steady stream of walkers chanting 'save our kids'.
Essex Police had threatened protesters with arrest if they caused trouble, issuing a dispersal order in the area.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Statesman
27 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Labour's summer of discontent
Photo by Toby Melville -. At No 10's summer media reception, Keir Starmer sought to conjure optimism. He invoked the success of the Lionesses – who won the European Championship five days later – and the return of Oasis. As memories turned to the 1990s, he conceded there was at least one difference: Labour's parlous poll ratings. But, he said, 'things can only get better'. It was the party's 1997 anthem that soundtracked the downfall of Rishi Sunak, who came to embody a stuck Britain: a country of stagnant living standards, crumbling public services and uncontrolled immigration. Labour always knew it could not rely on the wellspring of optimism that accompanied Tony Blair's first victory. But matters have deteriorated faster than pessimists anticipated. After a year in power, Labour's average poll rating stands at just 22 per cent, putting it eight points behind Nigel Farage's Reform (not until the fuel strikes in 2000 did Blair briefly lose his lead to the Conservatives). Cabinet ministers openly speculate over whether Starmer will still be leader by the next general election. The word that Britons are most likely to use to describe the country, according to research by More in Common, is 'broken'. The evidence of this disaffection is widespread. In Epping, Essex, on 27 July, around 500 protesters gathered for the fifth time to demonstrate against the use of the Bell Hotel to house asylum seekers (one of whom has been charged with sexual assault against a 14-year-old girl). Similar demonstrations were held in towns and cities across England. The following day, resident doctors held a fourth day of strikes over pay restoration. Their union, the British Medical Association, is emblematic of a newly militant middle class (the logo of Broad Left, an influential faction in the BMA, features a stethoscope in the style of a hammer and sickle). Doctors complain their earnings remain below the 2008 level even after a 28.9 per cent pay increase. But the sympathy of a public contending with an NHS waiting list of 7.36 million is exhausted. Looming over all this is the state of the economy – which it is Labour's defining mission to grow. It has shrunk for the last two months, with business closures at a 20-year high and consumer confidence falling at its fastest rate since Liz Truss's 2022 premiership. Inside Westminster and the City of London, the UK's fiscal precarity is the subject of animated conversation (Britain has the sixth-highest debt, fifth-highest deficit and third-highest borrowing costs among advanced economies). 'There's a real risk there could be a crisis quite quickly because of the situation with the bond markets,' Helen Thompson, the Cambridge professor of political economy and author, has warned. Then there is Gaza, a humanitarian catastrophe that an increasing number in Labour fear could become a political one. After almost half the cabinet, including Angela Rayner, David Lammy, Yvette Cooper, Wes Streeting, Shabana Mahmood and Lisa Nandy, pushed for faster recognition of a Palestinian state, Keir Starmer announced a deadline of September. But as a new left party led by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana gestates, some in Labour fear that London could fall, just as former fortresses such as Scotland and the 'Red Wall' did. Rather than the optimistic 1990s, the mood is more reminiscent of the fraught 1970s: the decade of 'stagflation', trade union militancy, an International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout and a putative military coup (38 per cent of those aged under 34 have a positive view of 'a military strongman with no government or elections'). That decade ended with the election of a politician previously thought too right-wing to win: Margaret Thatcher. Will the 2020s be any different? There might not be a vacancy inside Labour, but there is always a contest. Angela Rayner is the person that MPs believe is winning it. This is one reason her words to the cabinet on 22 July carried such weight – they are increasingly studied as those of a prospective prime minister. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe A week before the anniversary of the Southport murders, which triggered last summer's riots, Rayner told the cabinet that 'economic insecurity, the rapid pace of deindustrialisation, immigration and the impacts on local communities and public services, technological change and the amount of time people were spending alone online, and declining trust in institutions [were] having a profound impact on society'. Her comments, a day after Farage declared the UK was facing 'societal collapse' and 'civil disobedience on a mass scale', led to warnings from Michael Gove and others that the government was 'tacitly encouraging' unrest. But Rayner's allies – though surprised by the candour of No 10's cabinet readout – maintain she is prepared to speak uncomfortable truths on issues such as immigration and wants to 'start where people are'. The Deputy Prime Minister's perspective, they say, is informed by her north-west constituency Ashton-under-Lyne (where Reform finished second at the last election with 24.8 per cent of the vote). For Labour, the challenge is to match words with action. Home Office aides contend that the government is making progress after inheriting an 'absolute wreck' of a system. The number of asylum seekers accommodated in hotels, which surged as the Conservatives sought to introduce the Rwanda deportation scheme, has fallen since its peak in 2023. By the time of the next election in 2029, Yvette Cooper's team reaffirm, the government will have ended the use of asylum hotels entirely. Others, however, declare that far more radical intervention is needed. One influential Labour MP calls for the government to 'requisition Duchy of Lancaster land and build temporary Nightingale accommodation' (along the lines of the hospitals constructed during the Covid-19 pandemic); to pass an 'Immigration Sovereignty Act' that unilaterally reforms articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (which are blamed for preventing the deportation of foreign criminals); and, in an echo of Dominic Cummings, to 'send the Royal Navy into the Channel' to halt small boat crossings. The divide inside Labour is partly a classic left-right split: the biggest rebellions in this parliament have been over welfare cuts. But it is also increasingly a conservative-radical one. Conservatives argue that, given time, Starmer's patient, incrementalist strategy will work: higher living standards, shorter NHS waiting lists and lower immigration will pave the road to a second term. Radicals, by contrast, argue that something fundamental must change if Labour is to succeed. From the left, figures such as Andy Burnham, who has undergone a Tony Benn-like reinvention, champion electoral reform and a multi-party future. From the right, heterodox cabinet ministers privately favour a dramatic overhaul of the state and the welfare system – with the latter shifted from need towards contribution. Recently, the Overton window – the range of ideas and policies considered politically acceptable – has widened on immigration. Ahead of Rachel Reeves' daunting Budget this autumn, the same is becoming true of economic policy. Labour has no intention of introducing a wealth tax of the kind proposed by Neil Kinnock – a 2 per cent levy on assets worth more than £10m – but its refusal to rule out the policy has encouraged the most sustained debate yet. The IMF, meanwhile, has urged Reeves to consider charging for NHS treatment and ending the triple lock on the state pension. 'We don't have a democratic mandate for that,' one cabinet minister told me when I put the latter suggestion to them (though they did not reject the fiscal logic). Yet to maintain market confidence, Reeves may have to think the unthinkable in her Budget. Treasury aides insist she will keep pledges not to increase income tax, National Insurance (on employees), VAT and corporation tax (something critics regard as the government's 'original sin'). But this has left her painfully short of revenue raisers as bond vigilantes whisper they would prefer fiscal 'headroom' closer to £20bn than £9.9bn. When the irresistible force of the markets meets the immovable object of Reeves' tax pledges, which will prevail? For Starmer's government, the early signs are ominous. Exclusive polling by More in Common for the New Statesman shows that just 22 per cent of Britons believe the country is on the right track. Sixty per cent believe that it is on the wrong one (a plurality – 29 per cent – identify the 2016 Brexit vote as the defining error). Until recently, the great consolation for Labour has been a fractured right. The divide between Reform and the Conservatives has meant that Starmer could plausibly retain power even with a vote share lower than the 33.7 per cent he won in 2024. But the planned formation of a new left party threatens to subvert this calculation. Inside Labour circles, opinion is divided on the impact of the as-yet-nameless party. Some recall the People's Front of Judea/Judean People's Front split and Logan Roy's declaration in Succession: 'You are not serious people.' Others believe the new party, which attracted more than 500,000 email sign-ups in just three days, poses a grave threat. One senior Labour source warns 'it is not inconceivable that Keir, Wes and Shabana could all lose their seats' and that the party faces a 'worst-of-all-worlds scenario' at next year's elections as the populist left and right combine to make protest irresistible. Leading supporters of a pact between the Corbynites and the Greens privately estimate that such an alliance could win around 100 MPs at a general election. There is one figure whose name recurs with surprising frequency during discussions of Labour's fate: Tony Blair, still immersed in the minutiae of British politics and regularly receiving groups of MPs at his institute's office. Those who have recently met Blair say he believes 'the country wants someone to take it by the scruff of the neck, lead it and shake things up' as Donald Trump has in the US. Should Starmer prove incapable of doing so, the warning was clear: things will only get worse. [See more: Why I am sticking with Labour] Related


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Moment murderer is arrested as he touches down on UK soil 18 months after stabbing a teenager to death
A cold-blooded killer has been arrested after finally returning to the UK - 18 months after stabbing a teenager to death on a night out. Police have today released video footage showing officers waiting on the tarmac as Thomas Dures, 22, landed back on British soil in January, ending a months-long manhunt that stretched across Europe. Dures had spent 18 months on the run after brutally stabbing 19-year-old Matthew Daulby to death during a night out in Ormskirk, Lancashire, in July 2023. Matthew, who was out with friends, suffered a fatal stab wound to the chest after a sudden and shocking street attack in the early hours of the morning. Another man was also stabbed during the violence. Despite desperate efforts by paramedics, Matthew was later pronounced dead in hospital. A Home Office post-mortem confirmed he had died from a single stab wound. Chilling CCTV played to the court during Dures' trial showed him and accomplice Henry Houghton lurking in an alleyway moments before the deadly altercation. Armed with a lock knife, Dures can be seen striding towards Matthew's group, opening the blade as he advanced. Houghton followed, swinging a crude weapon made of a rock stuffed inside a sock. Matthew was struck with the makeshift weapon, causing damage to his brain and leaving him disoriented. It was in this vulnerable state that Dures plunged the knife into his chest. After the attack, Dures fled the scene - first looping around the town centre to discard his jacket on a park bench, and then dumping the murder weapon in a ginnel near Ormskirk Parish Church. Both items were later recovered by a dog walker and an estate agent, and handed in to police. Dures then vanished. Police launched multiple appeals to find him, but he evaded capture, fleeing the country and living abroad while Matthew's family grieved. It wasn't until January 2025 - 18 months after the murder - that Dures finally handed himself in to a police station in Greece. He was extradited to the UK shortly after, where he was met by officers and arrested the moment he stepped off the plane. In a statement Lancashire Police said: 'The Daulby family have had to wait patiently for the man responsible for delivering the fatal injury to answer for his crimes. 'The video shows the moment Thomas Dures landed back on English soil, to face trial. 'The Daulbys have had to grieve all of this time, knowing the man responsible for taking their son's life was actively evading justice and celebrating his 21st birthday in the sun. Something Matthew will never be able to do.' Police added that Dures returned to the UK 'with the intent of getting in the dock and telling a catalogue of lies'. 'He pointed the finger of blame at everybody but himself and took no accountability for his actions. Thankfully the jury saw through his lies and ensured that Dures will be held accountable for his crimes.' A jury at Preston Crown Court took less than three hours to find Dures guilty of Matthew's murder and the wounding of a second man. He has now been sentenced to life in prison. Yesterday marked two years since Matthew was killed and his family say the pain of losing him has not eased. In a heartbreaking victim impact statement read to the court, Matthew's mother Angela described Dures' actions as 'cowardly' and said they had left her family having to do things 'we would never have imagined having to do'. Matthew's father, Gary, described his son as 'kind, funny, clever and fiercely loyal' and said the family's world had been 'shattered beyond recognition'.


The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Nigel Farage and ‘lawless Britain': dangerous hyperbole has real-life consequences
During last year's general election campaign, Reform UK settled on 'Britain is broken' as a slogan. This summer, intending to dominate the news agenda during the long Westminster recess, Nigel Farage has decided to ramp up the dystopian rhetoric. 'Broken' has morphed into 'lawless', as Mr Farage tours the country deploying language reminiscent of the 'American carnage' speech delivered by Donald Trump at his first inauguration in 2017. Unfounded claims of a huge rise in crime have been breezily tossed out to bolster the assertion that Britain is 'facing nothing short of societal collapse'. The crisis of lawlessness on the streets, wrote Mr Farage in a recent article for the Daily Mail, was being compounded by the government-sponsored arrival of 'droves of unvetted men into our towns and cities'. Commenting on recent protests outside an Epping hotel accommodating asylum seekers, after a resident was charged with sexually assaulting a local teenage girl, he remarked that the country was close to 'civil disobedience on a vast scale'. According to the Crime Survey for England and Wales – which Mr Farage chooses to ignore but which is the most robust source of relevant evidence – incidents of theft, criminal damage and violence have been in long‑term decline since the 1990s. But Reform's leader is more interested in sinister mood music than data, as he seeks to foment a feelbad factor. His aim is to portray a country in which disinterested elites preside over a law and order crisis intimately connected to immigration, and where there is a yearning for an authoritarian response along the lines suggested by Mr Farage. Reform's pledge to repeal the Online Safety Act, made on Monday at a 'Britain is lawless' press conference, underlined its willingness to risk the further pollution of public discourse by disinformation and hate speech. As the chief constable of Essex reminded Mr Farage last week, after he falsely alleged that police had driven counter-protesters to the site of the Epping hotel, inflammatory talk has real‑life consequences. In an echo of last summer's riots after the appalling murder of three young girls in Southport, asylum seekers have reported being chased and attacked in the town. Having in many cases fled violent and unstable situations elsewhere, they now fear for their safety again. In Essex, and elsewhere in the country, far-right groups are seeking to create the conditions for another conflagration. These are worrying developments. But Britain's social fabric is not unravelling and the country is not on the verge of widespread civil conflict. A year ago, the vast majority of citizens backed a hardline response to the scenes of disorder that took place. Nevertheless, the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, was right to argue last week that much more needs to be done to enhance social cohesion in places buffeted by change and starved of resources. The problem with Mr Farage is that his hyperbolic claims are designed to heighten and sharpen tensions rather than truly address them. For a party that aspires to govern and claims to be in the mainstream, fuelling a sense of insecurity and anger in this way is deeply irresponsible. Britain is still a long way from being Mr Trump's America, and Reform's cynical opportunism may fail to yield the political dividends hoped for. But we have been served with another reminder of the darkness at the heart of Mr Farage's politics. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.