logo
Declassified files outline UK plan to evacuate Hongkongers in ‘Armageddon scenario' after Tiananmen crackdown

Declassified files outline UK plan to evacuate Hongkongers in ‘Armageddon scenario' after Tiananmen crackdown

HKFP24-07-2025
The UK drafted plans to evacuate millions of people in Hong Kong in an 'Armageddon scenario,' following China's Tiananmen crackdown in 1989, according to newly declassified documents.
The confidential British Cabinet Office files – made available online on Tuesday – show that then UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher's administration created contingency plans for a mass evacuation of Hong Kong people in the wake of the crackdown.
Beijing sent troops to disperse pro-democracy demonstrators at Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989, killing hundreds – if not thousands, according to some estimates.
According to the 415-page documents, the UK assessed its capacity to transfer millions of Hongkongers to Taiwan, the Philippines, or other places in the region by air and by sea, as well as a potential military conflict with China during the evacuation.
'This paper examines the scenarios that might prompt a large-scale exodus from Hong Kong in the period up to 1997 or thereafter,' read a document dated August 17, 1989.
'This includes evacuation by both civil and military means, and arrangements for the reception and resettlement of refugees,' it continued.
Hong Kong was handed over from British rule to Chinese rule on July 1, 1997.
'Internally generated panic'
The contingency plan – drafted by a secret Cabinet Office committee called 'MISC 140,' which reported to then British diplomat Leonard Appleyard – proposed two pre-1997 scenarios and two post-1997 scenarios that could lead to a mass exodus of people from Hong Kong.
In the period preceding 1997, Hong Kong could see 'a steady ebbing away of confidence, culminating in rising panic or economic collapse,' according to the document.
'If the confidence of the people of Hong Kong is not restored, there will inevitably be an increasing outflow of capital and talent from the territory. The rate of emigration would be limited only by the availability of places in the destination countries,' the paper read.
The pre-1997 period could also see a 'panic provoked by further developments in China,' which included 'the brutal use of military force against Chinese civilians' and the scenario of a civil war in the country, the paper added.
In post-1997 years, Hongkongers could still leave the territory en masse due to 'panic provoked by China' and 'internally generated panic,' the paper envisioned, which could result in the public losing confidence in the Sino-British Joint Declaration, a 1984 agreement under which Beijing promises to maintain a high degree of autonomy for Hong Kong after the transfer of sovereignty.
'In a deteriorating situation, Hong Kong's inhabitants would judge that the Joint Declaration was not working: this might be because of increasing Chinese interference; because of growing corruption in the territory; or because of a perception that Britain and the rest of the international community were no longer willing or able to do much to help,' the paper read.
'Chinese attitude will be crucial'
The Cabinet Office committee set out a three-phase contingency plan – from 'green' to 'amber' to 'red.' The British government would monitor movement from Hong Kong to the UK and amass the transportation capacity required for a mass evacuation when a large-scale exodus was imminent or had begun.
Among the evacuation plans proposed by the committee was one that would charter all 143 non-Chinese-owned cruise ships in the world, then ferry people in Hong Kong to Taiwan, the Philippines, and Australia.
Military assistance by the British air force and navy would be a 'significant feature' of an evacuation plan 'up to July 1997 but not beyond,' when Hong Kong was due to return to Chinese rule, according to the paper.
'The Chinese attitude will be crucial in determining whether there is a crisis leading to a mass exodus and, if so, how that crisis can be managed,' a document from October 1989 read.
The UK also 'could not handle a mass evacuation alone,' the documents show, and material support from the US – which has a large military presence in Asian countries like Japan and the Philippines – would be imperative.
'Other countries would have to help, and the United States would be particularly important,' according to the documents.
The files also disclose the UK government's estimate of the financial cost such a mass evacuation plan would have on the country.
'A large influx into the United Kingdom would create a huge resettlement problem which would be hugely expensive to deal with. This underlines the importance of doing everything possible to prevent a mass exodus,' the documents read.
Exodus
Between 1985 and 1997, about 57,600 people moved from Hong Kong, according to a 2021 BBC report citing official figures provided by the city's authorities.
The number paled in comparison to a more recent wave of large-scale emigration during the Covid pandemic, with official data showing a net outflow of about 123,000 residents in 2020 and 2021.
Part of the outflow is believed to have been propelled by the city's political changes following the pro-democracy protests and unrest in 2019 and Beijing's imposition of a national security law in 2020 to quell dissent.
As of March this year, 163,400 people from Hong Kong holding British National (Overseas) passports have arrived in the UK since London began accepting applications in 2021, according to the UK's Home Office.
Hong Kong's population shrank from about 7.48 million in 2020 to 7.34 million in mid-2022, before rebounding to about 7.53 million at the end of last year.
The government attributed the population rise to various policies aiming to attract talent and import overseas labour.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'HK and Macau to leverage collaborative strength'
'HK and Macau to leverage collaborative strength'

RTHK

time35 minutes ago

  • RTHK

'HK and Macau to leverage collaborative strength'

'HK and Macau to leverage collaborative strength' John Lee led a delegation to Macau to meet his counterpart Sam Hou-fai. Photo courtesy of Information Services Department Chief Executive John Lee emphasised the crucial roles of the Hong Kong and Macau SARs within the Greater Bay Area during an official visit to Macau on Tuesday. Leading a high-level delegation, Lee met with Macau Chief Executive Sam Hou-fai. In a statement following the meeting, Lee said the two SARs will continue to harness their collaborative strengths across key sectors including the economy, cross-boundary infrastructure, tourism and culture. He said both Hong Kong and Macau are integral parts of the Greater Bay Area and will continue to promote its development. The Hong Kong delegation visited the Guangdong-Macau In-depth Cooperation Zone in Hengqin during the visit. Lee highlighted the strategic significance of the cooperation zone, describing it as a key initiative designed to enrich the practice of One Country, Two Systems, fostering Macau's long-term prosperity, stability and integration into national development plans. The delegation also toured a Chinese medicine centre there to learn about the integration of traditional Chinese medicine and the cultural tourism industry. The group also visited the Guangdong-Macau In-depth Cooperation Zone in Hengqin Planning Exhibition Hall that features more than 600 exhibits on new products and technologies. The Hong Kong delegation included Financial Secretary Paul Chan, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Erick Tsang, Secretary for Health Lo Chung-mau, Secretary for Transport and Logistics Mable Chan and director of the Chief Executive's Office Carol Yip. Lee and the officials returned to Hong Kong later in the day.

Far-right German lawmaker's ex-aide on trial for spying for China
Far-right German lawmaker's ex-aide on trial for spying for China

HKFP

time5 hours ago

  • HKFP

Far-right German lawmaker's ex-aide on trial for spying for China

A German court will on Tuesday launch the trial of two suspected spies for China, one of whom worked as an assistant to the far-right lawmaker Maximilian Krah. The German national, partially identified as Jian G., allegedly worked for Chinese intelligence from 2002, including while he was an aide to the Alternative for Germany (AfD) MEP Krah between 2019 and 2024. Jian G. is accused by prosecutors in Dresden of using that position to pass on information about debates and decisions at the European Parliament, as well as some documents deemed highly sensitive. He is also suspected of being the handler for a second alleged operative, Chinese national Yaqi X., who is accused of spying on elements of the German arms industry. Jian G. is also suspected of gathering intelligence on leading AfD politicians and spying on Chinese dissidents in Germany. This included posing as an opponent of the Chinese government on social media in order to gain contacts in the opposition scene. The second defendant, Yaqi X., worked at a company which provided Leipzig airport with logistics services and is accused of helping Jian G. access information on flights and passengers. The information she passed on focused on flights transporting defence equipment and 'people with links to a German arms company'. According to German media reports, she particularly targeted arms giant Rheinmetall, which is involved in making Leopard tanks and which uses Leipzig airport for cargo flights. AfD 'power struggle' Both defendants have been in detention since they were arrested last year. The trial could be particularly embarrassing for the AfD if it leads to the information Jian G. collected on the party becoming public. According to news weekly Der Spiegel, investigators have seized records that Jian G. kept of conversations with Krah and other AfD politicians in which they discussed the private life of party co-leader Alice Weidel and alleged power struggles with her colleague Tino Chrupalla. Krah denied to the magazine ever having discussed such matters with Jian G. Krah was the AfD's top candidate in last year's European elections, but was excluded from its delegation after comments in which he minimised the crimes of the Nazis' notorious SS. However, he was welcomed back into the AfD fold for this year's German general election and now sits as one of the party's MPs in the Bundestag. The trial is expected to last until the end of September and Krah himself has been called to appear as a witness. Krah is also being investigated by prosecutors in Dresden on suspicion of money laundering and corruption during his time as a member of the European Parliament. According to Der Spiegel, between 2019 and 2023 he received more than 50,000 euros (US$57,900) in payments from firms linked to Jian G. Krah denies all wrongdoing and says the accusations against him are 'politically motivated'.

Why Trump shouldn't attend Xi's 'Victory Day' parade
Why Trump shouldn't attend Xi's 'Victory Day' parade

AllAfrica

time9 hours ago

  • AllAfrica

Why Trump shouldn't attend Xi's 'Victory Day' parade

As rumors swirl about President Donald Trump possibly attending China's 'Victory Day' parade this September, it's worth sounding an alarm. Such a visit to Beijing would be a strategic blunder that undermines Washington's Indo-Pacific posture, undercuts American allies and sends a troubling message to the wider world. On its face, this kind of diplomatic invitation may be tempting at this delicate juncture in bilateral relations. Trump has long shown an affinity for grand displays of military prowess, high-stakes diplomacy and face-to-face theatrics. A handshake with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in front of goose-stepping soldiers might make for dramatic television. If Beijing officials dangle the promise of a new trade agreement, it might even be a transactional win. But the costs would far outweigh the optics. First, there is the history and symbolism of Victory Day itself. China's September 3 commemoration is not merely a celebration of the end of World War II. It's a well-worn anti-Japanese ritual. While framed as a tribute to China's role in defeating fascism, the parade often serves as a thinly veiled nationalist spectacle aimed at disparaging modern Japan and legitimizing the Communist Party's historical narrative. This is not to suggest that Japan's actions during World War II were innocent or justified — far from it. But China's Victory Day parade is more about nationalist messaging and historical revisionism than sober remembrance, and ultimately aims to serve Beijing's current strategic goals. The irony is that most of the conventional resistance to Japan came not from Mao Zedong's Communist forces, but from Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist army — the same Nationalists who later fled to Taiwan. By standing alongside Xi and possibly even Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump would risk endorsing this misleading version of history. That, in turn, would alienate two of America's strategic partners in East Asia, namely Japan and Taiwan. Taiwan, in particular, would have reason to feel betrayed. Its very identity is rooted in the struggle against the same Chinese Communist Party that now seeks to erase its role, and seemingly its existence, from the annals of history. South Korea, too, would draw the wrong conclusions. Lee Jae-myung, the left-leaning president, has reportedly decided not to attend the same ceremony as a quiet signal of the importance of maintaining his country's alignment with Washington. Trump's presence could undercut this calculation, emboldening voices within Seoul that favor a tilt toward Beijing. It would surely sow confusion among American allies in East Asia at a time when Washington is demanding their deeper support for its Indo-Pacific strategy to counter China. There is also precedent to consider. In 2015, then-President Park Geun-hye of South Korea attended the same parade as the only US ally to do so. While she sought to strike a delicate diplomatic balance, the visit spectacularly backfired. Her decision raised significant eyebrows in Washington and Tokyo, and the political backlash at home was even greater. To this day, her appearance standing between Putin and Xi atop Tiananmen Tower is remembered not as a diplomatic gambit but as a major miscalculation. The stakes in 2025 are even higher. The world is witnessing the most dangerous moment for the global order since the end of the Cold War. China is waging an economic war against the West and flirting with military adventurism in the Taiwan Strait. Russia, meanwhile, remains entrenched in a war of aggression in Ukraine. For Trump to attend a parade that implicitly legitimizes both of these regimes would hand Beijing and Moscow a propaganda victory. Even more troubling is the message it would send about America's military posture in the Indo-Pacific. Chinese military parades prominently feature missiles and weapons systems explicitly designed to threaten US bases, forces and partners, including in Guam, Japan and Taiwan. Trump's attendance at the celebration could be interpreted as tacit approval of Beijing's growing ambitions and invite serious doubt about Washington's security resolve. There is also the potential domestic political cost. Trump built his election campaign on confronting China, restoring American strength, and putting 'America First.' Attending a parade that glorifies communist China's military might would hand his critics a damning visual contradiction. To national security conservatives and China hawks, it could look like a compromise of the very principles Trump claims to represent and defend. It would likewise undercut the recent efforts of Republican foreign policy voices such as Elbridge Colby and Brian Mast, who have been urging America's East Asian allies to take on a more assertive role in Washington's broader efforts to counterbalance China. Trump would thus be well advised to stay home on September 3. Kenji Yoshida is a Seoul-based correspondent for JAPAN Forward

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store