
Troll takedowns: Facebook accounts of 4 pro-Duterte influencers go dark
When the Facebook pages of four major influencers suddenly became unavailable on February 7, online users immediately linked it to the raging feud between the country's two most powerful political clans, those of former president Rodrigo Duterte and the incumbent Ferdinand Marcos Jnr.
All four influencers are vociferous Duterte supporters who had shared anti-Marcos content with their hundreds of thousands of followers. Last Friday, the influencers' Facebook pages went dark, each bearing the same message: 'The content isn't available.'
Asked if he saw an effort to take down pro-Duterte influencers, lawyer and Senate candidate Vic Rodriguez told This Week in Asia: 'Yes, there is an emerging pattern where the government is perceived to be deliberately curtailing our right to free speech, expression and of the press.'
Rodriguez, who was Marcos Jnr's general campaign manager in the 2022 presidential polls and served as his executive secretary for three months before turning against his boss, is now running for the Senate under Duterte's Tunay na Maisug na Opposition (Truly Strong Opposition). He said the Facebook takedown of the accounts was 'all characteristic of an authoritarian rule'.
The disabling of the influencers' sites happened against the backdrop of three events in the Philippines: the impeachment of Duterte's daughter, Vice-President Sara Duterte-Carpio; the start of the campaign period for the midterm elections in May; and congressional actions on fake news and disinformation. Trolls part of politics
Social media influencers and trolls have played a significant role in Philippine politics since 2016, when they helped Rodrigo Duterte win the presidency. His followers called themselves DDS – 'Diehard Duterte Supporters', a successful masking of the original meaning of the acronym, Davao Death Squads, which were groups set up by Duterte that allegedly carried out extrajudicial killings for his war on drugs when he was mayor.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTHK
9 hours ago
- RTHK
Trump barred from stopping Harvard students at border
Trump barred from stopping Harvard students at border Harvard University community members show support for international students in a protest at its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. File photo: Reuters A court has put a temporary stay on Donald Trump's latest effort to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard, as the US president's battle with one of the world's most prestigious universities intensified. The court order issued on Thursday came after a White House proclamation late on Wednesday sought to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country and said existing foreign enrollees risked having their visas terminated. "Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers," the order said. Harvard quickly amended an existing complaint filed in federal court, saying: "This is not the Administration's first attempt to sever Harvard from its international students." "[It] is part of a concerted and escalating campaign of retaliation by the government in clear retribution for Harvard's exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government's demands to control Harvard's governance, curriculum, and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students." US District Judge Allison Burroughs ruled the government cannot enforce Trump's proclamation. Harvard had showed, she said, that without a temporary restraining order, it risked sustaining "immediate and irreparable injury before there is an opportunity to hear from all parties." The same judge had already blocked Trump's earlier effort to bar international students from enrolling at the storied university. The government already cut around US$3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts, institution from any future federal funding. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and "viewpoint diversity." Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who accounted for 27 percent of total enrollment in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. In its filing, Harvard acknowledged that Trump had the authority to bar an entire class of aliens if it was deemed to be in the public interest but stressed that was not the case in this action. "The President's actions thus are not undertaken to protect the 'interests of the United States' but instead to pursue a government vendetta against Harvard," it said. Since returning to office Trump has targeted elite US universities which he and his allies accuse of being hotbeds of anti-Semitism, liberal bias and "woke" ideology. Trump's education secretary also threatened on Wednesday to strip Columbia University of its accreditation. The Republican has targeted the New York Ivy League institution for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, throwing all of its federal funding into doubt. Unlike Harvard, several top institutions – including Columbia – have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration. (AFP)


South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Why Duterte's diehard fans are carrying cardboard cut-outs around The Hague
It's morning in The Hague and Senator Robin Padilla is wandering around looking for a place to eat – while carrying a life-size full-colour cardboard cut-out of Rodrigo Duterte Settling down at an outdoor cafe, the Filipino political partisan props the standee beside him. The cardboard image of the former president depicts him seated, wearing dark glasses and a T-shirt. Padilla, president of the Duterte-controlled PDP Laban party, snaps a photo for his social media account. To some, this scene may appear surreal – but not to the other Filipinos nearby, who are arriving in town with their own standees in tow. In one video, a middle-aged Filipino woman rides a speeding tram while clutching a Duterte standee. She glances back at the bemused passengers, smiles and says earnestly: 'This is our president.' Duterte, 80, is being held at the International Criminal Court 's detention centre in Scheveningen, The Hague's seaside resort district. He is set to face trial this year for crimes against humanity related to his administration's 'war on drugs'. Senator Robin Padilla having a 'breakfast meeting' with Rodrigo Duterte's standee in The Hague. Photo: Facebook/Robin Padilla


South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
What's up with Section 899 of Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' and its ‘retaliatory' taxes?
With the market taking a closer look at the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' after it was narrowly passed by the US House of Representatives on May 22, a clause called Section 899 has caught the attention of investors worldwide by including a new set of 'retaliatory' taxes on inbound foreign investment. As the bill now awaits Senate consideration, there are growing concerns that some of the most sweeping changes to the tax treatment of foreign capital in the US in decades could lead to a sharp reduction in foreign investment in American assets. In this explainer, the Post breaks down some key points in Section 899, including which countries are targeted, and its potential impact on US assets. What is Section 899? Titled 'Enforcement of remedies against unfair foreign taxes', Section 899 is a new provision that targets investments by countries that have 'discriminatory and extraterritorial taxes' on US businesses. Taxes that have been named include the digital-services taxes, diverted-profits tax, and undertaxed-profits rules. Governments, corporations, private foundations or individuals from these countries will be charged an additional 5 percentage points of withholding tax rate each year on their US income, potentially taking the rate up to 20 per cent, until the 'unfair tax' is removed. Echoing the spirit of the 'Mar-a-Lago Accord' , Section 899 reflects Washington's increasing readiness to leverage US dominance in the global capital market to confront what it views as the unfair treatment of American businesses abroad.