logo
City Power warns it will go after more defaulting Joburg businesses

City Power warns it will go after more defaulting Joburg businesses

Eyewitness News14-07-2025
JOHANNESBURG - City Power has warned that it will be going after more businesses in Johannesburg that it said are illegally connected to the city's power grid.
After conducting investigations, City Power said it found several repeat offenders, including businesses disconnected in November.
ALSO READ: City Power continues with revenue collection drive
The power utility is grappling with runaway debt from businesses that are owing and those who are benefitting from the power without paying.
City Power said the Hursthill substation alone is owed R1.6 billion by defaulting businesses.
The power station supplies electricity to Auckland Park, Melville, Westdene, Coronationville, and surrounding areas.
In the Industria and Crown area, it was found that there are repeat offenders owing R23 million.
The utility said it will be conducting stricter and more regular disconnection operations with the help of law enforcement to add to the weekly disconnection operations already underway to try to recover the lost funds.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court hits the brakes: Mercedes repossesses R1. 6m GLE after owner's 6-year legal joyride
Court hits the brakes: Mercedes repossesses R1. 6m GLE after owner's 6-year legal joyride

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Court hits the brakes: Mercedes repossesses R1. 6m GLE after owner's 6-year legal joyride

The North Gauteng High Court has ordered that Mercedes-Benz can repossess a 2016 Mercedes-Benz GLE 63 S AMG valued at over R1.6 million after its owner defaulted on payments and ignored a settlement agreement. Image: Ron | IOL The North Gauteng High Court has ordered that Mercedes-Benz can repossess a 2016 Mercedes-Benz GLE 63 S AMG valued at over R1.6 million after its owner defaulted on payments and ignored a settlement agreement. The six-year battle over the car was not straightforward. Leruma Thobejane, who represented himself in court while fully robed, alleged that Mercedes-Benz 'had fraudulently approached the court for the issuing of a warrant for delivery of the vehicle in September 2023, whilst being fully aware that that matter was on appeal before the Supreme Court of Appeal'. In the order, the judge found that 'in my view the warrant was issued in terms of the court order, and not in breach thereof'. The court noted that Thobejane had failed to meet his payment obligations. 'The respondent however did not dispute the allegations in the applicant's attorney's affidavit that he breached the settlement order, and that he did not make the required payments in terms thereof,' the ruling stated. The judge added: 'The applicant has already been waiting for payment in terms of the settlement agreement since September 30, 2021, and the respondent remains in possession of the vehicle. In my view relief that the applicant is entitled to, should not further be frustrated by reason the applicant's attorney's reliance on an incorrect subrule.' Thobejane was partially successful in having a previous warrant of execution set aside. However, ultimately, the court authorised Mercedes-Benz to repossess the vehicle under its latest ruling. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The dispute dates back to 2019, when Mercedes-Benz Finance instituted proceedings against Thobejane after he defaulted on payments for the vehicle. The credit agreement stipulated ownership would remain with Mercedes-Benz Finance until full payment was made. It also provided that, in the event of default, the company could cancel the agreement, repossess the vehicle, and claim any shortfall after resale. Despite demands, Thobejane fell into arrears, owing more than R1.36m by the time summons were issued. After litigation and discovery, the parties reached a settlement in August 2021, which was made an order of court in March 2023. The settlement agreement required Thobejane to make five consecutive monthly payments totalling R1.5m plus interest and costs. It included a clause that if he breached the payment terms, the full outstanding balance would immediately become due, and Mercedes-Benz Finance could apply for judgment and repossession – rights to which Thobejane consented. IOL

Solar Power in SA: Understanding the confusion, costs, and compliance for homeowners
Solar Power in SA: Understanding the confusion, costs, and compliance for homeowners

IOL News

time11 hours ago

  • IOL News

Solar Power in SA: Understanding the confusion, costs, and compliance for homeowners

We break down what the tariff changes mean for solar power users. Image: Freepik As more South Africans turn to solar panels to avoid electricity woes, many homeowners find themselves having to navigate complicated regulations, registration demands, and rising costs. Like financial independence, the promise of energy independence is appealing and a dream for many, but the reality involves compliance, financial implications, and differing rules from Eskom and local municipalities. We break down what all of it entails. How does registration work? Both the national power utility Eskom and municipal distributors like Johannesburg's City Power require the registration of small-scale embedded generation (SSEG) systems, such as rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) installations. City Power's approach is actively registering these systems, and their meter readers are noting the presence of solar panels during standard meter audits. While registration is not yet being enforced, customers are urged to do so voluntarily to comply with National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) regulations. The utility is developing methods to identify unregistered systems in the future. This may include the possible use of satellite and drone-based detection. City Power emphasises that even small systems can pose risks like backfeeding, phase imbalances, or grid disturbances if not properly registered and integrated into the network. Now let's take a look at Eskom's campaign. Eskom launched a campaign in April 2025 to help residential owners in Eskom-supplied areas register their systems. For installations up to 50kVA (which covers most residential PV systems), Eskom has waived registration fees, installation costs, and the expense of a smart bi-directional meter until March 2026. This exemption could save households up to R9,132. Registered customers will be converted to the Homeflex tariff, allowing them to benefit from credits for exporting surplus energy to the grid. It's important to note that if your solar system is completely off-grid and has no connection to Eskom's network, you are not required to register. What are the challenges? Despite Eskom's efforts to simplify registration, organisations like the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) and AfriForum have challenged the legal basis of Eskom's registration requirements. AfriForum argued that Eskom cannot "threaten or force people to register their systems through statutory requirements, nor fine them". They also express concern that Eskom might be seeking data for future solar tariffs. Eskom's requirement for a registered electrical engineer or technologist to sign off on the system's safe integration has caused controversy. AfriForum contends that this is not a prescribed Nersa requirement and that the enforceable National Rational Standards primarily call for an accredited technician to sign off. This requirement, they warn, could create a big bottleneck in registrations due to a limited number of available electrical engineers across the country. The process for City Power customers requires submitting documentation, including a certificate of compliance, a single-line diagram, and an electricity supply application form. Once this has been approved, a smart bi-directional meter may be installed to track both consumption and feedback. Breaking down the costs In conjunction with registration and other expenses that may arise, solar power users connected to the grid are facing significantly higher electricity bills due to Eskom's new retail tariff plan (RTP), implemented on April 1, 2025. This plan shifts more of Eskom's cost recovery to fixed components, such as capacity charges, rather than variable consumption-based charges. For Eskom's most common residential tariff plans (Homepower 4 and Homeflex 4), the fixed charge increased by 88%, from R192.90 to R362.70, which customers pay before consuming any electricity. This change means that even households generating a large portion of their own electricity from solar are paying substantially more. For example, a small household using 450kWh per month but only drawing 90kWh from the grid could see its utility bill increase by over 51%. Large households are experiencing increases of over 36%. Eskom argues these fixed fees ensure all users contribute equally to grid maintenance. The impact of these fixed charges varies significantly by municipality. For instance, a household in City of Tshwane with the same entry-level solar system would pay less than half of what an Eskom Direct customer pays for the same amount of grid electricity. While some major municipalities have increased fixed charges, none have done so as drastically as Eskom. Adding to the confusion is the fact that each of South Africa's 177 municipalities that sell power has its own unique rules for connecting solar systems. The cost of compliance also varies. For Eskom, potential costs can include an administration fee (R2,500), meter change (R6,000 upwards), and, if required, R4,500 for line diagrams and engineer sign-off. IOL

Extortion suspect killed in shootout with Eastern Cape police
Extortion suspect killed in shootout with Eastern Cape police

The Citizen

time3 days ago

  • The Citizen

Extortion suspect killed in shootout with Eastern Cape police

Police had been investigating an extortion ring that was allegedly claiming protection fees from teachers in the Eastern Cape. Police in the Eastern Cape have killed a man linked to an alleged extortion ring. Officers traced the suspect to an area near Ngqeleni, roughly 50km north of Coffee Bay, where a shootout occurred. Authorities had been investigating an extortion ring that had allegedly been charging teachers monthly protection fees. Suspect killed in shootout Police intercepted the 30-year-old suspect in the Canzibe administrative area at roughly 2pm on Saturday. Police report that the suspect was travelling with a passenger, and after being instructed by officers to stop the vehicle, the suspect opened fire. 'Police returned fire in self defence, fatally wounding the suspect. No police officers were injured during the incident,' confirmed police spokesperson Brigadier Nobuntu Gantana. Officers recovered a 9mm and ammunition, and the unharmed passenger has been taken in for further questioning. 'The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (Ipid) will investigate the shooting as per standard protocol,' Gantana stated. Alleged extortion of teachers Teachers at Dalibhunga Senior Secondary School in Ngqeleni lodged a complaint on 26 July regarding a gang that was extorting money from them. 'Teachers at the school discovered a threatening note on the premises. The note, allegedly from an extortionist group, demands a monthly protection fee of R1 000 from each teacher,' confirmed Gantana. Provincial police commissioner Major General Thandiswa Kupiso described the alleged crimes as 'an attack on our education system and community stability'. Police are still searching for additional suspects and are urging members of the community to assist authorities with information that could lead to arrests. 'We are treating this threat with the utmost urgency. The organised crime unit is utilising all available resources to identify those responsible,' stated Kupiso. NOW READ: Cop and prosecutor get bail in R1.6 million extortion case

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store