Trade disputes should be resolved as quickly as possible, Germany says ahead of G7
BERLIN, May 20 (Reuters) - Ongoing trade disputes with the United States should be resolved as quickly as possible for the benefit of all, German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said on Tuesday, ahead of meeting his counterparts from other Group of Seven countries.
"Tariffs and uncertainties are a burden on our economy and therefore also on job security," Klingbeil said in Berlin before leaving for a G7 finance ministers meeting in Banff, Canada.
The Trump administration has imposed a 25% tariff on U.S. imports of steel, aluminium and cars, as well as a baseline 10% tariff on almost all countries, with additional "reciprocal" tariffs - making for a combined 20% in the EU's case - lined up if negotiations during a 90-day pause fail.
Germany and the European Union want to find an agreement with Washington, but the clock is ticking. "At the same time, as the largest single market in the world, we are determined to defend our interests," Klingbeil said of the EU.
He welcomed the opportunity of meeting his G7 colleagues in person after he took office two weeks ago, noting that strengthening international cooperation was more important than ever in view of global upheavals.
"We must send a crystal-clear signal that the G7 will continue to stand firmly by Ukraine's side," Klingbeil said, adding that the group was doing everything it could to secure a fair and lasting peace.
Another topic in G7 meetings will be the reconstruction of Ukraine after "the terrible destruction caused by Russian President Vladimir Putin's war", and especially how private investment can be mobilised, Klingbeil said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
North Korea's Kim vows unconditional support for Russia in meeting with Shoigu
SEOUL, June 5 (Reuters) - North Korean leader Kim Jong Un met Russia's Secretary of the Security Council Sergei Shoigu on Wednesday, state media KCNA reported. Kim pledged unconditional support for Russia's position on Ukraine and other international issues, the report said on Thursday. "Kim Jong Un affirmed that the government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea will, in the future, too, unconditionally support the stand of Russia and its foreign policies," it said, using the North's official name. North Korea will responsibly observe the articles of the treaty between the two countries, Kim was quoted as saying. The two men also discussed strengthening the comprehensive strategic partnership and mutual cooperation in different fields. The treaty was signed during Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to Pyongyang last year and a summit with North Korea's Kim, and includes a mutual defence pact for immediate military assistance if either faces armed aggression.
Sky News
28 minutes ago
- Sky News
The big problem facing UK as deadline to finalise US trade deal looms
When push comes to shove, the question of whether British industry faces crippling tariffs on exports to the US or enjoys a unique opportunity to grow may come back to three seemingly random words: "melted and poured". To see why, let's begin by recapping where we are at present in the soap opera of US trade policy. Donald Trump has just doubled the extra tariffs charged on imports of steel and aluminium into the US from 25% to 50%. In essence, this would turn a painfully high tariff into something closer to an insurmountable economic wall (remember during the Cold War, the Iron Curtain equated to an effective tariff rate of just under 50%). Anyway, the good news for UK steel producers is that they have been spared the 50% rate and will, for the time being, only have to pay the 25% rate. But there is a sting in the tail: that stay of execution will only last until 9 July - on the basis of President Trump's most recent pronouncements. 1:00 For anyone following these events from the corner of their eyes, this might all sound a little odd. After all, didn't Sir Keir Starmer announce only a few weeks ago that British steel and aluminium makers would be able to enjoy not 25% but 0% tariffs with America, thanks to his bold new trade agreement with the US? Well, yes. But the prime minister wasn't being entirely clear about what that meant in practice. Because the reality is that every trade agreement works more or less as follows: politicians negotiate a "heads of terms" agreement - a vague set of principles and red lines. There then follows a period of horse-trading and negotiation to nail down the actual details and turn it into a black and white piece of law. In this case, when the PM and president made their big announcement 28 days ago, they had only agreed on the "heads of terms". The small print was yet to be completed. Right now, we are still in the horse-trading phase. Negotiators from the UK and the US are meeting routinely to try and nail down the small print. And that process is taking longer than many had expected. To see why, it's worth drilling a little bit into the details. The trade deal committed to allowing some cars to pass into the US at a 10% rate and to protecting some pharmaceutical trade, as well as allowing some steel and aluminium into the US at a zero tariff rate. When it comes to cars, there are some nuances about which kind of cars the deal covers. Something similar goes for pharmaceuticals. Things get even knottier when you drill into the detail on steel. 2:13 You see, one of the things the White House is nervous about is the prospect that Britain might become a kind of assembly point for steel from other countries around the world - that you could just ship some steel to Britain, get it pressed or rolled or worked over and then sent across to the US with those 0% tariffs. So the US negotiators are insisting that only steel that is "melted and poured" in the UK (in other words, smelted in a furnace) is covered by the trade deal. That's fine for some producers but not for others. One of Britain's biggest steel exporters is Tata Steel, which makes a lot of steel that gets turned into tin cans you find on American supermarket shelves (not to mention piping used by the oil trade). Up until recently, that steel was indeed "melted and poured" from the blast furnaces at Port Talbot. But Tata shut down those blast furnaces last year, intending to replace them with cleaner electric arc furnaces. And in the intervening period, it's importing raw steel instead from the Netherlands and India and then running it through its mills. Or consider the situation at British Steel. There in Scunthorpe they are melting and pouring the steel from iron made in their blast furnaces - but now ponder this. While the company has been semi-nationalised by the government, it is still technically a Chinese business, owned by Jingye. In other words, its steel might technically count as benefiting China - which is something the White House is even more sensitive about. 👉 Tap here to follow Politics at Jack and Anne's wherever you get your podcasts 👈 You see how this is all suddenly becoming a bit more complicated than it might at first have looked? This helps to explain why the negotiations are taking longer than expected. But this brings us to the big problem. The White House has indicated that Britain will only be spared that 50% tariff rate provided the trade deal is finalised by 9 July. That gives the negotiators another month and a bit. That might sound like a lot, but now consider that that would be one of the fastest announcement-to-completion rates ever achieved in any trade negotiations in modern history. There's no guarantee Britain will actually get this deal done in time for that deadline - though insiders tell me they think they could be able to finalise it in a piecemeal fashion: the cars one week, steel another, pharmaceuticals another. Either way, the heat is on. Just when you thought Britain was in the safe zone, it stands on the edge of jeopardy all over again.
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
ECB to cut rates again as the case builds for a summer pause
FRANKFURT, June 5 (Reuters) - The European Central Bank is almost certain to cut interest rates again on Thursday and keep all options on the table for subsequent meetings, even as the case grows for a pause in its year-long easing cycle. The ECB has cut rates seven times in 13 months as inflation eased from post-pandemic highs, seeking to prop up a euro zone economy that was struggling even before erratic U.S. economic and trade policy dealt it yet another blow. With inflation now safely in line with its 2% target and a cut flagged by a host of policymakers, Thursday's decision will be uncontroversial, with the focus on what signals ECB President Christine Lagarde might send about policy ahead. Investors are already pricing in a pause in July, and some conservative policymakers have advocated a break to give the ECB a chance to reassess how exceptional uncertainty and policy upheaval both at home and abroad will shift the outlook. "Getting the hawks to support a June cut may require a hint of conditional patience: an implicit willingness to pause in July and wait until September before easing again, as long as there were no major downside surprises in the meantime," Deutsche Bank analysts said in a note. The case for a pause rests on the premise that the short- and medium-term outlooks for the 20-country currency bloc differ greatly and may require a different policy response. Inflation could dip in the short term, possibly even below the ECB's target, but increased spending and higher trade barriers could add to price pressures later. The added complication is monetary policy impacts the economy with a 12-to-18 month lag, so that support approved now could be giving help to a bloc that no longer needs it. A cut on Thursday would take the deposit rate to 2.0%, which the ECB considers "neutral" - no longer holding back the economy but not yet stimulating it either. Acknowledging near-term weakness, the ECB is expected to cut both its growth and inflation projections for next year. U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war is already damaging activity and will have a lasting impact even if an amicable resolution is found, given the hit to confidence and investment. This sluggish growth, along with lower energy costs and a strong euro, will curb price pressures. "Uncertainty around tariffs is extremely elevated, and that is not conducive to firms taking longer-term decisions around investment and hiring," Investec economist Sandra Horsfield said. "In the near term (that) will be a disinflationary force in its own right, quite irrespective of where tariffs eventually settle." Most economists think inflation could fall below the ECB's 2% target next year, triggering memories of the pre-pandemic decade when price growth persistently undershot 2%. Further ahead, the outlook changes significantly. The European Union is likely to retaliate against any permanent U.S. tariff, raising the cost of international trade. Firms may meanwhile relocate some activity to avoid trade barriers but changes to corporate value chains are also likely to raise costs. Higher European defence spending, particularly by Germany, and the cost of the green transition could add to inflation while a shrinking workforce as the bloc's population ages will keep wage pressures elevated. "We think the window for ECB rate cuts will close over the late summer," UBS economist Reinhard Cluse said. "We believe the ECB might have to hike rates again in late 2026 to counter rising inflation pressure in 2027, amid a euro zone - German - labour market that is subject to structural tightness during the demographic transition."
