logo
In 'fourth-quarter' State of the State address, Dunleavy paints optimistic picture

In 'fourth-quarter' State of the State address, Dunleavy paints optimistic picture

Yahoo29-01-2025

Jan. 29—JUNEAU — In his seventh and penultimate State of the State address, Gov. Mike Dunleavy depicted an optimistic picture of Alaska's prospects during President Donald Trump's second presidency, even as his own budget analysts predict declining revenue in the coming decade.
"We can develop our way to prosperity if we're given the opportunity and we take advantage of it," Dunleavy said.
Battling a cold, Dunleavy coughed and cleared his throat through his 46-minute address. Guests included First Lady Rose Dunleavy, over a dozen members of Dunleavy's cabinet, Olympian Alev Kelter and others.
After four years in which Dunleavy repeatedly said that Alaska's resource development prospects were limited by the administration of former President Joe Biden, the governor predicted boosted oil and gas development in the coming years, including the construction of a liquefied natural gas pipeline long sought by Alaska political leaders.
"The decades-old dream of cheap plentiful natural gas may soon be a reality with signed agreements on the near horizon," he said.
Watch the speech:
Dunleavy said he would continue to seek policy changes in the state's education system that have been opposed by many lawmakers.
Majority leaders in the House and Senate said this year they want to increase the state's education budget — after years of flat funding that has strained school budgets across Alaska — without tying the funding increase to any policy changes.
But Dunleavy said he wanted funding increases to be coupled with policy changes, including expanding charter schools and publicly-funded homeschooling options, though he did not provide specifics on the policies he would seek.
"I'll talk to anyone about more money if the conversation is also about different approaches and better outcomes, and that's what my education initiatives will include this year," he said.
Leaders in the House and Senate said the speech was aspirational and hopeful, but lacked indications that the governor was willing to work with bipartisan coalitions governing both chambers.
House Speaker Bryce Edgmon said he hoped that the governor would show willingness to work across the aisle on education and other policies.
"Otherwise, we're in for a long and protracted session," he said.
'We have hope'
House and Senate leaders said they hoped Dunleavy would share his vision for boosting the state's revenue and solving a projected deficit, but Dunleavy's speech made no mention of the $1.5 billion deficit budget he introduced last month.
Senate Majority Leader Cathy Giessel, an Anchorage Republican, said it was "somewhat embarrassing" that Dunleavy did not mention the deficit in his budget.
Dunleavy said resource development projects could, in the future, boost the state's coffers. But many of the oil and gas projects he cited would only boost revenue several years in the future. Dunleavy said a "North Slope renaissance" was just beginning.
"Money doesn't grow on trees. If we want more money for programs, we need more resource plays to fund them," Dunleavy said.
Dunleavy touted executive actions taken by the Trump administration to remove restrictions on resource development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
Dunleavy said he "couldn't be more excited" for the Trump term, again calling him "the most pro-Alaska President we've ever had."
The line got loud applause from a joint session of the Alaska Legislature. Rep. Frank Tomaszewski, R-Fairbanks, stood and applauded.
"We have a second chance at opportunities that looked like they slipped away just four years ago," said Dunleavy.
"Under the Trump administration, we have hope," he added.
Edgmon said he was disappointed that Dunleavy did not mention the expected challenges created by the freeze in federal funding announced by Trump earlier today.
"I think that's going to have potentially sweeping effects on all Alaskans, all sectors of the state," Edgmon said.
Dunleavy presented an upbeat vision of oil and gas projects broadly, including a costly natural gas pipeline that if constructed, would be the largest in the world.
Earlier in the month, Dunleavy and Frank Richards, president of the Alaska Gasline Development Corp., revealed that Glenfarne, a New York-based company, was pursuing plans to develop the state's long-planned $44 billion Alaska LNG project.
In Tuesday's address, Dunleavy again touted the project as a "game-changer" for Alaska, but he appeared to acknowledge the inevitability of importing gas to bridge a projected gas supply shortfall — at least in the near-term.
"We'll address the short-term shortage of natural gas for Southcentral, and we recognize that some of those solutions may be painful and certainly won't be popular, but they will be temporary," he said.
Giessel said she was glad that Dunleavy recognized the "desperate situation" created by the natural gas shortage. Sen. Bill Wielechwoski, an Anchorage Democrat, said that situation was due to "unfortunate, tremendous inaction" by the Dunleavy administration earlier in his tenure.
Wasilla Republican Sen. Mike Shower, the Senate minority leader, said nobody wants to import natural gas due to the anticipated extra costs. But getting Alaska's stranded supplies to market is not possible yet, he said.
"So until we can, we're gonna have to import it," he said in an interview.
Enstar, Southcentral Alaska's natural gas utility, recently announced that it was advancing plans to import gas through a converted facility in Nikiski.
Trump has appeared hostile to renewable energy since returning to the White House last week. On his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order to suspend new leases for wind projects.
Dunleavy, however, reiterated on Tuesday his openness to renewable energy projects and carbon capture. He previously said he is "agnostic as to the electron." and used Tuesday's address to again tout the need for expanded wind, solar and geothermal power generation in Alaska — alongside power from fossil fuels.
Dunleavy said he would introduce legislation "to ensure we have the most competitive licensing process that attracts professional talent." Dunleavy also said he would pursue permitting and regulatory reform.
Anchorage Republican Rep. Mia Costello, the House minority leader, described the speech overall as "optimistic."
She said "the horizon for oil and gas development is also very encouraging," and that work should be done in career and technical education to get Alaskans ready for those jobs.
Wielechowski said the contrast between Dunleavy's rosy projections for resource development and the current economic reality of Alaska reflect "a tale of two economies going on in this state."
"You have one group of people doing very well — the wealthy, the powerful, the privileged, the connected, the huge corporations — they're doing great. But the average Alaska, I think if you ask them on the street, 'How are you doing?' They're struggling to get by," Wielechowski said.
'Expand these opportunities'
Dunleavy touted early results from a bill he championed to improve reading instruction for Alaska students. That bill was adopted in a bipartisan vote in 2022.
"The early data is very encouraging," Dunleavy said. Some educators said it's too early to tell if the bill is achieving its intended purpose.
The governor also again referenced a national study conducted by a Harvard researcher that found Alaska's charter schools were outperforming those in other states. State researchers found the high performance of Alaska charter school students can be explained by demographic differences between charter school students and students in other public schools.
Senate President Gary Stevens, a Kodiak Republican, said he didn't think it was "legitimate" for the governor to keep mentioning the Harvard report "because it has been disproved by some of the experts."
Dunleavy also blasted a lawsuit backed by a union representing Alaska teachers asserting that the state's publicly-funding homeschooling program is violating the state constitution by funneling public education funding to private schools.
The Alaska Supreme Court sent the litigation back to the Superior Court after asking the plaintiffs to add specific school districts as defendants. The litigation is still active.
"Parents and students shouldn't be put on a waitlist to attend their schools of choice," said Dunleavy. "We should be working to expand these opportunities, not stopping them."
Stevens said Dunleavy's ideas on charter schools were "a non-starter for many of us who believe in public education and don't want to see those changes made."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State Department shifts $250 million from refugee aid to 'self-deportations'
State Department shifts $250 million from refugee aid to 'self-deportations'

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

State Department shifts $250 million from refugee aid to 'self-deportations'

By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. State Department has moved $250 million to the Department of Homeland Security for voluntary deportations by migrants without legal status, a spokesperson said, an unprecedented repurposing of funds that have been used to aid refugees uprooted by war and natural disasters. The money has been transferred "to provide a free flight home and an exit bonus to encourage and assist illegal aliens to voluntarily depart the United States," the State Department spokesperson told Reuters. Historically, those funds have been used "to provide protection to vulnerable people" overseas and to resettle refugees in the U.S., said Elizabeth Campbell, a former deputy assistant secretary of state. The re-routing of the money comes as President Donald Trump pushes to reshape U.S. government agencies to serve his 'America First' agenda. The State Department's planned reorganization explicitly states that the agency's refugee bureau now largely will focus on efforts to 'return illegal aliens to their country of origin or legal status.' The funds came from Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) overseen by the Bureau of Population, Refugee and Migration. Its website says its mission is to "reduce illegal immigration," aid people "fleeing persecution, crisis or violence and seek durable solutions for forcibly displaced people." Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, citing the law authorizing the funding, said in a May 7 Federal Register notice that underwriting the repatriation of people without legal status will bolster the "foreign policy interests" of the U.S. He did not mention the $250 million transfer to DHS. The DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's administration is working to speed up deportations in a crackdown that the Republican president vowed during the 2024 campaign would expel millions of people illegally in the U.S. It has encouraged migrants to leave voluntarily by threatening steep fines and deporting migrants to notorious prisons in Guantanamo Bay and El Salvador. But the volume of deportations since he took office in January appears to be less than those overseen by his predecessor Joe Biden in the February-May period of 2024, about 200,000 people versus 257,000. On May 9, Trump announced Project Homecoming, an initiative overseen by DHS that offers $1,000 stipends and travel assistance to migrants who "self-deport." DHS said in a May 19 news release that 64 people had "opted to self deport" to Honduras and Colombia on a charter flight under the program. Some experts said that while legal, sending the money to DHS for deportation operations was an unprecedented use of MRA funds. The main purpose of the funds historically has been "to provide refugee and displacement assistance, refugee processing and resettlement to the U.S., and respond to urgent and emerging humanitarian crises - not to return those very people to the harm or persecution they fled,' said Meredith Owen Edwards, senior director of Policy and Advocacy at the Refugee Council USA.

Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze
Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze

Two top Democrats claimed the Republicans' budget reconciliation bill and its proposal to let enhanced Obamacare credits expire will cause the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., announced findings that an estimated 51,000 Americans could die each year due to Republican-led changes to the federal healthcare system and the broader reconciliation bill. The national debt — which measures what the U.S. owes its creditors — fell to $36,214,400,664,854.53 as of June 3rd, according to the latest numbers published by the Treasury Department. That is down about $1.4 billion from the figure reported the previous day. Wyden called the "stakes" of the 'big, beautiful bill' debate "truly life and death," as a statement from his office read that "a new analysis estimates that more than 51,000 people will die per year as a direct result of the Republican reconciliation bill, and their refusal to extend Affordable Care Act premium tax credits." "Taking away health insurance and benefits like home care and mental healthcare from seniors, people with disabilities, kids, and working families will be deadly," Wyden said. "This analysis shows the dire consequences of moving ahead with this morally bankrupt effort," he said, referring to a study he and Sanders asked the University of Pennsylvania and Yale to conduct. Read On The Fox News App Liberals Blame Big Beautiful Bill's Loss On Dying Dems The Democrats employed the Philadelphia college's Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, as well as the Yale School of Public Health's Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis. "Let's be clear," Sanders said in a statement, "The Republican reconciliation bill which makes massive cuts to Medicaid in order to pay for huge tax breaks for billionaires is not just bad public policy." "It is not just immoral. It is a death sentence for struggling Americans." "[N]ot only will some of the most vulnerable people throughout our country suffer, but tens of thousands will die. We cannot allow that to happen," Sanders added. Winners, Losers And Grab-bags From House Gop's Narrow Passage Of 'Big, Beautiful Bill' In a copy of the study posted on UPenn's website, economics and health-centric academics found 7.7 million people would be estimated to lose Medicaid or Obamacare coverage by 2034, and 1.38 million "dual-eligible beneficiaries" would find themselves "disenroll[ed]." In a statement, Wyden cited figures of 11,300 deaths from the loss of Medicaid or Obamacare coverage, 18,200 deaths from the loss of Medicaid coverage among low-income beneficiaries and 13,000 deaths of Medicaid enrollees in nursing homes due to the rollback of a "nursing home minimum staffing rule" from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Wyden attributed an additional projected 8,811 deaths per year to the "failure to extend the enhanced [Obamacare] premium tax credits," citing the academics' analysis. Fox News Digital reached out to House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., -- who spearheaded the "big, beautiful bill" in the House -- for comment. A representative for UPenn told Fox News Digital the university sent the results of their analysis to Wyden and Sanders in response to a request on the matter. "The estimates of mortality that are contained in the letter were based on peer-review research that was done independently and well before their request," the UPenn representative said. "The senators' request was to take the research results and translate into the estimated number of deaths."Original article source: Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze

Republicans aren't following Elon Musk's lead anymore
Republicans aren't following Elon Musk's lead anymore

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans aren't following Elon Musk's lead anymore

Months ago, Elon Musk helped tank a government funding bill. Now, Republicans are mostly shrugging off his criticism of their "Big Beautiful Bill." "I don't think it's gonna move the needle in any direction," one House Republican told BI. Elon Musk says President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" is a "disgusting abomination." Republicans on Capitol Hill are making clear that they don't really care. "I think he's flat wrong," House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Wednesday. "I think he's way off on this." "We have a difference of opinion," Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters on Tuesday. "He's entitled to that opinion, we're going to proceed full speed ahead." It's a far cry from December, when Musk, then the incoming de facto leader of the White House DOGE Office, helped generate an online pressure campaign that swiftly tanked a government funding bill. That episode was a dramatic sign of the tech titan's burgeoning influence in Washington, suggesting that GOP lawmakers would be taking his cues — perhaps as much as they took Trump's — in the months to come. Now no longer leading DOGE, Musk has returned to being another outside voice. Fiscal hawks who agree with him don't mind getting a little backup. Other Republicans are happy to brush him off. "Elon, of course, is the wealthiest man in the world, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's wrong or he's right. He has an opinion, just like the rest of us," Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee told BI. "I don't think it's gonna move the needle in any direction." Musk did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has continued to pressure Republicans to support the bill, and the White House has said that those who vote against it should face primary challenges. Trump himself has not yet responded to Musk, though Johnson told reporters that the president is "not delighted that Elon did a 180" on the bill. Musk's broadside against the bill, according to him, is about its impact on the debt. Multiple forecasters who have analyzed the bill, including the Congressional Budget Office and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, have estimated that the current version of the bill would add more than $2 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. Musk has argued that this undermines DOGE, which has been trying to significantly reduce federal spending. Republicans were already arguing about this amongst themselves. Fiscal conservatives like Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin say that the version of the bill that passed the House last month adds too much to the debt, and they're now seeking to amend it. Most Republicans, however, have argued that outside projections about the bill's impact on the debt are flawed and don't account for potential economic growth as a result of the bill's eventual passage. Even those who agree with Musk don't seem to believe that his comments will strengthen their hand that much. "Sure, it helps bolster the case," Sen. Ron Johnson told reporters of Musk's tweet. "But again, the President wants to balance the budget as well." Perhaps the biggest reason why Musk's comments are unlikely to tank the bill: It's the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, and it's simply too important to them. The bill includes a permanent extension of tax cuts that Trump and Republicans first enacted in 2017, contains new funding for border security and immigration enforcement, and is chock full of other GOP priorities that they're not going to give up simply because of Musk's concern about the deficit. "All the things that are in this bill are so important for the US economy, it's going to be jet fuel for the US economy," Speaker Johnson told reporters on Wednesday. "The risk of not getting it done is enormous, not just for the Republican Party, but for the country. We've got to do this." The government funding bill that Musk helped tank in December, on the other hand, was a bipartisan piece of legislation that included all kinds of provisions that Republicans don't agree with. Plenty of fiscal conservatives planned to vote against it anyway, and Musk's involvement strengthened their case, eventually making it untenable for Speaker Johnson to move forward with it. Republican Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland, the chairman of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, voted "present" when the "Big Beautiful Bill" passed the House last month. He told reporters on Wednesday that he hopes senators keep Musk's criticism "in mind" as they make changes to the bill, but he didn't predict that it would change much. "He doesn't have to change the dynamic," Harris told BI. "I'm glad that he reminded people that the federal deficit is of grave concern." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store