
The Sodium Valproate scandal: Why are disabled children still waiting for compensation?
Jade is epileptic, and was prescribed a medication called Sodium Valproate.
It's an effective treatment for the condition and has helped save thousands of lives over the years - but it's also been linked to birth defects in thousands of babies, whose mothers were prescribed the drug during pregnancy - but never warned of the risks to their unborn children.
"Betrayed isn't even the word - because you trust your doctors, don't you?" Jade, from Lancashire, explains.
"When I found out that this medication could cause learning difficulties I was nearly sectioned, I didn't want to be here anymore, because I blamed myself.
"Even though I knew I asked all the right questions, it doesn't take away the guilt.
"I felt like a failure, like I shouldn't be a mum."
All three of Jade's children were born with signs of Foetal Valproate Syndrome - which can include a range of complex disabilities including learning difficulties, speech and language delay, sensory processing disorder, heart and kidney defects, and deformation of the spine or limbs.
Jade says she repeatedly asked doctors about the safety of taking the medication with all three of her pregnancies, but was only told of a slightly increased risk of spina bifuda.
Now, Jade worries constantly about her children's future. Her eldest son Tyler is the worst affected - and Jade believes it's because doctors increased her dosage of Sodium Valproate while she was pregnant.
Jade describes seeing the impact on her children as "devastating to watch"
"This has rewritten their lives, especially Tyler. It's taken so much away from him, he'll never have a meaningful job, and never be able to support himself, he'll never be able to drive.
"I don't really like to think about it, but is he ever going to get the opportunity to get married, to have kids? It's just not realistic, and it's not fair... all because I wasn't told.
"It's a huge scandal, it's a huge injustice - and it needs to be put right doesn't it?"
But putting it right has proved to be politically complicated.
In 2020 an independent review, chaired by Baroness Julia Cumberlege, strongly criticised the industry and regulators and recommended that the Government set up a redress scheme to compensate all affected children and their families.
In 2024, another report, this time by the Patient Safety Commissioner Dr Henrietta Hughes, set out exactly how the compensation scheme could work, and also suggested the Government make quicker interim payments.
But the one year anniversary of that report came and went in February 2025. I spoke to Dr Hughes at the time, and she was clearly frustrated that no progress had been made.
"My message to the Government one year ago was 'Get on with it!'" she told me. "And although the Government has changed my message remains the same.
"Waiting for redress doesn't put the suffering of those who have been harmed on pause, they need help right now."
Now, parliament has once again risen for its summer recess, with still no announcement being made.
For Janet Williams and Emma Murphy, who have helped to lead the campaign for Sodium Valproate compensation, it's another kick in the teeth for their disabled children, and the hundreds of families they represent.
"The weight of anxiety that this is causing on families is utterly ridiculous" says Janet, "and I think politicians have got to realise what that wait feels like."
So what's going on?
I've been following this story for a number of years, across two different political parties in Government, and when we approach them asking for an update you tend to hear very similar replies: that they sympathise with those affected; that this is a complex area of work; that they are working "at pace" to get a compensation scheme in place.
Now all those things can certainly be true - we've seen with the Thalidomide and the infected blood scandals among others that redress schemes are not simple, even with a huge amount of political goodwill.
There are always questions of eligibility, burdens of proof, challenging administration issues. For Sodium Valproate there's the added complication that we don't know for sure how many children were impacted, or how severely.
But Janet and Emma are worried that there's a bigger barrier to compensation victims of the scandal: money.
"We get the impression that they don't want to do this, because they're worried about how much this might cost," says Janet.
And both women say they've heard that they were very close to announcing a compensation scheme before the last General Election, but the then-government had to prioritise another scandal instead.
"We have spoken to a senior member of the Conservative Government" explains Emma.
"In that meeting it was stated that it was actually a toss up between sodium valproate and contaminated blood to get compensation.
"Tthink that could have been their thinking, to pit people's families up against each other, that is just abhorrent. These are real children with disabilities, real adults, real lives. We're not just data."
Now, Labour are in charge, and the Prime Minister has assured victims of the scandal that this is "obviously a really important matter".
But they have been in power for over a year now, and campaigners anxieties are mounting.
This MP, who has been fighting for compensation ever since she came into parliament, admits she feels frustrated by the lack of progress.
We have asked the Government for another update on when they will respond to the Hughes Report and set out the details of a compensation scheme.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said:
'The harm caused by sodium valproate continues to be felt today. Our sympathies are with those affected and we are fully focused on how best to support patients and prevent future harm.
'This is a complex area of work and the government is carefully considering the Patient Safety Commissioner's recommendations in full.
'Health Minister Baroness Gillian Merron met patients affected and has committed to providing a further update.'
So exactly when things will change for families waiting for redress remains a bit of an unknown.
One thing is clear though when you speak to women like Jade, Janet and Emma - this is a battle they aren't willing to lose.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Live
4 hours ago
- North Wales Live
DWP changes: Full list of people eligible for a free bus pass after overhaul
In the UK, many individuals are entitled to a free bus pass, including those with certain disabilities or those aged over 66. Despite recent changes to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) eligibility, travel schemes dependent on disability benefit eligibility may still provide free travel, even if benefits are lost under the contentious welfare reform bill recently passed by Parliament. Under the English National Concessionary Travel Scheme, disabled individuals in England can obtain a free bus pass through their local council. There have been recent worries that disabled people might lose their entitlement to a free pass following the Government's overhaul of PIP benefit eligibility. However, due to the wording of the bill, you may still be eligible for the concessionary travel scheme pass even if you lose PIP. Other factors, such as receiving the higher rate mobility component of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) or holding a Blue Badge, can also qualify individuals for a free bus pass. Some regions also offer free bus passes based on specific disabilities or conditions, regardless of PIP status. Concerns have been raised about the potential impact on individuals who rely on the Blue Badge scheme or those who hold concession travel cards offering free bus journeys following the overhaul to the benefits system announced by Liz Kendall in March, reports CambridgeshireLive. The Bill was significantly watered down in June following a revolt by backbench MPs. Some MPs and disability campaigners continue to warn that benefit claimants with severe, lifelong illnesses could see their out-of-work benefits halved under the reforms. The qualifying element of the disabled concessionary travel scheme, which allows people to access free bus journeys across England, traditionally relies on PIP eligibility. However, if you are deemed to have mobility difficulties and you receive the enhanced rate mobility component of PIP, you still qualify for the pass even if you don't receive any payments from it. You can also get a free travel pass for a number of other reasons, including if you are over the State Pension age, a carer or qualified under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme. Campaigners are calling on the Government to reduce the age that older people receive a free bus pass in England from 66 to 60 - in line with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Currently, you can apply for reduced cost or a free travel pass if you are: an older person who has reached their 66th birthday (current State Pension age) someone with a learning, speech, visual or physical disability under pensionable age a carer companion to someone who couldn't travel without your help Someone who qualifies under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme If you wish to qualify as a disabled person for the scheme, here are the eligibility requirements: chronically sick and disabled and suffering from any disability which permanently and seriously impairs your ability to walk permanently blind and unable to perform any duties for which sight is required assessed as having learning disabilities registered as profoundly deaf, with or without speech without the use of both arms, whether through the absence of limbs or otherwise unable to drive having had a driving license refused or revoked on medical grounds registered as partially sighted (where disability can be assessed by a Consultant Ophthalmologist) You must have undergone a PIP assessment and provide proof of receiving the enhanced rate mobility component of PIP or have been awarded at least 8 points for "moving around" or "communicating verbally".


Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
NHS to spend more on US drugs as Britain bows to Trump
Ministers are preparing to boost NHS spending on US drugs in a race to avoid a future tariff hit from Donald Trump. The Government told drugmakers last week that it would agree to boost spending on medicines to comparable levels with the US. The promise to increase the GDP share allocated to medicines is understood to have been made as part of talks with drug bosses over the NHS drugs spending cap. It follows demands from the US president that other countries stop 'freeloading' on American innovation and pay more for its medicines. In the US-UK trade agreement, signed earlier this year, ministers said the NHS would review drug pricing to take into account the 'concerns of the president'. The UK's expenditure on new innovative medicines currently stands at just 0.28pc of GDP, around a third of America's proportionate spending of 0.78pc of its GDP. Even in Europe, the UK lags other countries, with Germany spending 0.4pc of its GDP and Italy spending 0.5pc. Ministers are understood to have offered to take steps to get the UK level closer to the US proportion. However, sources said the Government did not provide details on timing or concrete actions as to how the NHS would increase medicine spending. One insider claimed the proposal was 'a lot of jam and a lot of tomorrows'. The offer comes weeks after the US president told the world's biggest drugmakers that they needed to lower prices for Americans, suggesting they pay for this by charging higher fees abroad. In a letter sent to the bosses of 17 pharmaceutical companies, Mr Trump demanded they 'negotiate harder with foreign freeloading nations' for their medicines, suggesting he would use tariffs to push through higher prices if countries resisted. Earlier this year, the Telegraph revealed that the White House was already pressing for the NHS to spend more on American drugs. US officials are particularly concerned by an arrangement that allows the NHS to spend less on medicines than other countries by forcing drugmakers to pay rebates. The UK's voluntary scheme for branded medicines pricing, access and growth (known as VPAG) makes sure that the NHS does not overpay for medicines. It does this by requiring pharmaceutical companies to pay sales rebates back to the NHS if its medicine bill rises faster than expected, essentially keeping a cap on drug costs. Earlier this year, the Department of Health launched a review of the scheme under pressure from Mr Trump and the pharmaceutical industry. Since then, ministers have been in negotiations with drug companies over how much the NHS should be able to claw back in rebates. Drug company chiefs are expected to vote on whether to accept the latest offer next week. The offer follows years where drug bosses have called for the UK to spend more on medicines. Albert Bourla, the chief executive of US drug giant Pfizer, said in June: 'We represent in the UK 0.3pc of their GDP per capita. That's how much they spend on medicine. So yes, they can increase prices.' He said countries were other countries were 'free-riding' on the US. A government spokesman said: 'The VPAG review is one of many ways in which we are taking decisive action to unlock innovation and drive investment in the UK's world-class pharmaceutical sector including the Life Sciences Sector Plan. 'We will make sure the next game changers in medicine are developed here in Britain, for the benefit of our health at home and abroad. 'We continue to work closely with industry, including Associated of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, on the VPAG review and the outcome will be announced in due course.' The Government previously argued it would 'only ever sign trade agreements that align with the UK's national interests and to suggest otherwise would be misleading'.


Daily Record
13 hours ago
- Daily Record
Dog expert reveals how long you should really walk your dog each day
Dog experts have settled a long standing debate on the minimum amount of exercise you should give your dog per day. As a dog owner, taking your four legged friend out for a walk every day is non-negotiable as it is essential our furry friends are getting a sufficient amount of exercise. But how long should you actually be walking your dog for according to the experts and government advice? Most pet owners are likely to decide how long their dog gets outside based on a number of factors. For example, their age, health, size and breed are all likely to play a part in this decision. However, the choice ultimately comes down to the owner. Dog experts at The Kennel Club have now offered their advice in the debate about how long dog owners should walk their pets for. They said: "Every dog should have at least one walk a day, often two, given that in some circumstances, under veterinary advice, the dog should be rested. "The Government recommends that we get at least 30 minutes of exercise each day, and this is something that everybody can achieve - and go beyond - on a daily dog walk. "The amount of exercise your dog needs will vary according to its breed, but every dog should have at least one walk a day, often two." The dog experts also advised that walking distance will be different for puppies and fully grown dogs, the Express reports. They explained that puppies need less 'formal' exercise and therefore long walks "can overtire them." While the amount of exercise your dog can manage varies between breeds and the health of your dog, they did give a rule of thumb that can help determine how much exercise is required for your pooch. According to The Kennel Club, the ideal amount is "five minutes of formal exercise per month of age (up to twice a day) until the puppy is fully grown i.e., 15 minutes (up to twice a day) when three months old, 20 minutes when four months old and so on. They added: "As they become older, they'll be able to cope with larger amounts of exercise". Veterinary doctor Nicole Rous backed this up in a TikTok video where she explained: "The rules are different for puppies and for adult dogs. There is a great rule of thumb for puppies - it's five minutes per month of life, and you can do this twice a day." Dr Nicole added: "So, if you have a four-month-old puppy, four times five is 20, you're looking at exercising for 20 minutes twice a day. That includes walks and things like that, but it also includes exercise in the back yard and games you're playing. "Adult dogs average 30 to 60 minutes a day, but this one's variable. So, if you've got a really active breed like a Border Collie, you're probably looking at one to two hours. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. "If you've got a more sedentary breed, you might be looking at two 20 minute walks a day rather than the full hour. Now, for senior dogs, we're at a similar level - 30 to 60 minutes, but the type of exercise is really important to look after their joints. "We want to look at low impact exercise, so walks, look at the surface you're walking on and then consider things like hydrotherapy - that's a really good exercise for the oldies to include in their regime." Dr Nicole stressed the crucial importance of maintaining exercise for dogs as they age to keep their minds active. The advice has resonated with numerous dog owners, as they were quick to share their own stories.