These 3 Arizona cities are among the best places to live in the U.S. Can you guess?
Two Arizona cities cracked the top 100 in a new national ranking of the best places to live, mostly standing out for their strong job markets and safety ratings.
U.S. News and World Report recently released its annual list of the best places to live in the U.S. for 2025-2026, evaluating 250 cities across the country.
The rankings are based on key factors such as affordability, quality of life, job market strength and access to recreational activities. The criteria were weighted on responses to a nationwide public survey conducted in February, which asked people what matters most when choosing where to live.
Most Arizona cities did not shine in the ranking, but three places made it to the top half—and two of them earned spots in the top 100.
Here are the best and worst Arizona places to live in, according to U.S. News and World Report.
Only three Arizona areas made it to the top half of the ranking of more than 250 places: Queen Creek at No. 93, Gilbert at No. 94 and Marana at No. 115.
Queen Creek, the highest-ranked Arizona town, is a suburban area located in the southeastern outskirts of metro Phoenix, offering a strong job market, low crime rates and a tight-knit community feel.
Right behind it at No. 94 was Gilbert, another Phoenix suburb. Larger and slightly more affordable than Queen Creek, Gilbert offers a blend of small-town charm and big-city amenities, with comparable levels of safety and employment opportunities.
Here's how Arizona cities/towns fared in the U.S. News & World Report ranking, from best to worst:
Queen Creek
Gilbert
Marana
Chandler
Scottsdale
Sierra Vista
Peoria
Surprise
Maricopa
Mesa
Goodyear
Buckeye
Phoenix
Avondale
Tucson
Prescott
Glendale
Casa Grande
Lake Havasu
Tempe
Flagstaff
Yuma
Here are the three best cities to live in the country, according to U.S. News and World Report.
Johns Creek, Georgia
Carmel, Indiana
Pearland, Texas
U.S. News ranked cities using data from government sources like the U.S. Census and private data firms, as well as its own resources. A national survey was conducted to find out what Americans value most when choosing a place to live.
Each city/town in the ranking received a total score based on the following five categories, which were weighted based on survey responses:
Quality of Life (26%): Things that affect long-term well-being, like education quality, health care access, environmental risks and state economy.
Value (25%): How affordable it is to live in each city, comparing housing costs in proportion to income and overall cost of essential things like food and utilities.
Desirability (24%): Focused on daily lifestyle and satisfaction, analyzing crime rates, weather, access to leisure activities and commuting time.
Job Market (23%): Job opportunities and income based on the unemployment rate and median income of each city.
Net Migration (2%): Whether more people are moving in or out of the city.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Here are the 2025 best cities to live in. Do you agree?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?
We've seen the headlines that reveal how rich the world's top billionaires are — but it's hard to comprehend just how rich they are. Consider this: Let's say you had $1 billion in your bank account and had to spend $100,000 every day, for an entire year. After 365 days, you would still have $963,500,000 (nine hundred sixty-three million five hundred thousand). Discover More: Find Out: Over the last two decades, billionaires have ballooned their wealth to unparalleled levels. In 2005, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates ranked as the world's richest person, with a net worth of $46.5 billion, as reported by CNN. Today, that title belongs to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, whose net worth stands at $368 billion as of June 5, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Even when adjusted for inflation, Gates' former net worth would be equivalent to roughly $76 billion in today's dollars. It is worth noting that other billionaires have also increased their wealth during the same time. For instance, tech billionaires Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos are worth $229 billion and $227 billion, ranking second and third globally. For many Americans, this trend is not sitting well. The sky-high cost of living has catalyzed support for redistributive tax policies, especially among younger voters and the progressive base of the Democratic Party. While higher taxation may or may not happen in the years to come, here's hypothetically how much you'd get if the world's richest man gives a check to every American. The United States Census Bureau estimates the current population to be around 341 million people, ranking only behind India and China. If Musk's enormous $368 billion were equally divided in the U.S., each person would receive $1,079 (rounded to the nearest dollar). A couple would receive $2,158, while a family of four would get $4,316. Despite the enormous wealth of billionaires, much of their fortune is tied up in stocks, real estate, and other holdings. Only a small percentage of their assets is held in cash. Based on data from Forbes, Musk has a 12% ownership stake in Tesla and to date, he remains the largest shareholder in the $1.15 trillion electric vehicle company. This is in addition to a 42% slice in SpaceX and a 54% interest in xAI, among many other businesses. Interestingly, Bloomberg reported that Musk's financial holdings appreciated by 77% after joining the campaign trail with President Donald Trump late last year, as reported by Bloomberg. Investors became bullish on Tesla and Musk became the first person to ever reach a net worth exceeding $400 billion. Since then, Tesla's market value has fluctuated as a result of volatile market conditions, macroeconomic factors and the threat of a global trade war. Editor's note: Data is accurate as of June 5 and is subject to change. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - The One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers for America. Now the Senate Must Deliver Too.
The House of Representatives has delivered on the American people's mandate by passing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in our nation's history. This transformative package includes record levels of tax cuts, spending reduction, and border and national security investment. The ball is now in the Senate's court and their mission is simple: move the One Big Beautiful Bill to the president's desk as soon as possible. This legislation delivers a historic tax cut and $5,000 raise for the average American family to provide immediate relief to working households struggling after four years of economic mismanagement under the Biden administration. It permanently expands the 2017 Trump tax break for small businesses, the backbone of our economy, and enhances incentives for American companies to invest, grow and raise worker wages for decades to come. The bill's impact extends beyond the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act by providing additional relief to lower- and middle-income Americans by eliminating taxes on tips, exempting overtime pay and doubling the tax credit for seniors on a fixed income. Additionally, we support working families by increasing the child tax credit to $2,500 per family, making interest on car loans tax deductible and expanding health savings accounts. We're strengthening America's security by investing $46 billion to complete President Trump's border wall and hiring 18,000 new immigration enforcement personnel to detain and deport at least 1 million illegal immigrants annually. We're committing almost $150 billion to rebuild America's military, including $34 billion to revitalize our naval fleet and $25 billion for missile defense. Furthermore, we're unleashing American energy dominance by opening federal lands for drilling, reducing the regulatory stranglehold on conventional fuels, and eliminating hundreds of billions in green new deal subsidies that have made U.S. energy more expensive and less reliable. And we're accomplishing all of this while reducing spending by $1.6 trillion, the largest spending reform package in American history by two-fold. This isn't just fiscal responsibility; it's the beginning of a generational reset that will restore America's financial health. At every stage of this process, Democrats have resorted to fear-mongering and false claims to undermine this critical legislation. So desperate to derail the bill, they manipulated Congressional Budget Office analyses to mislead the American people about the outcomes of the One Big Beautiful Bill. They use the fact that we prohibit illegal immigrants and able-bodied adults who refuse to work from receiving taxpayer-funded welfare services to fallaciously suggest that vulnerable people are being 'ripped away' from the social safety net. Furthermore, they deliberately cherry-pick CBO data to spread the false narrative that our tax cuts only benefit the wealthy. Never mind the fact that CBO's own data confirm that American households in every tax bracket would see increased after-tax income under our legislation. The left knows they can't convince the American people on the substance of this bill, so they have resorted to fabrications. The Senate now holds America's economic future in its hands. The House spent months developing a balanced budget reconciliation bill that advances every pillar of the America First vision, including restoring our nation's fiscal health by reining in the runaway spending and reducing our debt-to-GDP ratio. While the Senate may be able to make modest improvements, they must resist the temptation to significantly alter this carefully crafted legislation. Any major changes risk upsetting the delicate balance struck in the House and derailing President Trump's America First agenda. In fact, every day the Senate delays this process is another day closer to tax hikes for working families, uncertainty for small businesses, and a military and border patrol lacking the resources they need to be successful. The American people gave President Trump and unified Republican leadership a clear mandate to reverse course on the failures of the last four years — they expect action, not endless deliberation. The House has delivered. Now it's time for the Senate to meet this moment with the urgency it demands. America's next Golden Age is within reach — but Republicans must come together in order for us to seize it. House Budget Chairman Jodey Arrington represents Texas's 19th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. He sits on the House Ways and Means Committee and the Joint Economic Committee. August Pfluger represents Texas's 11th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. He is the chairman of the Republican Study Committee and sits on the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Democrats call for halt of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac privatization
Senate Democrats led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), the ranking member of the Banking Committee, called on the Trump administration to halt the reprivatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which finance 70 percent of the nation's mortgage market and entered federal conservatorship after the 2008 financial crisis. 'We have serious concerns that you plan to make significant changes to the enterprises in a way that would put investor profits over the homes of millions of Americans. Should President Trump make good on his plans, he may take us back to the status quo before the 2008 foreclosure crisis,' Warren and other Democratic senators wrote in a letter to William Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Financing Administration (FHFA). Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) and Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee also signed the letter. They asked Pulte and his staff to 'halt any plans to reprivatize the enterprises until you have adequately assessed the potential impact of y our plans on the housing market.' They warned that neither the federal housing administration nor the administration have produced a study of what impact releasing Fannie and Freddie from government conservatorship would have on mortgage rates and the housing market more broadly. The Democratic pushback was prompted by President Trump's post on social media last month that he is working on 'TAKING THESE AMAZING COMPANIES PUBLIC,' referring to the two special purpose entities. Democrats said they want Pulte to explain what factors influenced Trump's social media posts and what has changed since the FHFA director told lawmakers recently that the privatization of Fannie and Freddie was not a top priority. Warren and her colleagues asked Pulte to provide a list of any meetings he's had about privatization since his Senate confirmation in March and to name the agencies, departments and White House officials that have been involved in discussions about privatization. 'Despite your statutory role as regulator and conservator of the enterprises, you recently stated that President Trump will 'eventually make whatever decision that he wants to make, on his own timeline.' It is incredibly concerning that you appear to be conceding your responsibility to ensure the safety and soundness of the enterprises to advance the president's political agenda,' they wrote. They asked Pulte to provide answers to their questions by June 18. The other Democratic signatories included Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), Tina Smith (Minn.), Ruben Gallego (Ariz.), Ron Wyden (Ore.), Andy Kim (N.J.), Mazie Hirono (Hawaii), Chris Van Hollen (Md.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (Del.) and Mark Warner (Va.). Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) also signed the letter. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
