Mayor supports hapū in fight against fast-tracked marina proposal.
More than 30 people from the eastern Bay of Islands appealed to the Far North District Council for support in their battle against a fast-tracked consent for a marina at Waipiro Bay.
Photo:
RNZ/Peter de Graaf
Far North Mayor Moko Tepania has thrown his support behind hapū fighting a fast-tracked marina proposal, by calling for the project to be opened up to public consultation.
More than 30 people from the eastern Bay of Islands turned out at a Far North District Council meeting last week, urging councillors to oppose plans for a 250-berth marina at isolated Waipiro Bay - even though the council will not have a say if it goes through the fast-track consenting process.
Kaikōrero [speakers] for the affected hapū said the fast-track process deprived local communities of their voice, so they were turning to the council so their concerns could at least he heard.
The concept plan for the 250-berth Waipiro Bay marina.
Photo:
Supplied
Councillors did not pass a formal resolution - Tepania said the short timeframe made that impossible - but the mayor did pledge to write a personal letter opposing the use of fast-track legislation for the marina proposal.
He also invited any councillors who shared his concerns to sign the letter.
Tepania told RNZ he believed the proposal should go through the normal RMA (Resource Management Act) process.
"As a council we formally opposed the fast-tracking legislation because we had significant concerns about how it would affect our partnership with iwi and hapū here in the Far North, in that it makes two classes of iwi or hapū citizenship, those who have settled and those who have not. We're seeing that now, where we've got unsettled hapū who have come to us because they've got no other avenue to get the powers-that-be to listen to them," he said.
"I'm neither here nor there personally over this project, and I'm sure there are some benefits, but what I am opposed to is fast-tracking that does not follow normal resource management processes to ensure that iwi, hapū, community, council and key stakeholders can have a say, and that the process will be transparent."
Patukeha kaikōrero Lamorna Ahitapu-Rogers said hapū were grateful for the mayor's support, and the chance to express their opposition despite being locked out of the process.
If the marina went ahead, Te Rāwhiti residents would lose one of their main pipi beds and future options for mokopuna.
"If they build this marina, and that environment is destroyed when we get our Treaty settlement, there are a lot of things we won't be able to do that we have the potential to do at the moment," she said.
Patukeha kaikōrero Lamorna Ahitapu-Rogers says fast-track legislation has left her community without a voice.
Photo:
RNZ/Peter de Graaf
Hopper Developments, one of two companies behind the proposal, did not respond to requests for comment.
During last Thursday's council meeting in Kaikohe, speakers from Ngāti Kuta, Patukeha, Ngāti Hine and the local community board laid out their concerns.
Natasha Clarke-Nathan, a kaikōrero for Ngāti Kuta and Patukeha, said the proposed marina was "extremely large" with 250 berths, a boat ramp and shops, all in a remote part of the Bay of Islands.
It would exclude local people from an important area for gathering kai moana and effectively privatise part of the Bay of Islands.
"In our minds this is a privatisation, or a raupatu [confiscation], in favour of the wealthy," Clarke-Nathan said.
The development would contribute to the eastern Bay of Islands becoming a "dumping ground" for holiday homes and boats that were used only a few weeks a year.
It did not meet the requirements for fast-tracking because it offered no regional or national benefits, she said.
Opponents of a fast-tracked marina proposal packed the public gallery at Thursday's Far North District Council meeting.
Photo:
RNZ/Peter de Graaf
She disputed the applicants' claim there were no wāhi tapu in the area and said their figures for the marina's economic benefits were greatly overstated.
Clarke-Nathan said the applicants claimed a strong demand for marina berths, but the nearest existing marina, at Ōpua, had 20 empty berths.
The real demand was in Kerikeri, at the other end of the Bay of Islands.
Ahitapu-Rogers told councillors increasing the number of boats in the area would raise the risk of spreading the seaweed pest caulerpa.
The eastern Bay of Islands was already "ground zero" for the caulerpa invasion in Northland, she said.
A report released that same week by the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research estimated caulerpa's cost to the New Zealand economy could reach $9.4 billion.
Louise Dews, of the Eastern Bay of Islands Preservation Society, and Pere Huriwai-Seger were among those calling for council support in their fight against a fast-tracked marina.
Photo:
RNZ/Peter de Graaf
Jane Hindle, Russell representative on the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board, said a project that amounted to the "wholesale transfer of seabed into private ownership" needed the full scrutiny of the RMA.
Opponents of the development have called a public meeting at Russell's Kororāreka Marae at 1pm on 18 May.
Waipiro Bay is about 20km east of Russell in an isolated area on the "back road" between Whangārei and Russell.
Development to date is limited to a gated community of top-end holiday homes.
Projects which are not specifically named in the legislation, such the marina, have to apply for consideration under the fast-track process.
The Ministry for the Environment assesses the application to make sure it's complete, then the Minister for Infrastructure decides whether to accept it for fast-tracking.
If accepted it then goes to an expert panel, which may or may not hold a public hearing before deciding on the consent.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Fast track or slow track? The data problem that could hurt development
"I think inevitably the lack of information does mean a slow track," Simon Upton says. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins The government's fast track for building big infrastructure will be a slow track if New Zealand does not get its head around its hotchpotch of datasets about what is all around us. This warning about "globs" of siloed data hurting development is coming from the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. It follows years of failed attempts to unlock billions of dollars of growth from getting a better grasp on everything geospatial - that is, what is in the physical environment and how it interacts. "It's a place-based thing", said commissioner Simon Upton. "If you want to know about where you're going to farm something or where you're going to build something, you need to put together a whole lot of place-spaced or geospatial information, and that's currently held in all sorts of dispersed places." The three-decade struggle with the Resource Management Act had showed up what was at stake. But though this law was in for another overhaul, the key data piece was still missing. "The reason I think that the current moment really is a critical, is that this government is the second government in a row that's trying to completely upend the resource management system and do it all differently." The gap would bog down the government's controversial fast-tracking of big projects, Upton said. "From what I can see, the fast-track process still requires people to pull all the information together and so the panels that are looking at this, they're going to have to give people the time to pull that together and then analyse it. "I think inevitably the lack of information does mean a slow track. "The time has come when we need to be able to 'federate' or pull together that dispersed information so that people can make good decisions." His new report lists a whole raft of shortcomings in the geospatial system: It was "plagued" by duplication, overlaps and significant gaps, was poorly accessible, lacked leadership and was dispersed across scores of councils, agencies, catchment groups and other community bodies. "Without robust environmental information we won't be able to judge if costly actions and mitigations undertaken are making a difference," the 19-page report said. Upton has campaigned for a joined-up - or "federated" - system for years. In a 2022 report, he pointed out how the info gaps around land use, and water quality and use - at many of the 1500 water monitoring sites, for example, only a few types of measurements were made. "Compared with surface water, groundwater is even less well understood." In the marine ecosystem, "luck has driven much of what we know. For example, the early discovery of large submarine volcanoes in the Kermadec Arc, north of New Zealand, was largely the result of serendipitous mapping". The country has tried to get serious about geospatial before, with little to show for it. Over 15 years ago, the first national geospatial review said a massive jigsaw of joined-up datasets constantly being added to, would be worth billions to the economy. So the government set up a geospatial office, its job was to set up the technology, policies, standards and human resources for networks of "open, accessible and interoperable" data. But by 2014, the office (NZGO) was writing a 40-page report about the bureaucratic indifference and fragmentation that had derailed attempts to set up a Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) framework by 2014. RNZ got the report under the OIA. "Despite a review and reset in July 2013, low attendance and low engagement in ... governance groups was ongoing and meetings were frequently cancelled," Land Information NZ told RNZ in an OIA response to questions about the fate of a system that was promised to deliver billions in benefits. The geospatial effort dragged its feet for a host of reasons. "Organisations tended to participate in the national SDI for their own ends rather than because Cabinet has directed them to, or to deliver a public good", agencies "didn't have the resources to participate if they didn't get direct benefit"; or they found it "difficult to understand let alone explain to others" so could not get a budget for it. It did not help that it lacked "identifiable measures towards a defined 'end game'". By 2017 the NZGO "was effectively disestablished". The geospatial strategy still exists, but orphaned and without a champion, multiple geospatial industry players told RNZ. Simon Upton put his shoulder to the uphill push years after this drawn-out (2006-17) and failed attempt - he was not in the country at the time it was going on. "But I'd make this observation," Upton said. "This is not sexy stuff. This is scarcely a vote-winning territory, talking about data. "It is not something that is likely to enliven government officials or politicians. "This is really the the engine room stuff." But the government wanted to do spatial planning, so a big job was there to be done, he said. "If you want to do it differently and do it successfully, you are going to need much better information."
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mata Season 3 Episode 11 Tania Waikato
In the wake of an unprecedented punishment for the haka that drew global attention to the Treaty Principles Bill, Te Pāti Māori legal representative Tania Waikato reflects on the fallout, the opposition to the Regulatory Standards Bill, and what this moment reveals about Māori political power. Parliament took the unprecedented step of suspending both Te Pāti Māori leaders - Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi - for 21 days. Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke was suspended for seven days - but had also been punished with a 24-hour suspension on the day over a haka all three had performed in Parliament, against the Treaty Principles Bill, in November. It is against the rules of the House for members to leave their seats during a debate - which all three did. Waikato said one of the most galling things about the entire process was that the haka was said to be intimidatory and that the process the committee adopted was framed in that way from the beginning. She said in her 20 years of being a lawyer she had not seen a process that "disrespected the laws of natural justice" in the way it did. "I was actually flabbergasted at the lack of respect that that body had for very very basic rights that had anyone who's been accused of any type of behaviour that could have a censure result, let alone a censure of this magnitude, imposed on them should be given." Requests to the committee to have a hearing at a time when both counsels were available and for the accused to bring evidence to defend themselves against the allegations were rejected even though that was provided for in the standing orders, she said. "So right from the beginning of the process they were not following their own rules and they were ... in my opinion trumping up the charges to make them sound as serious as possible and to slant the outcome towards what we ended up with." Asked why the MPs chose not to appear before the committee, Waikato said it was because the MPs felt they would not get a fair hearing. "They felt, and quite rightly I believe, that they had already predetermined what they were going to decide." Waikato, who is also a health and safety lawyer, said Parliament was supposed to be the height of democracy but the behaviour of MPs within the House had degenerated and was "sliding towards this gutter politics style". "I watched some of the behaviour that goes on in the House and particularly in that last debate before the suspensions were made and there is no way that you could behave like that in any other workplace and get away with it - it would be illegal and you would be hauled up on workplace bullying charges in an instant if you behaved like that in any other workplace." Waikato said she would have advised Te Pāti Māori MPs to do the haka had she been their lawyer prior to this on the basis that the Treaty Principles Bill was "the most divisive, racist piece of legislation that has ever been introduced during our lifetimes". It was an exceptional event which required an exceptional response, she said. "And the Speaker took action on the day, it's not like there was nothing that happened on the day, Hannah was censured for what happened, it should have stopped there." It should not have been referred to the Privileges Committee, she said. Photo: Te Māngai Pāho Photo: NZ On Air
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Paula Penfold and Conor English Part 1
Tonight on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Paula Penfold and Conor English Paula goes behind the scenes on her breakthorugh story this week about former Prime Minister staffer Michael Forbes; the nation's disaster monitoring centre is hit by funding cuts and The Finance Minister is being accused of opening a can of worms for considering giving farmers early access to their Kiwisavers. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
