Bengaluru has so much potential; we just need to nurture it, says Kevin Oliver
But about four months ago, I decided I wanted to do something substantial in Bengaluru. It feels like a full circle moment to now come back,' says Kevin Oliver, musician, theatre director, fashion choreographer and Bengaluru boy, who has brought Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat to the city. Kevin's production offers a fresh interpretation of the classic, originally conceived by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice in the 1970s, now reimagined as India's first all-male pop opera. Excerpts:
'EVEN YEARS LATER, I LOVE THAT I CAN STILL SEE BENGALURU; IT'S NOT LOST'
Back in the city after years, Kevin offers a refreshingly balanced perspective on Bengaluru.
'I just love where Bengaluru's gone, and I love that I can still see Bengaluru; it's not lost. People certainly complain about the traffic and so many trees being cut down, and of course, that's going to happen. The city has become insane; it's grown so big. Being here for a month and a half has been such a fabulous trip down memory lane and into the future because Bengaluru is a city that endures.
And with all its madness, I love where Bengaluru's going,' he says.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute
Navy Quest
Undo
You Can Also Check:
Bengaluru AQI
|
Weather in Bengaluru
|
Bank Holidays in Bengaluru
|
Public Holidays in Bengaluru
'THERE'S A LOT OF COPY-PASTE HAPPENING TODAY'
Kevin is also particularly critical of the lack of originality in the arts. 'Today, in the arts, there's a lot of copy-paste happening. I feel, especially in India, we tend to do a lot of copy and paste, especially in the fashion business. It's the old designers reshowing the same old stuff in different fabrics, with a multitude of sequins and crystals. For me, the fashion quotient and artistic part of it are a little bit lost.
Every show looks the same; whether it's one designer or another, it looks the same to me. There's no innovation at all,' he says.
'BENGALURU HAS SO MUCH TO OFFER IN TERMS OF CREATIVE POTENTIAL'
Speaking about Bengaluru's creative landscape, Kevin notes that the city is 'brimming with untapped potential'. 'The talent here is amazing, but it's disheartening to see the arts fading away so much around the world. The city has so much to offer in terms of creative potential; we just need to nurture it."
The reason why we haven't achieved a certain standard in Bengaluru is purely because of the lack of support from corporates, groups. Everything is muddied
Kevin Oliver
JOSEPH GETS A COUTURE TWIST
'I wanted to marry fashion and music – something that has never been done in musicals. With Joseph, I wanted to bring an element of couture, right from the first image to the last image. I borrowed and begged from designers to lend me couture clothes and brought them down to Bengaluru. Key pieces in the show feature international branding, including Joseph's coat (left) which is 21 kgs of Swarovski crystal.
It's my interpretation of where we've taken the story since its '70s origins,' says Kevin.
'I CHOSE AN ALL-MALE CAST BECAUSE…'
But why an all-men cast? Kevin says, 'Joseph is very male. It's 12 brothers – it's very male-dominated. Men have such beautiful timbre in their voices – I wanted to showcase that, and so it became quite a natural fit for an all-male ensemble. (laughs) Of course, I had a lot of grumbling from the womenfolk, asking why I'd come back after so long to do an all-male musical. I said, 'Well, it was a twist. It wasn't planned; it was just about how I could make it fresh.
' And who knows, I might even do an all-female musical next time.' 'The musical follows a ninepart narrator format with 16 genre-fluid tracks and 100-plus male performers, aged 13–50, singing live from start to finish,' he adds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Danica Patrick fuels controversy by backing Sydney Sweeney amid outrage over American Eagle's anti-woke ad
Danica Patrick fuels controversy by backing Sydney Sweeney amid outrage over American Eagle's anti-woke ad (Image via Getty) Danica Patrick is speaking up after Sydney Sweeney 's new American Eagle ad caused a storm online. On Sunday, July 28, 2025, Patrick posted on Instagram, asking why people were so upset with the campaign. The ad, featuring Sydney Sweeney modeling jeans with the tagline 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans', was released last week and has sparked anger on social media. While many are calling it a hidden message promoting 'white beauty,' Patrick doesn't see the problem and she's not the only one backing Sweeney. Danica Patrick reacts to Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad The backlash began after American Eagle launched its fall 2025 campaign on Friday, July 26, starring 27-year-old actress Sydney Sweeney. Smiling and posing in several outfits, she was shown in the ad under the heading "Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans". Although many internet users considered the line to be a covert call advocating white beauty norms especially given Sweeney's blond hair and blue eyes, it was obviously a word play. Danica Patrick, a former NASCAR star who recently backed Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, aired her opinions on Instagram Stories. 'Can anyone tell me what's wrong with the new AE ads?! Very confused,' she wrote on July 28. WWE legend Sgt. Slaughter, whose real name is Robert Remus, also showed his support. On July 29, he posted on X (formerly Twitter), 'Attention @sydney_sweeney, YOU GO GIRL & That's An Order!!' Slaughter is a former WWF Heavyweight Champion and appeared on WWE SmackDown just last week during a tribute to Hulk Hogan, who passed away on July 26. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How to Trade ETH/USD Without Holding Ether IC Markets Learn More Undo ESPN's David Dennis Jr and others criticize the ad's hidden message While some celebrities are defending Sydney Sweeney, others are calling out the ad. On July 30, ESPN analyst David Dennis Jr posted online, saying he didn't notice the problem at first until 'experts on eugenics and fascism' explained the deeper meaning. He later added sarcastically, 'I'm just happy these AE ads are making it safe for conventionally attractive blue-eyed blonde women to be accepted again.' Also Read: 'I Have A Husband': Veronika Kudermetova's Bold Reply To Holger Rune's Private Message Fuels Gossip Across Tennis World Salon magazine also criticized the ad, saying the phrase 'great genes' has been historically used to praise whiteness and thinness. Publicist Alexandria Hurley told that she doesn't believe this was a mistake. 'It's a strategy,' she said. 'Sydney has leaned into controversy before this is not an accident.' The ad is still up on billboards and stores across the U.S., keeping the debate very much alive. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
High court upholds summons to Kangana Rananut in ‘Rs 100' tweet defamation case
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court on Friday dismissed a petition filed by actor-turned-MP Kangana Ranaut challenging her summoning by a Punjab court in a defamation case, making it clear that the magistrate has duly applied mind to the material on record while summoning her. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya, in a detailed 15-page order, said, "There are specific allegations against the petitioner who is a celebrity, that false and defamatory imputations by her in the retweet have dented the respondent's (Mahender Kaur) reputation and lowered her in her own estimation, as also in the eyes of others. Therefore, filing of the complaint to vindicate her rights cannot be termed mala fide." Ranaut is accused of defaming 73-year-old Mohinder Kaur, a farmer activist, through a tweet during the height of the farmers' protests against the now scrapped farm laws in 2020. Ranaut allegedly misidentified Kaur as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh fame and implied that such women could be hired to participate in protests for Rs 100. "Such remark, prima facie proves that the intent of the accused was to paint the complainant as a person of dubious integrity who is protesting without any cause and just for financial gains," the high court observed. Ranaut's counsel had contended that the trial court misconstrued provisions of Section 202 of CrPC and argued that she had only re-tweeted content by 'Adhivakta Gautam Yadav', who was not arrayed as an accused. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like She grew up to be America's sweetheart... can YOU guess? Watch More Undo The counsel pleaded that the retweet was made in good faith, without intent to harm Kaur's reputation, and in the absence of mens rea, the magistrate should not have proceeded. The order was passed on Feb 22, 2022. Senior advocate G K Mann, representing the complainant, argued that there was no dispute that Ranaut herself made the defamatory on the face of it retweet, which contains serious allegations against Kaur's character. Mann also said that Ranaut had shown no remorse or tendered any apology, suggesting intentional harm. The bench concluded that the summoning order was passed after due application of mind to the facts and preliminary evidence. The court also noted that it was not the petitioner's case that the retweet was not made by her. Regarding the complaint being filed solely against Ranaut, the judge observed, "Still further, because the respondent has filed a complaint only against the petitioner and not against the person to whom the original tweet has been attributed, in itself cannot be a ground to contend that the complaint is mala fide." 'Extra responsibility' on celebrities "As she (Kangana) holds a position of influence over the masses, she has extra responsibility on her shoulders to verify the truthfulness of the remarks made by her. It is evident from the evidence led by the complainant that the accused (Kangana) made the impugned defamatory remark without going into the truthfulness... She even failed to tender any apology to the complainant after knowing the truth." Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya Complaint was filed in 2021 The defamation complaint was filed on Jan 4, 2021, by Mohinder Kaur of Fatehgarh Jandia village in Bathinda. Kaur initiated the case in Bathinda court against Ranaut for her tweet (which was later deleted) that identified Kaur as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh fame and claimed such women could be hired for protests for Rs 100. Kaur had provided evidence asserting that Ranaut's words had damaged her image. The farmer stated that her family, owning 12 acres of land, found the accusation of protesting for a mere Rs 100 intolerable. MSID:: 123044276 413 |
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Were Travis Kelce and Ryan Reynolds quietly feuding before Taylor Swift cut ties with Blake Lively over legal drama?
What began as one of the most high-profile Hollywood friendships is now rumored to be unraveling behind closed doors. Taylor Swift and Blake Lively, once inseparable, have reportedly 'halted' their close bond after Lively became entangled in a legal battle with actor-director Justin Baldoni. But while Swift's withdrawal may appear sudden, sources suggest a deeper strain may have already existed—particularly between Swift's boyfriend, NFL star Travis Kelce, and Lively's husband, Ryan Reynolds. Taylor Swift was caught off guard after being named in legal drama between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni The tension emerged publicly when Lively filed a lawsuit involving Baldoni, her It Ends With Us co-star, alleging reputational damage. In the process, Taylor Swift was unexpectedly pulled into the narrative, labeled by Lively as one of her 'dragons' in court documents. Baldoni briefly subpoenaed Swift before withdrawing, a move critics said was an attempt to weaponize her fame. Insiders claim Swift was 'blindsided' and had no desire to be associated with the legal mess. 'Taylor wants no part in this drama,' one source revealed. In response, she reportedly distanced herself from Lively altogether, leading to what appears to be a quiet but firm end to their once-public friendship. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Global Indices Are on the Move — Time to Trade! IC Markets Learn More Undo Travis Kelce 's rumored discomfort with Reynolds may have foreshadowed the social split While Swift's fallout with Lively has been widely discussed, attention has now turned to Travis Kelce, who some say never quite fit into Reynolds' Hollywood circle. According to reports, Kelce 'never vibed with Reynolds,' finding him more performative than authentic. Though he kept polite company at events, insiders now claim Kelce's discomfort may have foreshadowed Swift's eventual break from the couple. This subtle clash between NFL grit and Hollywood glam may have quietly driven a wedge between the two power couples long before legal issues erupted. Also Read: 'Once he is done playing….': Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift discuss future plans and hint at marriage down the line For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
