Iranian Nuclear Program Degraded by up to Two Years, Pentagon Says
Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesman, offered the figure at a briefing to reporters, adding that the official estimate was "probably closer to two years." Parnell did not provide evidence to back up his assessment.
"We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the Department (of Defense) assess that," Parnell told a news briefing.
US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22 using more than a dozen 30,000-pound (13,600-kg) bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles.
The evolving US intelligence about the impact of the strikes is being closely watched, after President Donald Trump said almost immediately after they took place that Iran's program had been obliterated, language echoed by Parnell at Wednesday's briefing.
Such conclusions often take the US intelligence community weeks or more to determine.
"All of the intelligence that we've seen (has) led us to believe that Iran's -- those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated," Parnell said.
Over the weekend, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, said that Iran could be producing enriched uranium in a few months, raising doubts about how effective US strikes to destroy Tehran's nuclear program have been.
Several experts have also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes and could be hiding it.
But US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said last week he was unaware of intelligence suggesting Iran had moved its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes.
A preliminary assessment last week from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggested that the strikes may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by months. But Trump administration officials said that assessment was low confidence and had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged.
According to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, the strikes on the Fordow nuclear site caused severe damage.
"No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow. That being said, what we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged," Araqchi said in the interview broadcast by CBS News on Tuesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
36 minutes ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump's budget bill stalls in late-night session in US House
WASHINGTON — The US House of Representatives is working in the middle of the night as Donald Trump and his allies try to pressurise holdouts in the president's own Republican Party into backing his mega-bill on tax and spending. The sprawling legislation, which could define Trump's second term in office, is nearing its final vote. But it is first undergoing a procedural vote that was called late on Wednesday evening. Trump's bill has been opposed not only by opposition Democrats, but by a handful of Republicans who criticize its potential on the US deficit, healthcare and other issues. The bill ground through the US Senate earlier this week in another late-night session. Trump hopes it will pass by Friday. The House, or lower chamber, approved an earlier version of the bill in May with a margin of just one vote, and this bill, with new amendments that have frustrated some Republicans, must now be reconciled with the Senate version. Both chambers are controlled by Trump's Republicans, but within the party several factions are fighting over key policies in the lengthy legislation. The bill narrowly cleared the Senate, or upper chamber of Congress, on Tuesday. Vice-President JD Vance cast a tie-breaking vote after more than 24 hours of debate and resistance from some Republican senators. It has so far proven equally tricky for Trump's allies to pass the bill through the House. After about seven hours of wrangling that led to most lawmakers clearing from the chamber on Wednesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson scheduled an evening vote on the rule - a procedural vote that allows the legislation to be brought to the floor for a full vote. The vote will mark the first test for the legislation and give a barometer on whether Republicans might have the support needed to pass it. A rule vote is typically an easy procedural task, and if passed, will allow debate to start on the legislation. The president has been very involved in attempting to persuade the holdouts and held several meetings at the White House on Wednesday in hopes of winning them over. On Wednesday, he took to social media to apply further pressure, saying that the "House is ready to vote tonight". He added that Republicans are "united" to deliver "massive growth". Ralph Norman, a House Republican from South Carolina, attended one of the meetings but wasn't persuaded. "There won't be any vote until we can satisfy everybody," he said, adding he believes there are about 25 other Republicans who are currently opposed to it. The chamber can only lose about three Republicans to pass the measure. "I got problems with this bill," he said. "I got trouble with all of it." Sticking points include the question of how much the bill will add to the US national deficit, and how deeply it will cut healthcare and other social programmes. During previous signs of rebellion against Trump at Congress, Republican lawmakers have ultimately fallen in line. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise told reporters that Republicans were still on their way to Washington to vote, and that several had flight delays due to bad weather. What is at stake this time is the defining piece of legislation for Trump's second term. But several factions stand in its way. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the version of the bill that was passed on Tuesday by the Senate could add $3.3tn (£2.4tn) to the US national deficit over the next 10 years. That compares with $2.8tn that could be added by the earlier version that was narrowly passed by the House. The deficit means the difference between what the US government spends and the revenue it receives. This outraged the fiscal hawks in the conservative House Freedom Caucus, who have threatened to tank the bill. Many of them are echoing claims made by Elon Musk, Trump's former adviser and campaign donor, who has repeatedly lashed out at lawmakers for considering a bill that will ultimately add to US national debt. Shortly after the Senate passed the bill, Texas congressman Chip Roy, of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, was quick to signal his frustration. He said the odds of meeting Trump's 4 July deadline had lengthened. Freedom Caucus chairman Andy Harris of Tennessee told Fox News that Musk was right to say the US cannot sustain these deficits. "He understands finances, he understands debts and deficits, and we have to make further progress." On Tuesday, Conservative congressman Andy Ogles went as far as to file an amendment that would completely replace the Senate version of the bill, which he called a "dud", with the original House-approved one. Ohio Republican Warren Davison posted on X: "Promising someone else will cut spending in the future does not cut spending." — BBC
Al Arabiya
39 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
US House Republicans advance Trump tax-cut bill opening way for debate
The Republican-controlled US House of Representatives on Thursday advanced President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, a procedural step setting the stage for possible passage of the legislation in a vote expected later in the day. The House voted 219-213 to move forward. Developing
Al Arabiya
39 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
‘LISTEN TO ELON' – Musk's father tells Trump, plus deportation, drugs and DOGE
In this exclusive and candid interview with Al Arabiya English, Errol Musk, father of tech billionaire Elon Musk, speaks to Tom Burges Watson about the growing tensions between his son and US President Donald Trump. The interview explores the origins and implications of the public feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, delving into heated exchanges, political clashes, and controversial statements that have drawn widespread media attention. In a surprising twist, the conversation touches on recent threats to deport Elon Musk, a development that has sparked both legal and political debate. Errol Musk offers a rare, personal perspective on this high-stakes power struggle, sharing advice for his son Elon and a message for President Trump.
