
Crossed Wires: Musk, Trump, Mountainhead and the epic battle for the reins of influence
The plot of the newly released film, Mountainhead, about four tech bros who have the power to move world opinion at the flick of an algorithm, feels very much like what is happening with Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
Last week, a film called Mountainhead was released on HBO/Showmax. Social media has been all atwitter (sorry about the bad pun) since its release. The film is a darkly pointed satire, its four characters an amalgam of the world's most powerful tech barons. One of them, a guy called Venis, is inescapably Musk-ish, while the others are recognisable by personality and type, if not as specific people.
The film's release coincided perfectly with the delicious and explosive outbreak of war last week between Elon Musk and Donald Trump and his party. Calling it 'delicious' calls into question my journalistic objectivity, I am sure, but when two of the world's most powerful and narcissistic men end up in a cage fight, it is a spectacle, and this writer is not immune to its pleasures. But they are transitory, these pleasures. There is more at stake here.
Let's return to the film. Four tech bros gather in an ostentatious modernist monstrosity of a house in the mountains for a weekend of relaxation, alcohol, drugs and poker. Simultaneously, the world is aflame with violence stoked by AI-generated deepfake political videos which have been consumed by gullible populations.
The four bros periodically glance at their smartphones where images of carnage and mayhem multiply in cities across the globe. They are interested, even fascinated, but they are not horrified, nor even are they disturbed. These are the little people killing each other as a result of tech that they have developed; the violence doesn't touch them in their gilded palaces and it is unimportant next to the grandeur of their visions.
The plot, such as it is, springs from a falling out within the group, an attempted murder and an interpretation of friendship which ranks it significantly less important than their business transactions and desire for global dominance.
Linking it to Musk's real-life outburst, there is a series of scenes in the film in which one of the characters is called by the US president and is put on hold. While he waits for the call to be put through, it becomes clear that none of the men gives a damn about what the president has to say. They have the power to move world opinion at the flick of an algorithm; their financial and human reach is incalculable. They see themselves as gods. Mere politics is the common man's delusion.
This feels very much like what is now happening IRL. Musk has gone full tilt against his erstwhile supporters in Congress and the cabinet (including the president), presumably because he has calculated that he has more power to shape US opinion than the entire administration and its acolytes.
The Tweet War – how it started
The spat started slowly, with these two Musk tweets:
'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. Shame on those who voted for [the budget]: you know you did wrong. You know it.'
A short while later he ratcheted it up a notch…
'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.'
This was about as great a challenge to the GOP as one can imagine. Musk was threatening to use the full power of his bullhorn to unseat elected GOP members. Then it exploded, leaving even battle-hardened political journalists gasping.
Trump, predictably, hit back with his own comments about his disappointment in Musk amid a few other choice barbs. Musk went nuclear:
'Time to drop the really big bomb. Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That's why the FBI won't release them. Have a nice day DJT.' (This tweet has since been deleted; one wonders why.)
Oof. There's no coming back from that. And it didn't stop there, as the veiled and not-so veiled threats continued on X from Musk and on Truth Social from Trump.
Why did Musk start this war?
There are a couple of unanswered questions here. First, what prompted Musk to start this war? There are a few possible scenarios:
Like the boys in Mountainhead, perhaps he believes he has more power to shape public opinion than the entire GOP machine in Washington (or anywhere else), and he intends to use it. He is saying: the president's opinion doesn't matter as much as mine.
Or, perhaps he is simply a child throwing his toys out of the cot because Steve Bannon and other GOP influencers have accused him of lying about Doge cuts and succeeded in getting him ejected from Washington.
Or, he was so messed up on ketamine that he didn't know what he was doing.
Or, he was furious that Trump had nixed his choice for head of Nasa, Jared Isaacman.
Or, he is doing this to reclaim some respect from the Democrats, to scare up some Tesla sales and right his listing commercial ship.
Perhaps he was really annoyed about being excluded from a $400-million armored EV contract by the State Department, especially after his pally relationship with the president.
Or, he thinks the budget will hurt his companies, particularly Tesla which will lose its tax incentives.
Or, perhaps he really does think the budget is catastrophic for the US and is just speaking his truth to power.
My bet is on a combination of the first and the last scenario – he really does believe that X is the biggest weapon in history, his to wield as he sees fit, and he really does objectively hate the budget.
What does Musk want?
The second, more bewildering question concerns Musk's endgame. Where did he imagine this was going to lead him? Did he even think about the consequences of his tweets, particularly the threats to congressmen and what amounted to accusing the president of being a paedophile? I have tried to put myself in Musk's head (a stretch, I know), but I simply cannot see what his objective might be.
Perhaps it is this: he launched an X poll last Friday asking whether it was time for a third political party, a centrist party. Presumably he wants to be its architect and founder. It has been tried many times before by big personalities in US history, most recently in the 1970s. They were all spectacular and embarrassing failures. That is not how US politics works, so good luck with that.
Which leads us back to Bannon (now seemingly back in favour at the White House). In his Friday tweet he urged that Musk should be expelled as an illegal alien. Were it to happen, it would be the ultimate irony.
There is one thing we can say, with reasonable certainty. Unless there is a rapprochement (unlikely, given that insults have been hurled and cannot be taken back), Musk will use X against Trump and Maga, probably all the way to the midterms in 2026. One of his whining tweets claimed that Trump would have lost to Kamala Harris without his financial and social media support, which is probably accurate given the mere 44,000 votes that separated them in the electoral college.
A finely targeted X campaign could definitely influence the midterms, at least at congressional level, which could defang the president. And those who claim that no one can shake the absolute power of Trump would do well to recall that Trump's most recent favourable ratings were less than 50%, while Musk's were more than 75%.
Who runs the world now, in these most chaotic of times? Governments? Or social media titans with their grandiose aspirations for humanity, like Venis in Mountainhead?
We are about to find out. DM
Steven Boykey Sidley is a professor of practice at JBS, University of Johannesburg, a partner at Bridge Capital and a columnist-at-large at Daily Maverick. His new book, It's Mine: How the Crypto Industry is Redefining Ownership, is published by Maverick451 in South Africa and Legend Times Group in the UK/EU, available now.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Sleepless nights and empty seats: FIFA's broken Club World Cup
Making the Club World Cup great again? FIFA president Gianni Infantino presents the FIFA Club World Cup trophy to United States president Donald Trump in the Oval Office in the White House. Photo:/AFP Image:/AFP The FIFA Club World Cup gets underway this weekend. In the opening match of the revamped tournament, Egypt's Al Ahly will take on Lionel Messi and Inter Miami. In theory, this should be monumental – the world's best clubs converging in America to crown football's true global champion. FIFA's vision of a blockbuster tournament makes financial sense, and the hype would suggest universal excitement. That's certainly the case in South Africa, where anticipation runs high. Yet elsewhere, particularly in Europe, the enthusiasm feels conspicuously absent. Teams from Africa, Asia, South America, and Down Under will be enjoying their time in the sun in the United States, as they smile all the way to the bank. For the big teams in Europe, they need this tournament as much as one needs a nail in the head. European clubs will feel that they already have a competition that determines the best team in the world in the UEFA Champions League, and that the Club World Cup is an obvious "cash grab" on the part of FIFA. They're not entirely wrong. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ But this sentiment is typical of Europe, who want to enjoy the best of footballers who come from all over the world, and don't want to share the wealth among everyone else. At the Club World Cup, teams will get paid. South Africa's very own Mamelodi Sundowns will make around R170 million just for being there. Not a bad payday for a PR exercise meant to boost FIFA's image in America. Perhaps European club fear that once African, South American and Asian clubs have money of their own, they won't be able to plunder the continents of their best talents. So, the competition is good, then? In reality, FIFA has shot itself in the foot with the scheduling. The opening match between Al Ahly and Inter Miami will kick off at 2am (SA time) on Sunday morning. Mamelodi Sundowns' clash against Ulsan will be played at midnight. There are games that have been scheduled to begin at 3am and others at 4am. We love our football in South Africa, but not as much as our sleep. And it's winter, it's cold. By 2am on Sunday, many in Mzansi will be in their beds rather than cheering for Messi against Al Ahly.. Another thing that could embarrass FIFA is the fact that no one seems to be buying tickets. According to recent reports, they've had to slash ticket prices from $230 (over R4,000) to $55 (R970). The fact that FIFA thought Americans, who care very little about the game of football, would spend that much on tickets to watch Botafogo take on Seattle Sounders shows how out of touch they are. There will be some exciting games at the tournament, for sure, but FIFA is going to find it tough to keep fans' attention. Sundowns taking on Borussia Dortmund might sound exciting to people living in Pretoria, but to those from Cincinnati, it might not be the best ticket in town. The FIFA Club World Cup could have been a celebration of global football – a chance to uplift teams outside Europe's elite and captivate new audiences. Instead, it's shaping up to be another tone-deaf spectacle: absurd scheduling, overpriced tickets, and a desperate scramble for relevance. While the payouts might sweeten the deal for participating clubs, FIFA's arrogance in ignoring fans – both in timing and accessibility – proves yet again that the game's governing body prioritises profit over passion. Don't be surprised if the world doesn't show much interest. IOL Sport
![Drugs, debt…and a cult? Justin Bieber's Instagram spiral raises red flags [WATCH]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.citizen.co.za%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F06%2Fjustin-bieber-drugs.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![Drugs, debt…and a cult? Justin Bieber's Instagram spiral raises red flags [WATCH]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.citizen.co.za%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fcitizen-icon.png&w=48&q=75)
The Citizen
21 hours ago
- The Citizen
Drugs, debt…and a cult? Justin Bieber's Instagram spiral raises red flags [WATCH]
From 'Baby' to bad boy: Singer Justin Bieber baffled fans over the weekend with a string of bizarre selfies and cryptic messages to his Beliebers. Megastar Justin Bieber took to Instagram with a bizarre post and some selfies to share his thoughts. Pictures: Instagram/ justinbieber Canadian pop star Justin Bieber has again sparked concern among his 'Belieber' fandom and industry insiders after posting a series of cryptic Instagram selfies over the weekend. The images coincide with a fresh wave of speculation surrounding his personal life, including claims of financial distress, possible drug use, and deepening involvement in a religious group friends have labelled 'cult-like'. On Saturday, the 31-year-old singer shared a series of bathroom mirror selfies without context. Justin Bieber: Ketamine question in Instagram Story alarms fans A follow-up Instagram story mentioned ketamine and asked whether the substance 'controls people's emotions', raising eyebrows across social media. ' [You] could point at my flaws. Or [you] could recognise[ your]own lil b*tch ,' he captioned the bathroom-carousel. 'This feels like a cry for help,' one fan commented, echoing the sentiment of thousands more who flooded his feed with concern. Justin Bieber up close and personal The situation intensified when the Baby hitmaker shared a series of close-up images on his Instagram stories. One particular slide, a screenshot of an AI chat conversation, caught the attention. The slide posed the question: 'Has ketamine been used to control people's emotions?'. According to The Sun, the AI responded, 'There is clear evidence that ketamine has been misused in certain law enforcement scenarios, particularly in ways that amount to chemical restraint or social control…' Another post that Justin uploaded to his Instagram page on Saturday included a black-and-white selfie, as well as a screenshot, in which he appeared to be FaceTiming his wife, Hailey Bieber. READ: Matthew Perry's fatal dose: Ketamine crisis in the spotlight Wife Hailey Bieber 'concerned' for Justin The latest buzz about Justin's bizarre social media update comes after the singer displayed 'strange' behaviour at Hailey's skincare event in February. A source exclusively told Page Six that Bieber 'isn't sure how to manage things at this point' as he left Hailey and fans frantic with worry. 'Justin is going through a hard time and Hailey is doing her best to be there for him, but there's only so much she can do,' the source added. READ ALSO: What is pink cocaine? Party drug named in Diddy lawsuit found in Liam Payne's body Fame, fortune and financial troubles? Bieber earned an estimated $500 million to $1 billion at the height of his career, but mismanagement and excessive spending reportedly left him in such dire financial straits that he was forced to sell his music catalogue for $200 million in 2023. In May, it was reported that Bieber was in millions of dollars worth of debt to Scooter Braun, his former manager, despite parting ways with the music mogul almost two years ago. According to Page Six, an independent six-month audit conducted by accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC), the singer owes Braun more than $8,806,000. Friends have reportedly raised red flags over his continued big spending on private jets, luxury real estate, and extravagant gifts, despite his visible absence from the public performance circuit. 'He hasn't worked in a really long time, and it's starting to show,' an insider told the publication. READ ALSO: Justin Bieber is a troublemaker WATCH: Justin Bieber's money mess and meltdown Drug use concerns reignite In the midst of the financial chatter, a darker narrative has also emerged — that Bieber may be struggling again with substance use. The singer has publicly detailed his past drug addiction, notably in the 2021 docuseries Seasons, where he described feeling like he was 'dying' during his lowest points. Recent selfies showed paraphernalia like a large bong and marijuana-themed accessories. And while weed is legal in California, fans noted Bieber's vague ketamine references and erratic captions as potentially more troubling. 'There's been talk of him using again — mostly weed and pills, maybe lean,' a source told Page Six. 'It's not like before, but people are definitely worried.' His team has denied any current hard drug use, telling TMZ that Bieber is 'focused on health, faith, and family,' but concerns persist – especially given the substance themes woven into his latest posts. Cult accusations: Church under fire A third and increasingly controversial element to Bieber's current story is his close affiliation with Churchome, a megachurch led by Pastor Judah Smith. 'They treat him like he's a prophet,' one former associate told Rolling Stone. 'He's surrounded by yes-men and scripture—and not the healthy kind.' TMZ's new documentary, TMZ Investigates: What Happened to Justin Bieber, now available on Hulu, looks into Bieber's involvement in the organisation. One of Justin Bieber's longtime friends believes the singer is in a cult as his inner circle continues to shrink, according to Page Six. Ryan Good, the co-founder and creative director of Bieber's fashion brand, Drew House, has not spoken to the pop star in more than a year over concerns about his pastor, Judah Smith, sources told TMZ. The pair reportedly stopped talking after Good, 41, left the Grammy winner's place of worship, Churchome, in Beverly Hills. Smith has publicly denied the claims, but concerns continue to mount amid Bieber's increasingly erratic behaviour.


Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Crossed Wires: Musk, Trump, Mountainhead and the epic battle for the reins of influence
The plot of the newly released film, Mountainhead, about four tech bros who have the power to move world opinion at the flick of an algorithm, feels very much like what is happening with Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Last week, a film called Mountainhead was released on HBO/Showmax. Social media has been all atwitter (sorry about the bad pun) since its release. The film is a darkly pointed satire, its four characters an amalgam of the world's most powerful tech barons. One of them, a guy called Venis, is inescapably Musk-ish, while the others are recognisable by personality and type, if not as specific people. The film's release coincided perfectly with the delicious and explosive outbreak of war last week between Elon Musk and Donald Trump and his party. Calling it 'delicious' calls into question my journalistic objectivity, I am sure, but when two of the world's most powerful and narcissistic men end up in a cage fight, it is a spectacle, and this writer is not immune to its pleasures. But they are transitory, these pleasures. There is more at stake here. Let's return to the film. Four tech bros gather in an ostentatious modernist monstrosity of a house in the mountains for a weekend of relaxation, alcohol, drugs and poker. Simultaneously, the world is aflame with violence stoked by AI-generated deepfake political videos which have been consumed by gullible populations. The four bros periodically glance at their smartphones where images of carnage and mayhem multiply in cities across the globe. They are interested, even fascinated, but they are not horrified, nor even are they disturbed. These are the little people killing each other as a result of tech that they have developed; the violence doesn't touch them in their gilded palaces and it is unimportant next to the grandeur of their visions. The plot, such as it is, springs from a falling out within the group, an attempted murder and an interpretation of friendship which ranks it significantly less important than their business transactions and desire for global dominance. Linking it to Musk's real-life outburst, there is a series of scenes in the film in which one of the characters is called by the US president and is put on hold. While he waits for the call to be put through, it becomes clear that none of the men gives a damn about what the president has to say. They have the power to move world opinion at the flick of an algorithm; their financial and human reach is incalculable. They see themselves as gods. Mere politics is the common man's delusion. This feels very much like what is now happening IRL. Musk has gone full tilt against his erstwhile supporters in Congress and the cabinet (including the president), presumably because he has calculated that he has more power to shape US opinion than the entire administration and its acolytes. The Tweet War – how it started The spat started slowly, with these two Musk tweets: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. Shame on those who voted for [the budget]: you know you did wrong. You know it.' A short while later he ratcheted it up a notch… 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' This was about as great a challenge to the GOP as one can imagine. Musk was threatening to use the full power of his bullhorn to unseat elected GOP members. Then it exploded, leaving even battle-hardened political journalists gasping. Trump, predictably, hit back with his own comments about his disappointment in Musk amid a few other choice barbs. Musk went nuclear: 'Time to drop the really big bomb. Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That's why the FBI won't release them. Have a nice day DJT.' (This tweet has since been deleted; one wonders why.) Oof. There's no coming back from that. And it didn't stop there, as the veiled and not-so veiled threats continued on X from Musk and on Truth Social from Trump. Why did Musk start this war? There are a couple of unanswered questions here. First, what prompted Musk to start this war? There are a few possible scenarios: Like the boys in Mountainhead, perhaps he believes he has more power to shape public opinion than the entire GOP machine in Washington (or anywhere else), and he intends to use it. He is saying: the president's opinion doesn't matter as much as mine. Or, perhaps he is simply a child throwing his toys out of the cot because Steve Bannon and other GOP influencers have accused him of lying about Doge cuts and succeeded in getting him ejected from Washington. Or, he was so messed up on ketamine that he didn't know what he was doing. Or, he was furious that Trump had nixed his choice for head of Nasa, Jared Isaacman. Or, he is doing this to reclaim some respect from the Democrats, to scare up some Tesla sales and right his listing commercial ship. Perhaps he was really annoyed about being excluded from a $400-million armored EV contract by the State Department, especially after his pally relationship with the president. Or, he thinks the budget will hurt his companies, particularly Tesla which will lose its tax incentives. Or, perhaps he really does think the budget is catastrophic for the US and is just speaking his truth to power. My bet is on a combination of the first and the last scenario – he really does believe that X is the biggest weapon in history, his to wield as he sees fit, and he really does objectively hate the budget. What does Musk want? The second, more bewildering question concerns Musk's endgame. Where did he imagine this was going to lead him? Did he even think about the consequences of his tweets, particularly the threats to congressmen and what amounted to accusing the president of being a paedophile? I have tried to put myself in Musk's head (a stretch, I know), but I simply cannot see what his objective might be. Perhaps it is this: he launched an X poll last Friday asking whether it was time for a third political party, a centrist party. Presumably he wants to be its architect and founder. It has been tried many times before by big personalities in US history, most recently in the 1970s. They were all spectacular and embarrassing failures. That is not how US politics works, so good luck with that. Which leads us back to Bannon (now seemingly back in favour at the White House). In his Friday tweet he urged that Musk should be expelled as an illegal alien. Were it to happen, it would be the ultimate irony. There is one thing we can say, with reasonable certainty. Unless there is a rapprochement (unlikely, given that insults have been hurled and cannot be taken back), Musk will use X against Trump and Maga, probably all the way to the midterms in 2026. One of his whining tweets claimed that Trump would have lost to Kamala Harris without his financial and social media support, which is probably accurate given the mere 44,000 votes that separated them in the electoral college. A finely targeted X campaign could definitely influence the midterms, at least at congressional level, which could defang the president. And those who claim that no one can shake the absolute power of Trump would do well to recall that Trump's most recent favourable ratings were less than 50%, while Musk's were more than 75%. Who runs the world now, in these most chaotic of times? Governments? Or social media titans with their grandiose aspirations for humanity, like Venis in Mountainhead? We are about to find out. DM Steven Boykey Sidley is a professor of practice at JBS, University of Johannesburg, a partner at Bridge Capital and a columnist-at-large at Daily Maverick. His new book, It's Mine: How the Crypto Industry is Redefining Ownership, is published by Maverick451 in South Africa and Legend Times Group in the UK/EU, available now.