
Q&A: Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor speaks on Oscar-nominated film 'Nickel Boys' and why it matters
Hattie is the grandmother of Elwood (Ethan Herisse), a Black teen who gets sent to a juvenile reform school in the 1960s Jim Crow era just before he starts college. There, he builds a friendship with Turner (Brandon Wilson) as they both navigate the dark, segregated underbelly of Nickel Academy, where abuse and corruption runs rampant. Throughout the film, Hattie works incessantly to reunite and seek justice for her grandson.
"Hattie saw Elwood as her hope," Ellis-Taylor explained. Notably, shot from a first-person point of view, the film was directed by RaMell Ross and was based on Colson Whitehead's Pulitzer Prize-winning novel. It's inspired by the harrowing true story of the now-shut down Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys in Marianna, Florida.
The institution was at the center of atrocious allegations of racism, deaths, beatings, and poor conditions. It was closed in 2011, and dozens of unmarked graves were found on the grounds. Last year, Florida officials awarded millions to an estimated 400 survivors for the abuse that occurred between 1940 and 1975 at Dozier and a second overflow reform facility.
'Nickel Boys' is nominated for best picture and best adapted screenplay. USA TODAY interviewed veteran actress Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor, who has played in movies like "Ray," "If Beale Street Could Talk," and "King Richard," which earned her an Oscar nomination for best supporting actress in 2021.
Rate your 'Film of the Year': Join our Movie Meter panel and make your voice heard!
She spoke about her role as Hattie and the film's timeliness. (Note: This interview was edited for clarity and length and contains minor details about the movie.)
The Oscars:What movie won best picture last year?
Q&A with Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor of 'Nickel Boys'
Q: I'm curious to know if you knew the true story before you got the script and, if not, what your reaction was during your research.
Aunjanue: I would say I had superficial knowledge about what had happened at the Dozier school. I didn't have a full understanding of it. I knew that what had happened - at least with the bits and pieces that I had heard about - was barbaric and yet unsurprising. But I didn't become fully educated about it until I started to work on the film.
Q: What helped you prepare for your role as Hattie? Where did you draw inspiration from, and how do you feel you maintained her sense of warmth in such a tragic story?
Aunjanue: I think one of the things that I was conscious about and intentional about was that I wanted her to be warm. I wanted to show what it is like for a grandmother to love her grandson. I tried to express that in my smiles. I wanted that adoration to shine as much as possible, just because we see it so rarely. And I know how much I adore my niece and nephew. They make me smile far more than they make me scowl so I wanted to show that because that was real to me.
Q: Can you tell me how you think the film adequately shows the grandson-grandparent dynamic, especially in Black families, and how the film depicts that truthfully?
Aunjanue: Hattie saw Elwood as her hope. She was nervous for him, nervous for the activism work that he was beginning to do. She was nervous for his life, but in many ways, relented because she knew that Elwood was among thousands of Elwoods during that time, and they were the hope, not just for her, but the hope of and for the Black community and communities at risk in a racist and casteist society.
Q: In the scene when Hattie first meets Turner, she doesn't know him from anywhere. She just sees him at Nickel Academy, but she still embraces him. What do you think that scene reveals about Hattie, just as a character?
Aunjanue: I think Hattie and Turner have something in common, and that is loneliness. That's isolation. It's this exile that they both feel. I think Hattie is a lot like all our Black grandmas and Black mamas. They have an emotional intelligence in that way. They're very sentient in a way that they can look at you and know something ain't right. She looks at this boy and the idea that he doesn't have somebody to hug him and thinks that is a crime. And thinks that's a travesty, and it's like, "No, not in my presence, not today. Somebody's going to love you today."
Q: Why is the scene when Hattie finally hugs Elwood at the school so effective for viewers?
Aunjanue: I think that it depends on how the viewer meets the film. If you're me, and you see this, you're thinking about the idea of not being able to reach or touch someone you care about, someone you love, especially when you know that the thing holding them and keeping them away from you is unjust. You know the frustration of that, the pain of that, the inevitable depression, the scars that it puts not only on your psyche but on your body. We don't talk about the physical effect of white supremacy on Black life and how it affects your body.
Some of the work that I did in Mississippi regarding the Confederate flag there, I remember days when I could not get out of bed because I was so depressed and so angry and felt so helpless. That affected my sleep pattern. Folks who don't care about stuff like that ain't losing sleep, you know what I mean. It affects your health. So imagine being a grandmother, and you're not just dealing with the tools of white supremacy, but white supremacy taking something specific and human - your grandson away from you. What does that do to her body? Let alone her mind and soul, you know? So if you come into it with that coursing through your blood, I know you watch that and feel reflected.
Q: How challenging was it to film that scene from a first-person point of view? I know you previously spoke about speaking to a camera instead of a person, so how was that experience for you in general?
Aunjanue: Weird, you know? Listen. I knew that whatever I was going to do with my genius director, RaMell Ross, was going to be something that I had never experienced before, and that's why I wanted to do it. I knew that I was going to have to make, as my co-worker Ethan Herisse says, the camera a scene partner and, ultimately, the viewer a scene partner. And I don't like cameras. I hate them. I despise them. Sorry! I've never felt comfortable with them. They've always felt intrusive. It always makes me feel like what I'm doing is fake. So imagine having to take that thing you have talked about, which has been an enemy all your life, and make it your friend and have a relationship with it. It was strange. It was hard. It was never, not tough, but you know what Hattie was going through at the time was never not tough, so I think it fed the work.
Q: Why do you think now, in 2025, is the right time to tell this story?
Aunjanue: It is past the time for everybody to know what happened to those children at that school. First of all, it shouldn't have happened in the first place. There were folks in that community. They knew what was happening to those kids, and they did not say anything. What does it say about this country that we allow that kind of barbarism to happen on our soil and don't say anything, don't do anything about it? I mean, slavery happened here, and it took hundreds of years for that to end because, somehow, it was okay to do that to people. What does that say about our humanity? It was always the right time to tell this story because it should have never happened.
Q: How do you think this film will impact directors who want to tell similar stories of injustice in the future?
Aunjanue: What RaMell is doing, I think, cannot be overstated. What he has said about 'Nickel Boys' and the way that he shot it, is it's not enough to tell the story. I can answer your question by saying, Yeah, we need to tell more stories, right? But that's not enough. It's not enough to tell more stories. You also have to examine the tools with which we do the storytelling, and that is what he has done. What he is saying is it's not just about the dearth of storytelling about Black life and injustice and so on. It is the camera itself that needs to be confronted and how the camera itself has been complicit in creating these images that have been complicit in how we have been demoralized and harmed by this economy that is built on white hatred.
Q: What was your reaction to the film's nominations for best picture and best adapted screenplay?
Aunjanue: We had to get people to understand that what RaMell is doing is something that is this sort of necessary revolution and a way to honor these children and what happened to them in a way that is singular and rare. So I swear to you, it is all I wanted, and for it to happen, I'm just overjoyed.
Taylor Ardrey is a news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at tardrey@gannett.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
7 best twist endings of all time
What makes a successful twist ending? First of all, it has to surprise the audience. If you somehow guess the twist before it happens, then the movie failed to do its job. Furthermore, the twist has to make sense. Movies like 'Serenity' and 'Remember Me' featured shocking endings that did not belong. These twists ruined, not helped, the story. This month, 'The Usual Suspects' celebrates its 30th anniversary. The final twist in the Oscar-winning thriller is still one of the best in cinematic history. Where does it rank among all-time twist endings? Let's find out. 'It was clear whoever got that role was going to blow up,' Matt Damon said about auditioning for the 1996 legal thriller, 'Primal Fear.' The role in question was for Aaron Stampler, a stuttering boy accused of murdering the archbishop of Chicago. Edward Norton won the coveted part and, like Damon predicted, blew up, culminating in an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actor. There's no proof as to what moment secured Norton the critical acclaim; the best guess is that it happened during the film's final moments. After a not guilty verdict, Aaron reveals he faked an alternate personality to get away with murder. Richard Gere's stunned look speaks for everyone in that moment. Watch on Paramount Plus If you listen closely, you might still hear Charlton Heston's scream at the end of 'Planet of the Apes.' In the distant future, astronaut George Taylor (Heston) and his crew crash-land on an unknown planet where apes are the dominant species. On this planet, apes can talk and think like people, while humans are mute and primitive. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The makeup and philosophical themes have stood the test of time and even spawned an entire franchise that still exists today. However, the ending remains the film's lasting legacy. Taylor learning that the planet he landed on is Earth in the future remains a stroke of genius and a shocking conclusion to a revolutionary film. Rent/buy on Amazon or Apple Imagine being a child in 1980 and seeing 'The Empire Strikes Back.' After George Lucas opened your world to the wonder of a space opera in 'Star Wars,' you then learned that Darth Vader, one of the three most famous villains in cinematic history, was the father of Luke Skywalker. In today's Hollywood, twists are spoiled within minutes of the embargo lifting. But 45 years ago, you had to sit on that cliffhanger for three years before the trilogy wrapped in 1983's 'Return of the Jedi.' If this list consisted of misquoted lines in movie history, 'The Empire Strikes Back' might occupy the top spot. As much fun as it is to say, 'Luke, I am your father,' the correct reciting of Darth Vader's line reads, 'No, I am your father.' Watch on Disney Plus From a critical standpoint, 'Psycho' is on the shortlist of most influential horror movies ever produced. Alfred Hitchcock's mystery centers around Marion Crane (Janet Leigh), a real estate secretary who, after stealing money from her employer, flees Phoenix for California. Due to heavy rain, Marion stops for the night at the Bates Motel, where she meets a peculiar proprietor, Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins). Hitchcock solidified his 'Master of Suspense' title thanks to his revolutionary camerawork and haunting score. The tale also included two twists. The first occurs during a stabbing in the shower. The final twist happens near the end, when Norman, not his mother, is revealed to be the killer. Norman's sadistic smile will be ingrained in your memory. Rent/buy on Amazon or Apple The first rule of Fight Club: Do not talk about Fight Club. Apologies to Edward Norton and Brad Pitt, but we have to break the first rule for good reason. David Fincher's crime drama follows the journeys of the unnamed Narrator (Norton) and soap salesman Tyler Durden (Pitt) as they form an underground fight club. The club attracts depressed men looking for excitement in their lives. Eventually, the club transitions into Project Mayhem, an anarchist movement to disrupt the social order through acts of violence and vandalism. The Narrator disapproves of Tyler's methods until he realizes — and here's the twist — that Tyler is his alter ego. The second rule of Fight Club should be: Don't talk about the twist unless your job requires you to make a list about twist endings. Watch on Hulu The movie that inspired the list has to be near the top. For nearly the entire 106-minute runtime of 'The Usual Suspects,' Agent Dave Kujan (and the audience) attempted to identify the criminal mastermind known as Keyser Söze. Verbal Kint (Kevin Spacey) led us to believe Keyser Söze was Dean Keaton (Gabriel Byrne). Then, Kujan drops the coffee cup as the details from the random flyers jump off the wall. Keyser Söze was none other than Verbal Kint, and the moment his limp disappears remains one of cinema's most iconic images of the last 30 years. Watch on Prime Video The biggest strength of 'The Sixth Sense' is its twist ending. It also happens to be the film's greatest weakness. 'The Sixth Sense' relies on its twist more than any other movie on this list. It's hard to enjoy M. Night Shyamalan's psychological thriller and pretend like the reveal isn't coming. The twist is all you can think about, which hurts the movie's rewatchability. Nevertheless, learning that Malcolm (Bruce Willis) had been dead the entire time was jaw-dropping. It changed the trajectory of Shyamalan's career and became the new standard for twist endings. Rent/buy on Amazon or Apple Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Star Trek's 60th anniversary to be celebrated with waves of toys
For its 60th anniversary, the Star Trek franchise is going where it's never gone before – in terms of action figures. The groundbreaking original TV series debuted on NBC back on Sept. 8, 1966, spawning a fleet of subsequent movie and TV enterprises, including "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds," currently in its third season on Paramount+, and the in-production "Star Trek: Starfleet Academy," set to arrive on Paramount+ in 2026. With the space franchise's upcoming 60th anniversary looming, fans will likely engage in a massive celebration. Collectors already have plenty to get excited about. The first wave of figures, expected to be due later this year, includes characters never made available as action figures before, among them Capt. Jellico ("Star Trek: Prodigy"), Peter Preston from "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan," and Valkris, a female Klingon from "Star Trek III: The Search for Spock". The Nacelle Company, perhaps best known for TV specials such as "Kevin Hart's Guide to Black History" and "Down to Earth with Zac Efron" (both on Netflix), acquired the rights to market Star Trek playsets and accessories in 2024. The company has already announced that a host of action figures is in the works. Anniversary cruise: 'Star Trek' cruise will celebrate show's 60th birthday with William Shatner and more stars Those figures, which are one-twelfth size (roughly six or seven inches tall) can be pre-ordered now (priced individually at $28.99), will be followed by three additional waves: The arrival of a new line of Star Trek action figures "indicates how meaningful, and relevant, this series is, even 60 years later. And that makes me very proud," said Eugene "Rod" Roddenberry, son of the late Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry and CEO of Roddenberry Entertainment, in a statement to USA TODAY. "The Original Series holds a special place in the history of Star Trek, in the history of science fiction, and in the history of television," Roddenberry said. "I am thrilled to see it being honored in conjunction with Star Trek's 60th." Roddenberry wasn't ready to share other aspects of the 60th anniversary just yet. "But rest assured it's Roddenberry's intention to provide Trek fans the opportunity to be part of the celebration and engage in the Trek community," added Roddenberry, who suggested Trekkies follow the brand on Facebook, Instagram, Threads and YouTube. 'Lifelong' Trekkie commands Star Trek toy-making mission Nacelle CEO and founder Brian Volk-Weiss comes by his interest in Star Trek toys honestly, as the owner of a collection of more than 5,000 toys. He chose the company's name based on a word for the housing of a starship's warp engines. "I'm a lifelong Star Trek toy collector and a lifelong fan," Volk-Weiss told USA TODAY. When meeting with Paramount to secure the licensing, Volk-Weiss said he told the studio he planned to cater to Trekkies who want action figures beyond the obvious characters, such as Kirk and Picard. "Where's Captain Garrett? Where's Captain Jellico? Where is Peter Preston?" he said. "That was my pitch. …. What I basically said was, 'I believe the base of the Star Trek community is strong enough to give them what they want – and Valkris is the greatest example – even if it's a character that was on screen for 81 seconds, 35 years ago.'" The company's plan for releasing action figures is to alternate waves of figures who commanded a starship bridge with waves of assorted characters. When Nacelle announced it would be releasing Star Trek toys, it included an email address in the news release encouraging fans to chime in on figures they would like to see. Decisions on which ones to produce were "absolutely 100% influenced by that," Volk-Weiss said. Nacelle has announced a total of four waves of action figures to "assure the community this is not going to be a two-wave line," Volk-Weiss said, adding that "we have to make everybody feel confident we're going to go the distance." The toys, which are made in China, would fall under President Trump's unsettled tariff policy. But Volk-Weiss said the company plans to "keep everything on schedule and keep the prices locked," with Nacelle's other divisions helping to manage any impact on the profit margins. "My goal is to make this the most successful Star Trek (toy) line ever or at least tie Playmates from their original '90s run," Volk-Weiss said. "So if I want to do that, I can't raise my prices and I can't slow anything down because keeping the trust of the community – this sounds cheesy, but it's true – if we lose (that), the line will fail." Star Trek action figures: Wave One Wave One is available for pre-order and is expected to ship out this fall. Available for $28.99 each; $225 for a bundle of all eight figures: Watch: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Star Trek action figures: Wave Two Wave Two figures, announced in March 2025 at WonderCon in Anaheim, California, will be available for pre-order soon and released in 2026: Star Trek: The Original Series action figures in Wave Three Wave Three figures, which features the "Star Trek" original series cast in their duty uniforms and a 60th anniversary surprise two-pack of unannounced characters, was made public in July at the San Diego Comic-Con and will be available for pre-order soon and released in 2026: Star Trek action figures: Wave Four Wave Four figures, also announced in July at the San Diego Comic-Con, will be going on sale in mid-to-late 2026: Mike Snider is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @ & @mikesnider & msnider@ What's everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
35 years of Microsoft Solitaire: An illustrated history of the game's evolution
Over 500 million people have played Microsoft Solitaire since its 1990 release as an included game in the Windows 3.0 operating system. In 2019, it was inducted into the World Video Game Hall of Fame, marking it as one of the most influential video games of all time. Since its inception, it's been localized into 65 languages and played on every continent, including Antarctica. Though it doesn't come pre-installed in Windows computers anymore, users continue to download and play it on computers, tablets and phones 35 years later. USA TODAY's Ariana Torrey recounts her experience as a millennial growing up playing Microsoft Solitaire and how she evolved alongside the game: I was six-years-old when we got our first Windows PC. Before Windows 95, games were things I played on my Super Nintendo, sometimes my Gameboy, rarely our family Macintosh. But after being given my very own Windows login with a neon-colored icon as my profile picture, it only took me four clicks to find the 'Games' folder hidden in the START menu of the Windows taskbar. The games that came preinstalled on Windows 95 were FreeCell, Hearts, Minesweeper and Solitaire. The pickings were slim, but for a girl in the '90s, it amounted to hours of entertainment, and later, an obsession with solitaire-based card games that spanned well into adulthood. The Windows 95 version of Solitaire wasn't like the one I had seen my Nana play, meticulously laying out cards one-by-one into neat stacks, moving each row gingerly by hand. This version sported bright pixel art decks that you could change at will, and a mesmerizing animation of the cards cascading down and bouncing whenever you won a game. Originally included in Windows 3.0 in 1990, developers hoped Solitaire would help beginner computer users get familiar with the functionality of a mouse – a relatively new tool for people at the time. The computer did indeed make shuffling, ordering and restacking cards as simple as a single click. It also recorded your win percentages diligently, making it perfect ammo to hurl at your brother during arguments about who got to play next on the computer. As I aged and we upgraded to Windows 98 and then 2000, the gaming landscape was shifting before me with the release of the PlayStation 2, which pushed graphic capabilities as we knew it to places we had only dreamed of before. But these tried-and-true Windows games remained largely untouched. Always preinstalled, they changed very little with the turn of the millennium. They were simple. Reliable. Comforting. It became second nature to click into Solitaire while waiting around for my mom to get off the landline phone so I could log onto AOL messenger, or when patiently watching jpegs load, lines by blurry line, on 56k dial up. Along with millions of other Americans, I played Solitaire in the moments I was procrastinating, reflecting, bored, overwhelmed or needing a break. It required no commitment. No CD-Roms. No beefy hardware. Just your idle mind. With the launch of Windows XP in 2001, a whole new set of Internet-connected games were built into the operating system. Now with the ability to face opponents online, they included Internet Backgammon, Internet Checkers, Internet Hearts, Internet Reversi and Internet Spades. My beloved solo games were still available too, along with a brand new Solitaire mode – Spider Solitaire. All of the Internet games disappeared with later versions of Windows, but Spider Solitaire remained. It became a new staple in the pre-installed Windows zeitgeist for more than a decade, included with the four original games in the releases of Windows Vista in 2006 and Windows 7 in 2009. This strong quintuple of games remained with me all throughout high school and college with every upgrade we made on our family PC, and later, on my college laptop. I still played regularly, getting more competitive in my pursuit of better streaks and win percentages. I wasn't competing with anyone besides myself, but that is what I liked about it. When Windows 10 released in 2015, I had already started my career, and the world had grown up along with me; We all had less idle time, more distractions, an entire internet full of content to consume at any given moment. Solitaire couldn't compete with the dopamine hits of doom-scrolling social media or binge-watching Breaking Bad for the third time. Plus, there were just so many games now. Hundreds. Thousands. Some so addicting people were spending real life money on virtual, sparkly gems for games they would abandon six months later. Microsoft knew this. They had launched an entire empire of gaming with the Xbox console, and their operating system followed suit. Instead of coming pre-installed, Solitaire was now offered as an app you had to download from the Windows Store on your phone or PC in a suite of games called 'The Solitaire Collection.' It included the classics – Solitaire, FreeCell and Spider Solitaire, along with two other Solitaire modes – Pyramid and TriPeaks. All could be played as one-off games, but now there were also challenges, which gave you daily medals, which counted towards monthly achievements. Dopamine galore for any goal-oriented gamer. I greedily snatched them up. This is how Solitaire mostly remained until Windows started including ads between draws, some of them un-mutable and unskippable, which made the collection of games nearly unplayable in my eyes. But by this point, there were plenty of other options available for the Solitaire-obsessed. Do a quick search on the Google Play Store and you'll find thousands of hits for Solitaire from a myriad of developers, some with full story modes, eye-catching art, or other game mechanics woven in. There are a slew of card-based indie games, like the 2024 smash hit Balatro, which credits Solitaire as its inspiration. And with mega-giants like Microsoft-owned Activision cashing in with their release of Candy Crush Solitaire earlier this year, it's no surprise that this simple game has evolved just like we all have. The world demanded it. But for me, I'm a purist. Nothing will ever replace the simple pleasure of organizing randomized stacks of cards into ordered piles, whether by number, suit, or alternating back and forth. Sometimes I long for the days when everything felt that simple – back when I was young and the world was smaller, still contained to my home and bus stop and school. Back when I would play just to play, even with no one around to compete against. Just me. And a deck of cards. CONTRIBUTING Carlie Procell