logo
Opinion: India's Anti-Terrorism Security Apparatus Is Robust

Opinion: India's Anti-Terrorism Security Apparatus Is Robust

News1818 hours ago
The messaging to the world is now more clear, i.e., India will always act in self-defence, which is a sharp shift from the past doctrine of strategic restraint
Some recent reports have surfaced in the public domain suggesting that India's anti-terror operations in the thick and mostly inaccessible forests of Jammu and Kashmir have not been as successful as projected.
Nothing could be further from the truth. The factual position on the ground reveals that while there have been casualties on both sides, be it Indian troops or the terrorists, the battle being played out in this inhospitable terrain reveals that the enemy is in a much weaker position today than it ever was in the past two-and-a-half decades. The fight is ongoing and far from over.
Terrorism and insurgency in India are primarily linked to political, religious, ethnic, ideological, identity driven, linguistic or socio-economic grievances. It is broadly divided into three distinct categories, viz. cross border terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir, terrorism in the hinterland and extreme violence being a part of ongoing insurgencies.
India remains highly vulnerable to attacks by terrorists due to its porous borders in the west, north and northeast, besides its insufficiently protected long coastline. Terrorists and insurgents entering or residing in India continue to receive lavish material support and funds from many sources, especially from agencies located abroad.
Over the last decade or more, India has demonstrated stronger political will to strengthen border security, giving a free hand to security and intelligence agencies to gather, collate, coordinate and act on information, enact stricter laws to combat terrorism. Internationally, India has reworked its strategy, to disprove foreign sceptics and address cross-border terrorism and prevent the financing of terrorists.
We do not have to go too far back in time to see the success that India has achieved in countering terror. Three incidents stand out quite emphatically, sending out a firm message to regional inimical elements and to the larger international community that India is no pushover.
In 2016, the Indian Army conducted a series of strikes in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) at the end of September. Those strikes were a calculated hard response to a Pakistan-trained terrorist attack on an Indian Army base in Uri, Jammu and Kashmir on September 18, 2016, which claimed the lives of 19 soldiers.
Four terrorists linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed carried out the attack on the Uri army base. The Indian government decided to retaliate with surgical strikes to send out a message to Pakistan that India would not tolerate cross-border terrorism. New Delhi described the counter as a 'pre-emptive strike" to disrupt terrorist activities from across the LoC. The strikes were significant as they were the first of their kind against Pakistan.
Crossing the LoC under the cover of darkness, Indian Army commandos targeted and eliminated seven terrorist launch pads. The Indian government confirmed the killing of 35-40 terrorists, a claim dismissed by Pakistan. On February 14, 2019, a bus carrying Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) troopers, which was part of a convoy of 78 vehicles, was targeted in Pulwama by a Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) suicide bomber. He rammed his explosives-laden car into the bus, killing 40 CRPF personnel.
Biding its time, the Indian government ordered the country's air force to carry out an air strike in Balakot, Pakistan, on February 26, targeting terror camps. It was the first such aerial action against Pakistan since the 1971 war, sparking retaliatory raids and an aerial dogfight. Fortunately, it did not escalate into a full-scale war, but it put an alarmed wider world on notice that India would not take attacks on its soil or on its people lightly.
The third and most telling response to Pakistan's 'misadventures" has been 'Operation Sindoor". The operation was a balanced armed forces response to the killing of 26 innocent Indian civilians in Pahalgam, J&K on April 22, 2025. It reflected India's advanced technology, commitment to gathering precise intelligence and exhibited her self-reliance in defence. Nine terror training camps, including the headquarters of Lashkar-e-Taiba and
Jaish-e-Mohammed, were damaged with precise missile strikes, without crossing the Line of Control or the International Border.
When Pakistan responded by targeting Indian civilians and defence establishments, India effectively used its defence shields and drones to neutralise eleven Pakistani air bases, disrupting the mobility and operational momentum of Pakistan Air Force, and ensuring that Pakistan could not sustain a second or third wave of escalation. It used its advanced military technologies to send out a clear message to Islamabad that it would do well not to mess with New Delhi.
Several factors are at the root of India's counter terrorism successes. These are enhanced intelligence gathering through multiple agencies, including the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and the Intelligence Bureau (IB) (internal intelligence); better inter-agency cooperation overseen by the Joint Intelligence Committee and the Intelligence Bureau; establishing specialized units like the National Security Guard (NSG) and Anti-Terrorism Squads (ATS) to handle specific terrorist threats; improved border security; giving more teeth to laws like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act to strengthen punitive measures against terrorism and related activities.
Establishing the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to investigate and prosecute terror-related offences; actively raising the issue of cross-border terrorism in various international forums, including the United Nations, G20, and FATF; promoting capacity building in other countries through training, experience sharing, and technical cooperation in counter-terrorism efforts; working with international partners to address the financing of terrorism.
In addition, introducing de-radicalisation programs that focus on education, skills development and jobs; promoting public awareness and participation in counter-terrorism efforts; demonstrating the will to respond with punitive measures against sponsors of terrorism and using technology, including Artificial Intelligence, to neutralise terror threats.
By combining these elements, India has created a comprehensive and effective counter-terrorism ecosystem that strikes at the very heart of violent anti-social activity. This has been emphatically demonstrated over the past more than two years through anti-terror operations in dense mountain belts, even if it has come at the cost of casualties.
The Indian Army and other law enforcement agencies have pushed their full technological arsenal and might into ferreting out militants from mountain caves, deep forests and natural hideouts.
Security experts admit to the changing colour of militancy, but are confident about striking hard and causing maximum damage to inimical forces. They are constantly aware of the need to adapt without walking into deadly traps. The fact of the matter is that any terrorist attack on India will be met with a strong and resolute response, with India retaliating on its own terms, targeting terror hubs at their root.
top videos
View all
India is also on record as saying that it will not be intimidated by nuclear threats and warned that any terrorist safe haven operating under this pretext will face precise and decisive strikes. The messaging to the world is now more clear, i.e., India will always act in self-defence, which is a sharp shift from the past doctrine of strategic restraint.
The author is Editor, Brighter Kashmir, author, TV commentator, political analyst and columnist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author.
Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google.
view comments
Location :
Jammu and Kashmir, India, India
First Published:
August 17, 2025, 14:08 IST
News opinion Opinion: India's Anti-Terrorism Security Apparatus Is Robust
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parliament Watch: Highlights of Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, Monday August 4
Parliament Watch: Highlights of Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, Monday August 4

The Hindu

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Parliament Watch: Highlights of Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, Monday August 4

Monday (August 4, 2025) in Parliament was no better than the previous days. While the Rajya Sabha was adjourned early following the death of its member and former Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren. Meanwhile, the Lok Sabha attempted to function, but Opposition members did not stop protesting in the House. When it was reconvened at 2 p.m. following the morning chaos, officiating Chair Jagdambika Pal requested the members to allow a discussion on the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 which he said was brought by the government with the aim of bidding for the 2036 Olympics. The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, was introduced in the Lok Sabha on July 23 but the House was adjourned soon after and a discussion was not held. This Bill seeks to regulate the various sports administrators in India. It constitutes a National Sports Board (NSB) which will oversee all sports federations, including India's richest sports body – the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). Two prominent sports body which have opposed the Bill are BCCI and Indian Olympic Association (IOA), citing curtailing of autonomy. According to the Bill, the National Sports Board or NSB will have power to recognise, suspend or cancel registrations of sports organisations. It will also collaborate with international and national sports bodies to ensure compliance with the international standards, protection of the rights of athletes and support personnel. The board can suspend or cancel recognition of a sports body if its international recognition is suspended/cancelled, if it violates any part of this Act, if it has failed to hold elections, publish its annual audited accounts for misused, misapplied, or misappropriated any public funds. No sports organisation will be recognised unless it is a registered society, an incorporated not-for-profit company or a registered trust. The Centre is empowered to appoint officers and employees to discharge NSB's functions. The Bill also says that any sports organisation seeking to use the word 'India' or 'Indian' or 'National' or any national insignia or symbols in any language in its registered name, operating name, logo, or otherwise must obtain a no-objection certification by the Centre. Not everyone is on board with the Bill, though. In October last year, Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President P.T. Usha had first raised concerns over the Bill citing government infringing on the IOA's independence. She had stated that the NSB may 'lead to a conflict between the government and international sports governance bodies, particularly the IOC, which has previously suspended many National Olympic committees for excessive governmental interference'. We wait and watch if the Lower House will hold a discussion on this Bill today. Follow live updates of August 5 proceedings in Parliament here. Until next time.

Is passing Bills without discussion the new normal?
Is passing Bills without discussion the new normal?

The Hindu

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Is passing Bills without discussion the new normal?

The Opposition is relentless in its demand to discuss in Parliament the Election Commission's (EC) Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar, but that does not seem to stop the government from passing legislations in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. On Thursday (August 7, 2025), the Lok Sabha passed the Manipur Appropriation Bill, 2025, without a discussion even as the Opposition continued to protest loudly in the House through the process. The Bill, presented by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, authorises the State to spend ₹30,969 crore on its expenditure requirements during the current financial year. Ms. Sitharaman said that the Opposition's concern for Manipur was equivalent to 'crocodile tears' because they weren't allowing a discussion on releasing funds to the State marred by ethnic violence. Manipur has been under President's Rule since February 13, 2025. The Rajya Sabha passed the Coastal Shipping Bill, 2024 on Thursday. Union Ports, Shipping and Waterways Minister Sarbananda Sonowal said the legislation will reduce the compliance burden for Indian ships and will unlock the full potential of country's coastline. He said the Bill is also in tune with the concept of ease of doing business and ensures supply chain security for the country. In another important development, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, at a press conference, accused the EC of 'criminal fraud' and collusion with the BJP to steal elections. Mr. Gandhi claimed that 1,00,250 'fake votes' were created in the Mahadevapura Assembly seat under the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency to ensure a win for the BJP. In response, the Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) asked him to submit his evidence under oath. Mr. Gandhi listed out five different ways through which the alleged vote chori (theft) was done: duplicate voters, fake and invalid addresses, bulk voters at a single address, invalid photos, and the misuse of Form 6. The BJP, meanwhile, accused Mr. Gandhi of showing 'selective outrage', stating that his allegation about 'large-scale' electoral roll fraud was a sign of 'frustration and election rage'. On Friday, the Congress leadership, including party chief Mallikarjun Kharge and Mr. Gandhi, will take out a protest march to the ECI office in Bengaluru. In other news, leaders of the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) have agreed in principle to field a candidate for the Vice-Presidential election even though the Opposition does not have the requisite numbers to win the election, just to force a contest. The decision was taken at a dinner meeting of the bloc hosted by Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi. This was the first physical meeting of the INDIA bloc partners after a gap of 14 months. The last meeting was on June 1, 2024. The Election Commission notified the election on Thursday. Nominations should be filed by August 21, and the election is scheduled to be held on September 9. Meanwhile, leaders of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) on Wednesday (August 6, 2025) unanimously passed a resolution authorising Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP chief and Union Minister J.P. Nadda to choose their candidate for the vice-presidential election. For live updates from today's session, click here. Until next time.

Government pushes Bills even as adjournments continue
Government pushes Bills even as adjournments continue

The Hindu

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Government pushes Bills even as adjournments continue

In yet another day full of adjournments, the Lok Sabha passed the Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 on Wednesday (August 6, 2025) after an extremely brief discussion. Introducing the Bill in the Lok Sabha, Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways Sarbananda Sonowal said, 'This Bill represents a decisive step towards positioning India as a global leader in maritime trade and governance. It is a progressive and advanced legislation, up to date with international maritime conventions and informed by the best practices of leading maritime nations.' 'The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024, with 16 Parts and 325 clauses, modernises India's maritime legal framework by aligning with international conventions, enhancing safety at sea, improving emergency response, and ensuring environmental protection. It reduces compliance burdens, promotes Indian tonnage, and prioritises seafarer welfare and ship safety. The Bill aims to make India a globally respected maritime jurisdiction and unlock sustainable growth, investment, and innovation in the sector,' Mr. Sonowal added. The Bill introduces significant changes to India's maritime framework, using best practices of leading maritime jurisdictions like the U.K., Norway, and Singapore. It has reforms related to flexible vessel registration; easing ownership norms to attract foreign and NRI-led investment; enhanced safety and environmental standards aligned with international conventions to protect marine ecosystems; support for capital-deficient entrepreneurs and MSMEs through bareboat charter arrangements; expanded coastal security provisions in response to threats like 26/11; welfare measures for Indian seafarers, benefiting the 85% serving on foreign-flagged vessels; and a legal framework for maritime education to standardise over 160 training institutes across India. The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 is meant to be a progressive, future-ready legislation that replaces the Merchant Shipping Act of 1958. On the other hand, the Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, 2024, was passed in the Rajya Sabha. It adopts the Hague-Visby Rules, a globally accepted maritime standard also followed by countries like the United Kingdom, and repeals the century-old Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The legislation is expected to simplify maritime trade laws, reduce litigation risks, and enhance transparency and commercial efficiency in cargo movement by sea. All through this, Opposition members continued to protest in both the Houses, demanding a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise undertaken by the Election Commission of India in Bihar. In the Lok Sabha, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is open to all discussions suggested by the Opposition, but since the SIR issue is sub judice in the Supreme Court and is also an exercise by the ECI which is an autonomous body, it cannot be taken up for discussion in Parliament. Will Thursday see more discussion in Parliament or will it be yet another day full of adjournments? We shall see. For live updates, click here. Until next time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store