UK votes to decriminalise abortion after prosecutions of some women
The House of Commons approved an amendment to a broader bill on Tuesday that would prevent women from being criminally punished under an antiquated law.
Currently, a woman can face criminal charges for choosing to end a pregnancy after 24 weeks or without the approval of two doctors, under laws that technically still carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
The amendment passed 379-137. The House of Commons will now need to pass the crime bill, which is expected, before it goes to the House of Lords, where it can be delayed but not blocked.
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour member of Parliament who introduced one of the amendments, said the change was needed because police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions over the past five years, including some who suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths.
'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help,' she said. 'Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.'
Changes in the law implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within the first 10 weeks.
That has led to a handful of widely publicised cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks.
In May, Nicola Packer was acquitted after taking abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home.
The 45-year-old told jurors during her trial, which came after a four-year police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for so long.
Carla Foster was jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant. The Court of Appeal eventually suspended her sentence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
16 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Member of Irish rap band Kneecap faces court on ‘terrorism' charge
A member of the Irish rap group Kneecap is due to appear in court, charged with a 'terror' offence for allegedly supporting Hezbollah. Liam O'Hanna, 27, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, will appear at the Westminster Magistrates' Court in central London on Wednesday after he was charged in May for displaying a Hezbollah flag during a London concert in November. Kneecap has taken a stance against Israel's assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 60,000 people and reduced much of the enclave to rubble since it began in October 2023. The Lebanese armed group Hezbollah began cross-border attacks into Israel shortly after Israel launched the assault, saying at the time that it was acting in support of Palestinians in Gaza. Since Hezbollah was banned in the United Kingdom in 2019, it has been an offence to show support for the Iran-aligned group. Protest restrictions The hearing in central London is expected to hear legal arguments on whether the charge falls outside a six-month time limit, a court official told the AFP news agency. Police have imposed conditions limiting where demonstrations in support of O'Hanna can take place, saying they were needed to 'prevent serious disruption'. In response, the rap group described this move as a 'calculated political decision' which is a 'distraction from war crimes that the British state supports'. Still, they asked supporters to go out of their way to be compliant with the rules, 'irrespective of how pitiful'. Hundreds of fans had cheered outside the central London court in June when O'Hanna, or Liam Og O hAnnaidh in Gaelic, made his first appearance, with dozens waving flags and playing drums. Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove told the previous hearing the case was 'not about Mr O'Hanna's support for the people of Palestine or his criticism of Israel'. 'He is well within his rights to voice his opinions and his solidarity,' Bisgrove said. Instead, the prosecutor said, the case was about O'Hanna wearing and displaying 'the flag of Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist organisation, while allegedly saying 'Up Hamas, up Hezbollah''. The punk-rap group has said the video that led to the charge was taken out of context. Formed in 2017, the group is no stranger to controversy, clashing with the UK's previous Conservative government and voicing opposition to British rule in Northern Ireland. Banned organisations The hearing comes amid a growing controversy surrounding support for banned organisations in the UK. More than 700 people have been arrested, mostly at demonstrations, since the Palestine Action group was outlawed in early July. The ban came into force days after Palestine Action took responsibility for a break-in at an air force base in southern England that caused an estimated 7 million pounds ($9.5 million) of damage to two aircraft. The group said its activists were responding to the UK's indirect military support for Israel during the war in Gaza.
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
UK agrees to drop mandate for Apple ‘back door', US spy chief says
Apple will no longer be forced to provide the United Kingdom's government with access to American citizens' encrypted data, Washington's spy chief has said, signalling the end of a months-long transatlantic privacy row. Tulsi Gabbard, the United States' director of national intelligence, said on Monday that London agreed to drop its requirement for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have allowed access to the protected data of US users and 'encroached on our civil liberties'. Gabbard said the reversal was the result of months of engagement with the UK to 'ensure Americans' private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected'. The UK government said it would not comment on operational matters, but that London and Washington have longstanding joint security and intelligence arrangements that include safeguards to protect privacy. 'We will continue to build on those arrangements, and we will also continue to maintain a strong security framework to ensure that we can continue to pursue terrorists and serious criminals operating in the UK,' a government spokesperson said. 'We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe.' Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The UK's climbdown on encryption comes after Apple in February announced it could no longer offer advanced data protection, its highest-level security feature, in the country. While Apple did not provide a reason for the change at the time, the announcement came after The Washington Post reported that UK security officials had secretly ordered the California-based tech giant to provide blanket access to cloud data belonging to users around the world. Under the UK's Investigatory Powers Act, authorities may compel companies to remove encryption under what is known as a 'technical capability notice'. Firms that receive a notice are legally bound to secrecy about the order unless otherwise granted permission by the government. It was not immediately clear if Apple would start offering advanced data protection again in the UK. Like other tech giants, Apple has marketed its use of end-to-end encryption as proof of its steadfast commitment to the privacy of its users. End-to-end encryption scrambles data so it cannot be read by third parties, including law enforcement and tech companies themselves. Governments around the world have made numerous attempts to undermine or bypass encryption, saying that it shields serious criminals from scrutiny. Privacy experts and civil liberties advocates have condemned efforts to weaken the technology, arguing that they treat innocent people as potential criminals and put the privacy and security of all users at risk. John Pane, chair of the advocacy group Electronic Frontiers Australia, welcomed the UK's reported reversal as a win for digital rights and safety. 'Were Apple to create a backdoor to its encrypted user data it would create a significant risk which could be exploited by cybercriminals and authoritarian governments,' Pane told Al Jazeera. 'EFA believes access to encryption technologies is vital for individuals and groups to be able to safeguard the security and privacy of their information and it is also fundamental to the existence of the digital economy. The right to use encrypted communications must be enshrined in law.'
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
China angered as Hong Kong activists granted asylum in UK, Australia
China angered as Hong Kong activists granted asylum in UK, Australia NewsFeed Hong Kong activist Tony Chung and ex-lawmaker Ted Hui have been granted asylum in the UK and Australia, years after facing charges linked to the 2019 anti-government protests. Both fled amid Beijing's crackdown under the national security law that criminalised dissent. Video Duration 00 minutes 37 seconds 00:37 Video Duration 01 minutes 03 seconds 01:03 Video Duration 03 minutes 05 seconds 03:05 Video Duration 01 minutes 22 seconds 01:22 Video Duration 02 minutes 21 seconds 02:21 Video Duration 02 minutes 56 seconds 02:56 Video Duration 02 minutes 20 seconds 02:20
