Iran MPs' vote to suspend IAEA cooperation is ‘wrong signal': Berlin
BERLIN: Germany on Thursday urged Iran to keep working with the UN's nuclear watchdog, labelling a vote by Iranian lawmakers to halt cooperation with the IAEA 'a totally wrong signal'.
Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told journalists that Germany 'urges the Iranian government not to go down this path'.
Wadephul's comments came a day after the vote in Iran's parliament, and following a 12-day war that saw Israeli and US strikes on nuclear facilities.
According to Iranian state TV, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the International Atomic Energy Agency 'refused to even marginally condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities' and had 'put its international credibility up for auction'.
The decision of the Iranian parliament still requires the approval of Iran's Guardian Council, a body empowered to vet legislation.
Wadephul also said there were 'hopeful signs' of US-Iran talks after President Donald Trump said they would take place next week.
'We are directing all our diplomatic efforts towards finding a binding agreement as soon as possible,' Wadephul said, during a joint news conference with his Canadian counterpart Anita Anand.
He added that the so-called E3 grouping of Britain, France and Germany would 'play a central role' in any talks and that 'Iran expressly wants a European component'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Pentagon chief backs Trump on Iran strike success
WASHINGTON: US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth insisted Thursday that American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites were a success, backing President Donald Trump and berating the media for covering an intelligence report that questioned the results of the operation. American B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs last weekend, while a guided missile submarine struck a third site with Tomahawk cruise missiles. "President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating – choose your word – obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities," Hegseth told journalists at the Pentagon, referring to a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran. Trump has called the strikes a "spectacular military success" and repeatedly said they "obliterated" the nuclear sites. On Thursday, he insisted that Iran did not manage to move nuclear materials – including enriched uranium – ahead of the US military action. "Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!" Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform. However, US media revealed a preliminary American intelligence assessment earlier this week that said the strikes only set back Iran's nuclear programme by months – coverage sharply criticised by Hegseth. "Whether it's fake news CNN, MSNBC or the New York Times, there's been fawning coverage of a preliminary assessment." The document was "leaked because someone had an agenda to try to muddy the waters and make it look like this historic strike wasn't successful," Hegseth said. Trump has also lashed out at coverage of the intelligence report, calling for journalists to lose their jobs. Hegseth did not definitively state that the enriched uranium and centrifuges at the heart of Iran's controversial nuclear programme had been wiped out, but cited intelligence officials – although giving little detail – as saying the nuclear facilities were destroyed. "If you want to know what's going on at Fordo, you better go there and get a big shovel, because no one's under there right now," Hegseth said, referring to the deep-underground nuclear site. Among the officials cited by Hegseth was US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who said the previous day that "Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed." He also referred to a statement by CIA chief John Ratcliffe that said: "A body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's nuclear programme has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes." Ratcliffe pointed to a "historically reliable and accurate" source of information indicating that "several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years." International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi, speaking Thursday on French radio, meanwhile said Iran's uranium-enriching centrifuges had been knocked out. "Given power of these (bombs) and the characteristics of a centrifuge, we already know that these centrifuges are no longer operational," Grossi said. Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign targeting Iranian nuclear sites, scientists and top military brass on June 13 in a bid to end the country's nuclear programme, which Tehran says is for civilian purposes but Washington and other powers insist is aimed at acquiring atomic weapons. Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up during his first term in 2018, but he ultimately decided to take military action.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Pentagon chief backs Trump on success of Iran strikes
WASHINGTON: US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth insisted Thursday that American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites were a success, backing President Donald Trump and berating the media for questioning the results of the operation. American B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs last weekend, while a guided missile submarine struck a third site with Tomahawk cruise missiles. 'President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating -- choose your word -- obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities,' Hegseth told journalists at the Pentagon, referring to a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran. Trump has called the strikes a 'spectacular military success' and repeatedly said they 'obliterated' the nuclear sites. On Thursday,he insisted that Iran did not manage to move nuclear materials -- including enriched uranium -- ahead of the US military action. 'Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform. However, US media revealed a preliminary American intelligence assessment earlier this week that said the strikes only set back Iran's nuclear program by months -- coverage sharply criticized by Hegseth. 'Whether it's fake news CNN, MSNBC or the New York Times, there's been fawning coverage of a preliminary assessment.' The document was 'leaked because someone had an agenda to try to muddy the waters and make it look like this historic strike wasn't successful,' Hegseth said. Trump has also lashed out at coverage of the intelligence report, calling for journalists to lose their jobs. Hegseth did not definitively state that the enriched uranium and enriching centrifuges at the heart of Iran's controversial nuclear program had been wiped out, but cited intelligence officials -- although giving little detail -- as saying the nuclear facilities were destroyed. 'If you want to know what's going on at Fordo, you better go there and get a big shovel, because no one's under there right now,' Hegseth said, referring to the deep-underground nuclear site. Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign targeting Iranian nuclear sites, scientists and top military brass on June 13 in a bid to end the nuclear program, which Tehran says has only civilian purposes but Washington and other powers say is pursuing atomic weapons. Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up during his first term in 2018, but he ultimately decided to take military action. The US operation was massive, involving more than 125 US aircraft including stealth bombers, fighters and aerial refueling tankers as well as a guided missile submarine.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
US Independence Day event no threat to Hong Kong security: consulate chief
HONG KONG: The top American diplomat in Hong Kong defended US Independence Day celebrations as 'perfectly normal' on Thursday after local education officials reportedly warned teachers and students to stay clear due to national security risks. Relations between Hong Kong and the United States frayed after Beijing imposed a national security law on the city in 2020, which critics say has quelled dissent and eroded rights, and ties have further strained during the latest US-China competition. US Consul General Gregory May said he was 'disappointed' as the consulate regularly interacts with schools. 'I challenge any of you to find anything about this event... that would in any way violate the national security of any country,' May told a reception marking the July 4th anniversary. Several schools got notices from education officials to keep pupils away from consulate-hosted US Independence Day events and avoid breaching the security law, local newspaper Ming Pao reported last week. The Education Bureau did not confirm or deny the report, only saying on Tuesday that 'schools have the responsibility to play a good gate-keeper role and to enhance the sensitivity of teachers and students to national security'. A US consulate spokesperson condemned the move as 'repression'. Guests at Thursday's reception included Hong Kong's commerce and economic development chief Algernon Yau and former city leader Donald Tsang. Pro-Beijing lawmaker Regina Ip, who convenes the government's cabinet, told AFP on Wednesday that the Bureau made an 'oversimplification, causing unnecessary concern'. May, who will soon become deputy head of the US embassy in Beijing, also bemoaned the treatment of pro-democracy media mogul Jimmy Lai and other 'political prisoners', saying Hong Kongers have been jailed for peaceful expression of views. Lai, 77, is in the middle of a lengthy trial for foreign collusion charges under the national security law and has been in custody since 2020. May criticised the Hong Kong government for 'transnational repression', referring to police bounties issued against 19 overseas pro-democracy activists. 'This is an attempt to restrict the free speech of people in the United States,' he said, adding that it was 'very disturbing' that authorities have targeted the activists' families in Hong Kong.
