US Independence Day event no threat to Hong Kong security: consulate chief
HONG KONG: The top American diplomat in Hong Kong defended US Independence Day celebrations as 'perfectly normal' on Thursday after local education officials reportedly warned teachers and students to stay clear due to national security risks.
Relations between Hong Kong and the United States frayed after Beijing imposed a national security law on the city in 2020, which critics say has quelled dissent and eroded rights, and ties have further strained during the latest US-China competition.
US Consul General Gregory May said he was 'disappointed' as the consulate regularly interacts with schools.
'I challenge any of you to find anything about this event... that would in any way violate the national security of any country,' May told a reception marking the July 4th anniversary.
Several schools got notices from education officials to keep pupils away from consulate-hosted US Independence Day events and avoid breaching the security law, local newspaper Ming Pao reported last week.
The Education Bureau did not confirm or deny the report, only saying on Tuesday that 'schools have the responsibility to play a good gate-keeper role and to enhance the sensitivity of teachers and students to national security'.
A US consulate spokesperson condemned the move as 'repression'.
Guests at Thursday's reception included Hong Kong's commerce and economic development chief Algernon Yau and former city leader Donald Tsang.
Pro-Beijing lawmaker Regina Ip, who convenes the government's cabinet, told AFP on Wednesday that the Bureau made an 'oversimplification, causing unnecessary concern'.
May, who will soon become deputy head of the US embassy in Beijing, also bemoaned the treatment of pro-democracy media mogul Jimmy Lai and other 'political prisoners', saying Hong Kongers have been jailed for peaceful expression of views.
Lai, 77, is in the middle of a lengthy trial for foreign collusion charges under the national security law and has been in custody since 2020.
May criticised the Hong Kong government for 'transnational repression', referring to police bounties issued against 19 overseas pro-democracy activists.
'This is an attempt to restrict the free speech of people in the United States,' he said, adding that it was 'very disturbing' that authorities have targeted the activists' families in Hong Kong.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Interview: China's tariff-free trade pact for African countries brings development opportunity, says Ghanaian analyst
by Xinhua writer Justice Lee Adoboe ACCRA, June 26 (Xinhua) -- China's recent decision to expand its preferential trade policy, granting zero-tariff access to a total of 53 African countries, has huge positive significance for both global trade and China-Africa trade, a Ghanaian analyst has said. "This is a defining moment for Africa and a shining example of what it means to stick to the principles of globalization and free trade, which we are advocating for," Paul Frimpong, executive director of the Africa-China Center for Policy and Advisory (ACCPA), a Ghana-based think tank, told Xinhua recently in an exclusive interview. The initiative to expand the preferential trade policy, offering tariff-free treatment to all 53 African countries that have diplomatic relations with China, was announced during the recent Ministerial Meeting of Coordinators on the Implementation of the Follow-up Actions of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in Changsha, the capital of central China's Hunan Province, earlier this month. Frimpong said the preferential treatment elevates China-Africa relations to a new historical high, highlighting China's attitude of giving equal treatment to all African countries and actively helping them achieve development. China's gesture is also a significant boost for global trade in the complex international environment, where recent reckless imposition of unnecessary tariffs destabilizes and disrupts the global trading architecture, according to Frimpong. "While the world has spent decades building an ecosystem around globalization, multilateralism, and trade. But in recent times, we've seen a movement that undermines this ecosystem that we spent years building," he said. The analyst noted that many global institutions, including the World Trade Organization (WTO), were built to promote global trade, and all WTO members need to promote global trading principles by removing all trade barriers, including punitive tariffs. "However, some recent developments seek to undermine these principles," he observed. Frimpong, therefore, has seen China's expansion of its free-trade policy to 53 African countries as not only an opportunity for Africa but also a perfect substitute for all the least developed countries (LDCs) across the world bearing the brunt of the new tariff war. He recalled that among the countries around the world that already enjoy free access to the Chinese market, 33 of them were African LDCs. The new measure will enable 20 more African countries to enjoy free access to the Chinese market. "This preferential trade treatment presents a significant opportunity for Africa to bridge the trade deficit between the continent and China by utilizing the 1.4-billion-people Chinese market," he said. China has maintained its position as Africa's largest trading partner for 16 consecutive years, with bilateral trade volume surpassing 2 trillion yuan for the first time in 2024 to reach 2.1 trillion yuan (about 293.2 billion dollars), data from the General Administration of Customs of China showed. From January to May this year, China-Africa trade totaled 963.21 billion yuan, marking a 12.4 percent year-on-year increase and hitting a record high for the period. Frimpong said that research by the ACCPA and other institutes indicates a strong demand in the Chinese market for African exports, which is an opportunity for Africa to develop their manufacturing capacities to export value-added products to the Chinese market. "Obviously, this free market for Africa gives African countries the opportunity to diversify their products and meet the demands of the Chinese market. And of course, they will also earn more for their countries," he added.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Exclusive-White House wants major cut in US war crimes, accountability funding, sources say
WASHINGTON/THE HAGUE (Reuters) -The White House on Wednesday recommended terminating U.S. funding for nearly two dozen programs that conduct war crimes and accountability work globally, including in Myanmar, Syria and on alleged Russian atrocities in Ukraine, according to two U.S. sources familiar with the matter and internal government documents reviewed by Reuters. The recommendation from the Office of Management and Budget, which has not been previously reported, is not the final decision to end the programs since it gives the State Department the option to appeal. But it sets up a potential back-and-forth between the OMB and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his aides, who will reply to OMB with their suggestions on which programs deserve to continue. The programs also include work in Iraq, Nepal, Sri Lanka and the Gambia. The State Department and OMB did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The expectation that Rubio would argue for many of the programs to be continued is slim, according to two U.S. officials. However, the top U.S. diplomat could make a case to keep crucial programs, such as aiding potential war crimes prosecutions in Ukraine, according to one source familiar with the matter. Several of the programs earmarked for termination operate war crimes accountability projects in Ukraine, three sources familiar with the matter said, including Global Rights Compliance, which is helping to collect evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity across Ukraine, such as sexual violence and torture. Another is the Legal Action Network, a legal aid group which supports local efforts to bring cases against Russian suspects of war crimes in Ukraine, the sources said. Requests seeking comment from the groups were not immediately answered. State Department bureaus that would like to preserve any war crimes and accountability programs should send their justifications by close of business day on July 11, said an internal State Department email seen by Reuters. CHANGING PRIORITIES The administration of President Donald Trump has frozen and then cut back billions of dollars of foreign aid since taking office on January 20 to ensure American-taxpayer money funds programs that are aligned with his "America First" policies. The unprecedented cutbacks have effectively shut down its premier aid arm U.S. Agency for International Development, jeopardized the delivery of life-saving food and medical aid and thrown global humanitarian relief operations into chaos. The OMB recommendation is yet another sign that the administration is increasingly de-prioritizing advocacy for human rights and rule of law globally, an objective that previous U.S. administrations have pursued. While U.S. foreign aid freezes had already started hampering an international effort to hold Russia responsible for alleged war crimes in Ukraine, Wednesday's recommendations raise the risk of U.S. completely abandoning those efforts. Among the programs that are recommended for termination is a $18 million State Department grant for Ukraine's Prosecutor General's Office that is implemented by Georgetown University's International Criminal Justice Initiative, two sources said. While the programs do not directly impact Ukraine's frontline efforts to fend off Russia's invasion, supporters say they represent the best chance of extensively documenting reported battlefield atrocities in Europe's biggest conflict since World War Two, now grinding toward a fourth year. Ukraine has opened more than 140,000 war crime cases since Moscow's February 2022 invasion, which has killed tens of thousands, ravaged vast swathes of the country and left behind mental and physical scars from occupation. Russia consistently denies war crimes have been committed by its forces in the conflict. PATH TO APPEAL Other programs include one that does accountability work on Myanmar army's atrocities against Rohingya minorities as well as on the persecution of Christians and other minorities by Syria's ousted former president Bashar al-Assad, two sources said. While the OMB recommendations could face State Department push-back, the criteria to appeal are set very strictly. In an internal State Department email, the administration cautioned that any effort to preserve programs that were recommended to be terminated should be thoroughly argued and directly aligned with Washington's priorities. "Bureaus must clearly and succinctly identify direct alignment to administration priorities," the email, reviewed by Reuters said. (Reporting by Humeyra Pamuk and Anthony Deutsch; Additional reporting by Gram Slattery and Jonathan Landay; Editing by Nia Williams)
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Hope in fraught times: Trump-Xi bond could shift ties for the better, say US experts
BEIJING: US President Donald Trump's free hand domestically and open admiration for Chinese President Xi Jinping could make him the wild card capable of shifting the relationship between the world's two largest powers from rivalry to cooperation, American scholars have said. Speaking at a session developed in collaboration with The Straits Times at a World Economic Forum event in Tianjin on Thursday (June 26), Harvard professor Graham Allison pointed out that Trump is not a China hawk. 'If you look at the campaign last year, there were a thousand people running for office in the country in which 80 per cent of the people have a negative view of China,' he said, referring to the US general election in 2024. 'Only one person had positive things to say about China. This was Donald Trump.' Prof Allison noted that Trump had said to Xi that when China and the United States work together, they can solve most of the world's problems. He said he believed that Trump is determined to be a 'great deal maker' and a 'great peacemaker'. 'If he is going to succeed in that mission, the opportunity for Trump and Xi to surprise us on the upside, I think, is enough to be hopeful,' said the national security analyst who has served under former US presidents Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan. Prof Allison's optimism stands out in the current climate. Since Trump began his second term in January, the US-China rivalry has intensified – most notably with the US' imposition of unprecedentedly high tariffs on Chinese goods – leading many observers to take a pessimistic view of the world's most consequential relationship. His optimism is also striking, given that he is famous for popularising the 'Thucydides Trap' – a concept that draws upon historical pattern to suggest that conflict becomes likely when an established power feels threatened by a rising power. (Clockwise from left) ST Foreign Editor Li Xueying moderating a session with Professor Graham Allison, Professor Jin Keyu, Professor Monica Toft and Professor Happymon Jacob at a World Economic Forum event in Tianjin on June 26. - Photo: World Economic Forum Another American scholar at the same session shared his optimism. Professor Monica Toft of The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy said Trump has significant leeway to take a softer approach on China, given that most Americans are not interested in foreign policy and that Congress and the courts are unlikely to challenge him. 'If President Trump decided he could align US interests more closely with China – without giving away the store – he has both the prerogative and the opportunity to do that,' she said. Prof Toft noted that global politics today is shaped by two strongmen – Trump and Xi – who share a personal rapport. 'They talk to one another, they respect one another, they admire one another,' she said. 'It could be an extraordinary period for humanity if they can find a way to collaborate and coordinate on certain issues.' Speaking at the same session, Professor Jin Keyu from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology also saw bright spots in an otherwise gloomy picture of the US-China rivalry. 'I do not agree with the view that they are in a new Cold War,' she said. She said while China and the US may be politically opposite and economically competitive, there is a need for them to cooperate to provide global public goods. 'There is space to collaborate, whether it's on the risk of artificial intelligence, climate, data transparency, and so forth,' she said. At the session titled 'Geopolitics: An Unfolding Story', moderated by ST Foreign Editor Li Xueying, the panel also discussed the erosion of the 'nuclear taboo', a normative belief that the use of nuclear weapons is unacceptable, even in situations where it might be strategically advantageous. This concept was brought into sharp focus by recent conflicts. In June, the US and Israel attacked Iran to destroy its nuclear weapons development programme. In 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine, which found itself less able to defend itself because it had given up its nuclear capabilities decades ago. Professor Happymon Jacob, who teaches nuclear disarmament at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in India, pointed out that while the taboo against the use of nuclear weapons remains, the taboo against the possession of nuclear weapons appears to be collapsing. 'Ukrainians would say we made a mistake in giving up our nuclear weapons,' he said at the same panel. 'The Russians will tell you that we have nuclear weapons, thousands of them. There is no way we are going to be defeated in this war.' He noted how South Korea, faced with the threat of nuclear-armed North Korea, is also thinking about developing nuclear weapons. - The Straits Times/ANN
