Researchers find a link between gut bacteria and genes in colitis flare-ups
Ulcerative colitis is a chronic disease that affects more than 1.2 million people in the United States, according to a 2023 study of medical claims data. It falls under the umbrella of inflammatory bowel disease, or IBD — a group of conditions that includes Chron's disease and is marked by unpredictable flare-ups, long-term discomfort, and treatments that often work inconsistently.
'This study demonstrates that it's not just an imbalance of microbes in your gut or genetics that induce intestinal inflammation — but the interaction between the two,' said Hisako Kayama, an associate professor of immunology at Osaka University and co-senior author of the study.
At the center of that inflammatory response is a protein called STING that helps the body recognize the DNA of bacteria and viruses and mount an immune response. Healthy people are able to keep this response under control with the help of a gene called OTUD3, which acts as a biological brake. But in some people, their OTUD3 gene variant leads that brake to fail — causing the immune system to treat harmless bacteria as a threat. Unchecked, the protein can drive chronic inflammation, particularly in the gut, which is home to many different types of "good" bacteria.
The protein STING is very important in fighting bacterial infections, said co-author Dr. Kiyoshi Takeda, a professor of immunology at Osaka University. 'But the problem is that the overactivation of STING causes inflammation.'
To explore how this interaction plays out, the researchers studied mice bred specially to have a genetic vulnerability to colitis similar to humans. When feces from the ulcerative colitis patients was transferred to the colons of the mice, they developed more severe colitis symptoms than mice with a normal version of the gene. If they didn't have the gene variant or the microbial trigger, the disease didn't develop.
In total, researchers used tissue and gut bacteria from 124 patients — including 65 with ulcerative colitis and 59 with colorectal cancer — plus 12 healthy people as controls.
The culprit was a molecule called cGAMP, which is made by certain gut bacteria. In healthy mice, researchers know that OTUD3 helps break down excess cGAMP so the immune system doesn't overreact. But in mice without a working version of that gene, cGAMP built up, overactivating STING and causing inflammation.
The findings could help explain why some patients respond poorly to current ulcerative colitis treatments, which typically suppress the immune system as a whole. By pinpointing a single inflammatory pathway, the study opens the door to more precise, personalized therapies — especially for patients who carry this specific gene variant.
Still, the researchers caution that any treatment targeting the STING protein directly must be used carefully, since suppressing it too much could leave patients vulnerable to infection. Alternative approaches, such as targeting cGAMP-producing bacteria, could allow STING to keep doing its job in the rest of the body while dialing down inflammation in the colon.
The variant gene that colitis sufferers have is common. According to past genome-wide studies, it appears in about 53% of Europeans, 52% of Americans and 16% of Japanese people. Not everyone with it develops the disease, lending credence to the idea that it's the interaction between genes and microbes that triggers inflammation.
'This study is helpful in demonstrating a specific example — a genetic variant and a microbial signal — that leads to inflammation,' said Dr. Jonathan Jacobs, a gastroenterologist and microbiome researcher at UCLA who was not involved with the study. 'That's exciting," he said, because it offers a clear mechanism that ties together many of the risk factors scientists have long observed in inflammatory bowel disease.
Even if it turns out not many people are vulnerable to this particular gut-genetic interaction, he said, the research could lead to more personalized treatment. 'It moves us closer to precision medicine,' Jacobs said.
The shift toward more targeted treatment could make a world of difference for patients like Anderson Hopley, a volunteer with the Orange County and Los Angeles chapter of the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation who was diagnosed with Crohn's this year.
'I know people who have medication that'll work for a couple years, maybe even just a couple months, and then it kind of randomly stops,' he said. 'They have to adjust everything.'
Although Hopley has Crohn's, not ulcerative colitis, he said the new study still resonates.
'I think it'd be really nice to know what causes this,' he said. 'Even if there's not a cure yet, just having an answer — some clarity — would be a step in the right direction.'
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Solve the daily Crossword

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapeutics Market Report 2025: Global Trends, Revenue, and Market Dynamics
The global IBS and IBD therapeutics market is set to grow from $33.3 billion in 2025 to $52.6 billion by 2030, at a 9.6% CAGR. The report analyzes market trends, key players, and regional impact, offering insights into drug classes and business strategies of industry leaders like AbbVie and Amgen. Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapeutics Market Dublin, July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapeutics Market" report has been added to global market for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapeutics is expected to grow from $33.3 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach $52.6 billion by the end of 2030, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.6% during the forecast period of 2025 to and IBD are types of gastrointestinal diseases. The pathophysiology of both diseases is unknown and is believed to be influenced by environmental factors, ethnicity, dietary habits and genetic predisposition. Due to varied symptoms, patients must use multiple therapeutics simultaneously. Therapeutics aim to improve patients' quality of life and achieve clinical remission for the longest period key businesses in the IBS therapeutics market include Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Abbott and Allergan. In the IBD therapeutics market, corporations include AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc., Amgen and Biogen. Start-up companies are increasingly entering the IBS and IBD therapeutics market with novel pipeline candidates. Global pharmaceutical companies, such as AbbVie and Amgen, are focused on label expansion studies and licensing collaborations with small businesses to develop and market products. Report ScopeThe report provides an overview of the global irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapeutics market and analyzes market trends. It includes global revenue ($ million) for the base year 2024, estimated data for 2025 and forecast data from 2026 through 2030. The market is segmented into irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease based on disease type. The IBS therapeutics segment is further segmented based on symptom type and drug class. The IBD therapeutics segment is further segmented based on type and drug class. The report also focuses on regional market segmentation. The regions covered in this study include North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America and the Middle East and Africa (MEA), focusing on significant countries in these regions. The report includes an analysis of the competitive landscape, which provides the ranking and share of key businesses in the global IBS and IBD therapeutics market. A dedicated section of company profiles providing details about leading market enterprises is also report includes: 142 data tables and 54 additional tables Analysis of the global market for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapeutics Analyses of global market trends, with historic revenue data from 2022 to 2024, estimates for 2025, and projected CAGRs through 2030 Estimates of the market's size and revenue prospects, along with a corresponding market share analysis by symptom type, drug class, type, and region Facts and figures pertaining to market dynamics, technological advances, regulations and the impact of macroeconomic factors Insights derived from Porter's Five Forces model, as well as global supply chain analysis Patent analysis, featuring key granted and published patents Overview of sustainability trends and ESG developments, with emphasis on consumer attitudes, as well as the ESG risk ratings and practices of leading companies Analysis of the industry structure, including companies' market shares and rankings, strategic alliances, M&A activity and a venture funding outlook Profiles of the leading companies, including AbbVie Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services Inc., Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and Amgen Inc. Key Attributes: Report Attribute Details No. of Pages 155 Forecast Period 2025 - 2030 Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2025 $33.3 Billion Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2030 $52.6 Billion Compound Annual Growth Rate 9.6% Regions Covered Global Key Topics Covered: Chapter 1 Executive Summary Chapter 2 Market Overview Inflammatory Bowel Disease Irritable Bowel Syndrome Porter's Five Forces Analysis in the IBS and IBD Therapeutics Market Impact of U.S. Tariffs Macroeconomic Factor Analysis Population Demographics and Aging Populations Government Policies on Drug Prices Chapter 3 Market Dynamics Market Drivers Rising Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Disorders Increasing Entry of Biologics and Biosimilars Market Restraints Side Effects and Ceiling Impact of Biologics Overlap with Other Gi Disorders Use of Alternative Treatment Approaches Market Opportunities Self-Administered Drugs Personalized Therapies Chapter 4 Regulatory Landscape Regulatory Aspects of IBS and IBD Therapeutics The U.S. European Union Asia-Pacific Chapter 5 Emerging Technologies and Pipeline Analysis Key Takeaways Emerging Technologies Novel Target-based Small-Molecule Drugs Microbiome-based Therapeutics Advanced Combination Treatments AI for Drug Discovery Pipeline Analysis Chapter 6 Market Segmentation Analysis Market Analysis by Disease Irritable Bowel Syndrome Inflammatory Bowel Disease Market Analysis by Drug Class Irritable Bowel Syndrome Inflammatory Bowel Disease Market Analysis by Region North America Europe Asia-Pacific South America Middle East and Africa Chapter 7 Competitive Intelligence Key Takeaways Industry Structure Company Share Analysis of the IBD Therapeutics Market Competitive Share Analysis of the IBS Therapeutics Market Strategic Analysis Chapter 8 Sustainability in the IBS and IBD Market: An ESG Perspective Introduction to ESG ESG Risk Ratings Company Profiles Abbvie Inc. Amgen Inc. Astrazeneca Bayer AG Biogen Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Gilead Sciences Inc. Ironwood Johnson & Johnson Services Inc. Lilly Merck & Co. Inc. Pfizer Inc. Sanofi Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. UCB For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. Attachment Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapeutics Market CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Patients With IBD and PSC Face Elevated CRC Risk
TOPLINE: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially those who had been diagnosed before 20 years of age, and with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) had an elevated risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a cohort study to analyse the effect of IBD with and without PSC on the risk for CRC. They enrolled patients with IBD diagnosed between January 1969 and December 2014 from the Swedish National Patient Register, including those who underwent colectomy. Patients were classified as those having PSC on the basis of the diagnosis of cholangitis. A total of 85,813 patients with IBD alone and 3066 with IBD and concomitant PSC were included. Each patient with IBD was matched with five control individuals from the general population without IBD (n = 432,037). Information on the diagnosis of CRC and cause of death was obtained using register data. Synchronous cancer was defined as two or more CRCs occurring within or less than 180 days. TAKEAWAY: Patients with IBD and concomitant PSC and those without PSC had an increased risk for CRC (incidence rate [IR], 269 and 95 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively) compared with matched control individuals (IR, 58 cases per 100,000 person-years; P < .001). Those with unclassified IBD and PSC had the highest risk for CRC (IR ratio [IRR], 7.38; 95% CI, 5.56-9.63). Compared with control individuals, patients diagnosed with IBD before the age of 20 years, with or without PSC, demonstrated a significantly elevated risk for CRC (IRR, 74.97 and 18.75, respectively; P < .001). CRC was more likely to be in the proximal colon among patients with IBD and PSC than among those with IBD without PSC and control individuals, with 37.5% vs 27% and 22.4% of CRC being located in the caecum and ascending colon. Synchronous cancers were found in 4.7% of patients with IBD and PSC and 4.4% of those with IBD without PSC vs 1.9% of control individuals (P < .001). Those with IBD and PSC had the highest mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.56; P < .001). IN PRACTICE: "In PSC+ [IBD with a concomitant PSC diagnosis], primary CRC is more often located in the proximal colon. This must be considered when counselling patients with IBD regarding type of resection for cancer and choice of restorative surgery," the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Maie Abdalla, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. It was published online on July 22, 2025, in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. LIMITATIONS: The register included only hospital discharge diagnoses before 2001, potentially missing outpatients with milder disease. Variables such as diet, smoking, family history of CRC, colitis severity, tumour stage, and others could not be accounted for. PSC lacks a specific International Classification of Diseases code; therefore, researchers had to combine a cholangitis code with an IBD diagnosis to identify cases. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden and by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF agreement, Sweden. One author reported being an employee of AstraZeneca and having shares in the same. The author also reported receiving prior research funding and honoraria for lectures and consultancy from various pharmaceutical companies. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.


Medscape
24-07-2025
- Medscape
Mindfulness Therapy Aids IBD Patients With Mental Distress
TOPLINE: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy reduced psychological distress and improved well-being of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and it may offer benefits for sleep quality and inflammation. METHODOLOGY: Even in remission, many patients with IBD experience anxiety, depression, fatigue, and poor sleep, which can lower their quality of life, undermine self-care, and drive up healthcare use. Researchers conducted this trial in the Netherlands between July 2021 and May 2022 to strengthen the evidence for the effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in reducing psychological distress in patients with IBD who had been in remission for at least 3 months and experienced at least mild levels of distress. They randomly assigned 142 patients (mean age, 48.6 years; 64.1% women) to receive either mindfulness therapy plus usual treatment (n = 70; intervention group) or only usual treatment (n = 72; control group); the follow-up period lasted 12 months. The mindfulness therapy program included eight weekly group sessions of 2.5 hours, 30-45 minutes of daily home practice, and a 6-hour silent retreat day between sessions six and seven. Usual treatment included pharmacologic and surgical disease control treatments and the prevention of complications. The primary outcome was psychological distress post-intervention (3 months from baseline), measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) total score. Secondary outcomes included well-being, sleep, self-compassion, mindfulness skills, and disease activity. TAKEAWAY: Patients in the intervention group vs the control group showed reduced psychological distress (Cohen d [d], -0.61) and an improvement in the HADS total score (unstandardized coefficient B, -3.4; P < .001) at 3 months from baseline. The HADS total scores remained lower in the intervention group vs the control group during the entire 12-month follow-up duration. Compared with patients in the control group, those in the intervention group showed improved well-being (d, 0.41) and increases in mindfulness skills (d, 0.46) and self-compassion (d, 0.42). Patients in the intervention group vs the control group had a reduced total sleep time (d, -0.67) but an increased proportion of deep sleep (d, 0.7). No between-group difference was observed in the occurrence of disease flares, but patients in the control group showed a significant reduction in fecal calprotectin levels, an indicator of intestinal inflammation compared with patients in the control group (d, -0.49). IN PRACTICE: 'Our results demonstrate that MBCT [mindfulness-based cognitive therapy] could be a valuable addition to the currently limited number of psychological treatment options for patients with IBD with psychological distress. The group format of MBCT allows for the simultaneous treatment of more patients, potentially making it more cost-effective than individual therapy. Additionally, group therapy provides opportunities for peer support,' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: This study, led by Milou M. ter Avest, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, was published online in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its unblinded design, risking expectation bias in self-reports. Mindfulness teachers had varied competence levels, which may have introduced bias. The study did not assess sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea, narcolepsy, or restless legs syndrome that may have affected the sleep metrics. Additionally, electroencephalography headbands were not available for all patients, and technical and self-application issues may have led to unusable nights and data loss. DISCLOSURES: This trial was supported by ZonMw (the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development) and the MindMore Foundation. Two authors reported serving on the advisory boards of various pharmaceutical companies, and one of them also reported receiving a grant from Royal DSM. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.