Former jet-sprint world champ jailed for assault
A former world champion jet-sprinter has been jailed after dragging his partner by her hair and smashing her face into the floor.
David Raymond Hopkins, 59, of Milton, appeared in the Dunedin District court this week after earlier admitting two charges of assault in a family relationship, breaching a protection order, intimidation and wilful damage.
Hopkins won titles in World SuperBoat jetsprinting in the 2010s.
The court heard that on November 9, 2023, the defendant's on-off partner of 10 years sent him a text saying she wanted to break up.
At 7pm that day, an agitated Hopkins arrived at their shared family home where the woman accused him of cheating on her.
A verbal argument turned physical when the defendant hit the woman in the face multiple times causing her mouth to bleed.
She picked up her phone to call for help, but Hopkins snatched it from her and snapped it in half.
He then grabbed her by the hair and dragged her from the kitchen to the spare room where he forced her head into the floor.
While she was on the ground, he kicked her in the chest and back and said he was going to kill her, and he knew how to hide a body.
Judge David Robinson said while the relationship was "toxic" on both sides, Hopkins still failed to accept he had done anything wrong.
A pre-sentence report said he "fails to see any wrongdoing on his part" and "there is a lack of insight in terms of what happened".
This was the third time Hopkins had been before the court in relation to the same victim and he had convictions dating back to 2006.
The judge accepted there were indications the victim could be "manipulative" but said that did not excuse the defendant's behaviour.
"Your position can't be characterised as anything but victim blaming," the judge said.
In a statement to the court, the victim said she suffered pain in her muscles and bones as a result of the attack and thinking about it gave her anxiety.
Judge Robinson sentenced Hopkins to 21 months' imprisonment and considered home detention "entirely inappropriate" as it was insufficient to denounce his behaviour or deter him from reoffending.
felicity.dear@odt.co.nz , Court reporter
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
6 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Lawyer accused of using LinkedIn to intimidate women
Multiple female lawyers claim that a former senior partner who was suspended for drunkenly groping interns at a Christmas party has been using a social media platform to intimidate them. James Gardner-Hopkins inadvertently became the face of New Zealand's #MeToo movement after his conduct towards junior female colleagues at Russell McVeagh was made public. The former partner at the top law firm was suspended in 2022 after he was found to have inappropriately touched five young women at two parties in 2015. However, earlier this year, when his suspension ended, Gardner-Hopkins applied for a Practising Approval Certificate, which is a licence lawyers need to work in the legal profession. Multiple branches of women's law associations, and their individual members, opposed his readmission to the profession and made submissions to the New Zealand Law Society. However, following those submissions, multiple women have complained that Gardner-Hopkins has found their profiles on the social media networking site LinkedIn, and has been repeatedly accessing them to "intimidate" them. "This is a recognised form of intimidation. By viewing their profiles openly, he is making it clear to these women that he is watching them. This behaviour appears to be designed to intimidate those who have raised legitimate concerns," the Wellington Women's Law Association (WWLA) wrote to the Law Society after several of its members had their profiles viewed. "There is an option to view LinkedIn profiles anonymously, yet he has chosen not to use it. Over the past few days, this behaviour appears to have escalated, with some women reporting it has occurred multiple times. There appears to be no legitimate reason for him to be doing this." The WWLA didn't name Gardner-Hopkins in its own LinkedIn post about the issue, but said it had received complaints from 10 women, one of whom was a law student, claiming he had done the same to them. Barrister Steph Dyhrberg, who represented three of Gardner-Hopkins' Christmas Party victims, also wrote to the Law Society in June with similar concerns. "He (Gardner-Hopkins) has for some time (starting around the time opposition to his application started emerging) been repeatedly viewing the LinkedIn profiles of many women who have spoken up about his misconduct and/or opposed his application, including those who made a written submission," Dyhrberg wrote. "This has been happening again over the past few days. Some women report he has done it to them at least three times. There is no possible legitimate reason for Mr Gardiner-Hopkins to do this. It is a recognised form of intimidation: he is doing it on an open basis so the women know he is checking their profiles." A spokeswoman for New Zealand Women's Law Journal said they were also aware that since submissions were made against Gardner-Hopkins being granted a practising certificate, he had been viewing profiles of women associated with the journal on LinkedIn. "We are appalled at Mr Gardner-Hopkins' behaviour and it only reaffirms the concerns the Journal expressed to the Law Society in March," they said. "We call on the Law Society to condemn this behaviour and to take it into account in their decision regarding Mr Gardner-Hopkins' practising certificate." In response to Dyhrberg, a spokesperson for the New Zealand Law Society said the concerns would be passed on to the decision maker from the Practising Approval Committee, and to Gardner-Hopkins' lawyer. A spokesperson for the Law Society told NZME that Gardner-Hopkins' application for a certificate is still ongoing, and as yet, no decision has been made. They said that when adverse comments are received about a person applying for a PAC, those are shared with the applicant along with the identity of the person who made the submission, but their contact details aren't disclosed. "The Law Society values the significant contribution members of the profession and commenters make to our decision-making processes, and we expect every commenter will be treated with respect, courtesy and professionalism by applicants," the spokesperson said. Gardner-Hopkins told NZME in July that he was going through a process and had been advised to let that take its course before commenting publicly. He said the same thing when asked for comment this week about allegations he'd been using LinkedIn to intimidate women who had made submissions against him. 'Put plainly, Mr Gardner-Hopkins sexually assaulted multiple junior women staff members…' The approval process for a Practising Approval Certificate is confidential, but multiple branches of women's law associations around the country published their submissions against Gardner-Hopkins rejoining the profession online, after they'd submitted them to the Law Society. "Put plainly, Mr Gardner-Hopkins sexually assaulted multiple junior women staff members in his capacity as a partner on two separate occasions," submissions from the Auckland Women's Lawyers Association president, Karlene O'Halloran, read. "There is obvious public concern regarding Mr Gardner-Hopkins' fitness, which as a profession we must address properly. A practising certificate is a privilege, not a right, and its issuance must be aligned with the legal profession's core values." The Wellington branch of the association said his readmission would undermine the integrity of the profession, while the New Zealand Women's Law Journal said that issuing him a practising certificate would, in effect, be condoning sexual assault and harassment. "It also undermines the efforts of those who compromised their career prospects in order for someone who is not fit and proper to be held accountable for their failings. Of course, if Mr Gardner-Hopkins is issued a practising certificate, their efforts will count for little," the journal's submission reads. By Jeremy Wilkinson, Open Justice multimedia journalist
Otago Daily Times
6 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Claims lawyer used LinkedIn to intimidate women
Multiple female lawyers claim that a former senior partner who was suspended for drunkenly groping interns at a Christmas party has been using a social media platform to intimidate them. James Gardner-Hopkins inadvertently became the face of New Zealand's #MeToo movement after his conduct towards junior female colleagues at Russell McVeagh was made public. The former partner at the top law firm was suspended in 2022 after he was found to have inappropriately touched five young women at two parties in 2015. However, earlier this year, when his suspension ended, Gardner-Hopkins applied for a Practising Approval Certificate, which is a licence lawyers need to work in the legal profession. Multiple branches of women's law associations, and their individual members, opposed his readmission to the profession and made submissions to the New Zealand Law Society. However, following those submissions, multiple women have complained that Gardner-Hopkins has found their profiles on the social media networking site LinkedIn, and has been repeatedly accessing them to "intimidate" them. "This is a recognised form of intimidation. By viewing their profiles openly, he is making it clear to these women that he is watching them. This behaviour appears to be designed to intimidate those who have raised legitimate concerns," the Wellington Women's Law Association (WWLA) wrote to the Law Society after several of its members had their profiles viewed. "There is an option to view LinkedIn profiles anonymously, yet he has chosen not to use it. Over the past few days, this behaviour appears to have escalated, with some women reporting it has occurred multiple times. There appears to be no legitimate reason for him to be doing this." The WWLA didn't name Gardner-Hopkins in its own LinkedIn post about the issue, but said it had received complaints from 10 women, one of whom was a law student, claiming he had done the same to them. Barrister Steph Dyhrberg, who represented three of Gardner-Hopkins' Christmas Party victims, also wrote to the Law Society in June with similar concerns. "He (Gardner-Hopkins) has for some time (starting around the time opposition to his application started emerging) been repeatedly viewing the LinkedIn profiles of many women who have spoken up about his misconduct and/or opposed his application, including those who made a written submission," Dyhrberg wrote. "This has been happening again over the past few days. Some women report he has done it to them at least three times. There is no possible legitimate reason for Mr Gardiner-Hopkins to do this. It is a recognised form of intimidation: he is doing it on an open basis so the women know he is checking their profiles." A spokeswoman for New Zealand Women's Law Journal said they were also aware that since submissions were made against Gardner-Hopkins being granted a practising certificate, he had been viewing profiles of women associated with the journal on LinkedIn. "We are appalled at Mr Gardner-Hopkins' behaviour and it only reaffirms the concerns the Journal expressed to the Law Society in March," they said. "We call on the Law Society to condemn this behaviour and to take it into account in their decision regarding Mr Gardner-Hopkins' practising certificate." In response to Dyhrberg, a spokesperson for the New Zealand Law Society said the concerns would be passed on to the decision maker from the Practising Approval Committee, and to Gardner-Hopkins' lawyer. A spokesperson for the Law Society told NZME that Gardner-Hopkins' application for a certificate is still ongoing, and as yet, no decision has been made. They said that when adverse comments are received about a person applying for a PAC, those are shared with the applicant along with the identity of the person who made the submission, but their contact details aren't disclosed. "The Law Society values the significant contribution members of the profession and commenters make to our decision-making processes, and we expect every commenter will be treated with respect, courtesy and professionalism by applicants," the spokesperson said. Gardner-Hopkins told NZME in July that he was going through a process and had been advised to let that take its course before commenting publicly. He said the same thing when asked for comment this week about allegations he'd been using LinkedIn to intimidate women who had made submissions against him. 'Put plainly, Mr Gardner-Hopkins sexually assaulted multiple junior women staff members…' The approval process for a Practising Approval Certificate is confidential, but multiple branches of women's law associations around the country published their submissions against Gardner-Hopkins rejoining the profession online, after they'd submitted them to the Law Society. "Put plainly, Mr Gardner-Hopkins sexually assaulted multiple junior women staff members in his capacity as a partner on two separate occasions," submissions from the Auckland Women's Lawyers Association president, Karlene O'Halloran, read. "There is obvious public concern regarding Mr Gardner-Hopkins' fitness, which as a profession we must address properly. A practising certificate is a privilege, not a right, and its issuance must be aligned with the legal profession's core values." The Wellington branch of the association said his readmission would undermine the integrity of the profession, while the New Zealand Women's Law Journal said that issuing him a practising certificate would, in effect, be condoning sexual assault and harassment. "It also undermines the efforts of those who compromised their career prospects in order for someone who is not fit and proper to be held accountable for their failings. Of course, if Mr Gardner-Hopkins is issued a practising certificate, their efforts will count for little," the journal's submission reads. By Jeremy Wilkinson, Open Justice multimedia journalist
NZ Herald
6 days ago
- NZ Herald
Complaints made to Law Society after James Gardner-Hopkins accused of using LinkedIn to intimidate women
Multiple female lawyers claim that a former senior partner who was suspended for drunkenly groping interns at a Christmas party has been using a social media platform to intimidate them. James Gardner-Hopkins inadvertently became the face of New Zealand's #MeToo movement after his conduct towards junior female colleagues at Russell
