
Fact check: Aree France's working conditions are among Europe's worst?
"In a study carried out at the end of 2021 and published in 2022 (...) France is in 36th position, right at the bottom with Albania, in terms of working conditions," Delgènes told Public Sénat, the official TV channel of the upper house of the French Parliament.
His statements have prompted a flood of reactions on social media.
It comes as the issue of precarious working conditions comes to the fore in France.
Over the past two and a half months, five young workers and trainees aged between 15 and 19 have been killed in workplace accidents, raising questions about the country's labour conditions.
We took a closer look at the data to verify the claims made by Delgènes.
France trails most European counterparts
The claims are based on a 2021 study by Eurofound, a Dublin-based agency that conducts research into living and working conditions in European countries.
Its most recent survey into European working conditions, known as EWCS, dates from 2021. Updated fieldwork from 2024 is expected to be made public later this year.
The research looks at working conditions in 36 European countries, including all 27 European Union member states.
It includes a 'job quality index', which combines data points on aspects such as health, safety, work satisfaction and more to measure the degree to which workers are strained in the workplace.
The results suggest that more workers in France are exposed to 'extremely strained' or 'highly strained' conditions than in most other countries.
Only in Serbia, Montenegro, Slovakia and Poland do more workers have 'extremely strained' or 'highly strained' conditions, according to the findings.
France not in 36th position 'with Albania'
When we also consider those who cited 'moderately strained' conditions, France ranks penultimately, with only Slovakia scoring worse, and Albania faring slightly better.
The research therefore does not place France "right at the bottom, with Albania in terms of working conditions" as Delgènes asserts.
When we look only at workers citing "extremely strained", or the most severe conditions, France ranks 30th, above other EU member states such as Croatia and Cyprus as well as the United Kingdom.
Concerns over health and safety
The data, however, does place France behind most of its European counterparts when it comes to labour conditions.
Data provided by Eurostat, the EU's statistical office, confirms the trend.
According to the latest estimates, only Malta ranks worse than France in terms of the incidence of fatal accidents recorded in the workplace.
These concerns have been augmented recently with the tragic deaths of five young workers in their place of work in the space of just two and a half months. According to estimates, two people die in the workplace in France every day.
The French government is examining a proposal to sanction employers responsible for workplace issues, such as through fines and criminal prosecutions, according to a document recently seen by French media, including Le Monde.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
3 minutes ago
- Euronews
China announces fertility subsidy program as births hit historic lows
Long seen in the West as a byword for the Chinese Communist Party's heavy-handedness, the one-child policy became a trope for Chinese authoritarianism. While the policy was officially scrapped in 2015 after years of looser enforcement, China now faces unprecedentedly low birth rates — and has announced it will begin offering childcare subsidies for the first, second and third child up to the age of three, starting this year. Under the plan, families will receive what the government calls a 'fertility bonus' of 3,600 yuan or just over €430 per child until the age of three. While the national government will pay this 'base' amount, local authorities are free to top it up depending on their own resources. The CCP said the nationwide rollout of cash subsidies will help ease the pressure of childcare expenses and will help to prevent a further decline in the fertility rate. Crucially, the subsidies will be tax-exempt and excluded from calculations of household or individual income, ensuring they do not affect eligibility for minimum living allowances or extreme poverty assistance. Why now? In 2024, China's total fertility (TFR) rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime according to current patterns — was around 1.15 children per woman. That's among the world's lowest and below the so-called 'replacement level' of 2.1, meaning the baseline for the population size to stay the same. Demographers use these rates to measure whether a population is shrinking, growing or staying the same. The goal of the new policy would not be to expand the population, but to keep it at a relatively similar size without seeing it skew too heavily towards an ageing population. The latter is a problem faced by many European economies. According to the World Health Organization, by 2040, around 28% of China's population will be over the age of 60, threatening to disrupt what used to be a growing labour force and competitive wages. This also skews the dependency ratio, with funds in the economy going to supporting elderly relatives, increased healthcare costs and pensions. In 2022, China's population shrank for the first time since 1961, marking a yearly drop of 850,000 people as deaths outnumbered births. In 2023, the worst year on record, the population fell by approximately 2.08 million, and the decline continued in 2024 — improving only slightly — as it fell by 1.39mn. Chinese growth miracle is reversed In 1978, China went through political and economic reforms, including opening up parts of its economy to combat rural poverty and absorbing hundreds of millions of workers into its labour force. It is widely considered one of the fastest economic transformations in history, with China becoming the biggest net exporter in the world and its economy growing an average of about 9.5% per year until 2018. Of course, the economic clout came with political and diplomatic power. Now, the population decline could lead to China falling on the wrong side of the demographic dividend as its pool of available labour shrinks. Ultra-low fertility economies China is not the only Asian country to suffer from this problem and its effects on the economy. Several Asian countries are now considered ultra-low fertility economies, where population decline has become very steep and hard to reverse — even with pro-natalist policies like the child subsidy. A mix of economic, cultural and demographic dynamics may reinforce a cycle of fewer births in these countries. Economically, this erodes the very demographic dividend that once fuelled the explosive growth of East Asia's richest countries.


Euronews
3 minutes ago
- Euronews
German politicians furious at von der Leyen over new EU-US trade deal
German politicians across party lines denounced European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Tuesday, calling for her resignation after she agreed to asymmetric trade terms that impose 15% US tariffs on EU exports while granting Americans duty-free access to European markets. The deal, struck under pressure from German Chancellor Friedrich Merz both in public and behind the scenes to avoid threatened 30% punitive tariffs, triggered unprecedented cross-party criticism in Germany, where lawmakers described the arrangement as a "capitulation" and "betrayal of Europe". Merz himself initially appeared satisfied. "With the agreement, we have succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard," the German chancellor said on Sunday. By Monday evening, however, Merz suddenly had a change of heart, expressing strong reservations. The agreed tariffs were now a "considerable burden" for the German economy, in the eyes of Merz. Under the agreement announced Sunday, EU products face 15% US tariffs while American goods enter Europe levy-free. For the EU, the US tariff rate for steel and aluminium imports will remain at 50%. The EU also committed to purchasing $750 billion in US energy and pledged $600 billion in European corporate investments in America. The deal led to an unprecedented wave of shock and outrage across all camps of German politics. Now, for the first time in a long time, all German parties are criticising the move. "Due to pressure from the German chancellor, the EU has agreed to a deal that abandons fundamental principles of rules-based global trade. Instead of long-term stability, the agreement creates uncertainty," Sandra Detzer from the Greens said, slamming the deal at the Bundestag. In fact, this agreement hits Germany particularly hard. According to the Institute for Economic Research (IfW), the deal will cost the German economy around €6.5 billion in terms of its GDP in the first year. "This is an inadequate compromise and sends a fatal signal to the closely interlinked economies on both sides of the Atlantic," warned Wolfgang Niedermark from the Federation of German Industries (BDI). A rate of 15% is set to have immense adverse effects, and the lack of an agreement for steel exports was an "additional low blow", he pointed out. 'Von der Leyen should resign for this worst deal ever' German EU politician Fabio De Masi (BSW) is also shocked. "This bad deal will do immense economic damage to Europe - it is a betrayal of Europe. Mrs von der Leyen should resign for this worst deal ever," he told Euronews. "While the US is to export duty-free to the EU, EU exporters will be subject to a 15% tariff. In addition, European companies are to make direct investments worth hundreds of billions of US dollars." "So Trump is hitting us with new punitive tariffs and, as business, we are filling his order books with purchases of dirty US fracking gas and defence equipment." EU politician Svenja Hahn (FDP) concurs. "15% tariffs are better than the threatened 30 - but the deal is not a success. At best, it is damage control," she told Euronews. The deal struck on Sunday represents "unbalanced to the detriment of the EU, contains no substantial successes" and weakens "rules-based trade". "Ursula von der Leyen has damaged the EU's reputation and economic strength with her weak conduct of negotiations, she must finally deliver: less bureaucracy, a strong internal market and real progress on free trade agreements, especially Mercosur," Hahn explained. German-Polish MEP Tomasz Froelich (AfD) told Euronews that the agreement reached is "not a deal", but "a capitulation of the EU", as there had been no serious attempt to exert pressure on the US, according to him. "This declaration of bankruptcy stands in stark contrast to the EU's otherwise grandiloquent behaviour on the international stage: confrontation in all directions, leaving hardly any options, especially in the area of energy imports," he explained. "I will work in the EU Parliament to ensure that this humiliating and ruinous agreement is prevented after all," Froelich, who serves as the first deputy head of the AfD delegation at the European Parliament, added. Governing parties lob criticism too Ruling CDU/CSU lawmaker Johannes Winkel stepped up to the plate. "This humiliation of Europe by the US must above all be a reason for self-criticism," Winkel warned on X. "Energy saving, bureaucracy, ESG instead of innovation, growth and technology. This politically motivated economic self-deprecation must end." Others representing the coalition partner SPD also dared to come forward with particularly harsh criticism. Bremen's mayor, Andreas Bovenschulte said on X: "The worst thing is how our EU leader is allowing herself to be humiliated into licking Trump's boots and flattering him as a 'tough - even fair - dealmaker'. Not a spark of honour in her body." The SPD politician later walked back on a part of his statement. "I take back the honour thing. That was a bit harsh," he said. In his hometown of Bremen, thousands of jobs at the ArcelorMittal steel plant are in jeopardy. Bavaria's Minister President Markus Söder (CSU) was honest and made it clear on Monday: things cannot go on like this. "The customs deal has prevented the worst," Söder said, "but the situation is now more difficult than before, especially for the automotive industry." "That's why it must be clear: There must be no additional taxes in Europe, as the EU is currently planning." Relief would now be needed to offset the tariffs. Söder criticised von der Leyen: "We simply need to do less of a Green Deal in Europe and more of an Economic Deal." Economic expert and longstanding German MEP Markus Ferber (CSU) also made it clear to the Bild newspaper: "If you consider that our offer was the complete elimination of all tariffs, then the deal is not a great success." "Fifteen per cent makes European products massively more expensive in the US and will hit the German economy particularly hard. Even if a non-agreement would have been even more expensive, a good deal looks different."


France 24
31 minutes ago
- France 24
'Enough was enough': Why France is now taking a stand on Palestinian statehood
France and Saudi Arabia are co-chairing a high-level summit at the United Nations this week in a bid to generate momentum for international recognition of a Palestinian state. More than 100 countries are attending the three-day meeting in New York, from July 28-30. Israel, which opposes the two-state solution, is boycotting the summit, which has also been described by the United States as "counterproductive". The talks follow an announcement made by French President Emmanuel Macron last Thursday that France will formally recognise the state of Palestine in September, during the United Nations General Assembly. The meeting was postponed from late June and downgraded from a four-day meeting of world leaders amid surging tensions in the Middle East, including the 12-day Israel-Iran war, and the war in Gaza. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said Monday that 'this must be a turning point and a transformational juncture for the implementation of the two-state solution". "We must work on the ways and means to go from the end of the war in Gaza to the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," he told delegates. In 1947, the United Nations approved a resolution to partition Palestine – then under British mandate – into separate Jewish and Arab states. Israel was declared the following year. For decades, most UN member states have long supported the creation of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. But after more than 21 months of war in Gaza, the rapid expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and public statements by Israeli leaders rejecting Palestinian sovereignty, fears have grown that a viable Palestinian state may be slipping out of reach. Barrot warned it would be an "illusion to think that you can get to a lasting ceasefire without having an outline of what's going to happen in Gaza after the end of the war and having a political horizon". 06:24 A diplomatic U-turn The move marks a significant shift for France, whose policy has walked a diplomatic tightrope since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks in Israel. At the time, Macron travelled to Israel and pledged 'unconditional' support for the country, even calling for an international coalition to eradicate Hamas – a stance that surprised even Israeli officials. Last November, France refused to act on the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, both accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. (A similar warrant was issued for Mohammed Deif, the leader of Hamas's armed wing, whom Israel claims to have killed on July 13, 2024.) The shift began during Macron's return from Egypt in early April. Speaking aboard the presidential plane, Macron announced that France would recognise the state of Palestine 'in the coming months'. At the time, the French presidency and the foreign ministry outlined conditions for recognition, including the demilitarisation of Hamas, the release of Israeli hostages and the reform of the Palestinian Authority. From precondition to demand Critics have pointed out that none of these conditions have been fully met. Despite being significantly weakened by Israel's military campaign, Hamas still controls Gaza and holds 49 hostages, 27 of whom the Israeli army has declared dead. Now, Macron continues to call for the "demilitarisation" of Hamas but no longer makes it a prerequisite for recognition, according to Adel Bakawan, an associate researcher at the French Institute of International Relations (IFRI). Jean-Paul Chagnollaud, honorary president of the Institute for Research and Studies on the Mediterranean and the Middle East (iReMMO), said France had "boxed itself in" by making demands it had "no ability to enforce". Still, the disarmament of Hamas remains central to the discussion, he added. In a letter to Macron in early June, Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas pledged that any future Palestinian government would exclude Hamas. But France's diplomatic balancing act is playing out amid heightened global tensions since the Hamas attacks of October 7. A growing number of countries from the Global South have voiced frustration at what they see as double standards from Western powers: harsh condemnation of Russia's war in Ukraine and silence over Israel's actions in Gaza. Starving Gaza, shifting lines In 2024, three Western European countries – Norway, Spain and Ireland – officially recognised the Palestinian state, joining dozens of others across the continent. Today, more than 140 of the UN's 193 member states recognise Palestinian statehood. According to Bakawan, Macron's pivot represents a "reassessment" of French diplomacy in light of its recent shortcomings. Paris is now trying to align itself more clearly with the "Global South". The humanitarian crisis in Gaza – and in particular, the growing threat of famine – appears to have been a turning point for Paris. In late July, images of starving children circulated widely on social media and in global media outlets. Amnesty International on Saturday accused Israel of using starvation as a weapon of war, which the NGO said constitutes a war crime. Amnesty called on France to 'move from words to action'. That tipping point extended beyond humanitarian circles. Even US President Donald Trump — a staunch ally of Israel — said on Monday he saw signs of "real famine" in Gaza. For France, that may have marked a breaking point. "It created a sense that enough was enough," Chagnollaud said. According to Gaza's health ministry, more than 60,000 people have been killed in the territory since October 2023. Macron's gamble Still, France's decision also appears driven by strategic calculations. According to Bakawan, the war in Gaza remains locked in a stalemate between three actors – Israel, Hamas and the United States – none of whom, he said, are currently seeking an end to the conflict. Trump, who has positioned himself as a would-be mediator, has floated a plan to relocate Gaza's population to third countries. In this context, Macron saw an opening to 'offer another perspective, a political way forward', Bakawan added. If Paris follows through in September, it would become the first G7 country to officially recognise the state of Palestine. Whether such a diplomatic gesture can help bring peace to the Middle East remains to be seen. 'It's an important step,' said Chagnollaud. 'When a major power like France says the only path to a just and lasting peace is through international law, that carries weight.'