NATO leaders set to back Trump defence spending goal
NATO leaders are gathered in The Hague for a summit tailor-made for US President Donald Trump, with European allies hoping a pledge to hike defence spending will prompt him to dispel doubts about his commitment to the alliance.
The summit is expected to endorse a higher defence spending goal of five per cent of GDP - a response to a demand by Trump and to Europeans' fears that Russia poses an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte acknowledged it was not easy for countries to find the money for extra defence spending but said it was vital to do so.
"There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative," he told reporters on Wednesday.
NATO officials hope the conflict between Israel and Iran, and the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend, will not overshadow the gathering, hosted by Rutte in his home city.
Trump has threatened not to protect NATO members if they fail to meet spending targets and he raised doubts about his commitment again on his way to the summit by avoiding directly endorsing the alliance's mutual defence clause.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, he said there were "numerous definitions" of the clause.
"I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there," he said.
The new target - to be achieved over 10 years - is a big increase on the current goal of two per cent of GDP, although it will be measured differently.
Countries would spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5 per cent on broader defence-related measures such as cybersecurity, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle military vehicles.
All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal.
But Rutte accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his intense efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly.
Trump gave an unusual insight into those efforts on Tuesday by posting a private message in which Rutte lavished praise on him and congratulated him on "decisive action in Iran".
"You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done," Rutte told Trump.
"Europe is going to pay in a BIG way as they should, and it will be your win."
To satisfy Trump, Rutte has also kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge.
The text is expected to cite Russia as a threat and reaffirm allies' support for Ukraine but not dwell on those issues, given Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance towards Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor, Joe Biden.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening rather than at the main meeting on Wednesday, although Trump said he would probably meet Zelenskiy separately.
Zelenskiy and his aides have said they want to talk to Trump about buying US weapons and increasing pressure on Moscow through tougher sanctions.
The Kremlin accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defence spending.
NATO leaders are gathered in The Hague for a summit tailor-made for US President Donald Trump, with European allies hoping a pledge to hike defence spending will prompt him to dispel doubts about his commitment to the alliance.
The summit is expected to endorse a higher defence spending goal of five per cent of GDP - a response to a demand by Trump and to Europeans' fears that Russia poses an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte acknowledged it was not easy for countries to find the money for extra defence spending but said it was vital to do so.
"There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative," he told reporters on Wednesday.
NATO officials hope the conflict between Israel and Iran, and the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend, will not overshadow the gathering, hosted by Rutte in his home city.
Trump has threatened not to protect NATO members if they fail to meet spending targets and he raised doubts about his commitment again on his way to the summit by avoiding directly endorsing the alliance's mutual defence clause.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, he said there were "numerous definitions" of the clause.
"I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there," he said.
The new target - to be achieved over 10 years - is a big increase on the current goal of two per cent of GDP, although it will be measured differently.
Countries would spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5 per cent on broader defence-related measures such as cybersecurity, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle military vehicles.
All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal.
But Rutte accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his intense efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly.
Trump gave an unusual insight into those efforts on Tuesday by posting a private message in which Rutte lavished praise on him and congratulated him on "decisive action in Iran".
"You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done," Rutte told Trump.
"Europe is going to pay in a BIG way as they should, and it will be your win."
To satisfy Trump, Rutte has also kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge.
The text is expected to cite Russia as a threat and reaffirm allies' support for Ukraine but not dwell on those issues, given Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance towards Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor, Joe Biden.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening rather than at the main meeting on Wednesday, although Trump said he would probably meet Zelenskiy separately.
Zelenskiy and his aides have said they want to talk to Trump about buying US weapons and increasing pressure on Moscow through tougher sanctions.
The Kremlin accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defence spending.
NATO leaders are gathered in The Hague for a summit tailor-made for US President Donald Trump, with European allies hoping a pledge to hike defence spending will prompt him to dispel doubts about his commitment to the alliance.
The summit is expected to endorse a higher defence spending goal of five per cent of GDP - a response to a demand by Trump and to Europeans' fears that Russia poses an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte acknowledged it was not easy for countries to find the money for extra defence spending but said it was vital to do so.
"There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative," he told reporters on Wednesday.
NATO officials hope the conflict between Israel and Iran, and the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend, will not overshadow the gathering, hosted by Rutte in his home city.
Trump has threatened not to protect NATO members if they fail to meet spending targets and he raised doubts about his commitment again on his way to the summit by avoiding directly endorsing the alliance's mutual defence clause.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, he said there were "numerous definitions" of the clause.
"I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there," he said.
The new target - to be achieved over 10 years - is a big increase on the current goal of two per cent of GDP, although it will be measured differently.
Countries would spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5 per cent on broader defence-related measures such as cybersecurity, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle military vehicles.
All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal.
But Rutte accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his intense efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly.
Trump gave an unusual insight into those efforts on Tuesday by posting a private message in which Rutte lavished praise on him and congratulated him on "decisive action in Iran".
"You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done," Rutte told Trump.
"Europe is going to pay in a BIG way as they should, and it will be your win."
To satisfy Trump, Rutte has also kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge.
The text is expected to cite Russia as a threat and reaffirm allies' support for Ukraine but not dwell on those issues, given Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance towards Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor, Joe Biden.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening rather than at the main meeting on Wednesday, although Trump said he would probably meet Zelenskiy separately.
Zelenskiy and his aides have said they want to talk to Trump about buying US weapons and increasing pressure on Moscow through tougher sanctions.
The Kremlin accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defence spending.
NATO leaders are gathered in The Hague for a summit tailor-made for US President Donald Trump, with European allies hoping a pledge to hike defence spending will prompt him to dispel doubts about his commitment to the alliance.
The summit is expected to endorse a higher defence spending goal of five per cent of GDP - a response to a demand by Trump and to Europeans' fears that Russia poses an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte acknowledged it was not easy for countries to find the money for extra defence spending but said it was vital to do so.
"There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative," he told reporters on Wednesday.
NATO officials hope the conflict between Israel and Iran, and the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend, will not overshadow the gathering, hosted by Rutte in his home city.
Trump has threatened not to protect NATO members if they fail to meet spending targets and he raised doubts about his commitment again on his way to the summit by avoiding directly endorsing the alliance's mutual defence clause.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, he said there were "numerous definitions" of the clause.
"I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there," he said.
The new target - to be achieved over 10 years - is a big increase on the current goal of two per cent of GDP, although it will be measured differently.
Countries would spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5 per cent on broader defence-related measures such as cybersecurity, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle military vehicles.
All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal.
But Rutte accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his intense efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly.
Trump gave an unusual insight into those efforts on Tuesday by posting a private message in which Rutte lavished praise on him and congratulated him on "decisive action in Iran".
"You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done," Rutte told Trump.
"Europe is going to pay in a BIG way as they should, and it will be your win."
To satisfy Trump, Rutte has also kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge.
The text is expected to cite Russia as a threat and reaffirm allies' support for Ukraine but not dwell on those issues, given Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance towards Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor, Joe Biden.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening rather than at the main meeting on Wednesday, although Trump said he would probably meet Zelenskiy separately.
Zelenskiy and his aides have said they want to talk to Trump about buying US weapons and increasing pressure on Moscow through tougher sanctions.
The Kremlin accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defence spending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Beyond Ukraine': Volodymyr Zelensky warns Russia could turn its attention to Europe ‘soon'
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has issued a chilling warning about Russia, saying it could strike a NATO country within the next few years. Spurred on by the rising threat from Russia, as well as pressure from US President Donald Trump, NATO countries are expected to commit to increasing their defence spending to 5 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2035 at the summit currently taking place in The Hague. However, Zelensky described this timeline as too slow and suggested Russia could launch an attack on a NATO member state 'soon, I believe soon.' He added that it would more likely be a matter of years than months as Russia would still need to train and ready its army which has been decimated by the war in Ukraine. 'We believe that starting from 2030, Putin can have significantly greater capabilities,' he told the UK's Sky News. 'Today Ukraine is holding him up, he has no time to drill the army and they are all getting annihilated and wiped out at the battlefield. 'Ten years is a very long time,' he said referring to the target for NATO's defence spending, 'He [Putin] will have a new army ready by then.' While alarming, a Russian attack on a NATO state is still generally considered unlikely as both Russia and NATO - the US, UK and France in particular - have nuclear weapons, and Article 5 specifies that an attack on one member of the alliance is an attack on all. Addressing the summit in the Netherlands on Tuesday, Zelensky said the 5 per cent of GDP spend on defence was necessary and would be a strong deterrent. 'We have to understand that his [Putin's] objectives reach beyond Ukraine,' he said. 'A united Europe can create a defence capability that will destroy Russia's illusion that war with Europe could bring it anything.' The sentiment was echoed by NATO's secretary-general Mark Rutte, who described Russia as 'the most significant and direct threat' to the alliance. 'It's clear that they [Russia] want to extend their territory,' he said. 'For a couple of years now, they've been reconstituting themselves rapidly.' Rutte noted that Russia is producing four times more ammunition than the NATO countries combined, and said that it hasn't been difficult to convince members to agree to increased defence spending. The Kremlin on Tuesday denied any planned attack on NATO, saying that the alliance is determined to portray Russia as a 'fiend of hell' in order to justify the massive proposed increase in defence spending. Last month, a report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London suggested that Russia could be in a position to threaten NATO nations within two years, especially if Trump is able to broker a ceasefire in Ukraine soon. It asserted that Russia could rebuild its ground forces to pre-war levels relatively quickly if it shifts to a lower-tech, high-volume model reminiscent of Soviet-era armies, and warns of 'a significant military challenge to NATO allies, particularly the Baltic states, as early as 2027'. French President Emmanuel Macron and EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas have voiced similar concerns, warning that Russia's military ambitions extend beyond Ukraine. 'It's a question of when they will start the next war,' Kallas said last year. Zelensky is set to meet with US President Trump on the sidelines of the two-day NATO summit which wraps up on Wednesday, 25 June. They are set to discuss Ukraine's 'purchase of a defence package, a large part of which consists of air defence systems', as well as more 'sanctions against Russia, and a price cap on oil', according to a senior source in the Ukrainian presidency.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Blood on his hands': Pakistan turn on Donald Trump over Nobel Peace Prize furore
A former Pakistani opposition leader has claimed Donald Trump's hands are 'stained with blood', calling for his nation to withdraw its Nobel Peace Prize nomination for the US president. Over the weekend, Pakistan revealed it would formally recommend Mr Trump for the prestigious award for his role in resolving the recent conflict with India. News of the nomination arrived just before Mr Trump confirmed US strikes on nuclear sites in Iran. The fast-developing situation has since evolved into a tenuous ceasefire between Iran and Israel, which saw Republican congressman Buddy Carter nominate the US President for the Nobel Peace Prize on Tuesday 'in recognition of his extraordinary and historic role in brokering an end to the armed conflict'. The ceasefire appeared to hold after the first night with Mr Trump lambasting both sides in the aftermath of the US' attack on Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend. While the US President called it an 'obliteration' of Iran's nuclear capabilities, bombshell reports have since emerged that the nation's nuclear program remains intact. 'President Trump's influence was instrumental in forging a swift agreement that many believed to be impossible,' Mr Carter wrote in the letter. 'President Trump also took bold, decisive actions to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions and ensure that the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism remains incapable of acquiring nuclear weapons.' Nobel Peace Prize nominations can come from heads of state down to politicians serving at a national level, international courts of law as well as university chancellors and professors of social science, history, philosophy, law and theology, directors of foreign policy institutes, past recipients of a Nobel prize and members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee. But the support in Pakistan appears to be wavering after the US' actions in Iran. On Saturday, Pakistan's government praised President Trump's 'great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship', adding he was a 'genuine peacemaker'. On Sunday, Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the US attack on Iran, stating the move violated international law. 'The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran is deeply disturbing,' Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. 'Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond.' Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in a statement that he had contacted Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and 'conveyed Pakistan's condemnation of the US attacks'. It comes as thousands protested in the streets of Pakistan's biggest city Karachi against the US and Israeli strikes. Pakistani politicians have also called for their government to withdraw their nomination. President of Pakistan's Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam party and former leader of the opposition Maulana Fazal-ur-Rehman called for his nation to withdraw its nomination. 'President Trump's claim of peace has proven to be false; the proposal for the Nobel prize should be withdrawn,' Rehman told party members at a meeting on Sunday. 'Trump has supported the Israeli attacks on Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iran. How can this be a sign of peace? 'How can a man with the blood of Afghans and Palestinians on his hands claim to be a peacemaker?' Similarly former senator Mushahid Hussain said on X: 'Since Trump is no longer a potential peacemaker, but a leader who has wilfully unleashed an illegal war, Pakistan government must now review, rescind and revoke his Nobel nomination!' Veteran politician Afrasiab Khattak posted on X: 'The sycophancy adopted by Pakistani ruling elite in nominating President Trump for Nobel Peace Prize is not part of normative conduct in international diplomacy. It was most embarrassing to announce the nomination hours before Trump ordered to bomb Iranian nuclear sites.' In more bad news for Mr Trump, senior Ukrainian politician Oleksandr Merezhko withdrew his Nobel Peace Prize nomination for the US President, claiming he'd lost 'any kind of faith' that he could end the war in Ukraine. Mr Merezhko nominated Trump in late 2024, telling The Telegraph he believed it would help the then president-elect to follow through on his promises of ending the war. In May 2023, Mr Trump said he could settle the war between Russia and Ukraine in '24 hours', a claim he repeated 53 times throughout the campaign according to a CNN fact check. He walked the claim back in an interview with Time, saying he 'said that figuratively, and I said that as an exaggeration, to make a point'. 'Obviously, people know that when I said that, it was said in jest, but it was also said that it will be ended,' he added. Since taking office, Mr Trump has had a disastrous meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, while Russia and Ukraine appear to be no closer to peace as the US President's attention turns to the Middle East. In a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Mr Merezhko wrote: 'This appeasement of aggression encourages Putin to continue the attack. Trump just turns a blind eye to all of it. 'I lost any kind of faith that Trump will deliver in any of his promises.' Of Mr Trump's actions in the Middle East, Mr Merezhko said: 'I understand his position in relation to Israel. It is the right thing to do in order to help Israel to survive because Iran has said they want to destroy Israel. 'I wish he would do the same for Ukraine. Russia also wants to destroy Ukraine. Russia and Iran help each other. Trump should be consistent and help Ukraine.' However, Mr Trump has renewed support from Israel to achieve his coveted Nobel Peace Prize aspirations. Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon warned Iran that any violation to the fragile ceasefire will be met with a 'forceful response'. But he also praised Mr Trump for his involvement in the ceasefire, saying he 'deserves' a Nobel Peace Prize. 'I think we should thank him for his leadership, for the brave decision that he took, and to recognise the effort of the United States.' Mr Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize several times during his presidencies, but has yet to win the award. It's a fact he is well aware of judging by a post last Friday on Truth Social after he announced a peace deal between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do,' Mr Trump wrote. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo. 'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me.'
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
NATO countries bowed to Trump's defence demands. It'll cost them 19,800 fighter jets
Governments around the world agreeing to the change will need to make some tough decisions in the context of other budget pressures, says Euan Graham, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 'How the government cuts the pie of the tax take is going to require hard, hard decisions,' Graham says. The UK, for example, which has agreed to hit the 5 per cent target by 2035, is slashing foreign aid to pay for its additional $155 billion defence spending bill. 'That is not an announcement that I am happy to make,' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said of the change. 'However, the realities of our dangerous new era mean that the defence and national security of our country must always come first.' Other countries lifting their spending to meet the new target include Germany, France and Italy. They will need to boost their annual spending by $220 billion, $153 billion and $135 billion, respectively. Earlier this month, Rutte warned NATO members that if they didn't pledge to up defence spending to 5 per cent, 'you'd better learn to speak Russian'. But Spain, which spent just 1.3 per cent of its GDP on defence last year, refused the increase. The extra spending would force the country to 'drastically raise taxes on the middle class, or severely cut the size of our welfare state,' Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said. The NATO agreement could see Australia dragged further into the debate over defence spending by bolstering the Trump White House's argument that US allies can spend more on defence. US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth has told Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, which the Albanese has pushed back against in favour of its plan to lift expenditure to 2.3 per cent. The Coalition went to the election promising to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2035-36, which the Parliamentary Budget Office said this week would cost $156 billion and add $24 billion in interest costs. If Australia's defence spending was lifted to 5 per cent in the same time frame, the cost to the federal budget would be $261 billion and have an additional $40 billion in interest. Rabobank senior strategist Ben Picton said the debate was about 'guns or butter'. 'The Australian government is faced with choices between increasing the defence budget to expand capability or increasing spending on social programs like the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), aged care, and childcare,' Picton said in a research note this week. 'Clearly, Australia is currently choosing 'butter' but retains substantial headroom in the budget to increase spending by comparison to peer economies.' Loading The Australian government spent about $56 billion on defence in 2024-25 – more than the $44 billion it spent on the NDIS. Eminent economist Saul Eslake believes that no government will cut spending on social services to beef up defence. 'You'd make a lot of people pissed off and it's hard to do, which to me means you've got to look to the revenue side [to raise more money],' Eslake says. But Graham says Australians would understand a cut to services – like the NDIS – if the government was 'honest about the nature of the threat' posed to national security.
