China puts new restrictions on EV battery technology in latest move to consolidate dominance
John Liu
, CNN
A worker from Chinese electric vehicle company NIO sits in a car during its final inspection at the end of the automated production.
Photo:
Kevin Frayer / Getty Images via CNN Newsource
China has put export restrictions on technologies critical for producing electric vehicle batteries, in a move to consolidate its dominance in the sector that has contributed to the country's lead in the global EV race.
Several technologies used to manufacture EV batteries and process lithium, a critical mineral for batteries, were added to the government's export control list.
Inclusion on the list means transferring the technologies overseas - such as through trade, investment, or technological cooperation - will require a government-issued license, according to a statement by the country's Commerce Ministry.
The new controls mirror similar restrictions introduced just three months ago on certain rare earth elements and their magnets - critical materials used not only in EV production, but also in consumer electronics and military equipment such as fighter jets. China's dominance of the rare earths supply chain has emerged as among its most potent tools in a renewed trade war with the United States.
China has emerged as a leading player in the competitive global EV market, thanks in part to its ability to develop high-performance, cost-effective batteries through its comprehensive supply chain, from raw material processing to battery manufacturing.
Huge numbers of car manufacturers around the world use Chinese EV batteries in their vehicles. Chinese EV battery makers accounted for at least 67 percent of the global market share, according to SNE Research, a market research and consultancy firm.
First proposed in January, the latest licensing requirements have cast uncertainty over Chinese EV makers' overseas expansion plans, particularly as markets like the European Union have employed tariffs on Chinese car exports to push them to set up shop there. Many Chinese battery makers also have plans to localise production in markets such as Southeast Asia and the US.
The Commerce Ministry said the restrictions "aim to safeguard national economic security and development interests, and promote international economic and technological cooperation."
Liz Lee, an associate director at Counterpoint Research, said the move "deepens the emerging geopolitical tech decoupling beyond materials to process IP (intellectual property)." She added that this could accelerate efforts by the US, EU and others to boost localisation of precursor materials and metal refining capabilities.
China's CATL, the world's largest EV battery producer and a key supplier of Tesla, has plants in Germany and Hungary and has plans for a joint venture factory in Spain with Stellantis, the owner of Fiat and Chrysler. It is also licensing its technology to be used in a Ford EV battery plant under construction in Michigan.
Meanwhile, Chinese EV giant BYD, which manufactures its own battery and surged past Tesla in 2024 sales to become the world's largest EV maker, has EV production facilities around the world, from Hungary and Thailand to Brazil.
And Gotion, another major EV battery maker in China, has plans to build a production plant in Illinois.
Analysts said the true impact of the new export controls remains uncertain, as details are still unclear.
Lee noted the restrictions "appear to target upstream process technologies .. rather than battery cell and module manufacturing."
Since CATL's plants in Germany and Hungary focus on cell and module production and do not appear to replicate the restricted processes locally, the near-term effect may be limited, she said.
For BYD, which only assembles battery packs overseas and does not manufacture battery cells abroad, the controls do not appear to affect operations at this stage, Lee added.
Vincent Sun, senior equity analyst at Morningstar covering China's EV sector, said the ultimate impact would depend on how easily companies can obtain permits - something that "may take some extra time to see."
CNN has reached out to CATL, BYD, Gotion and Ford for comment.
One part of the newly announced restrictions surrounds the battery cathode production technology for the making of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, a type of lithium-ion battery that has become increasingly popular in EVs in the last five years for its lower price and greater safety. Another part focuses on the processing, refinement and extraction of lithium.
China dominates the production of LFP batteries and the processing of lithium globally, according to Fastmarkets, a United Kingdom-based research company. Last year, it held 94 percent market share for LFP production capacity and provided 70 percent of global processed lithium production.
But while LFP batteries amounted to 40 percent of the global EV market by capacity, adoption of them is more prevalent in EVs made by Chinese manufacturers than elsewhere, according to Adamas Intelligence, a data analysis and consultancy firm focusing on critical minerals and batteries.
James Edmondson, vice president in research at IDTechEx, a research firm, told CNN that despite LFP's lower energy density, its much lower cost, compared with its common alternative battery made of nickel, manganese, and cobalt, has made it "a staple in lower-cost vehicles" and there are plans for greater adoption by EU and US automakers.
China's dominance in LFP production means that "even for LFP produced outside of China, Chinese suppliers would still often play a part in the production of precursors to LFP cathodes," he said.
China holds a "significant lead" in the technology itself, as shown by BYD's "Super E-Platform" that promised a 250-mile (402km) range on just a five-minute charge, Edmondson added. The technology outperforms Tesla's Superchargers, which take 15 minutes to deliver 200 miles.
Not to be outdone, CATL followed in April with a more competitive product, an upgraded LFP battery that provides an even longer range of 320 miles with the same charging time.
-CNN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
10 hours ago
- Techday NZ
APAC retailers stay confident, prioritise loyalty amid challenges
A new survey has indicated that a significant majority of Asia-Pacific (APAC) retailers remain confident in executing their customer engagement strategies over the coming 12 months, despite an environment of increasing economic uncertainty. Retailers signal confidence The survey, conducted by Twilio at an industry event, found that four in five APAC retailers feel assured in their ability to successfully implement their customer engagement plans for the year ahead. The findings are anchored in input from 288 retail professionals spread across the region. This confidence persists even as 43% of respondents anticipate both opportunities and challenges in the current market landscape. The report reveals that maintaining customer trust and loyalty is cited as the top concern by 27% of those surveyed, with price-related dissatisfaction (23%) and managing communications on pricing and product availability (21%) trailing close behind. Loyalty as a focal point In response to these challenges, many APAC retailers are renewing their focus on loyalty and re-engagement initiatives to reinforce their relationships with customers. Nearly 28% of survey participants identified this area as their most significant untapped opportunity. Product discovery (24%) and post-sale care (18%) were also highlighted as important focal points for investment and improvement within the customer journey. Retailers are increasingly prioritising tools intended to enhance personalised engagement. Around 25% reported investment in personalised offers and loyalty schemes, 27% in conversational artificial intelligence, and 22% in additional human agent support. These shifts reflect a broader dedication across the sector toward delivering targeted, empathetic, and human-centred experiences for customers at all stages of interaction. Confidence is high in the region, which is fantastic. However, the brands that truly shine will be the ones that actually do something with that confidence," commented Nicholas Kontopoulos, Vice President of Marketing, Asia Pacific & Japan at Twilio. "Customer loyalty is under pressure. Building resilience means responding to customers with empathy, relevance, and precision. And that begins with a data-driven, customer-first approach. Data-driven engagement and case studies The survey also points to a regional trend towards utilising data-driven strategies for customer retention and engagement. Key examples cited in the report illustrate this shift. ZALORA, an eCommerce fashion company serving over 55 million customers in Asia, has consolidated its customer data and introduced self-service tools for teams, enabling marketing campaigns to be launched in minutes rather than weeks, which has led to a doubling of conversion rates. Pomelo Fashion, another retailer with substantial reach in Southeast Asia, has focused on individualising customer recommendations and product discovery. This tailor-made approach resulted in a 50% increase in product engagement and a revenue uptick of 15%. Central Group, which is amongst Thailand's largest retail operators, integrated its online and offline customer data, activating more than 80 automated, personalised engagement scenarios. This initiative led to a tenfold increase in campaign revenue directly linked to these new practices. The cited examples underscore a sector-wide pivot from seeing loyalty as merely a points-based programme towards leveraging it as a strategic asset for relevance, trust-building, and lasting value creation for both retailers and their customers. Survey context The survey's findings are based on the responses of nearly 300 retail professionals collected during an industry retail show in early June 2025. Twilio commissioned and analysed the survey to offer insights into current retailer sentiment and planned investments within the APAC region.
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
High butter prices are actually a good thing for New Zealand, economists say
File photo. Photo: Margaret Jaszowska for Unsplash Butter prices might be biting at the supermarket checkout, but there's a warning that anyone hoping they'll fall should be careful what they wish for. The price of butter has increased about 50 percent over the past year, pushed up by high global dairy prices. But economists say that's actually a good thing for New Zealand. Household Economic Survey data shows that in 2023, households spent about $124 million on butter. Between 15 percent and 30 percent of households would buy butter over a one- or two-week period. But the country exported $5.2 billion worth. "It's not nearly worth trying to change the domestic butter game at the expense of our very lucrative export potential," Brad Olsen, chief executive at Infometrics said. "Being in China at the moment, I've been looking around here ... we are still charging more in our premium export markets than we are seeing domestically. "I mean in New Zealand, butter is $8.50 to $11 depending on who you're talking to or what shop you're going to. I've found an Anchor block in China that was only 454 grams for about $13.52. So the export stuff works for us." India is also a large producer of butter and has comparatively low prices, but Olsen said that was not comparable because farmers there were getting a subsidy of up to a third. In Australia, there was no GST on fresh food. Butter is about 7 percent of total New Zealand exports. "So yes, consumers get hit with higher butter prices in New Zealand," Olsen said. "But we make a lot more as a country from the exports that we send out overseas. And I guess you know, cause there's all this talk of, well, what happens if butter prices were lower ... I do think that there is this conception that if magically butter prices were lower, everything else would be the same too. "And that's just a complete false economy. If you had persistently lower butter prices, then there wouldn't be quite as many people farming. Or they wouldn't be the same profits from manufacturing and similar from Fonterra and what have you. That would mean there would be less money going into the economy across the country, people would have fewer jobs than they would at the moment. And so you might be paying cheaper, better prices. But you might not have a job. "That's the trade off that, that to a degree we're talking about ... I also think we talk a lot about butter. How much butter does every household in New Zealand consume? Like how many blocks are you guys buying?" Westpac chief economist Kelly Eckhold said it was good for the country overall that dairy prices were high. "Exports of cheese is $3 billion. All these dairy products are rising for the same underlying reason - demand for milk fats is increasing. Butter and cheese in particular are the things the world wants." He said the conversation was influenced by the fact that everyone encountered the retail price but not everyone was exposed to the export earnings. "One thing to think about is the gains from the income are more narrowly shared than the costs that come to all of us. We all go to the supermarket and buy a bit of butter and cheese and milk. "But if I look at employment trends on a regional basis, you can see in the last few months the regions where jobs are growing are Canterbury, Otago, Southland, West Coast, Marlborough ... these are areas that have a much higher agricultural and dairy input. There are more jobs in those parts of the country whereas Wellington and Auckland are very weak. There aren't many dairy farms in Remuera unfortunately." He said a wider problem was not that dairy products' price was rising but that New Zealand incomes were not keeping up. "Prices are being bid up by people overseas who are wealthier than us and their incomes are growing more strongly. "That's why they can afford to pay the prices that are pushing the prices up. The question isn't should we be redistributing further the profits form those sector. The question should be what can we do to improve the incomes of Kiwis so when demand goes up overseas we can keep pace. If we can do something that gets job growth up that's unequivocally better than putting price controls on butter or cheese." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
High butter prices is actually a good thing for New Zealand, economists say
File photo. Photo: Margaret Jaszowska for Unsplash Butter prices might be biting at the supermarket checkout, but there's a warning that anyone hoping they'll fall should be careful what they wish for. The price of butter has increased about 50 percent over the past year, pushed up by high global dairy prices. But economists say that's actually a good thing for New Zealand. Household Economic Survey data shows that in 2023, households spent about $124 million on butter. Between 15 percent and 30 percent of households would buy butter over a one- or two-week period. But the country exported $5.2 billion worth. "It's not nearly worth trying to change the domestic butter game at the expense of our very lucrative export potential," Brad Olsen, chief executive at Infometrics said. "Being in China at the moment, I've been looking around here ... we are still charging more in our premium export markets than we are seeing domestically. "I mean in New Zealand, butter is $8.50 to $11 depending on who you're talking to or what shop you're going to. I've found an Anchor block in China that was only 454 grams for about $13.52. So the export stuff works for us." India is also a large producer of butter and has comparatively low prices, but Olsen said that was not comparable because farmers there were getting a subsidy of up to a third. In Australia, there was no GST on fresh food. Butter is about 7 percent of total New Zealand exports. "So yes, consumers get hit with higher butter prices in New Zealand," Olsen said. "But we make a lot more as a country from the exports that we send out overseas. And I guess you know, cause there's all this talk of, well, what happens if butter prices were lower ... I do think that there is this conception that if magically butter prices were lower, everything else would be the same too. "And that's just a complete false economy. If you had persistently lower butter prices, then there wouldn't be quite as many people farming. Or they wouldn't be the same profits from manufacturing and similar from Fonterra and what have you. That would mean there would be less money going into the economy across the country, people would have fewer jobs than they would at the moment. And so you might be paying cheaper, better prices. But you might not have a job. "That's the trade off that, that to a degree we're talking about ... I also think we talk a lot about butter. How much butter does every household in New Zealand consume? Like how many blocks are you guys buying?" Westpac chief economist Kelly Eckhold said it was good for the country overall that dairy prices were high. "Exports of cheese is $3 billion. All these dairy products are rising for the same underlying reason - demand for milk fats is increasing. Butter and cheese in particular are the things the world wants." He said the conversation was influenced by the fact that everyone encountered the retail price but not everyone was exposed to the export earnings. "One thing to think about is the gains from the income are more narrowly shared than the costs that come to all of us. We all go to the supermarket and buy a bit of butter and cheese and milk. "But if I look at employment trends on a regional basis, you can see in the last few months the regions where jobs are growing are Canterbury, Otago, Southland, West Coast, Marlborough ... these are areas that have a much higher agricultural and dairy input. There are more jobs in those parts of the country whereas Wellington and Auckland are very weak. There aren't many dairy farms in Remuera unfortunately." He said a wider problem was not that dairy products' price was rising but that New Zealand incomes were not keeping up. "Prices are being bid up by people overseas who are wealthier than us and their incomes are growing more strongly. "That's why they can afford to pay the prices that are pushing the prices up. The question isn't should we be redistributing further the profits form those sector. The question should be what can we do to improve the incomes of Kiwis so when demand goes up overseas we can keep pace. If we can do something that gets job growth up that's unequivocally better than putting price controls on butter or cheese." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
