South Sudan tensions: US orders non-emergency staff to leave
The United States has ordered all its non-emergency staff in South Sudan to leave, amid rising tensions in the country.Fighting in recent days has threatened an already fragile peace deal between President Salva Kiir and Vice-President Riek Machar.The two leaders signed a peace agreement in 2018 to end a five-year civil war that killed hundreds of thousands of people, but their relationship has remained fraught.On Sunday, the US State Department said that fighting was ongoing in South Sudan between various political and ethnic groups and that "weapons are readily available to the population".
"Due to the risks in the country, on March 08, 2025, the Department of State ordered the departure of non-emergency US government employees," it said.The UN human rights commission for South Sudan on Saturday warned of an "alarming regression" that threatened to undo years of progress towards peace.President Kiir has called for calm and made an assurance that the country would not return to war.In an escalation of the tensions, a UN helicopter that had been evacuating members of the national army was shot at on Friday, killing several people, including one crew member.Earlier in the week, the deputy chief of the army and two ministers allied to Machar were arrested by security forces, which an opposition spokesman termed a "grave violation" of the peace deal.The arrests of the Machar-allied officials followed clashes in the country's Upper Nile state between government forces and a militia known as the White Army, which had fought alongside Machar during the civil war.South Sudan, the world's newest nation, gained independence in 2011 after seceding from Sudan.But just two years later, following a rift between Kiir and Machar, the country descended into a civil war, in which more than 400,000 people were killed.The 2018 power-sharing agreement between the two stopped the fighting, but key elements of the deal have not been implemented – including a new constitution, an election, and the reunification of armed groups into a single army.Sporadic violence between ethnic or local groups has continued in parts of the country.
You may also be interested in:
General's arrest violates South Sudan peace deal, opposition saysMystery in South Sudan after sacked spy boss mired in gun battleCurfew and deaths in South Sudan after revenge attacks on SudaneseSalva Kiir: South Sudan's president in a cowboy hat
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
China ready to drop all tariffs on African imports
China say dem don ready to drop di tariffs dem dey charge on imports from all 53 African kontris wey dem get diplomatic relations wit. Di move wey dem announce for one China-Africa co-operation meeting, dey come as di continent dey face di possibility of increased tariffs on dia products wey dey enta US. China na Africa largest trading partner – one position dem don hold for di last 15 years – as Africa dey export goods wey worth around $170bn (£125bn) go di Asian nation for 2023. One joint ministerial statement bin criticise "certain kontris' [effort to] scata di existing international economic and trade order" through di unilateral imposition of tariffs. China ask US to resolve trade disputes on di basis of "equality, respect and mutual benefit". Di zero-tariff move, wen dem implement am, go be extension of one deal dem make last year for China to drop tariffs on goods from 33 African nations wey dey classified as "least developed". Di expanded list go include some of China largest trading partners on di continent, wey include South Africa and Nigeria. China neva tok wen di go come into effect. Eswatini na di only African state dem exclude from di zero-tariff announcement as dem recognise Taiwan as independent kontri, whereas China see am as breakaway province. China currently dey import plenty raw materials from Africa, most especially from di Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea. For April, President Donald Trump bin raise concern among US trading partners wen e announce high tariffs on dia imports from many kontris, wey include 50% rate for Lesotho, 30% for South Africa and 14% for Nigeria. Di US bin pause di implementation until next month, although di temporary pause fit dey extended further for countries wey dey negotiate "in good faith", according to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. For 2024, di US import $39.5bn-worth of goods from Africa. Dem carry out di importation under di zero-tariff deal wey dey known as di Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), wey now look like say dey under threat if Trump administration go ahead wit di imposition of fresh charges.
Reuters
43 minutes ago
- Reuters
China says it will remove all tariffs on African exports to boost trade
NAIROBI, June 12 (Reuters) - China will negotiate and sign a new economic pact with Africa that will get rid of all tariffs on the 53 African states it has diplomatic ties with, it said, a move that could benefit middle-income nations. The Asian economic giant offers duty- and quota-free market access to least developed countries (LDCs), including many in Africa, but the new initiative will level the playing field by also offering middle-income countries similar market access. "China is ready to... welcome quality products from Africa to the Chinese market", China's foreign ministry said after a meeting of senior Chinese officials with African foreign ministers in Changsha to review implementation of commitments made during a summit in Beijing last September. In recognition of the significant disadvantages that businesses from LDCs like Tanzania or Mali could face from their more developed counterparts like South Africa once the market is fully opened, China pledged additional measures to support LDCs, including training and marketing promotion. Beijing's move could help relatively advanced countries, with significant manufacturing bases for value added products, to take advantage of the vast Chinese market, analysts said. "It enables middle-income countries like Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt and Morocco... to be able to now enter the Chinese market duty-free," said Hannah Ryder, founder of Development Reimagined, an Africa-focused consultancy. Trade between China and Africa has been growing in recent years, but it has been heavily skewed in favour of China, which had a surplus of $62 billion last year. "Unless we have an equivalent increase of African exports to China, then trade deficits will continue to increase," Ryder said, adding that the initiative announced by Beijing could help to balance trade. During last year's summit in Beijing, China pledged 360 billion yuan ($50 billion) to African economies over three years in credit lines and investments, marking its return to big-ticket funding deals for the continent after a pandemic-related hiatus. ($1 = 7.1747 Chinese yuan renminbi)
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Hypocrisy and double standards taint the West's view of Israel
The West Bank has been occupied by Israel since the Six-Day War of 1967. The UN and the International Court of Justice have said time and again that the occupation is illegal, but that hasn't stopped Israel from allowing 700,000 of its citizens to settle there, displacing Palestinians by often violent means in the process. The Israeli military have actively assisted in the eviction of ordinary Palestinian families from their homes and land. Yet only now does the West take baby steps to express its displeasure; it's far too little and far too late. Do our leaders not recognise their hypocrisy and double standards? There's no doubt that Russia's invasion of Ukraine is a brutal and illegal act, rightly condemned by the West. But Russia hasn't reduced Ukraine to rubble and what it's doing is a recognisable war of imperial conquest. What Benjamin Netanyahu's Israel is doing in the West Bank is ethnic cleansing; in Gaza, there's no war, but there is genocide. The evil of apartheid in South Africa was overturned by a determined campaign of boycott, divestment and sanction. Why on earth are we not doing the same to Israel? Apartheid was a cruel, racist policy, but it didn't involve dropping one-tonne bombs on terrified families in tents, it didn't involve the slaughter of 17,000 children in a little over a year and a half. Yet South African athletes were barred from international competition, while Israel is invited to sing a cheery song at the Eurovision Song Contest; why? The West appears to have lost its moral compass, or maybe we've just become inured to scenes of atrocity on our screens. We see and hear dreadful reports from so many parts of the world and it can be tempting to just shrug and look away. That's a temptation that must be resisted. We should be looking out for our neighbours, doing what we can to help the weak and innocent when they are assailed by violent oppressors. And, in the modern connected world, everybody is a neighbour. Doug Maughan, Dunblane. Why can't London replace Faslane? WHAT a surprise! Rachel Reeves has included a couple of important 'gifts' to Scotland from the large proportion of our Scottish taxes that Westminster keeps, under the pretext of using them to pay for pan-UK projects like Crossrail and HS2. We are, after all, to get the new computer for Edinburgh University that was promised before the general election last year, but cancelled when Labour won a big enough majority not to need Scottish support. We will also get funds for the Acorn carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire, which was ready to establish a world-first pilot more than a decade ago, but was refused funding by Westminster, in spite of support from the oil companies agreeing to the use of their pipelines and depleted wells, and at a time when its success might have saved Longannet. This project site was also bypassed when funding was allocated instead to two sites in England and was left on the back-burner. I wonder, however, if even now, it will actually go ahead. I may be becoming a conspiracy theorist, but I suspect these two funding offers are the bribe to sweeten the pill of Scotland providing the facilities for the Westminster intention to increase the nuclear components of their defence plans and to base them at Faslane, as far from London as possible. I believe that is precisely the purpose of the funding to 'upgrade' to that site and will be the first recipient project to be undertaken. Thereafter, it is not beyond possibility that 'changing fiscal circumstances' might still see the other two cancelled, again. I firmly believe that the majority of Scots already consider that having nuclear capacity so close to our largest city makes us a first-strike target and want them removed. If it is safe enough on that site, then somewhere on the Thames in the periphery of London should be equally safe. Of course, when the upgrade is completed, the redundant submarines et cetera will then quickly be added to the rotting hulks at Rosyth and radioactive material buried somewhere in the north of Scotland. Are we happy to host yet more, more powerful, nukes, attack submarines and such dangerous material anywhere in Scotland? If not, independence is the only way to avoid it, and soon! L. McGregor, Falkirk. Time is up for the nationalists IN the spending allocation Scotland has been given a record £52 billion for its budget and the predicted reaction from the SNP is that it's not enough. The harsh reality is that the SNP have over the last 18 years totally mismanaged funds and wasted millions of pounds through total incompetence and poor commercial judgement such as the ferry fiasco, Prestwick Airport, and pursuing lost causes in the courts. The Hamilton by-election allowed the Scottish voter a say in what they thought about the SNP and gave them a real bloody nose as change is urgently needed in Scotland and the time is now up for the SNP. Dennis Forbes Grattan, Bucksburn, Aberdeen Swinney should lead SNP next May IT is unbelievable that senior SNP figures should be contemplating a change in leader of the party with less than a year to go until the next Scottish Parliamentary Election. Other than appointing Nigel Farage, a change of leader will do nothing for the party's chances next May. The sensible course of action is to fight the next election with John Swinney as leader and then consider changing leader in a controlled and dignified manner. Knee-jerk reactions do no credit to the SNP and if that is the way in which they intend to behave it does not augur well for an independent Scotland. Sandy Gemmill, Edinburgh. WHEN you think of all the things Labour's Joani Reid could have raised with Sir Keir Starmer at Prime Minister's Questions It seems strange that Ms Reid should squander her opportunity by asking whether Sir Keir thought John Swinney 'should stay put' as SNP leader following the Hamilton Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. Ms Reid made no mention of the raft of SNP successes in defeating Labour at recent council by-elections, including a double win in March. So certainly, Mr Swinney should stay put. Ruth Marr, Stirling. Unhealthy competition HEALTH Minister Neil Gray said that 'A&E in Scotland faces similar pressures to those elsewhere in the UK.' May I remind Mr. Gray that running our health service is not a race against England, Wales or Northern Ireland. It's not a competition to see who has the best medical services. You were elected to be part of the Scottish cabinet doing a very important job for Scotland. Unfortunately you're not very good at it. Ian Balloch, Grangemouth. Managing NHS resources YOUR correspondent, David Gilchrist, asks whether the resources of the NHS could be more economically organised (letters, June 11). An important issue, to be sure. Premises and equipment are essential, certainly, but the most important and expensive resource the NHS employs is its workforce. Mr Gilchrist offers three negative portrayals of NHS staff. Firstly, you can see 'a large number of staff milling about, sitting at computers.' Apart from the obvious fact that using a computer is an absolutely essential part of the delivery of patient care, it's a good trick to be able to 'mill about' while sitting at one. Secondly, the staff is described as 'enormous.' Well, yes, look at how much work needs to be done. Thirdly, 'unionised' is used pejoratively. This is insulting. Unions exist to ensure that working people are fairly rewarded for the work that they do. Does anybody think that they shouldn't be? AJ Clarence, Prestwick. English people heading north IN Jane Lax's partly justifiable critique of Scotland under the SNP ('Why on earth would anyone want to come to Scotland?', letters, June 12) she ignores the fact that, as a recent newspaper article elsewhere has highlighted, immigration from England is booming. It also said that those coming to the UK will tend to seek their compatriots already here ('birds of a feather fly together'), most of whom are in England's conurbations. George Morton, Rosyth.
