Holidaymakers flock to Penang as hotels offer all-you-can-eat durian deals
Many Penang hotels bundled room rentals with all-you-can-eat durian feasting. PHOTO: THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
GEORGE TOWN - Never underestimate the power of the Musang King, Black Thorn and all their genetic cousins to pull in the crowds.
With the durian season here as well as the school holidays, most hotels were at least 85 per cent full during the weekend while some were fully booked, said Malaysian Association of Hotels Penang chapter chairman Tony Goh.
'The hotels were packed and did well during the long weekend.
'Hotels by the beach and in the town area were almost full,' Mr Goh added.
As with the yearly tradition, most hotels bundled room rentals with all-you-can-eat durian feasting.
'Penang is renowned for having orchards that produce durians you cannot find in other states.
'Other than the ever-popular Musang King and Black Thorn, there are 'vintage' clones like Hor Lor, Red Prawn, Green Skin and Capri, and rare variants like Tupai King and Lin Feng Jiao (purportedly named after Hong Kong superstar Jackie Chan's wife).
'Each variant offers a slightly different tang, and for durian lovers, these are complex flavours to be appreciated and deciphered,' said Mr Goh.
Penang tourism committee chairman Wong Hon Wai said the 'King of Fruits' was a fail-proof attraction.
He said with the surge in visitors, the funicular train to Penang Hill also saw an increase in ridership: 6,691 on May 30, 8,183 on May 31, 9,396 on June 1 and 9,251 on June 2.
'The ridership totalled 33,521 in the past four days.
'On normal non-peak days, it is around 4,000 a day,' Mr Wong said.
He said the increase in visitors was also attributed to Singapore's school holidays, which had started as well.
Mr Wong urged tourism players, including hawkers, to give out good deals and provide top-level service during the holiday period.
As for Penang's ever-popular murals, Mr Wong urged visitors to avoid scribbling, scratching or defacing them, which had happened in the past.
'The murals are meant to be admired, not vandalised,' he said.
Penang Tourist Guide Association chairman Clement Liang advised tourists to avoid engaging unlicensed tourist guides.
'Many visitors unknowingly hire unlicensed guides and end up being disappointed by the tours organised,' he said.
Mr Liang urged tourists to use only licensed hotels and facilities to avoid scams. THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
13 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Ex-IPP director Goh Jin Hian wins appeal, court says firm failed to prove his breach caused losses
Ex-IPP director Goh Jin Hian wins appeal, court says firm failed to prove his breach caused losses Source: Straits Times Article Date: 06 Jun 2025 Author: Grace Leong The court concluded that this was a case of 'a deep-seated fraud'. The Appellate Division of the High Court has found Goh Jin Hian, a former director of insolvent marine fuel supplier Inter-Pacific Petroleum (IPP), is not liable to pay US$146 million (S$187.9 million) plus interest in compensation for losses suffered by the firm. In overturning a lower court ruling that found Goh was not entitled to relief from liability, the Appellate Division wrote: 'While we agree with the (High Court) judge that Dr Goh had breached the care duty by reason of his ignorance of the cargo trading business, IPP has failed to show... that the breach caused the loss in question.' Goh, the son of former prime minister Goh Chok Tong, served as a director of IPP from June 28, 2011 to Aug 12, 2019. The court clarified that 'it cannot be part of a director's duty of supervision and oversight to pick up fraud unless there are telltale warning signs'. A 63-page ruling delivered on June 5 by Justice Kannan Ramesh, a judge of the Appellate Division, stated: 'A director may be a sentinel, but he is not a forensics investigator or a sleuth, unless there are signs that would put him on inquiry.' The other two judges presiding were justices Tay Yong Kwang and Woo Bih Li. 'It does not follow that where a director has fallen asleep at the wheel, any or all losses occasioned to the company during the slumber should be vested on the director. Where the director has breached the duty of care, skill and diligence, the burden is on the company to prove that the breach has caused the loss suffered by the company,' the court ruled. Senior Counsel Thio Shen Yi of TSMP Law Corporation, who represented Goh, noted that the latest decision is an important clarification on the law of the duties of directors. 'Dr Goh has always maintained that his conduct caused no avoidable loss to IPP, and we believe he has been vindicated. This is an important decision that has practical implications for all directors,' said Mr Thio, who acted for Goh with Ms Nanthini Vijayakumar, a partner of TSMP Law. Deloitte & Touche, IPP's judicial managers turned liquidators, had sued Goh to recover US$156 million in losses, accusing him of 'sleepwalking through his time as a director', and failing to discover and stop drawdowns in trade financing between June and July 2019 to fund alleged non-existent or sham transactions. IPP alleged that Goh failed to act reasonably in the face of three 'red flags' – an audit confirmation request signed by Goh specifying receivables allegedly owed by Mercuria Energy Trading to IPP, the suspension of IPP's bunker craft operator licence, and three confirmations of indebtedness signed by Goh and sent to Maybank. High Court Justice Aedit Abdullah had found that Goh was not entitled to relief from liability because of 'the egregiousness of his breaches of duty, chief among which was his ignorance as to IPP's cargo trading business' – a 'vehicle of fraud' that had 'disastrous consequences' for the company. 'It was through his combination of misfeasance and nonfeasance, in failing to even be aware of IPP's cargo trading business, that the fraudsters were able to use IPP's cargo trading business as a vehicle of fraud in the first place,' Justice Aedit said in his grounds of decision in July 2024. Goh had appealed against the ruling in February 2024 that found him liable for breach of director's duties and statutory duties and losses suffered by IPP. In allowing Goh's appeal, the Appellate Division found that the three purported red flags IPP relied on 'were not in fact red flags that would have put Goh on a train of inquiry leading to the fraud in the cargo trading business being uncovered, and the loss thereby averted'. The court concluded that this was a case of 'a deep-seated fraud'. Although Goh was not aware of the cargo trading business, the court ruled that 'it does not follow that if Goh had been aware of the cargo trading business, he would have discovered the fraud and thereby put a stop to it'. The court ruled: 'There is no suggestion by IPP there were any, apart from the 'red flags', which we have concluded were not in fact red flags. Further, there was no allegation that the auditor and IPP's financial manager alerted Goh of any issues with the accounts, or that the monthly management accounts and financial statements suggested anything untoward. 'Thus, there is nothing to the point that if Goh had been aware of the cargo trading business, he would have exercised oversight in a manner which would have picked up the fraud and averted the loss.' Mr Thio said: 'Directors owe fiduciary obligations and duties of care to a company, but the Appeals Court has crucially recognised the practical and commercial limits to their ability to scrutinise for and detect fraud, especially deep-seated fraud. This acknowledges the complex commercial realities that directors often operate in.' Mr Terence Quek, chief executive of the Singapore Institute of Directors, noted that the High Court's decision 'was alarming to the general director community as it suggested that directors of all stripes can be held personally liable for losses caused by fraud committed by other directors'. 'That is likely to have caused concern to many executive and non-executive directors in MNC (multinational corporation) subsidiaries (and) family-owned companies,' he said. 'This decision provides much welcome clarity on the true scope of directors' duties in a private company. The ruling recognises that while directors must exercise care and diligence, they cannot be held personally liable for every act of misconduct – particularly when committed by others under difficult-to-detect circumstances,' he added. 'But the judgment is also sobering, as it recognised that Goh did breach his director duties.' Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Goh Jin Hian v Inter-Pacific Petroleum Pte Ltd (in liquidation) [2025] SGHC(A) 7 Print
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
President Tharman, PM Wong congratulate newly elected South Korean President Lee Jae-myung
South Korean president Lee Jae-myung taking an oath during his inauguration ceremony at the National Assembly in Seoul on June 4. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG SINGAPORE – President Tharman Shanmugaratnam and Prime Minister Lawrence Wong extended congratulations to newly elected South Korean president Lee Jae-myung on June 5. Mr Lee was elected president in a June 3 snap election, six months to the day after he evaded military cordons to vote against a shock martial law decree imposed by his ousted predecessor. Singapore and the Republic of Korea enjoy substantive and multi-faceted relations, underpinned by robust economic links and strong people-to-people ties, wrote Mr Tharman in his letter. He noted that both countries are 'like-minded partners who cooperate well at multilateral fora and share a similar outlook on key regional and international issues, in particular the need to support free trade, multilateralism, and a rules-based international order'. Mr Tharman said that, with 2025 marking the 50th anniversary of Singapore's diplomatic relations with South Korea, he is confident that these close ties will continue to strengthen with Mr Lee's support and leadership. 'I wish you every success as you assume your new role and take the country forward,' said Mr Tharman, who also extended an invitation to Mr Lee to visit Singapore soon and wished him good health . PM Wong said in his letter that Mr Lee's victory reflected the confidence that the people of South Korea have in his leadership and vision. Also highlighting the close and longstanding friendship that Singapore and South Korea shared, PM Wong noted the strong and multi-faceted cooperation between both countries, including collaboration in new and emerging areas like the digital economy, energy and sustainability, artificial intelligence, start-ups, research and development and food security. 'We are like-minded partners on many regional and international issues, including the importance of a peaceful Korean Peninsula and an open, rules-based international trading system,' said PM Wong. Both countries are set to upgrade relations to a strategic partnership in October, and this also includes timely reviews of the Korea-Singapore Free Trade Agreement and the bilateral Air Services Agreement, said PM Wong, adding that he is looking forward to working with Mr Lee to advance this cooperation. 'I wish you good health and success as you assume office. I look forward to visiting the Republic of Korea later this year to attend the Apec (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) Economic Leaders' Meeting, and to make an official visit where we can jointly launch the Republic of Korea-Singapore strategic partnership,' said PM Wong. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Court partially allows Goh Jin Hian's appeal, finds he did not breach duty by not probing IPP's red flags
[SINGAPORE] The Appellate Division of the High Court has partially allowed an appeal by Goh Jin Hian against having to pay damages for breaching his duty of care as a then-director of the insolvent marine fuel supplier, Inter-Pacific Petroleum (IPP). The ruling on Thursday (Jun 5) said that Goh had breached his duty of care as a result of not being aware of IPP's cargo trading business – not because he had failed to open a probe into red flags surrounding the company. The justices presiding were Tay Yong Kwang, Woo Bih Li and Kannan Ramesh. Goh was also found not to have breached his duty to act in the best interests of IPP's creditors regarding drawdowns on bank facilities in relation to fraudulent cargo trades. This follows his being found liable in February 2024 for breaching of his director's duties, statutory duties and the losses suffered by the firm, which came to US$146 million plus interest. The liquidators of IPP had sued Dr Goh, the son of former prime minister Goh Chok Tong, to recover US$156 million in losses, accusing him of 'sleepwalking through his time as a director' and failing to discover and stop the drawdowns in trade financing between June 2019 and July 2019, said to have been funding non-existent or sham transactions. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In his grounds of decision released last July, High Court Justice Aedit Abdullah said Dr Goh had not taken 'reasonable steps', such as by making the necessary inquiries, when red flags surrounding the company arose. Goh was also unaware of the existence of IPP's cargo trading business, despite being a director of the company, and therefore did not know this business was a fraudulent scheme perpetrated by IPP, said the justice. Following the appeal, the judgement has been set aside, and Dr Goh no longer has to pay damages to IPP. While the Appellate Division agreed with the previous judgement that Goh had breached his duty of care by being unaware of IPP's cargo trading business, it found that the three red flags raised in the previous judgement were not 'red flags that would have put Dr Goh on a train of inquiry leading to the fraud in the cargo trading business being uncovered'. One such red flag was an audit confirmation request relating to amounts of receivables due to IPP from customer Mercuria Energy Trading, which Goh signed and was sent to Mercuria on Feb 7, 2018. The sum due was US$132 million. While Justice Aedit said Goh should have made inquiries upon receiving the audit confirmation request, the Appellate Division said the fact that this sum was requested by Mercuria was 'not, in and of itself, enough to put him on inquiry'. This was because Mercuria was a big company and that the size of the receivable could have been explained by IPP's sizeable trading volume, amounting to about US$1 billion, with it. Two other issues that IPP's liquidators had called red flags – the suspension of IPP's bunker craft operator licence in June 2019 and three confirmations of indebtedness signed by Dr Goh in July 2019 – were also found not to be red flags by the Court of Appeal. In the case of the suspension, 'even if Dr Goh had made the inquiries... it is unclear if he would have uncovered fraud in the cargo trading business, even if he had learned that IPP was carrying on such business'. The judges were not persuaded that the suspension of the licence was a red flag. As for the confirmation of indebtedness, there was no assertion in the confirmations that the debts were for the cargo trading business, and they were thus not considered red flags. The Appellate Division therefore departed from Justice Aedit's finding that Dr Goh breached the care duty regarding the red flags. It also disagreed with Justice Aedit that Dr Goh did not breach his duty to act in the best interests of the respondent's creditors on the drawdowns for fraudulent cargo trades made on IPP's bank facilities. It found that IPP bears the legal burden of proving that the fraud would have been detected, and that the resulting loss would have been averted had Dr Goh known that IPP was undertaking the cargo trading business, but failed to discharge this burden. Dr Goh was represented by TSMP Law Corporation, led by joint managing partner Thio Shen Yi; IPP's liquidators were represented by LVM Law Chambers, led by managing director Lok Vi Ming. After the appeal, Thio said the decision has practical implications for all directors, as the Court of Appeal has clarified that it 'cannot be part of a director's duty of supervision and oversight to pick up fraud unless there are tell-tale warning signs'. 'Directors owe fiduciary obligations and the duty of care to the company, but the Appeals Court has crucially recognised the practical and commercial limits to their ability to scrutinise for and detect fraud, especially deep-seated fraud,' he added.
